The declining exceptionalism of agriculture: identifying the domestic politics and foreign policy of agricultural trade protectionism

REFERENCES

• Anderson, K. (1991) Lobbying Incentives and Pattern of Protection in Rich and Poor Countries, Geneva: GATT Secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, K. and Hayami, Y. (1986) The Political Economy of Agricultural Protection: East Asia in International Perspective, London, UK: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, K. and Tyers, R. (1988) ‘The pattern of distortions to agricultural incentives’, in A. Maunder and A. Valdes (eds) Agriculture and Governments in an Interdependent World, Dartmouth, UK: Aldershot, pp. 175–86.
   Google Scholar
• Averyt, W. F. (1977) Agropolitics in the European Community: Interest Groups and the Common Agricultural Policy, New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, N. and Katz, J. (1995) ‘What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data’, American Political Science Review 89: 634–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, T., Clarke, G., Groff, A., Keefer, P. and Walsh, P. (2001) ‘New tools in comparative political economy: the database of political institutions’, World Bank Economic Review 15: 165–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, G. S. (1985) ‘Public policies, pressure groups, and deadweight costs’, Journal of Public Economics 28: 329–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beghin, J. C. and Kherallah, M. (1994) ‘Political institutions and international patterns of agricultural protection’, Review of Economics and Statistics 76: 482–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilal, S. (2000) ‘The political economy of agricultural policies and negotiations’, in S. Bilal and P. Pezaros (eds) Negotiating the Future of Agricultural Policies: Agricultural Trade and the Millennium WTO Round, The Hague: Kluwer Law International, pp. 81–93.
   Google Scholar
• Bueno de Mesquita, B., Smith, A., Silverson, R. M. and Morrow, J. D. (2003) The Logic of Political Survival, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bullock, D. S. (1994) ‘The countercyclicity of government transfers: a political pressure group approach’, Review of Agricultural Economics 16: 93–102.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, E., Kayser, M. A. and Rogowski, R. (2008) ‘Electoral systems and real prices: panel evidence for the OECD countries’, British Journal of Political Science 38: 739–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, E., Kayser, M. A., Linzer, D. A. and Rogowski, R. (2010) Electoral Systems and the Balance of Consumer-Producer Power, New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, W. D. (1998) ‘From protected development to market liberalism: paradigm change in agriculture’, Journal of European Public Policy 5: 632–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, G. (1987) ‘Electoral equilibrium under alternative voting institutions’, American Journal of Political Science 31: 82–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, G. (1990) ‘Centripetal and centrifugal incentives in electoral systems’, American Journal of Political Science 34(4): 903–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C. L. (2004) ‘International institutions and issue linkage: building support for agricultural trade liberalization’, American Political Science Review 98(1): 153–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Gorter, H. and Swinnen, J. F. M. (1994) ‘The economic polity of farm policy’, Journal of Agricultural Economics 45: 312–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrlich, S. D. (2007) ‘Access to protection: domestic institutions and trade policy in democracies’, International Organization 61: 571–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, C. L. (2009) ‘A protectionist bias in majoritarian politics’, Economics & Politics 21(2): 278–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawande, K. and Hoekman, B. (2006) ‘Lobbying and agricultural trade policy in the United States’, International Organization 60: 527–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, A. (1991/92) ‘The politics of interest representation in the Japanese diet: the case of agriculture’, Pacific Affairs 64: 506–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, G. and Helpman, E. (1994) ‘Protection for sale’, American Economic Review 84: 833–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, G. M. and Helpman, E. (2005) A protectionist bias in majoritarian politics', Quarterly Journal of Economics 120(4): 1239–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpin, D. (ed.) (2005) Surviving Global Change? Agricultural Interest Groups in Comparative Perspective, Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Hayami, Y. (1990) ‘Japan’, in F. Sanderson (ed) Agricultural Protectionism in the Industrialized World, Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, pp. 181–218.
   Google Scholar
• Henisz, W. J. (2000) ‘The institutional environment for economic growth’, Economics and Politics 12(1): 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Honma, M. and Hayami, Y. (1986a) ‘The determinants of agricultural protection levels: econometric analysis’, in K. Anderson and Y. Hayami (ed) The Political Economy of Agricultural Protection: East Asia in International Perspective, London, UK: Allen and Unwin, pp. 39–49.
   Google Scholar
• Honma, M. and Hayami, Y. (1986b) ‘Structure of agricultural protection in industrial countries’, Journal of International Economics 20: 115–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. W. and Wollack, J. S. (2006) ‘Database of electoral systems and the personal vote’, http://dss.ucsd.edu/~jwjohnso/espv.htm
   Google Scholar
• Kono, D. Y. (2009) ‘Market structure, electoral institutions, and trade policy’, International Studies Quarterly 53: 885–906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magee, S. P., Brock, W. A. and Young, L. (1989) Black Hole Tariffs and Endogenous Policy Theory: Political Economy in General Equilibrium, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, E. and Busch, M. (1995) ‘The political economy of nontariff barriers: a cross-national’, International Organization 49: 723–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner, H. V. (2002) ‘International trade’, in W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse and B. A. Simmons (eds) Handbook of International Relations, London, UK: Sage, pp. 448–61.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. M., Schleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W. (1991) ‘The allocation of talent: implication for growth’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 106: 503–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myerson, R. B. (1993) ‘Incentives to cultivate favored minorities under alternative electoral systems’, American Political Science Review 87(4): 856–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielson, D. L. (2003) ‘Supplying trade reform: political institutions and liberalization in middle-income presidential democracies’, American Journal of Political Science 47: 470–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orden, D. (1996) ‘Agricultural interest groups and the North American Free Trade Agreement’, in A. O. Krueger (eds) The Political Economy of American Trade Policy, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 335–84.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2004) ‘Agricultural support: how is it measured and what does it mean?’, OECD Observer (June): 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Olper, A. (2001) ‘Determinants of agricultural protection: the role of democracy and institutional setting’, Journal of Agricultural Economics 52: 75–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1965) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1985) ‘Space, agriculture and organization’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 67: 928–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paarlberg, R. (1997) ‘Agricultural policy reform and the Uruguay round: synergistic linkage in a two-level game?’ International Organization 51: 413–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J. H, and Jensen, N. (2007) ‘Electoral competition and agricultural support in OECD countries’, American Journal of Political Science 51(2): 314–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson, T. and Tabellini, G. (1999) ‘The size and scope of government: comparative politics with rational politicians’, European Economic Review 63: 699–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, P. E. (1995) The Price of Federalism, Washington, DC: Brookings.
   Google Scholar
• Rickard, S. J. (2012a) ‘A non-tariff protectionist bias in majoritarian politics: government subsidies and electoral institutions’, International Studies Quarterly 56: 777–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickard, S. J. (2012b) ‘Electoral systems, voters’ interests and geographic dispersion', British Journal of Political Science 42(4): 855–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogowski, R. (1987) ‘Trade and the variety of democratic institutions’, International Organization 41: 203–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogowski, R. (1989) Commerce and Coalitions: How Trade Affects Domestic Political Alignments, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogowski, R. and Kayser, M. A. (2002) Majoritarian electoral systems and consumer power: price-level evidence from the OECD countries, American Journal of Political Science 46(3): 526–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarker, R., Meilke, K. and Hoy, M. (1993) ‘The political economy of systematic government intervention in agriculture’, Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 41: 289–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, T. W. (1945) Agriculture in an Unstable Economy, New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Sheingate, A. D. (2001) The Rise of the Agricultural Welfare State: Institutions and Interest Group Power in the United States, France, and Japan, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swinnen, J., de Gorter, H., Rausser, G. C. and Banerjee, A. N. (2000) ‘The political economy of public research investment and commodity price in agriculture: an empirical study’, Agricultural Economics 22: 111–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thies, C. G. (2001) ‘A historical institutionalist approach to the Uruguay Round agricultural negotiations’, Comparative Political Studies 34: 400–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thies, C.G., and Porche, S. (2007) ‘The Political Economy of Agricultural Protection’. Journal of Politics 69(1): 116–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G. (2002) Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tweeten, L. (2002) ‘Farm commodity programs: essential safety net or corporate welfare?’ in L. Tweeten and S. R. Thompson (eds) Agricultural Policy for the 21st Century, Ames, IA: Iowa State Press, pp. 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank (2005) World Development Indicators CD-ROM, Washington, DC: IBRD.
   Google Scholar