Adolescent substance use in different social and peer contexts: A social network analysis

References

• Abel G, Plumridge L, Graham P. Peers, networks or relationships: Strategies for understanding social dynamics as determinants of smoking behaviour. Drugs: education, prevention and policy 2002; 9(4)325–338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander C, Piazza M, Mekos D, Valente T. Peers, schools and adolescent cigarette smoking. Journal of Adolescent Health 2001; 29: 22–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauman KE, Ennett ST. On the importance of peer influence for adolescent drug use: Commonly neglected considerations. Addiction 1996; 91: 185–198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauman KE, Fisher LA. Findings from longitudinal studies of adolescent smoking and drinking. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour 1986; 15: 345–353
   Google Scholar
• Dolcini MM, Harper GW, Watson SE, Catania JA, Ellen JM. Friends in the ‘hood’: Should peer-based health promotion programs target nonschool friendship networks?. Journal of Adolescent Health 2005; 36: 267.e6–15
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ennett ST, Bauman KE. Peer group structure and adolescent cigarette smoking: A social network analysis. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 1993; 34: 226–236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennett ST, Bauman KE. The contribution of influence and selection to adolescent peer group homogeneity: The case of adolescent smoking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1994; 6(74)653–663
   Google Scholar
• Friedkin NE. A structural theory of social influence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK 1998
   Google Scholar
• Goddard E, Higgins V. Smoking, drinking and drug use among young teenagers in 1998. The Stationery Office, LondonEngland 1999; 1
   Google Scholar
• Gordon J, Turner KM. Ifs, maybes and buts: Factors influencing staff enforcement of pupil smoking restrictions. Health Education Research 2003; 18(3)329–340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilamo-Ramos V, Litardo HA, Jaccard J. Prevention programs for reducing adolescent problem behaviours: Implications of the co-occurrence of problem behaviours in adolescence. Journal of Adolescent Health 2005; 36: 82–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynie DL. Delinquent peers revisited: Does network structure matter?. American Journal of Sociology 2001; 106(4)1013–1057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland PW, Leinhardt S. An exponential family of probability distributions for directed graphs. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1981; 76: 33–65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ianotti RJ, Bush PJ. Perceived vs. actual friends’ use of alcohol, cigarette, marijuana, and cocaine: Which has the most influence?. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 1992; 21: 375–389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirke DM. Chain reactions in adolescents’ cigarette, alcohol and drug use: Similarity through peer influence or the patterning of ties in peer networks?. Social Networks 2004; 26: 3–28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindstrom M, Merlo J, Ostergren P. Individual and neighbourhood determinants of social participation and social capital: A multilevel analysis of the city of Malmo, Sweden. Social Science & Medicine 2002; 54: 1779–1791
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lochner K, Kawachi I, Brennan R, Buka S. Social capital and neighbourhood mortality rates in Chicago. Social Science & Medicine 2003; 56: 1797–1805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson JM, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 2001; 27: 415–444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michell L, Amos A. Girls, pecking order and smoking. Social Science and Medicine 1997; 44: 1861–1869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray M, Swan A, Bewlay B, Johnson M. The development of smoking during adolescence—The MRC Derbyshire Smoking Study. International Journal of Epidemiology 1983; 12: 185–192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oetting ER, Donnermeyer JF. Primary socialization theory: The etiology of drug use and deviance. Substance Use and Misuse 1998; 33: 995–1026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson MA, Michell L. Smoke rings: Social network analysis of friendship groups, smoking and drug-taking. Drugs: education, prevention and policy 2000; 7: 21–37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson MA, Steglich C, Snijders T. Homophily and assimilation among sport-active adolescent substance users. Connections 2006; 27(1)51–67
   Google Scholar
• Pearson M, West P. Drifting smoke rings: Social network analysis and Markov processes in a longitudinal study of friendship groups and risk-taking. Connections 2003; 25(2)59–76
   Google Scholar
• Richards W. The NEGOPY network analysis program. Simon Fraser University, Department of Communications, Burnaby, BC 1989
   Google Scholar
• Richards W. NEGOPY 4.30 manual and user's guide. Simon Fraser University, School of Communications, Burnaby, BC 1995
   Google Scholar
• Savin-Williams R, Berndt T. Friendship and peer relations. At the threshold: The developing adolescent, S Feldman, G Elliott. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA 1990; 277–307
   Google Scholar
• Steglich C, Snijders T, Pearson M. Dynamic networks and behaviour: Separating selection from influence. Working Paper. Groningen University, The Netherlands 2004, (Available at: http://ppswmm.ppsw.rug.nl/~steglich/dynamics/)
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg L, Morris A. Adolescent development. Annual Review of Psychology 2001; 52: 83–110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorlindsson T, Vilhjalmsson R. Factors related to cigarette smoking and alcohol use among adolescents. Adolescence 1991; 26: 399–418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolone WL, Tieman CR. ‘Drugs, delinquency and ‘nerds’: Are loners deviant?’. Journal of Drug Education 1990; 20: 153–162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner K, West P, Gordon J, Young R, Sweeting H. Could the peer group explain school differences in pupil smoking rates? An exploratory study. Social Science & Medicine 2006; 62: 2513–2525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Roosmalen EH, McDaniel SA. Peer group influence as a factor in smoking behaviour of adolescents. Adolescence 1989; 24: 801–816
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman S, Faust K. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK 1994
   Google Scholar
• West P, Michell L. Smoking and peer influence. Handbook of pediatric and adolescent health psychology, A Goreczny, M Herson. Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights, MA 1999
   Google Scholar
• West P, Sweeting H, Leyland A. School effects on pupils’ health behaviours: Evidence in support of the health promoting school. Research Papers in Education 2004; 19: 261–291
   Google Scholar