Risk and responsibilization: resistance and compliance in Swedish treatment for youth cannabis use

References

• Andersson Vogel, M. (2018). An endeavour for autonomy: How girls understand their lived experiences of being referred to secure care. Young, 26, 70–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åström, T., Gumpert, C.H., Andershed, A.K., & Forster, M. (2017). The SAVRY improves prediction of reoffending: A naturalistic longitudinal comparative study. Research on Social Work Practice, 27, 683–694. doi:10.1177/1049731515605184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åström, T., Jergeby, U., Andershed, A.K., & Tengström, A. (2013). Social workers' assessments of needs and interventions for adolescents with substance misuse problems, criminal behaviour and mental health difficulties: A vignette study. European Journal of Social Work, 16, 635–650. doi:10.1080/13691457.2012.724384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Blackman, S.J. (2004). Chilling out: The cultural politics of substance consumption, youth and drug policy. Berkshire: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blackman, S.J. (2007). ‘See Emily play’: Youth culture, recreational drug use and normalization. In M. Simpson, R. MacDonald & T. Shildrick (Eds.). Drugs in Britain: Supply, consumption and control (pp. 39–59). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bonar, E.E., Goldstick, J.E., Collins, R.L., Cranford, J.A., Cunningham, R.M., Chermack, S.T., … Walton, M.A. (2017). Daily associations between cannabis motives and consumption in emerging adults. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 178, 136–142. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchell, G., Gordon, C., Miller, P. (Eds.). (1991). The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmental Rationality. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ekendahl, M., Karlsson, P., & Månsson, J. (2018). Logics of legitimation in Swedish treatment for youth cannabis use: The problem representations of social workers in a prohibitionist policy context. Contemporary Drug Problems, 0091450918764128.
   Google Scholar
• ESPAD Group. (2016). The 2015 ESPAD Report. Results from the European School Survey Project on Alcohol and Other Drugs. Luxembourg: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. Retrieved from http://www.espad.org/sites/espad.org/files/ESPAD_report_2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1999). Risk and responsibility. The Modern Law Review, 62, 1–10. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.00188
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, N., Parton, N., & Skivenes, M. (Eds.). (2011). Child protection systems: International trends and orientations. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goddard, T. (2012). Post-welfarist risk managers? Risk, crime prevention and the responsibilization of community-based organizations. Theoretical Criminology, 16, 347–363. doi:10.1177/1362480611433432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard, T., & Myers, R.R. (2017). Against evidence-based oppression: Marginalized youth and the politics of risk-based assessment and intervention. Theoretical Criminology, 21, 151–167. doi:10.1177/1362480616645172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gripenberg, J., Tengström, A., Andersson, B., & Skårner, A. (2015). Trestad Del A: Genomgång av delprojekt och samlad bedömning [Trestad part A: Review of subprojects and a joint assessment]. Stockholm/Göteborg/Malmö: Trestad2. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/jom7251/Downloads/SlutrapportTrestad2%20Del%20A.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Guttormsson, U., & Leifman, H. (2016). ESPAD i Sverige. Europaperspektiv på skolungdomars drogvanor 1995–2015 [ESPAD in Sweden. European perspectives on substance use among students 1995-2015]. Stockholm: The Swedish Council for Information on Alcohol and other Drugs. Retrieved from http://www.can.se/contentassets/4397a3abfb7d4c9c931f987e89ef5896/espad-i-sverige.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hannah-Moffat, K. (2016). A conceptual kaleidoscope: Contemplating ‘dynamic structural risk’ and an uncoupling of risk from need. Psychology, Crime & Law, 22, 33–46. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2015.1114115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, K., Lundström, T., & Sallnäs, M. (2011). A comparison of out-of-home care for children and young people in Australia and Sweden: Worlds apart? Australian Social Work, 64, 416–431. doi:10.1080/0312407X.2011.603092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, S., Brooks, R., Cleaver, E., & Ireland, E. (2009). Researching young people’s lives. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hibell, B., Guttormsson, U., Ahlström, S., Balakireva, O., Bjarnason, T., Kokkevi, A., & Kraus, L. (2011). The 2011 ESPAD report: Substance use among students in 36 European countries. Stockholm: The Swedish Council for Information on Alcohol and other Drugs. Retrieved from http://www.espad.org/sites/espad.org/files/The_2011_ESPAD_Report_FULL_2012_10_29.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hier, S.P. (2008). Thinking beyond moral panic: Risk, responsibility, and The Politics of Moralization. Theoretical Criminology, 12, 173–190. doi:10.1177/1362480608089239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järvinen, M., & Ravn, S. (2015). Explanations and expectations: Drug narratives among young cannabis users in treatment. Sociology of Health & Illness, 37, 870–887. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.12239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, P. (2001). Youth at risk: Processes of individualisation and responsibilisation in the risk society. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 22, 23–33. doi:10.1080/01596300123314
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, P. (2006). The entrepreneurial self and ‘youth at-risk’: Exploring the horizons of identity in the twenty-first century. Journal of Youth Studies, 9, 17–32. doi:10.1080/13676260500523606
   Google Scholar
• Kemshall, H. (2002). Effective practice in probation: An example of ‘advanced liberal’ responsibilisation? The Howard Journal, 41, 41–58. doi:10.1111/1468-2311.00224
   Google Scholar
• Kemshall, H. (2008). Risks, rights and justice: Understanding and responding to youth risk. Youth Justice, 8, 21–37. doi:10.1177/1473225407087040
   Google Scholar
• Kemshall, H. (2010). Risk rationalities in contemporary social work policy and practice. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 1247–1262. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcp157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilmer, J.R., Hunt, S.B., Lee, C.M., & Neighbors, C. (2007). Marijuana use, risk perception, and consequences: Is perceived risk congruent with reality? Addictive Behaviors, 32, 3026–3033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Månsson, J. (2017). Cannabis discourses in contemporary Sweden: Continuity and change (Doctoral Dissertation, Stockholm University, Sweden). Retrieved from https://su.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1086649/FULLTEXT01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Measham, F., & Shiner, M. (2009). The legacy of ‘normalisation’: The role of classical and contemporary criminological theory in understanding young people’s drug use. International Journal of Drug Policy, 20, 502–508. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2009.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, W.A., Crawshaw, P., Bunton, R., & Green, E.E. (2001). Situating young people’s experiences of risk and identity. Health, Risk & Society, 3, 217–233. doi:10.1080/13698570124548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, D., Fraser, S., Törrönen, J., & Tinghög, M.E. (2015). Sameness and difference: Metaphor and politics in the constitution of addiction, social exclusion and gender in Australian and Swedish drug policy. International Journal of Drug Policy, 26, 420–428. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.01.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, R. (2013). The biographical and psychic consequences of ‘welfare inaction’ for young women in trouble with the law. Youth Justice, 13, 218–233. doi:10.1177/1473225413505385
   Google Scholar
• Myers, R. (2017). ‘I accept that I have nobody’: Young women, youth justice, and expectations of responsibility during reentry. Social Justice, 44, 62–82.
   Google Scholar
• O’Gorman, A. (2016). Chillin, buzzin, getting mangled, and coming down: Doing differentiated normalization in risk environments. Drugs: Education, Prevention & Policy, 23, 247–254. doi:10.1080/09687637.2016.1176991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, H.J., Aldridge, J., & Measham, F. (1998). Illegal leisure: The normalization of adolescent recreational drug use. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2013). Majority now supports legalizing marijuana. Washington: The Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/files/legacy-pdf/4-4-13%20Marijuana%20Release.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Phoenix, J., & Kelly, L. (2013). ‘You have to do it for yourself’: Responsibilization in youth justice and young people’s situated knowledge of youth justice practice. The British Journal of Criminology, 53, 419–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogeberg, O. (2015). Drug policy, values and the public health approach–four lessons from drug policy reform movements. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 32, 347–364. doi:10.1515/nsad-2015-0034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rollnick, S., & Miller, W.R. (1995). What is motivational interviewing? Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 23, 325–334. doi:10.1017/S135246580001643X
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (2000). Government and control. British Journal of Criminology, 40, 321–339. doi:10.1093/bjc/40.2.321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N., & Miller, P. (1992). Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. British Journal of Sociology, 43, 173–205. doi:10.2307/591464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandberg, S. (2012). Is cannabis use normalized, celebrated or neutralized? Analysing talk as action. Addiction Research & Theory, 20, 372–381. doi:10.3109/16066359.2011.638147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroder, R.I.A., Sellman, D., Frampton, C., & Deering, D. (2009). Youth retention: Factors associated with treatment drop‐out from youth alcohol and other drug treatment. Drug and Alcohol Review, 28, 663–668. doi:10.1111/j.1465-3362.2009.00076.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shildrick, T. (2002). Young people, illicit drug use and the question of normalization. Journal of Youth Studies, 5, 35–48. doi:10.1080/13676260120111751
   Google Scholar
• Shildrick, T. (2016). Normalisation, youth transitions and austerity. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 23, 264–266. doi:10.3109/09687637.2016.1172556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (2010). Doing qualitative research (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Soneryd, L., & Uggla, U. (2015). Green governmentality and responsibilization: New forms of governance and responses to ‘consumer responsibility’. Environmental Politics, 24, 913–931. doi:10.1080/09644016.2015.1055885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sznitman, S.R., & Taubman, D.S. (2016). Drug use normalization: a systematic and critical mixed-methods review. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 77, 700–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry-McElrath, Y.M., O'Malley, P.M., & Johnston, L.D. (2009). Reasons for drug use among American youth by consumption level, gender, and race/ethnicity: 1976–2005. Journal of Drug Issues, 39, 677–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tham, H. (2012). The influence of the drug issue on criminal policy. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 13, 12–30. doi:10.1080/14043858.2012.739677
   Google Scholar
• The Swedish Council for Information on Alcohol and other Drugs. (2016). Skolelevers drogvanor 2016 [Substance use among students 2016]. Stockholm: The Swedish Council for Information on Alcohol and other Drugs. Retrieved from http://www.can.se/contentassets/54701581408a4e87a2de636f8d28791d/skolelevers-drogvanor-2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Törnqvist, D. (2009). När man talar om knark: Drogdebatt i svensk dagspress 1970–1999 [Speaking of drugs: The drug debate in the Swedish press 1970–1999] (Doctoral dissertation, Umeå University, Sweden). Retrieved from http://umu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A217958&dswid=4923
   Google Scholar
• Trnka, S., & Trundle, C. (2014). Competing responsibilities: Moving beyond neoliberal responsibilisation. Anthropological Forum, 24, 136–153. doi:10.1080/00664677.2013.879051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldron, H.B., & Turner, C.W. (2008). Evidence-based psychosocial treatments for adolescent substance abuse. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 37, 238–261. doi:10.1080/15374410701820133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werth, R. (2013). The construction and stewardship of responsible yet precarious subjects: Punitive ideology, rehabilitation, and ‘tough love’ among parole personnel. Punishment & Society, 15, 219–246. doi:10.1177/1462474513481720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L. (2016). Muddy waters? Reassessing the dimensions of the normalisation thesis in twenty-first century Britain. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 23, 190–201. doi:10.3109/09687637.2016.1148118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar