Denying access of Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups to contraceptive services: a case study among the Baiga community in Chhattisgarh, India

References

• Bijoy CR. The adivasis of India – a history of discrimination, conflict and resistance. Indig Aff. 2001;1:54–61. Available from: https://www.iwgia.org/images/publications/IA_1-01.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Xaxa Chairman V, Ramanathan Member U, Bara Member J, et al. Report of the high level committee on socio-economic, health and educational status of tribal communities of India. Ministry of Tribal Affairs Government of India Constitution of the High Level Committee [Internet]. Delhi; 2014. Available from: http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Tribal Committee Report, May-June 2014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Public Health Resource Network. Tribal health, book 15. In: Sundararaman T, Prasad V, Nandi S, Delhi: Public Health Resource Network; 2010. p. 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Nandi S, Mishra J, Kanungo K, et al. Public health advocacy to reinstate reproductive rights of Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups (PTGs) in Chhattisgarh. BMC Proc. 2012;6(5):P1. doi: 10.1186/1753-6561-6-S5-P1
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health and Family Welfare Madhya Pradesh. Orders regarding non promotion of sterilization of certain sub communities in tribal areas under the family planning programme. 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Visaria L, Ved RR. India’s family planning programme: policies, practices and challenges. New Delhi: Routledge India; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. National Population Policy 2000 [Internet]. 2000. Available from: http://populationcommission.nic.in/PublicationDetails/11_984_1.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Public Health Resource Network. Exploring health inequities amongst particularly vulnerable tribal groups: case studies of Baiga and Sabar in Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand States of India. Report of a study by Public Health Resource Network. Trivandrum; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS). National Family Health Survey – 4 (2015–16): State Fact Sheet Chhattisgarh. Delhi; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS). National Family Health Survey – 4 District Fact Sheet Kabirdham. Delhi; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• International Institute for Population Sciences and Macro International. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005–06: India: volume 2. Mumbai: IIPS; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Ronsmans C, Graham WJ. Maternal mortality: who, when, where, and why. Lancet. 2006;368:1189–1200. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69380-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Oza S, et al. Every newborn: progress, priorities, and potential beyond survival. Lancet. 2014 [cited 2018 Oct 2];384:189–205. Available from: doi:10.1016/. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60496-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwin V. The Baiga. London: AMS Press; 1939.
   Google Scholar
• Chhattisgarh K, et al. One year since the Bilaspur sterilisation tragedy: a stock taking report. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Sarojini N, Subha Sri B, Ambhore V, et al. Bilaspur sterilisation deaths: evidence of oppressive population control policy. Indian J Med Ethics. 2015 [cited 2018 Oct 2];12:2–5. Available from: http://www.issuesinmedicalethics.org/articles/bilaspur-sterilisation-deaths-evidence-of-oppressive-population-control-policy/.
   Google Scholar
• Singh J. An ill-conceived plan. The Hindu. 2017 Feb 19.
   Google Scholar
• Thanenthiran S, Racherla SJ, Jahanath S. Reclaiming & redefining rights: ICPD+ 20: status of sexual and reproductive health and rights in Asia Pacific. Kuala Lumpur: Asia-Pacific Resource & Research Centre for Women (ARROW); 2013.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Population Fund. Programme of Action. Adopted at the International Conference on Population and Development, Cairo. 5–13 September 1994 [Internet]. 2004 [cited 2018 Oct 2]. Available from: https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/event-pdf/PoA_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Reading C, Wien F. National Collaborating Centre for Aboriginal Health Centre De Collaboration Nationale De La Santé Autochtone. 2009; Available from: www.nccah-ccnsa.ca.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donoghue L. Towards a culture of improving indigenous health in Australia. Aust J Rural Health. 1999;7:64–69. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1584.1999.00218.x
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Who recommendations for augmentation of labour. Geneva: 2014; [cited 2018 Oct 1]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/112825/9789241507363_eng.pdf;jsessionid=BF1758BBF3AAAC9E23DBA45C36536B0D?sequence=1.
   Google Scholar
• Writ Petition Public Interest Litigation in the Honourable High Court of Chhattisgarh. WPPIL NO. 27 of 2017. Ranichand Baiga vs State of Chhattisgarh. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh D. Tribals want govt to scrap 1979 order denying sterilisation access. Indian Express [Internet]. 2017 Apr 24; Available from: https://indianexpress.com/article/india/baigas-tribals-want-govt-to-scrap-1979-order-denying-sterilisation-access-achanakmar-tiger-reserve-pvtg-4625607/.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health and Family Welfare Chhattisgarh. Regarding sterilisation of Baigas and other PVTGs. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh D. Chhattisgarh tweaks 38-year rule for tribal sterilisation, but govt nod still required. Indian Express [Internet]. 2017 Jun 5; Available from: https://indianexpress.com/article/india/chhattisgarh-tweaks-38-year-rule-for-tribal-sterilisation-but-govt-nod-still-required-4689176/.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsburg F, Rapp R. The politics of reproduction. Annu Rev Anthropol. 1991;20:311–343. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.20.100191.001523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prakash A. Contested Discourses: politics of ethnic identity and autonomy in the Jharkhand Region of India [Internet]. Altern. Glob. Local, Polit. Sage Publications, Inc.; [cited 2018 Oct 2]. p. 461–496. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40644975.
   Google Scholar
• Lee VS. Political determinants and aboriginal and tTorres Strait Islander women: don’t leave your integrity at the political gate. J Public Health Policy. 2017;38:387–393. doi: 10.1057/s41271-017-0075-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann B, Rao M. India's population programme: obstacles and opportunities. Econ Polit Wkly. 2015;44:10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Rao M. Population policies: states approve coercive measures. Econ Polit Wkly. 2001;36:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Petchesky R. Human rights, reproductive health and economic justice: why they are indivisible. Reprod Health Matters. 2000;8:12–17. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(00)90001-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Declaration. United Nations declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples. United Nations Gen Assem. 2008;10, Available from: http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/en/drip.html.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. Convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women. Annu Rev Popul Law. 1987;14:133.
   Google Scholar
• OHCHR. International covenant on economic, social and cultural rights [Internet]. 1976 [cited 2018 Oct 2]. Available from: https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/cescr.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• LiveLaw News Network. A woman has a sacrosanct right to her bodily integrity: SC allows woman to abort 26-week-old fetus. Live Law.in. 2017 Jul.
   Google Scholar
• The Wire. FAQ: What the Right to privacy judgment means for Aadhaar and Mass Surveillance. Wire. 2017 Aug.
   Google Scholar
• Sundari Ravindran TK. Poverty, food security and universal access to sexual and reproductive health services: A call for cross-movement advocacy against neoliberal globalisation. Reprod. Health Matters. 2014;22:14–27. doi:10.1016/S0968-8080(14)43751-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen G, Govender V. Sexual and reproductive health and rights in changing health systems. Glob Public Health. 2015;10:228–242. doi:10.1080/17441692.2014.986161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar