Drug prevention with vulnerable young people: A review

References

• Booth, R. E., Zhang, Y., & Kwiatkowski, C. F. (1999). The challenge of changing drug and sex risk behaviors of runaway and homeless adolescents. Child Abuse and Neglect, 23(12),1295–1306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce, C., & Emshoff, J. (1992). The super II program: An early intervention program. Journal of Community Psychology, Special Issue, 10–21.
   Google Scholar
• Canning, U., Millward, L., Raj, T., & Warm, D. (2004). Drug use prevention among young people: A review of reviews. London: HDA.
   Google Scholar
• Catalano, R. F., Gainey, R. R., Fleming, C. B., Haggerty, K. P., & Johnson, N. O. (1999). An experimental intervention with families of substance abusers: One-year follow-up of the focus on families project. Addiction, 94(2),241–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, C. P., Montgomery, S., Pentz, M. A., Rohrback, L. A., Johnson, C. A., Flay, B. R., & Mackinnon, D. P. (1998). Effects of a community-based prevention program on decreasing drug-use in high-risk adolescents. American Journal of Public Health, 88(6),944–948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crome, I. B., & McArdle, P. (2004). Prevention programmes. In Crome, I. B., Ghodse, H., Gilvarry, E., & McArdle, P. (Eds), Young people and substance misuse (pp. 15–30). London: Gaskell.
   Google Scholar
• Cuijpers, P. (2003). Three decades of drug prevention research. Drugs: education, prevention and policy, 10(1),7–20. DFES (2003). Every child matters—Green Paper. London: Department for Education and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• DeWit, D., Ellis, K., Rye, B. J., Steep, B., Braun, B., & Heathcote, J. (1998). Evaluations of ‘Opening Doors’, a drug prevention program for at-risk youth: Three reports. Toronto: ARF.
   Google Scholar
• Eggert, L. L., Thompson, E. A., Herting, J. R., Nicholas, L. J., & Dicker, B. G. (1994) Preventing adolescent drug abuse and high school dropout through an intensive school-based social network development program. American Journal of Health Promotion, 8(3),202–215.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Evans, A., & Alade, S. (2000). Vulnerable young people and drugs: Opportunities to tackle inequalities. London: DrugScope.
   Google Scholar
• Godley, M., & Velasquez, R. (1998). Effectiveness of the Logan Square prevention project: Interim results. In Valentine, J., Dejong, J. A., & Kennedy, N. J. (Eds), Substance abuse prevention in multicultural communities (pp. 87–103). New York: Haworth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, K. W., Botvin, G. J., Nichols, T. R., & Doyle, M. M. (2003). Effectiveness of a universal drug abuse prevention approach for youth at high risk for substance use initiation. Preventive Medicine, 36(1),1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, R., Marsland, L., & Reid, M. (2003). Substance use by young offenders: The impact of the normalization of drug use in the early years of the 21st century. Home Office Research Study 261. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Hanlon, T. E., Bateman, R. W., Simon, B. D., O’Grady, K. E., & Carswell, S. B. (2002). An early community-based intervention for the prevention of substance abuse and other delinquent behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(6),459–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrell, A., Cavanaugh, S., & Sridharan, S. (1999). Evaluation of the Children at Risk program: Results 1 year after the end of the program. Washington, DC: US National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Home Affairs Committee (2002). The Government’s drug policy: Is it working? London: House of Commons.
   Google Scholar
• Home Office (1998). Tackling drugs to build a better Britain. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Home Office (2002). Updated drug strategy 2002. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Kaminski, R. A., Stormshak, E. A., Good, R. H., & Goodman, M. R. (2002). Prevention of substance abuse with rural Head Start children and families: Results of Project STAR. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16(4), 11–26.
   Google Scholar
• Kumpfer, K. L., Alvarado, R., Tait, C., & Turner, C. (2002). Effectiveness of school-based family and children’s skills training for substance abuse prevention among 6–8-year-old rural children. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16(4), 65–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, C. (1998). Risk factors for problem drug use: Identifying vulnerable groups. Drugs: Education, prevention and policy, 5(3),217–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, C., & Griffiths, P. (1998). Editorial: Problems for the future? Drug use among vulnerable groups of young people. Drugs: Education, prevention and policy, 5(3),213–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lochman, J. E., & Wells, K. C. (2002). The coping power program at the middle-school transition: Universal and indicated prevention effects. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16(4) 40–54.
   Google Scholar
• Measham, F., Aldridge, J., & Parker, H. (2001). Dancing on drugs: Risk, health and hedonism in the British club scene. London: Free Association Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morehouse, S., & Tobler, N. S. (2000). Preventing and reducing substance abuse among institutionalized adolescents. Adolescence, 35(137),1–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Audit Office (2004). Connexions service: Advice and guidance for all young people. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, J., Hawkins, D. J., Catalano, R. F., Abbott, R. D., & Day, L. E. (1995). Preventing school failure, drug use and delinquency among low-income children: Long-term intervention in elementary schools. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 65(1),87–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, H., Aldridge, J., & Measham, F. (1998). Illegal leisure: The normalization of adolescent recreational drug use. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Powis, B., & Griffiths, P. (2001). Working at the margins: An evaluation of a drugs prevention programme for young people who have been excluded from school. Briefing Paper 15, London: Drugs Prevention Advisory Service.
   Google Scholar
• Schochet, P. Z., Burghardt, J., & Glazerman, S. (2001). National job corps study: The impacts of job corps on participants’ employment and related outcomes [and] Methodological appendices on the impact analysis. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, L. W., Gottfredson, D. C., Mackenzie, D. L., Eck, J., Reuter, P., & Bushway, S. D. (1998). Preventing crime: What works, what doesn’t, what’s promising. Washington: National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, N. J., & Saulnier, C. F. (1996). Substance abuse prevention among high-risk youth. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, 14, 61–79.
   Google Scholar
• St Pierre, T. L., Mark, M. M., Kaltreider, D. L., & Aikin, K. J. (1997). Involving parents of high-risk youth in drug prevention: A 3-year longitudinal study in boys and girls clubs. Adolescence, 17(1),21–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, J., Griffith, J., Ruthazer, R., Gottlieb, B., & Keel, S. (1998). Strengthening causal inference in adolescent drug prevention studies: Methods and findings from a controlled study of the urban youth connection program. In Valentine, J., Dejong, J. A., & Kennedy, N. J. (Eds), Substance abuse prevention in multicultural communities (pp. 127–145). New York: Haworth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, F. L., & Nicholson, H. J. (1998). Friendly PEERsuasion against substance abuse: The girls incorporated model. In Valentine, J., Dejong, J. A., & Kennedy, N. J. (Eds), Substance abuse prevention in multicultural communities (pp. 7–22). New York: Haworth Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, D., & Pitts, M. (1998). Educating young people about drugs: A systematic review. Addiction, 93(10),1475–1487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R. J., & Chang, S. J. (2000). A comprehensive and comparative review of adolescent substance abuse treatment outcome. Clinical Psychology and Practice, 7(2),138–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar