Different paths to power: The rise of Brazil, India and China at the World Trade Organization

REFERENCES

• Armijo, Leslie, and Sean Burges (2010) ‘Brazil, the Entrepreneurial and Democratic BRIC’, Polity, 42(1): 14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armijo, Leslie, and Christine Kearney (2008). ‘Does Democratization Alter the Policy Process? Trade Policymaking in Brazil’, Democratization,15(5): 991–1017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrighi, Giovanni (2007) Adam Smith in Beijing: Lineages of the Twenty-First Century, New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Babb, Sarah (2009) Behind the Development Banks: Washington Politics, World Poverty, and the Wealth of Nations, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Babones, Salvatore (2011) ‘The Middling Kingdom: The Hype and the Reality of China's Rise’, Foreign Affairs 90(5): 79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ban, Cornel, and Mark Blyth (2013) ‘The BRICs and the Washington Consensus: An introduction’, Review of International Political Economy, 20(2): 241–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, Michael, and Raymond Duvall (2005) Power in Global Governance, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beeson, Mark (2009) ‘Trading Places? China, the United States, and the Evolution of the International Political Economy’, Review of International Political Economy,16(4): 729–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeson, Mark, and S. Bell (2009) ‘‘The G-20 and International Economic Governance: Hegemony, Collectivism, or Both’’, Global Governance, 15:67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breslin, Shaun (2010). ‘China's Emerging Global Role: Dissatisfied Responsible Great Power’, Politics 30: 52–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridges (2013) ‘Food Stock Subsidies to “Make or Break” Bali Trade Talks’, Bridges Daily Update, WTO Ninth Ministerial Conference (Issue 3): 5 December.
   Google Scholar
• Bukovansky, Mlada (2010) ‘Institutionalized Hypocrisy and the Politics of Agricultural Trade’, in Rawi Abdelal, Mark Blyth, and Craig Parsons (eds) Constructing the International Economy, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burges, Sean W. (2013) ‘Brazil as a Bridge between Old and New Powers?’ International Affairs, 89(3): 577–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chorev, Nitsan (2008) Remaking US Trade Policy: From Protectionism to Globalization, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clapp, Jennifer (2006) ‘WTO Agriculture Negotiations: Implications for the Global South’, Third World Quarterly, 27(4): 563–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conti, Joseph (2011) Between Law and Diplomacy: The Social Contexts of Disputing at the World Trade Organization, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, Andrew, and Daniel Schwanen (2009) CIGI Special G20 Report: Flashpoints for the Pittsburgh Summit, Waterloo, ON: Centre for International Governance Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Dauvergne, Peter, and Déborah Farias (2012) ‘The Rise of Brazil as a Global Development Power’, Third World Quarterly, 33(5): 903–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhar, Biswajit, and Murali Kallummal (2007) ‘Trade Policy Off the Hook: The Making of Indian Trade Policy since the Uruguay Round’, in Mark Halle and Robert Wolfe (eds) Process Matters: Sustainable Development and Domestic Trade Transparency, Winnipeg, MB: International Institute for Sustainable Development: 183–218.
   Google Scholar
• Drahos, Peter(2003) ‘When the Weak Bargain with the Strong: Negotiations in the World Trade Organization’, International Negotiation, 8(1): 79–109.
   Google Scholar
• Eagleton-Pierce, Matthew, (2012) Symbolic Power in the World Trade Organization, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emmott, Bill (2008) Rivals: How the Power Struggle Between China, India and Japan Will Shape Our Next Decade, New York: Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Evenett, Simon (2007) ‘EU Commercial Policy in a Multipolar Trading System’, CIGI Working Paper No. 23.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, Hui (2006) The Politics of China's Accession to the World Trade Organization: The Dragon Goes Global, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, Kevin P. (2008) ‘Understanding Developing Country Resistance to the Doha Round’, Review of International Political Economy 15(1): 62–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilpin, Robert (1987) The Political Economy of International Relations, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, Wyn (2007) ‘The Shift from Duopoly to Oligopoly in Agricultural Trade’, in Donna Lee and Rorden Wilkinson (eds) The WTO After Hong Kong, New York: Routledge, pp. 169–85.
   Google Scholar
• Hampson, Fen Osler, 1990. ‘Climate Change: Building Coalitions of the Like-Minded’, International Journal 45(Winter): 36–74.
   Google Scholar
• Higgott, Richard A., and Andrew F. Cooper (1990) ‘Middle Power Leadership and Coalition Building: Australia, the Cairns Group, and the Uruguay Round of Trade Negotiations’, International Organization, 44(4): 589–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopewell, Kristen (2013) ‘New Protagonists in Global Economic Governance: Brazilian Agribusiness at the WTO’, New Political Economy, 18(4): 602–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, Ho-Fung (ed.) (2009) China and the Transformation of Global Capitalism, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hurrell, Andrew (2006) ‘Hegemony, Liberalism and World Order: What Space for Would-be Great Powers?’ International Affairs, 82(1): 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurrell, Andrew, and Amrita Narlikar (2006) ‘A New Politics of Confrontation: Brazil and India in Multilateral Trade Negotiations’, Global Society, 20(4): 415–33.
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, John (2008) ‘The Rise of China and the Future of the West: Can the Liberal System Survive?’ Foreign Affair s, January/February: 23–37.
   Google Scholar
• Jacques, Martin (2009) When China Rules the World: The Rise of the Middle Kingdom and the End of the Western World, London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, Yang (2010) ‘China's Pursuit of Free Trade Agreements: Is China Exceptional?’, Review of International Political Economy 17(2): 238–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapoor, Ilan (2006) ‘Deliberative Democracy and the WTO’, Review of International Political Economy 11(3): 522–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, Paul (1987) The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000, New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Lima, Maria Regina Soares de, and Monica Hirst (2006) ‘Brazil as an Intermediate State and Regional Power: Action, Choice and Responsibilities’, International Affairs, 82(1): 21–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margulis, Matias E. (2013) ‘The Regime Complex for Food Security: Implications for the Global Hunger Challenge’, Global Governance, 19(1): 53–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margulis, Matias E., and Tony Porter (2013) ‘Governing the Global Land Grab: Multipolarity, Ideas, and Complexity in Transnational Governance’, Globalizations, 10(1): 65–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattern, Janice Bially (2008) ‘The Concept of Power and the (Un)Discipline of International Relations’, in Christian Reus-Smit and Duncan Snidal (eds) The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mittelman, James H. (2013) ‘‘Global Bricolage: Emerging Market Powers and Polycentric Governance’,’Third World Quarterly, 34(1): 23–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narlikar, Amrita (2003) International Trade and Developing Countries: Bargaining Coalitions in the GATT & WTO, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Narlikar, Amrita (2010) New Powers: How to Become One and How to Manage Them. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Narlikar, Amrita (2013) ‘Negotiating the Rise of New Powers’, International Affairs 89(3): 561–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narlikar, Amrita, and Diana Tussie (2004) ‘The G20 at the Cancun Ministerial: Developing Countries and Their Evolving Coalitions in the WTO’, World Economy 27(7).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organski, A. F. K. 1968. World Politics. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto, Sanjay, Kate Macdonald, and Shelley Marshall (2011). ‘Rethinking Global Market Governance’, Politics & Society 39(3): 299–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polaski, Sandra (2006) Winners and Losers: Impact of the Doha Round on Developing Countries,Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, Tony (2005) ‘The United States in International Trade Politics: Liberal Leader or Heavy-Handed Hegemon?’ in David Kelly and Wyn Grant (eds) The Politics of International Trade in the Twenty-First Century, New York: Palgrave Macmillan,pp. 204–20.
   Google Scholar
• Raghavan, Chakravathi (2000) ‘After Seattle, World Trading System Faces Uncertain Future’, Review of International Political Economy, 7(3): 495–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roemer-Mahler, Anne (2012) ‘Business Conflict and Global Politics: The Pharmaceutical Industry and the Global Protection of Intellectual Property Rights’, Review of International Political Economy, 20(1): 121–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggie, John Gerard (1996) Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schirm, Stefan A. (2010) ‘Leaders in Need of Followers: Emerging Powers in Global Governance’, European Journal of International Relations, 16(2): 197–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, James, and Rorden Wilkinson (2013) ‘China Threat? Evidence from the WTO’, Journal of World Trade 47(4): 761–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadlen, Kennneth C. (2005) ‘Exchanging Development for Market Access: Deep Integration and Industrial Policy Under Multilateral and Regional-Bilateral Trade Agreements’, Review of International Political Economy 12(5): 750–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer, Gregory, Michelle Ratton Sanchez, and Barbara Rosenberg (2008) ‘The Trials of Winning at the WTO: What Lies Behind Brazil's Success’, Cornell International Law Journal, 41(2): 383–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha, Aseema, (2007) ‘Global Linkages and Domestic Politics: Trade Reform and Institution Building in India in Comparative Perspective’, Comparative Political Studies,40(10): 1183–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg, Richard (2002) ‘In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-based Bargaining in the GATT/WTO’, International Organization, 56(2): 339–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephen, Matthew D. (2012) ‘‘Rising Regional Powers and International Institutions: The Foreign Policy Orientations of India, Brazil and South Africa’,’ Global Society, 26(3): 289–309.
   Google Scholar
• Subacchi, Paola (2008) ‘New Power Centres and New Power Brokers: Are They Shaping a New Economic Order?’ International Affairs, 84(3): 485–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanian, A. (2011) ‘The Inevitable Superpower: Why China's Dominance Is a Sure Thing’, Foreign Affairs, 90(5): 66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, Ian (2007) ‘The Periphery Strikes Back? The G20 at Cancun’, in Donna Lee and Rorden Wilkinson (eds) The WTO After Hong Kong, New York: Routledge,pp. 155—68.
   Google Scholar
• The Economist (2010) ‘The trillion-dollar club: The BRICs’, 17 April 2010, p. 64.
   Google Scholar
• Veiga, Pedro da Motta (2007) ‘Trade Policy-making in Brazil: Changing Patterns in State-Civil Society Relationship’, in Mark Halle and Robert Wolfe (eds) Process Matters: Sustainable Development and Domestic Trade Transparency, Winnipeg: IISD,pp. 143–82.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, Robert H. (2003) ‘What Strategies are Viable for Developing Countries Today? The World Trade Organization and the Shrinking of “Development Space”‘, Review of International Political Economy, 10(4): 621–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, Robert H. (2011) ‘Emerging World Order? From Multipolarity to Multilateralism in the G20, the World Bank, and the IMF’, Politics & Society, 39(3): 347–78.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, Kenneth N. (1979) Theory of International Politics, New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, Rorden (2007) ‘Building Asymmetry: Concluding the Doha Development Agenda’, in Donna Lee and Rorden Wilkinson (eds) The WTO After Hong Kong, New York: Routledge, pp. 248–61.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, Rorden, (2009) ‘Language, Power and Multilateral Trade Negotiations’, Review of International Political Economy 16(4): 597–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, Rorden, and James Scott (2008) ‘Developing Country Participation in the GATT: A Reassessment’, World Trade Review, 7(3): 473–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, Robert (2004) ‘Crossing the River by Feeling the Stones: Where the WTO is Going After Seattle, Doha and Cancun’, Review of International Political Economy, 11(3): 574–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank (2010) ‘The End of the Third World? Modernizing Multilateralism for a Multipolar World’, Speech by President Robert B. Zoellick, 14 April 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Young, Alasdair R. (2010) ‘Perspectives on the Changing Global Distribution of Power: Concepts and Context’, Politics, 30: 2–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakaria, Fareed (2008) The Post-American World, New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar