Disrespect and abuse in maternity care: individual consequences of structural violence

References

• Afnan-Holmes H, Magoma M, John T, et al. Tanzania’s countdown to 2015: an analysis of two decades of progress and gaps for reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health, to inform priorities for post-2015. Lancet Global Health. 2015;3(7):e396–e409. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00059-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children (MoHCDGEC) [Tanzania Mainland], Ministry of Health (MoH) [Zanzibar], National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), Office of the Chief Government Statistician (OCGS), and ICF. (2016). Tanzania demographic and health survey and malaria indicator survey (TDHS-MIS) 2015–16. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Rockville, Maryland, USA:MoHCDGEC, MoH, NBS, OCGS, and ICF.
   Google Scholar
• Sando D, Ratcliffe H, McDonald K, et al. The prevalence of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth in urban Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16(1):e323. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1019-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruk M, Kujawski S, Mbaruku G, et al. Disrespectful and abusive treatment during facility delivery in Tanzania: a facility and community survey. Health Policy Plan. 2018;33(1):e26–e33. doi:10.1093/heapol/czu079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon SA, George AS, Chebet JJ, et al. Experiences of and responses to disrespectful maternity care and abuse during childbirth; a qualitative study with women and men in Morogoro region, Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14(1):95. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. The prevention and elimination of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth. WHO statement. WHO; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Hunter EC, et al. The mistreatment of women during childbirth in health facilities globally: a mixed-methods systematic review. PLoS Med. 2015;12(6):e1001847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henning S. “Shut up … and push!” – obstetrical violence, dignified health care and the intersection with human rights. J Integr Stud. 2016;8(1):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler M, Santos MJ, Ruiz-Berdún D, et al. Moving beyond disrespect and abuse: addressing the structural dimensions of obstetric violence. Reprod Health Matters. 2016;24(47):47–55. doi: 10.1016/j.rhm.2016.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheper-Hughes. Death without weeping: the violence of everyday life in Brazil. London: University California Press; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Peace GJ. And peace research. J Peace Res. 1969;6(3):167–191. doi: 10.1177/002234336900600301
   Google Scholar
• Farmer P. An anthropology of structural violence. Curr Anthropol. 2004;45(3):305–325. doi: 10.1086/382250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montesanti SR, Thurston WE. Mapping the role of structural and interpersonal violence in the lives of women: implications for public health interventions and policy. BMC Womens Health. 2015;15(1):173.
   Google Scholar
• Jewkes R, Penn-Kekana L. Mistreatment of women in childbirth: time for action on this important dimension of violence against women. PLoS Med. 2015;12(6):e1001849. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001849
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fathalla M. Why did Mrs X die? Presented at launch of the safe motherhood movement international conference on safe motherhood, Nairobi, 1987. Available at: https://www.figo.org/lectures-speeches-Professor-Mahmoud-Fathalla.
   Google Scholar
• Richey LA. From the policies to the clinics: the reproductive health paradox in post-adjustment health care. World Dev. 2004;32(6):923–940. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer A, Meleis A, Knaul FM, et al. Women and health: the key for sustainable development. The Lancet. 2015;386(9999):1165–1210. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60497-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorsen VC, Tharp ALT, Meguid T. High rates of burnout among maternal health staff at a referral hospital in Malawi: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs. 2011;10(1):1984. doi: 10.1186/1472-6955-10-9
   Google Scholar
• Rosen HE, Lynam PF, Carr C, et al. Direct observation of respectful maternity care in five countries: a cross-sectional study of health facilities in east and Southern Africa. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0728-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koblinsky M, Matthews Z, Hussein J, et al. Going to scale with professional skilled care. Lancet. 2006;368(9544):1377–1386. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69382-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman LP, Kruk ME. Disrespect and abuse of women in childbirth: challenging the global quality and accountability agendas. Lancet. 2014;6736(14):1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Storeng KT, Béhague DP. “Playing the numbers game”: evidence-based advocacy and the technocratic narrowing of the safe motherhood initiative. Med Anthropol Q. 2014;28(2):260–279. doi: 10.1111/maq.12072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell OMR, Calvert C, Testa A, et al. Maternal health 3 The scale, scope , coverage, and capability of childbirth care. Elsevier Ltd. 2016;6736(16):1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Solnes Miltenburg A. Assessing emergency obstetric and newborn care: can performance indicators capture health system weaknesses? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17:92. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1282-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spradley J. Participant observation. Long Grove: Waveland Press; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Brown H. “If we sympathise with them, they’ll relax” fear/respect and medical care in a Kenyan hospital. Med Antropol. 2010;22:1.
