A tale of two Canadian cities: Comparing supervised consumption site (SCS) policy making in Toronto and Vancouver

References

• Altheide, D. (1996). Qualitative media analysis. US: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. (2013). Mayor Ford opposed to supervised injection sites in Toronto. Global News (online)
   Google Scholar
• Bayoumi, A., & Strike, C. (2012). Report of the Toronto and Ottawa Supervised Consumption Assessment Study, 2012. Toronto: St. Michael’s Hospital and the University of Toronto
   Google Scholar
• Bayoumi, A., & Strike, C. (2016). Making the case for supervised injection services (Vol. 387, pp. 1890–1891). St. Michael's Hospital and the University of Toronto Dalla Lana School of Public Health. Retrieved from http://www.catie.ca/sites/default/files/TOSCA%20report%202012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Beletsky, L., Davis, C., Anderson, E., & Burris, S. (2008). The law (and politics) of safe injection facilities in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 231–237. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.103747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berridge, V. (1999). Histories of harm reduction: Illicit drugs, tobacco, and nicotine. Substance Use & Misuse, 34, 35–47. doi: 10.3109/10826089909035634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, J. (2013). Social problems (3rd ed.). New York: Norton and Company, Incorporated
   Google Scholar
• Bill C-2: An Act to Amend the Controlled Drug and Substances Act. (2013). 1st Reading October 16, 2013, 41st Parliament, 2nd Session, 2013–2014. Retrieved from http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/LOP/LegislativeSummaries/41/2/c2-e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Blain, M. (2002). The New U.S. Anti-‘Drug War’ Movement. Paper presented at the World Congress of Sociology, International Sociological Association, Brisbane, Australia
   Google Scholar
• Blanken, P., Barendregt, C., & Zuidmulder, L. (2009). The evolution of crack and basing cocaine in the Rotterdam Heroin Scene. Journal of Drug Issues, 29, 609–626. doi: 10.1177/002204269902900310
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, G.A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9, 27–40. doi: 10.3316/QRJ0902027
   Google Scholar
• Bullington, B. (2007). The velvet hangover: Reflections on Czech Drug Policy. Journal of Drug Issues, 37, 205–228. doi: 10.1177/002204260703700110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, Y.W. (2000). Substance abuse and developments in harm reduction. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 162, 1697–1700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, J. (2000). Report on Visit to Drug Programs in Amsterdam, Netherlands and Frankfurt, Germany
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, C. (2006). Traffic stopped to pressure Tories over injection site: Activists vent anger at government for not saying if Vancouver project will stay open. Vancouver Sun, p. A4
   Google Scholar
• Cook, S. (1970). Variations in response to illegal drug use: A comparative study of official narcotic drug policies in Canada, Great Britain, and the United States from 1920 to 1970. Alcohol and Research Foundation: Toronto
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, J. (2005). Miller urges study of safe needle sites. Drug strategy debated. National Post, p. A18
   Google Scholar
• DiChiara, A., & Galliher, J.F. (1994). Dissonance and contradictions in the origins of marihuana decriminalization. Law and Society Review, 28, 41–77. doi: 10.2307/3054137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EMCDDA. (2015). Drugs policy and the city in Europe. Lisbon: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA)
   Google Scholar
• Fantino, J. (2007). Duty: The life of a cop. Canada: Key Porter Books
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, B. (1999). Prohibition, public health, and a window of opportunity: An analysis of Canadian drug policy 1985–1997. Policy Studies, 20, 197–210. doi: 10.1080/01442879908423778
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, B. (2000). Prescriptions, power and politics: The turbulent history of methadone maintenance in Canada. Journal of Public Health Policy, 21, 187–210. doi: 10.2307/3343343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, J. (2013). Supervised injecting facilities: A case study of contrasting narratives in a contested health policy arena. Critical Public Health, 23, 77–94. doi: 10.1080/09581596.2012.735360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flexibility of Treaty Provisions as Regards Harm Reduction Approaches (74/10). (2002). Vienna, October 30 to November 15. United Nations International Narcotics Control Board. Retrieved from http://www.communityinsite.ca/INCB-HarmReduction.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Freday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 1–11
   Google Scholar
• Frerichs, P. (2001). The Frankfurt Monday’s Round: A decade of interdisciplinary co-operation in local drug policy. In Schardt, S. (Ed.), Co-operation and Community Consensus – The multi-agency approach to effective local drug policies. Frankfurt am Main: European Cities on Drug Policy
   Google Scholar
• Gent, C. (2000). Needle exchange policy adoption in American cities: Why not? Policy Sciences, 33, 125–153. doi: 10.1023/A:1026532832250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, J. (2005). Council endorses drug strategy. Globe and Mail, p. A15
   Google Scholar
• Hathaway, A., & Tousaw, K.I. (2008). Harm reduction headway and continuing resistance: Insights from safe injection in the city of Vancouver. International Journal of Drug Policy, 19, 11–16. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2007.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayle, S. (2015). Comparing drug policy windows internationally: Drug consumption room policy making in Canada and England and Wales. Contemporary Drug Problems, 42, 20–37. doi: 10.1177/0091450915569724
   Google Scholar
• Health Canada. (2002). Application for an exemption under Section 56 of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act for a scientific purpose for a pilot supervised injection site research project. Ottawa: Health Canada
   Google Scholar
• Health Canada. (2004). I-Track – Enhanced surveillance of risk behaviours among injecting drug users in Canada. Pilot Survey Report. Ottawa: Health Canada
   Google Scholar
• Hedrich, D., Kerr, T., & Dubois-Arbour, F. (2010). Drug consumption facilities in Europe and Beyond. In Rhodes, T., & Hedrich, D. (Eds.), Harm reduction: Evidence, impact, and challenges. Lisbon: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction
   Google Scholar
• Heimer, R., Bluthenthal, R.N., Singer, M., & Khoshnood, K. (1996). Structural impediments to operational syringe-exchange programs. AIDS Public Policy Journal, 11, 169–184
   Google Scholar
• Hobourg, E., & Frank, V.A. (2014). Drug consumption rooms and the role of politics and governance in policy processes. International Journal of Drug Policy, 25, 972–977. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.01.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, N. (2006). An overview of models of delivery of drug consumption rooms. York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation
   Google Scholar
• Hyshka, E. (2009a). The Saga continues. Canadian legislative attempts to reform cannabis law in the twenty-first century. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 51, 73–91. doi: 10.3138/cjccj.51.1.73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyshka, E. (2009b). Turning failure into success: What does the case of Western Australia tell us About Canadian cannabis policy-making? Policy Studies, 30, 513–531. doi: 10.1080/01442870902899962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyshka, E., Bubela, T., & Wild, T.C. (2013). Prospects for scaling-up supervised consumption facilities in Canada: The role of evidence in legal and political decision making. Addiction, 108, 467–478. doi: 10.1111/add.12064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IACB. (2002). Report of the International Narcotics Control Board for 2002. New York: United Nations
   Google Scholar
• Kent, H. (2001). Is Australia’s safe injection site bound for Canada? Canadian Medical Association Journal Website (eCMAJ), 164, 1332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, T., MacPherson, D., & Wood, E. (2008). The establishment of North America’s first safe injection site: Lessons from the first Vancouver experience. In Stephens, A. (Ed.), Crossing frontiers: International development in the treatment of drug dependence. Brighton: Pavilion Publishing
   Google Scholar
• Kimber, J., Dolan, K., & Wodak, A. (2005). Survey of drug consumption rooms: Service delivery and perceived public health and amenity impact. Drug and Alcohol Review, 24, 21–24. doi: 10.1080/09595230500125047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimber, J., Dolan, K., van Beek, I., Hedrich, D., & Zurhold, H. (2003). Drug consumption facilities: An update since 2000. Drug and Alcohol Review, 22, 227–233. doi: 10.1080/095952301000116951
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston: Little Brown and Company
   Google Scholar
• Kubler, D., & Walti, S. (2001). Drug policy-making in metropolitan areas: Urban conflicts and governance. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25, 35–54. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.00296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legal Affairs Section, United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime. (2002). Flexibility of treaty provisions as regards harm reduction approaches. Decision 74/10. United Nations International Narcotics Control Board, Seventy-Fifth Session, Vienna, Austria
   Google Scholar
• Lenton, S. (2004). Pot, politics and the press-reflections on cannabis law reform in Western Australia. Drug and Alcohol Review, 15, 335–341. doi: 10.1080/09595239600186101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunn, S., & Zimonjic, P. (2016). Safe injection sites have potential to save lives, says Jane Philpot. CBC News (online)
   Google Scholar
• MacPherson, D. (2001). A framework for action: A four-pillars approach to drug problems in Vancouver. Vancouver, B.C.: City of Vancouver Planning Department
   Google Scholar
• McClean, M. (2000). Vancouver drug epidemiology and drug crime statistics. Ottawa: Canadian Community Epidemiology Network on Drug Use (CCENDU)
   Google Scholar
• Mick, H. (2006). Toronto rally sets sights on B.C. site; protesters shine light on beleaguered Vancouver facility for drug addicts. Globe and Mail, p. A10
   Google Scholar
• MSIS Evaluation Committee. (2003). Final report of the evaluation of the Medically-Supervised Injecting Centre (MSIC). Sydney, Australia
   Google Scholar
• Ogata, K., Cuoto, N., & Greene, I. (2014). Rob Ford and the end of honour. The Innovation Journal, 19, 1–27
   Google Scholar
• Ogilvie, M. (2011a). Injection sites dramatically curbs overdose death: Study. Toronto Star (online). Retrieved from http://www.thestar.com/life/health_wellness/2011/04/17/injection_site_dramatically_curbs_overdose_deaths_study.html
   Google Scholar
• Ogilvie, M. (2011b). Toronto closer to getting safe injection site. Toronto Star (online). Retrieved from http://www.thestar.com/life/health_wellness/2011/09/30/toronto_closer_to_getting_safe_injection_site.html
   Google Scholar
• Ogilvie, M. (2012). Three drug injection sites recommended for Toronto, two in Ottawa. Toronto Star (online). Retrieved from http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2012/04/11/three_drug_injection_sites_recommended_for_toronto_two_in_ottawa.html
   Google Scholar
• Peat, D. (2013). Mayor Rob Ford strongly opposes safe injection sites. Toronto Sun (online)
   Google Scholar
• Philbin, M., Lozada, R., Zúñiga, M., Mantsios, A., Case, P., Magis-Rodriguez, … Strathdee, S. (2008). A qualitative assessment of stakeholder perceptions and socio-cultural influences on the acceptability of harm reduction programs in Tijuana, Mexico. Harm Reduction Journal, 5, 36. doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-5-36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platt, J. (1981). Evidence and proof in documentary research 1: Some specific problems of documentary research. The Sociological Review, 29, 31–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1981.tb03021.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, C. (2005). Safe injection site proposed. Public meetings will cover plans; Takes addicts off street: Health officer Could be modelled on Vancouver idea (sic). Toronto Star, p. B01
   Google Scholar
• Pycroft, A., & Bartollos, C. (2014). Applying complexity theory. Bristol: Policy Press
   Google Scholar
• Reinarman, C., & Levine, H.G. (1997). Crack in America: Demon drugs and social justice. US: University of California Press
   Google Scholar
• Rohleder, P., & Lyons, A. (2014). Qualitative research in clinical and health psychology. US: Palgrave Macmillan
   Google Scholar
• Schatz, E., & Noguier, M. (2012). Drug consumption rooms: Evidence and practice. International Drug Consortium Paper
   Google Scholar
• Scheerer, S. (1978). The New Dutch and German drug laws: Social and political conditions for criminalization and decriminalization. Law & Society Review, 12, 585–606. doi: 10.2307/3053306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, H. (1989). Die Rechtsstellung der Fixerräume. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Strafrecht, Bd. 106, Heft 3, Bern. [Gutachten gem. Vertrag vom 14./18.November 1988 der Eidgenössischen Betäubungsmittelkommission]. Berne: Bundesamt für Gesundheitswesen
   Google Scholar
• Select Committee on Home Affairs, Third Report. Session 2001-02. Retrieved from http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200102/cmselect/cmhaff/318/31813.htm
   Google Scholar
• Silberman, M. (1976). Toward a theory of criminal deterrence. American Sociological Review, 41, 442–461. doi: 10.2307/2094253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skretting, A. (2006). The Nordic countries and public drug injection facilities. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 13, 5–16. doi: 10.1080/09687630500412239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, D., Palepu, A., & Tyndall, M. (2006). The establishment of North America’s first state sanctioned supervised injection facility: A case study of culture change. International Journal of Drug Policy, 17, 73–82. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2005.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spears, J. (2006). Are safe injection sites coming here? That's not likely, councillors insist. But opponents keep eye on Vancouver. Toronto Star, p. FO2
   Google Scholar
• Strathdee, S.A., Patrick, D.M., Currie, S., Cornelisse, P.G., Rekart, M., & Montaner, J.S. (1997). Needle exchange is not enough: Lessons from the Vancouver injecting drug use study. AIDS, 11, F59–F65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Supreme Court Collections (SCC), September 30. (2011). 3 S.C.R. 134. Retrieved from http://scc.lexum.org/decisia-scc-csc/scc-csc/scc csc/en/item/7960/index.do
   Google Scholar
• Supreme Court of Canada. (2011). Canada (Attorney General) v. PHS Community Services Society
   Google Scholar
• Tempalski, B. (2007). Placing the dynamics of syringe exchange programs in the United States. Health Place, 13, 417–431. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2006.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry-McElrath, Y.M., & McBride, D.C. (2004). Local implementation of drug policy and access to treatment services for juveniles. Crime and Delinquency, 50, 60–87. doi: 10.1177/0011128703258873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toronto Board of Health. (2013). Board decision-supervised injection services in Toronto. Toronto, City of Toronto
   Google Scholar
• Toronto Board of Health. (2016a). Supervised injection services for Toronto: Next steps. Toronto, City of Toronto
   Google Scholar
• Toronto Board of Health. (2016b). Board decision-implementing supervised injection services in Toronto. Toronto, City of Toronto
   Google Scholar
• Toronto City Council. (2016). Council Meeting Minutes. Retrieved from http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2016.HL13.2
   Google Scholar
• Toronto Needs Supervised Consumption Sites! Blue Jays Baseball Banner Drop. AIDS Action Now. (2013). Retrieved from http://www.aidsactionnow.org/?p=1111
   Google Scholar
• Toronto Public Health. (2013). Supervised injection services in Toronto. Toronto, City of Toronto
   Google Scholar
• Toronto. (2001). Report of the Officer of the Chief Coroner
   Google Scholar
• Toronto. (2005). Toronto Drug Strategy Advisory Committee. The Toronto drug strategy. A comprehensive approach to alcohol and other drugs
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven: Yale University Press
   Google Scholar
• Tyndall, M.W., Craib, K., Currie, S., Li, K., O’shaughnessy, M.V., & Schechter, M.T. (2001). Impact of HIV infection on mortality in a cohort of injection drug users. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 28, 351–357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchtenhagen, A. (2000). Heroin-assisted treatment in Switzerland: A case study in policy change. Addiction, 105, 29. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02741.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. Office of Drugs and Crime. (October 30 November 15, 2002). Flexibility of treaty provisions as regards harm reduction approaches. Decision 74/10. United Nations International Narcotics Control Board, Seventy-Fifth Session, Vienna, Austria
   Google Scholar
• Vancouver City Council. (2001a). Summary report of public consultation feedback regarding a framework for action, A four pillar approach to drug problems in Vancouver, Parts A and B. November 2000–March 2001. Retrieved from http://former.vancouver.ca/ctyclerk/cclerk/010430/rr1-appa.htm
   Google Scholar
• Vancouver City Council. (2001b). Council Meeting Minutes. Retrieved from http://former.vancouver.ca/ctyclerk/cclerk/010515/ag010515
   Google Scholar
• Vancouver Data Catalogue. (2002). Municipal election official results. Retrieved 2014 from http://data.vancouver.ca/datacatalogue/municipalElectionResults.htm
   Google Scholar
• Watson, T., Bayoumi, A., Kolla, G., Penn, R., Fischer, B., Luce, J., & Strike, C. (2012). Police Perceptions of supervised consumption sites (SCSs): A qualitative study. Subst Use Misuse, 47, 364–374. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2011.645104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, L., Arreola, S.G., & Kral, A. (2011). The prospect of implementing a Safer Injection Facility in San Francisco: Perspectives of community stakeholders. The International Journal of Drug Policy, 22, 239–241. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2011.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, J., Linssen, L., & de Graaf, I. (2003). Drug consumption facilities in the Netherlands. Journal of Drug Issues, 33, 649–661. doi: 10.1177/002204260303300307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo, A. (2016). Ottawa approves second supervised injection site. Globe and Mail (online)
   Google Scholar
• Wortley, S., & Gartner, R. (2013). ‘Highlights’ of a criminological career: Anthony Doob and the state of evaluation research in Canada. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 55, 577–594. doi: 10.3138/cjccj.2012.ES08
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zampini, G.F. (2014). Governance versus government: Drug consumption rooms in Australia and the UK. International Journal of Drug Policy, 25, 978–984. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar