Subnational politics and foreign direct investment in Mexico

REFERENCES

• Abed, G.T. and Davoodi, H.R. (2000) ‘Corruption, Structural Reforms and Economic Performance in the Transition Economies’, Working Paper No. 132, Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Archibold, R.C. (2011) ‘Despite Mexican Violence, US Firms Expand by Border’, The New York Times, 21, <http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/11/world/americas/11matamoros.html?pagewanted=1&_r=2&ref=global-home> (accessed 20 October 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Baker, A. (2003) ‘Why is Trade Reform So Popular in Latin America? A Consumption Based Theory of Trade Policy Preferences’, World Politics, 55(2): 423–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandelj, N. (2002) ‘Embedded Economies: Social Relations as Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in Central and Eastern Europe’, Social Forces, 81(2): 409–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benton, A.L. (2008) ‘Do Investors Assess the Credibility of Campaign Commitments? The Case of Mexico's 2006 Presidential Race’, Political Research Quarterly, 61(3): 403–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biglaiser, G. and Brown, D. (2004) ‘Political Stability and Foreign Direct Investment in Latin America’, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Portland, Oregon, 11 March.
   Google Scholar
• Busse, M. (2004) ‘Transnational Corporations and Repression of Political Rights and Civil Liberties: An Empirical Analysis’, Kyklos, 57(1): 45–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busse, M. and Hefeker, C. (2007) ‘Political Risk, Insitutions and Foreign Direct Investment’, European Journal of Political Economy, 23(2): 397–415.
   Google Scholar
• Carkovic, M. and Levine, R. (2005) ‘Does Foreign Direct Investment Accelerate Economic Growth?’, in E.M. Graham, T.H. Moran and M. Blomström (eds) Does Foreign Direct Investment Promote Development: New Methods, Outcomes and Policy Approaches, Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics Press, pp. 195–220.
   Google Scholar
• Chadee, D.D., Qiu, F. and Rose, E.L. (2003) ‘FDI Location at the Subnational Level: A Study of EJVs in China’, Journal of Business Research, 56(10): 835–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppedge, M. (1993) ‘Parties and Society in Mexico and Venezuela: Why Competition Matters’, Comparative Politics, 25(3): 253–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppedge, M. (1997) ‘A Classification of Latin American Political Parties’, Working Paper No. 224, Notre Dame: The Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies, University of Notre Dame.
   Google Scholar
• Daniele, V. and Marani, U. (2011) ‘Organized Crime, the Quality of Local Institutions and FDI in Italy: A Panel Data Analysis’, European Journal of Political Economy, 27(1): 312–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai, M.A., Foley, C.F. and Hines, J.R. , Jr. (2006) ‘Capital Structure with Risky Foreign Investment’, Working Paper 12276, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, . <http://www.nber.org/papers/w12276> (accessed 20 October 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Dunning, J. H. and Lundan, S. M. (2008) Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy, . Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dussel Peters, E. (2000) La Inversión extranjera en México, . Red de Inversiones y Estrategias Empresariales, Serie Desarrollo Productivo. No. 80, Santiago: CEPAL.
   Google Scholar
• Dussel Peters, E. (2009) ‘Don't Expect Apples from a Pear Tree: Foreign Direct Investment and Innovation in Mexico’, Discussion Paper No. 28, Medford, MA: Working Group on Development and Environment in the Americas.
   Google Scholar
• Edmonds-Poli, E. (2006) ‘Decentralization under the Fox Administration: Progress or Stagnation?’, Mexican Studies, 22(2): 387–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egger, P. and Winner, H. (2005) ‘Evidence on Corruption as Incentive for Foreign Direct Investment’, European Journal of Political Economy, 21(4): 932–52.
   Google Scholar
• Fairris, D. and Levine, E. (2004) ‘Declining Union Density in Mexico, 1984–2000’, Monthly Labor Review, 127(9): 10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Harms, P. and Ursprung, H. (2002) ‘Do Civil and Political Repression Really Boost Foreign Direct Investment?’, Economic Inquiry, 40(4): 651–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecock, R.D. (2006) ‘Electoral Competition, Globalization, and Subnational Education Spending in Mexico, 1999–2004’, American Journal of Political Science, 50(4): 950–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández-Rodriguez, R. (2003) ‘The Renovation of Old Institutions: State Governors and the Political Transition in Mexico’, Latin American Politics and Society, 45(4): 97–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IMCO (Instituto Mexicano para la Competitividad) (various years). Competetividad Estatal de Mexico 2008. Mexico City: IMCO.
   Google Scholar
• INEGI (Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía) (various years) . <http://www.inegi.gob.mx> (accessed 20 October 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, N.M. (2003) ‘Democratic Governance and Multinational Corporations: Political Regimes and Inflows of Foreign Direct Investment’, International Organization, 57(3): 587–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, N.M. (2006) Nation-States and the Multinational Corporation: A Political Economy of Foreign Direct Investment, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, N.M. and McGillivray, F. (2005) ‘Federalism and Foreign Direct Investment’, International Interactions, 31(4): 303–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, N.M. and Rosas, G. (2007) ‘Foreign Direct Investment and Income Inequality in Mexico, 1990–2000’, International Organization, 61(3): 467–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malesky, E.J. (2008) ‘Straight Ahead on Red: How Foreign Direct Investment Empowers Subnational Leaders’, The Journal of Politics, 70(1): 97–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejía Reyes, P. (2002) ‘Inversión extranjera directa en los estados de México: evolución reciente y retos futuros’, Paper presented at the Conference La economía Mexicana en el Umbral del Siglo XXI, at El Colegio Mexiquense, Toluca, Mexico, December.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, K.E. and Nguyen, H.V. (2005) ‘Foreign Investment Strategies and Sub-National Institutions in Emerging Markets: Evidence from Vietnam’, Journal of Management Studies, 42(1): 63–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, T.H. (2002) ‘How Does FDI Affect Host Country Development? Using Industry Case Studies to Make Reliable Generalizations’, in T.H. Moran, E.M. Graham and M. Blomström (eds) Does Foreign Direct Investment Promote Development?, Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, pp. 281–313.
   Google Scholar
• Nolan, J.L. (1999) Mexico Business: The Portable Encyclopedia for Doing Business with Mexico, Petaluma, CA: World Trade Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ortega Gómez, P., Cruz, A.K. and Alcaráz Vargas, J.L. (2010) ‘Competitividad para la atracción y localización de la inversión extranjera directa en México’, Paper presented at the Fourth Congress of the Red Internacional de Investigadores en Competitividad, Puerta Vallarta, Mexico, November.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, D.E. (2002) ‘Re-Scaling IPE: Subnational States and the Regulation of the Global Political Economy’, Review of International Political Economy, 9(3): 465–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plümper, T. and Troeger, V.E. (2007) ‘Efficient Estimation of Time-Invariant and Rarely Changing Variables in Finite Sample Panel Analyses with Unit Fixed Effects’, Political Analysis, 15(2): 124–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ProMexico (Seceretaria de Economía) (2012) ‘Site Selection Tool: Investment Incentives’, . <http://mim.promexico.gob.mx/wb/mim/seleccion_de_indicadores> (accessed 20 October 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez, M. (2000) ‘Foreign Direct Investment in Mexico: A Cointegration Analysis’, The Journal of Development Studies, 37(1): 138–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samford, S. (2010) ‘Averting “Disruption and Reversal”: The Logic of Rapid Trade Reform in Latin America’, Politics and Society, 38(3): 373–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, H. (2009) ‘Political Institutions and Foreign Direct Investment in Developing Countries: Does the Sector Matter?’, . Working paper, <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1403983>.
   Google Scholar
• SCT (Secretaria de Comunicaciones y Transportes) (2010) ‘Puertos de Mexico’, . <http://www.sct.gob.mx/puertos-y-marina-mercante/puertos-de-mexico> (accessed XX October 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Smarzynska, B.K. and Wei, S. (2002) ‘Corruption and the Composition of Foreign Direct Investment: Firm-Level Evidence’, Working Paper No. 7969, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, . <http://www.nber.org/papers/w7969> (accessed 20 October 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Transparencia Mexicana (various years) Índice Nacional de Corrupción y Buen Gobierno, Mexico, D.F.: Transparencia Mexicana.
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD (United Nations Committee on Trade and Development) (1998) World Investment Report: Trends and Determinants, New York: UNCTAD.
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD (United Nations Committee on Trade and Development) (2007) World Investment Report: Transnational Corporations, Extractive Industries and Development, New York: UNCTAD.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, S. (2000a) ‘How Taxing is Corruption on International Investors’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(1): 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, S. (2000b) ‘Local Corruption and Global Capital Flows’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 31(2): 303–46.
   Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J.M. (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, C., Delios, A. and Yang, J.Y. (2002) ‘Locational Determinants of Japanese Foreign Direct Investment in China’, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(1): 63–86.
   Google Scholar