Criminal law and the risk of harm: a commentary on the impact of criminal laws on sexual and reproductive health, sexual conduct and key populations

References

• Grover A. Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. 2011. (UN Doc. A/66/254).
   Google Scholar
• Toonen v. Australia, Communication No. 488/1992, UN Doc. CCPR/C/50/D/488/1992 (1994) (Human Rights Committee).
   Google Scholar
• Dudgeon v. UK, Application No. 7525/76, Judgement of 22 October 1981 (European Court of Human Rights).
   Google Scholar
• Norris v. Ireland, Application No. 10581/83, Judgment of 26 October 1988 (European Court of Human Rights).
   Google Scholar
• Modinos v. Cyprus, Application No. 15070/89, Judgment of 22 April 1993 (European Court of Human Rights).
   Google Scholar
• LC v. Peru, Communication No. 22/2009, UN Doc. CEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009 (25 November 2011) (CEDAW).
   Google Scholar
• Mellet v. Ireland, Communication No. 2324/2013, UN Doc. CCPR/C/116/D/2324/2013 (2016) (Cleveland S, concurring) (Human Rights Committee).
   Google Scholar
• Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, General Recommendation No. 33, UN Doc. CEDAW/C/GC/33 (2015), para 47.
   Google Scholar
• Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment No. 22, UN Doc. E/C.12/GC/22. 2016. para. 40.
   Google Scholar
• Working Group on Discrimination against Women in law and in practice, UN Doc. A/HRC/29/40. 2015. pp. 19, 49 and 73.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. Study on the impact of the world drug problem on the enjoyment of human rights. UN Doc. A/HRC/30/65. 2015. p. 61.
   Google Scholar
• Navtej Singh Johar and Ors. v Union of India, Thr. Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice, Judgment of 6 September 2018, WP (C) No. 76 of 2016 (Supreme Court of India)
   Google Scholar
• Decision No. C-221 of 5 May 1994, La Corte Constitucionel, Gaceta Constitucional Ediciona Extraordianaria (Constitutional Court of Colombia).
   Google Scholar
• National Coalition for Gay and Lesbian Equality and Another v Minister of Justice and Others (CCT11/98) [1998] ZACC 15; 1999 (1) SA 6; 1998 (12) BCLR 1517 (9 October 1998) (Constitutional Court of South Africa).
   Google Scholar
• Brazilian Supreme Court, Writ of Habeas Corpus, 124.306 Rio de Janeiro State, Majority Opinion.
   Google Scholar
• UNAIDS, The Gap Report. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz SR, Nowak RG, Orazulike I, et al. The immediate effect of the same-Sex marriage prohibition Act on stigma, discrimination, and engagement on HIV prevention and treatment services in men who have sex with men in Nigeria: analysis of prospective data from the TRUST cohort. Lancet HIV. 2015;2(7):e299–e306. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(15)00078-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risher K, Adams D, Sithole B, et al. Sexual stigma and discrimination as barriers to seeking appropriate healthcare among men who have sex with men in Swaziland. J Int AIDS Soc. 2013;16(3 suppl 2):18715. doi: 10.7448/IAS.16.3.18715
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starrs AM, Ezeh AC, Barker G, et al. Accelerate progress – sexual and reproductive health and rights for all: report of the guttmacher – Lancet Commission. Lancet. 2018;391:2642–2692. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30293-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization, Safe abortion: technical and policy guidance for health systems. 2nd ed. Geneva: WHO; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Decker MR, Crago A. Chu S, et al. Human rights violations against Sex workers: burden and effect on HIV. Lancet. 2015;385(9963), 186–199. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60800-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amnesty International. What I am doing is not a Crime – the Human Cost of Criminalizing Sex Work in the City of Buenos Aires. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Watch. Off the streets: arbitrary detention and other Abuses against Sex Workers in Cambodia. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Sexual health, human rights and the law. Geneva: WHO; 2015. pp. 20.
   Google Scholar
• Expert meeting on the Scientific, medical, legal and human rights aspects of Criminalization of HIV non-disclosure, exposure and transmission, Geneva, Switzerland, 31 August – 2 September 2011. Available from: http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1576514/ReportUNAIDSExpertMeetingOnCriminalization_9Feb2012.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Oslo declaration on HIV Criminalization. 2012. Available from: http://www.hivjustice.net/oslo/oslo-declaration/.
   Google Scholar
• Grover A. Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. 2010. (UN Doc. A/HRC/14/20).
   Google Scholar
• Barré-Sinoussi A, Karim SS, Albert J, et al. Expert consensus statement on the science of HIV in the context of criminal Law. J Int AIDS Soc. 2018;21:e25161. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeBeck K, Cheng T, Montaner TS, et al. HIV and the criminalisation of drug use among people who inject drugs: a systematic review. Lancet HIV. 2017;4(8):E357–E374. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(17)30073-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNDP, Global Commission on HIV and the Law, Risks, Rights and Health. 2012. Available from: http://www.hivlawcommission.org/resources/report/FinalReport-Risks,Rights&Health-EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Amnesty International. On the Brink of Death: Violence Against Women and the Abortion Ban in El Salvador. 2014. Available from: http://www.amnestyusa.org/research/reports/on-the-brink-of-death-violence-against-women-and-the-abortion-ban-in-el-salvador.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Reproductive Rights, Marginalized, Persecuted, and Imprisoned: The Effects of El Salvador’s Total Criminalization of Abortion. 2014. Available from: https://www.reproductiverights.org/sites/crr.civicactions.net/files/documents/El-Salvador-CriminalizationOfAbortion-Report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Amnesty International. The Total Abortion Ban in Nicaragua: Women’s Health and Lives Endangered, Medical Professionals Criminalized. 2009. Available from: http://www.amnestyusa.org/pdfs/amr430012009en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Open Society Foundations. 10 Reasons to Decriminalize Sex Work: A Reference Brief. 2012. Available from: https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/sites/default/files/10-reasons-decriminalize-sex-work-20150410_0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network. Women, Sex Work and HIV. 2012. Available from: http://www.aidslaw.ca/site/women-and-hiv-women-sex-work-and-hiv/?lang=en.
   Google Scholar
• Ipas. When Abortion is a Crime: The Threat to Vulnerable Women in Latin America. 2013. Available from: http://www.ipas.org/en/Resources/Ipas%20Publications/When-Abortion-is-a-Crime-The-threat-to-vulnerable-women-in-Latin-America.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Watch. Sex Workers at Risk: Condoms as Evidence of Prostitution in Four US Cities. 2012., Available from: https://www.hrw.org/report/2012/07/19/sex-workers-risk/condoms-evidence-prostitution-four-us-cities.
   Google Scholar
• Amnesty International. She is not a criminal: the impact of Ireland’s Abortion Law. 2015. Available from: http://www.amnestyusa.org/pdfs/Ireland_She_Is_Not_A_Criminal.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UNAIDS. Ending Overly Broad Criminalization of HIV Non-disclosure, Exposure and Transmission: Critical Scientific, Medical and Legal Considerations (Guidance Note) (2013), http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/20130530_Guidance_Ending_Criminalization_0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. Born Free and Equal: Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in International Human Rights Law. 2012. pp. 28–37.
   Google Scholar
• KL v. Peru, Communication No. 1153/2003, UN Doc. CCPR/C/85/D/1153/2003. 2005. (Human Rights Committee).
   Google Scholar
• Case of R.R. v. Poland, Application no. 27617/04, Judgment of 28 November 2011 (European Court of Human Rights).
   Google Scholar
• VC v. Slovakia, Application No. 18968/07, Judgment of 8 November 2011 (European Court of Human Rights).
   Google Scholar
• NB v. Slovakia, Application No. 29518/10, Judgment of 12 June 2012, (European Court of Human Rights).
   Google Scholar
• I.G., M.K. and R.H. v. Slovakia, Application No. 15966/04 (European Court of Human Rights).
   Google Scholar
• IV v. Bolivia, Inter American Court of Human Rights, 30 November 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, General Recommendation 35, UN Doc. CEDAW/C/GC/35. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association (ILGA), State-Sponsored Homophobia, A World Survey of Laws: criminalization, protection and recognition of same sex love (2016).
   Google Scholar
• Finer L, Fine JB. Abortion Law around the world: progress and pushback. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(4):585–589. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Reproductive Rights, The World’s Abortion Laws. 2014. Available from: http://www.reproductiverights.org/pub_fac_abortion_laws.html.
   Google Scholar
• Cook R. Stigmatized Meanings of Criminal Abortion Law. In: Cook RJ, Erdman JN, Dickens BM, editor. Abortion law in transnational perspective: cases and controversies. University of Pennsylvania Press; 2014. pp. 347–369.
   Google Scholar
• UNAIDS, Addressing the detrimental health and human rights impacts of criminal laws. Available from: http://www.unaids.org/en/resources/presscentre/featurestories/2018/may/criminal-laws.
   Google Scholar
• Amnesty International, Body Politics. Available from: https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/pol40/7764/2018/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Accountability International, Challenging Criminalisation Globally. Available from: https://accountability.international/projects/challenging-criminalisation-globally/.
   Google Scholar