References
- International Campaign for Women’s Right to Safe Abortion. Poland – tens of thousands march against the latest anti-abortion bill on 23 March; [cited 2018 Mar 27]. Available from: http://www.safeabortionwomensright.org/poland-tens-of-thousands-march-against-the-latest-anti-abortion-bill-on-23-march/
- Eurostat. Legally induced abortions by mother’s age; [cited 2018 Mar 8]. Available from: http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?wai=true&dataset=demo_fabort
- United Nations. Abortion policies: a global review. Available from: http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/abortion/profiles.htm
- Maierhofer W. Abortion democracy: Sarah Diehl’s advocacy documentary film for women’s rights in Poland and South Africa. Sex Health Issues. 2017. DOI: 10.15761/SHI.1000106
- Mishtal J. Neoliberal reforms and privatisation of reproductive health services in post-socialist Poland. Reprod Health Matters. 2010;18(36):56–66. DOI: 10.1016/S0968-8080(10)36524-4
- United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. Trends in contraceptive use worldwide 2015 (ST/ESA/SER.A/349). New York: UN; 2015.
- Berer M. Abortion law and policy around the world: in search of decriminalization. Health Human Rights. 2017;19(1):13–27. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5473035/
- Chełstowska A. Stigmatisation and commercialisation of abortion services in Poland: turning sin into gold. Reprod Health Matters. 2011;19(37):98–106. DOI: 10.1016/S0968-8080(11)37548-9
- Gryymala-Busse A. Why would Poland make its already strict abortion law draconian? The Washington Post. 2016 Apr 18. Available from: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/04/18/why-would-poland-make-its-already-strict-abortion-law-draconian/?utm_term=.ca257c333052
- Singh S, Remez L, Sedgh G, et al. Abortion worldwide 2017: uneven progress and unequal access. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2018. Available from: https://www.guttmacher.org/report/abortion-worldwide-2017
- Constitutional Court of Chile Decision STC Rol N° 3729(3751)-17 CPT. Unofficial translation. 2017 Aug 28. Available from: https://www.law.utoronto.ca/utfl_file/count/documents/reprohealth/chile-2017-english.pdf
- Montero A, Villarroel R. A critical review of conscientious objection and decriminalisation of abortion in Chile. J Med Ethics. 2018. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104281
- United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner. CCPR/C/116/D/2324/2013. Available from: http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CCPR%2FC%2F116%2FD%2F2324%2F2013
- European Court of Human Rights. A, B and C v Ireland. Judgement, Strasbourg. 2010 Dec 16. Available from: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-102332
- Zampas C. Irish Government announces referendum on abortion. INTLAWGRRLS. 2018 Jan 31. Available from: https://ilg2.org/2018/01/31/
- World Health Organization. Safe abortion: technical and policy guidance for health systems. Legal and policy considerations. Geneva: WHO; 2015 (revised). Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/173586/WHO_RHR_15.04_eng.pdf?sequence=1
- United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. Abortion policies and reproductive health around the world. New York: UN; 2014.
- World Health Organization. Unsafe abortion: global and regional estimates of the incidence of unsafe abortion and associated mortality in 2008. Geneva: WHO; 2011. Available from: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/unsafe_abortion/9789241501118/en/