Estimating problem drug use prevalence at national level: Comparison of three methods

References

• Bieleman B, Biesma S, Meijer G. Doelgroepenanalyse dak- en thuislozen en harddrugsverslaafden Stedendriehoek [Analysis of homeless people and hard drug users Stedendriehoek]. Intraval, Groningen/Rotterdam 2002
   Google Scholar
• Bieleman B, Snippe J, De Bie E. Drugs binnen de grenzen: Harddrugs en criminaliteit in Nederland, schattingen van de omvang [Drugs within bounds: The extent of hard drug use and crime in the Netherlands]. Intraval, Groningen/Rotterdam 1995
   Google Scholar
• Biesma S, Snippe J, Bieleman B. Harddrugsgebruikers geregistreerd: aard, omvang en mobiliteit van problematische harddrugsgebruikers in Rotterdam [Problem drug users in Rotterdam: Size, composition and mobility of the population]. Intraval, Rotterdam 2004
   Google Scholar
• Biesma S, Snippe J, Oldersma F, Bieleman B. Inventarisatie harddrugsverslaafden en dak- en thuislozen Leeuwarden, Noord en Zuidwest Friesland [Inventory of hard drug users and the homeless in Leeuwarden, Noord en Zuidwest Friesland]. Intraval, Groningen/Rotterdam 2003
   Google Scholar
• Brecht M-L, Wickens TD. Application of multiple capture methods for estimating drug use prevalence. Journal of Drug Issues 1993; 23: 229–250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger I, Struben H. Haagse harddruggebruikers: het bereik van politie en verslavingszorg in 1996–1998 en veranderingen ten opzichte van 1993–1995 [Hard drug users in The Hague: The reach of the police and addiction treatment services]. GGD Den Haag, Den Haag 2001
   Google Scholar
• Coumans AM, Neve RJM, Van de Mheen H. Het process van marginalisering en verharding in de drugsscene van Parkstad Limburg. Resultaten van het Drug Monitoring Systeem 1998–2000 [The process of marginalization and hardening in the drug scene of Parkstad Limburg. Results of the Drug Monitoring System 1998–2000]. IVO, Rotterdam 2000
   Google Scholar
• Coumans AM, Knibbe R. Druggebruikers in Parkstad Limburg: trends en profielen: resultaten van het Drug Monitoring Systeem 2001–2002 [Drug users in Parkstad Limburg: Results from the Drugs Monitoring System 2001–2002]. IVO, Rotterdam 2002
   Google Scholar
• De Graaf I, Wildschut J, Van de Mheen H. Utrechtse druggebruikers: een jachtig bestaan [Drug users in Utrecht: A hectic existence]. IVO, Rotterdam 2000
   Google Scholar
• Demirtas H. Simulation driven inferences for multiply imputed longitudinal datasets. Statistica Neerlandica 2004; 58: 466–482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EMCDDA. Methodological guidelines to estimate the prevalence of problem drug use on the national level. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, Lisbon 1999, (Available at: http://www.emcdda.org/situation/themes/problem_drug_use.shtml)
   Google Scholar
• EMCDDA. National prevalence estimates of problem drug use in the European Union: 1995–2000. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, Lisbon 2003, (Available at: http://annualreport.emcdda.eu.int/)
   Google Scholar
• Everitt BS. Modern medical statistics. Arnold, London 2003
   Google Scholar
• Frischer M, Hickman M, Kraus L, Mariani F, Wiessing L. A comparison of different methods for estimating the prevalence of problematic drug misuse in Great Britain. Addiction 2001; 96: 1465–1476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godfrey C, Wiessing L, Hartnoll R, Sharp F, Neaham R. Modelling drug use: Methods to quantify and understand hidden processes. EMCCDA Scientific Monograph Series No. 6. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. 2001
   Google Scholar
• Hser Y-I, Prendergast M, Anglin MD, Chen JK, Hsieh S-C. A regression analysis estimating the number of drug-using arrestees in 185 US cities. American Journal of Public Health 1998; 88: 487–490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Working Group for Disease Monitoring, & Forecasting. Capture–recapture and multiple-record systems estimation I: History and theoretical development. American Journal of Epidemiology 1995; 142: 1047–1058
   Google Scholar
• Kraus L, Augustin R, Frischer M, Kümmler O, Uhl A, Wiessing L. Estimating prevalence of problem drug use at national level in countries of the European Union and Norway. Addiction 2003; 98: 471–485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiner P, Soldz S, Berger M, Eliott E, Reynes J, Willams C, Rodriguez-Howard M. Social indicator-based measures of substance abuse consequences, risk and protection at the town level. The Journal of Primary Prevention 2001; 21: 339–365
   Google Scholar
• Little RJA, Rubin DB. The analysis of social science data with missing values. Sociological Methods and Research 1989; 18: 292–326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin DB. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. Wiley, New York 1987
   Google Scholar
• Schafer JL. Multiple imputation: A primer. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 1999; 8: 3–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seber GAF. The estimation of animal abundance and related parameters (2nd ed.). Charles Griffin & Company, London 1982
   Google Scholar
• Smit F, Toet J, Van Oers H, Wiessing L. Estimating local and national problem drug use prevalence from demographics. Addiction Research and Theory 2003; 11: 401–413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StataCorp. Stata statistical software (release 9.0). TX: Stata Corporation, College Station 2005
   Google Scholar
• Stimson GV, Hickman M, Quirk A, Frischer M, Taylor C. Estimating the prevalence of problem drug use in Europe. EMCCDA Scientific Monograph Series No. 1. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. 1997
   Google Scholar
• Taylor C. Introduction to multiplier methods. Estimating the prevalence of problem drug use in Europe, GV Stimson, M Hickman, A Quirk, M Frischer, C Taylor. EMCCDA Scientific Monograph Series No. 1, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxemburg 1997
   Google Scholar
• Van de Mheen H. De Rotterdamse drugsscene onder de loep. Resultaten van 5 jaar Drugs Monitoring Systeem in Rotterdam [Spotlight on the Rotterdam drugs scene: Results from the Rotterdam Drug Monitoring System over the last 5 years]. IVO, Rotterdam 2000
   Google Scholar
• Van Driel H, Wierdsma AL. Tien jaar methadon in Rotterdam [Ten years of methadone in Rotterdam]. GGD-Rotterdam e.o, Rotterdam 1999
   Google Scholar