   Google Scholar
• Nurses T, Council M. Code of professional conduct for nurses and midwives in Tanzania. 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Moore M, Armbruster D, Graeff J, et al. Assessing the “caring” behaviors of skilled maternity care providers during labor and delivery: experiences from Kenya and Bangladesh. The CHANGE project. Washington: Academy for Educational Development/The Manoff Group; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Ross-Davie M, Cheyne H. Understanding support in labour: the potential of systematic observation. Evid Based Midwifery. 2014;12(4):121–126.
   Google Scholar
• Ross-Davie M. Measuring the quantity and quality of midwifery support of women during labour and childbirth: The development and testing of the “Supportive Midwifery in Labour Instrument” [dissertation]. Sterling: University of Sterling; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Bowser D, Hill A. Exploring evidence for disrespect and abuse in facility-based childbirth: report of a landscape analysis. Washington (DC): United States Agency for International Development; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• d’Oliveira AFPL, Diniz SG, Schraiber LB. Violence against women in health-care institutions : an emerging problem. Lancet. 2002;359:1681–1685. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08592-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green T. Qualitative methods for health research. 3rd ed. London: Sage Publications; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Feinstein S, Mwahombela L. Corporal punishment in Tanzania’s schools. Int Rev Educ. 2010;56(4):399–410. doi: 10.1007/s11159-010-9169-5
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Moreno C, Jansen HaF, Ellsberg M, et al. Prevalence of intimate partner violence: findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. Lancet. 2006;368:1260–1269. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69523-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Geest S, Finkler K. Hospital ethnography: introduction. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59(10 SPEC. ISS.):1995–2001. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinman A. The violences of everyday life. violence and subjectivity. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2000; p. 226–241.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffre Y, Prual A. Midwives in Niger: An uncomfortable position between social behaviours and health care constraints. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38(8):1069–1073. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90224-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meguid T. (Re)humanising health care – placing dignity and agency of the patient at the centre. Nord J Hum Rights. 2016;34(1):60–64. doi: 10.1080/18918131.2016.1153189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Follingstad D, Hart DD. Defining psychological abuse of husbands toward wives. J Interpers Violence. 2000;15(9):891–920. doi: 10.1177/088626000015009001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solnes Miltenburg A, Lambermon F, Hamelink C, et al. Maternity care and human rights: what do women think? BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2016;16:1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12914-016-0091-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan B. Authoritative knowledge and its construction. In: Davis-Floyd R, Sargent C, editors. Childbirth and authoritative knowledge cross cultural perspectives. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1997. p. 55–79.
   Google Scholar
• Jewkes R, Abrahams N, Mvo Z. Why do nurses abuse patients? Reflections from South African obstetric services. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47(11):1781–1795. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00240-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire P. Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York (NY): The Continuum International Publishing Group Inc; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Adams V. Metrics: what counts in global health. London: Duke University Press; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Midwives’ voices midwives’ realities. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Meguid T. Notes on the rights of a poor woman in a poor country. Health Hum Rights. 2008;10(1):105–108. doi: 10.2307/20460092
   Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne DE. Validity issues in narrative research. Qual Inq. 2007;13(4):471–486. doi: 10.1177/1077800406297670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar