The IMF as a de facto institution of the EU: A multiple supervisor approach

REFERENCES

• Arriazu, R., Crow, J. and Thygesen, N. (1999) External Evaluation of IMF Surveillance: Report by a Group of Independent Experts, Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Best, J. (2007) ‘Legitimacy dilemmas: the IMF's pursuit of country ownership’, Third World Quarterly, 28(3): 469–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billiet, S., Hodson, D. and Maher, I. (2009) ‘The principal-agent approach to EU studies: Apply liberally but handle with care’, Comparative European Politics, 7(4): 409–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bini Smaghi, L. B. (2004) ‘A single EU seat in the IMF?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 42(2): 229–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, G. and Willett, T. D. (2004) ‘IMF conditionality, implementation and the new political economy of ownership’, Comparative Economic Studies, 46(3): 423–450.
   Google Scholar
• Boren, J. H., (1972) When in doubt, mumble: a bureaucrat's handbook, New York: Van Nostrand-Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Boughton, J. M. (2001) Silent Revolution: The International Monetary Fund, 1979–89, Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Broome, A. (2013) ‘The politics of IMF–EU co-operation: institutional change from the Maastricht Treaty to the launch of the euro’, Journal of European Public Policy, 2(4): 89–605.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, K., Oliver, C. and Johnston, T. (2010) ‘Asia sees double standards in IMF Greek rescue’, Financial Times, 30 April.
   Google Scholar
• Broz, J. L. and Hawes, M. B. (2006) ‘US domestic politics and international monetary fund policy. Delegation and agency in international organizations’ in D. G. Hawkins, D. A. Lake, D. L. Nielson and M. J. Tierney (eds) Delegation and agency in international organizations, Cambridge: University Press, pp. 77–106.
   Google Scholar
• Buiter, W. H. (2007) “Country ownership”: a term whose time has gone’, Development in practice, 17(4–5): 647–652.
   Google Scholar
• Charter, D., Bremner, C. and Watson, R. (2010) ‘EU leaders on verge of a deal to rescue Greece and save the Euro’, The Times, 11 February.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, B. (2003) ‘Can the euro ever challenge the dollar?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 41(4): 575–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commission (2008) ‘Commission proposal for a Council Decision providing Community medium-term financial assistance for Hungary’, COM(2008) 716 final.
   Google Scholar
• Commission (2009a) ‘Memorandum of Understanding between the European Community and the Republic of Latvia’. Full text available at: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/eu_borrower/balance_of_payments/pdf/mou_bop_latvia_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Commission (2009b) ‘Supplemental Memorandum of Understanding between the European Community and the Republic of Latvia’ Full text available at: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/eu_borrower/balance_of_payments/pdf/mou_add1_bop_latvia_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Commission (2009c) ‘Recommendation for a Council Recommendation to Ireland with a view to bringing to an end the situation of an excessive deficit’, SEC(2009) 568 final.
   Google Scholar
• Commission (2010a) ‘Commission visit to Hungary for informal discussions’, IP/10/712.
   Google Scholar
• Commission (2010b) ‘Recommendation for a Council Decision giving notice to Greece to take measures for the deficit reduction judged necessary in order to remedy the situation of excessive deficit’, SEC(2010) 93 final.
   Google Scholar
• Commission (2013) “Two-Pack” enters into force, completing budgetary surveillance cycle and further improving economic governance for the euro area’, MEMO/13/457, Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Copelovitch, M. S. (2010) ‘Master or servant? Common agency and the political economy of IMF lending’, International Studies Quarterly, 54(1): 49–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, M. (1983) ‘High Conditionality Lending: The United Kingdom’ in J. Williamson (ed.) IMF Conditionality, Washington DC: Institute for International Economics, pp. 421–439.
   Google Scholar
• Darling, A. (2012) Back from the Brink: 1000 Days at Number 11, London: Atlantic Books.
   Google Scholar
• de Schoutheete, P. (2012) ‘The European Council’ in J. Peterson and M. Shackleton (eds) The institutions of the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 43–67.
   Google Scholar
• Drazen, A. (2002) ‘Conditionality and Ownership in IMF Lending: A Political Economy Approach’, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 3562.
   Google Scholar
• Elgie, R. (2002) ‘The politics of the European Central Bank: principal-agent theory and the democratic deficit’, Journal of European Public Policy, 9(2): 186–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EU Heads of State or Government (2010) ‘Statement by the Heads of State or Government of the European Union’, Brussels, 10 February.
   Google Scholar
• Euro Area Heads of State or Government (2010) ‘Statement by the Heads of State of Government’, Brussels, 25 March.
   Google Scholar
• Eurogroup (2011) ‘Statement by the Eurogroup’, Brussels: Council of Ministers of the European Union, 2 July.
   Google Scholar
• Eurogroup (2012) ‘Eurogroup Statement on Greece’, 27 November 2012.
   Google Scholar
• European Council (2010), ‘Conclusions’, Nr: EUCO 7/10, 25–26 March.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, D.C. (2010) ‘Merkel praised in Germany for hard line on Greece debt crisis’, Christian Science Monitor, 26 March.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, C., Barber, T. and Oakley, D. (2010) ‘IMF calls for eurozone reform’, Financial Times, May 11.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, E. R. (2006) Money talks: The International Monetary Fund, conditionality and supplementary financiers, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goyal, R., Brooks, P. K., Pradhan, M., Tressel, T. and Dell’Ariccia, G. (2013) ‘A Banking Union for the Euro Area’, IMF Staff Discussion Note No. 13/01, Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Gros, D. (2003) A Stability Pact for Public Debt, Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, D. G., Lake, D. A., Nielson, D. L. and Tierney, M. J. (2006) ‘Delegation under anarchy: states, international organizations, and principal-agent theory’ in D. G. Hawkins, D. A. Lake, D. L. Nielson and M. J. Tierney (eds) Delegation and agency in international organizations, Cambridge: University Press, pp. 3–38.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. (2011) Governing the Euro Area in Good Times and Bad, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. (2013) ‘The Little Engine That Wouldn't: Supranational Entrepreneurship and the Barroso Commission’, Journal of European Integration, 35(3): 301–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IMF (2011) ‘Hungary: Ex Post Evaluation of Exceptional Access Under the 2008 Stand-By Arrangement’ IMF Country Report No. 11/145.
   Google Scholar
• IMF (2012) ‘Annual Report of the Executive Board for the Financial Year Ended April 30, 2012’, Washington DC: IMF.
   Google Scholar
• IMF (2013) ‘Greece: Ex Post Evaluation of Exceptional Access under the 2010 Stand-By Arrangement’, IMF Country Report No. 13/156.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, J.K. and Laatikainen, K.V. (eds) (2013) Routledge Handbook on Europe and International Institutions: Performance, Policy, Power, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, M. S., and Sharma, S. (2001) ‘IMF Conditionality and Country Ownership of Programs’ IMF Working Paper WP/02/142, Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Kofman, F. and Lawarree, J. (1996) ‘A prisoner's dilemma model of collusion deterrence’, Journal of Public Economics, 59(1): 117–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornelius, S. (2013) Angela Merkel: The Chancellor and her World, London: Alma Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, R.A. (1994) ‘Confusion and Conflict? Diverging Interpretations of the European Convention on Human Rights in Strasbourg and Luxembourg’ in R.A. Lawson and M. de Blois (eds) The Dynamics of the Protection of Human Rights in Europe – Essays in Honour of Professor Henry G. Schermers vol. III, Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. 219–252.
   Google Scholar
• Lombardi, D. and Woods, N. (2008) ‘The politics of influence: An analysis of IMF surveillance’, Review of International Political Economy, 15(5): 711–739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lütz, S. and Kranke, M. (2014) ‘The European rescue of the Washington Consensus? EU and IMF lending to Central and Eastern European countries’, Review of International Political Economy, 21(2): 310–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L. L. (2006) ‘Distribution, information, and delegation to international organizations: The case of IMF conditionality’ in D. G. Hawkins, D. A. Lake, D. L. Nielson and M. J. Tierney (eds) Delegation and agency in international organizations, Cambridge: University Press, pp. 140–64.
   Google Scholar
• McCubbins, M. D. and Schwartz, T. (1984) ‘Congressional oversight overlooked: Police patrols versus fire alarms’, American Journal of Political Science, 28(1): 165–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, K. R. and Meunier, S. (2002) ‘Between national sovereignty and international power: what external voice for the euro?’, International Affairs, 78(4): 849–868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Latvia (2008) ‘Convergence Programme of the Republic of Latvia 2008–2011’. Full text available at: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/economic_governance/sgp/pdf/20_scps/2009–10/01_programme/lv_2010-01-29_cp_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mitnick, B. M. (1975) ‘The theory of agency’, Public Choice, 24(1): 27–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (1999) ‘A new statecraft? Supranational entrepreneurs and international cooperation’, International organization, 53(2): 267–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moschella, M. (2012) ‘IMF Surveillance in Crisis: The Past, Present and Future of the Reform Process’, Global Society, 26(1): 43–60.
   Google Scholar
• Nic Shuibhne, N. (2012) ‘The European Court of Justice’ in J. Peterson and M. Shackleton (eds) The institutions of the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 148–169.
   Google Scholar
• Panagiotarea, E. (2013) Greece in the Euro: Economic Delinquency or System Failure? Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pisani-Ferry, J., Sapir, A. and Wolff, G. B. (2011) An evaluation of IMF surveillance of the euro area, Brussels: Bruegel.
   Google Scholar
• Pisani-Ferry, J., Sapir, A. and Wolff, G. B. (2013) EU-IMF assistance to euro area countries: an early assessment, Brussels: Bruegel.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, M. (2007) ‘Principal-Agent Analysis and International Delegation: Red Herrings, Theoretical Clarifications and Empirical Disputes’. Bruges Political Research Papers, (2).
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, M. A. (1997) ‘Delegation, agency, and agenda setting in the European Community’, International organization, 51(1): 99–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollack, M. A. (2003) The engines of European integration: delegation, agency, and agenda setting in the EU, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, C. (2012) The IMF and European Economies: Crisis and Conditionality, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sarooshi, D. (2005) International Organizations and Their Exercise of Sovereign Powers, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schäuble, W. (2010) ‘Why Europe's monetary union faces its biggest crisis’, Financial Times, 12 March.
   Google Scholar
• Scheepens, J. P. J. F. (1995) ‘Financial intermediation and corporate finance. An analysis of agency problems and optimal contracts’, Doctoral dissertation, PhD thesis, Tilburg: Tilburg University.
   Google Scholar
• Spaventa, L. (1983) ‘Two Letters of Intent: External Crises and Stabilization Policy, Italy, 1973–77’ in J. Williamson (ed) IMF conditionality, Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, pp. 441–73.
   Google Scholar
• Spiegel, P. (2012) ‘Will Lagarde's euro plan become Europe's?’, Financial Times, Brussels Blog, 22 June.
   Google Scholar
• Spiegel, P. and Hope, K. (2013) ‘Rehn bridles at IMF attack on rescue’, Financial Times, 8 June.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss-Kahn, D. (2010) ‘After the Global Financial Crisis—The Road Ahead for Europe’, Address at the Warsaw School of Economics, Warsaw, Poland, March 29, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Strausz, R. (1997) ‘Delegation of monitoring in a principal-agent relationship’, The Review of Economic Studies, 64(3): 337–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallberg, J. (2003) European Governance and Supranational Institutions: Making States Comply, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tirole, J. (1992), ‛Collusion and the Theory of Organizations,’ in J.-J. Laffont (ed.) Advances in Economic Theory: Sixth World Congress, Volume 2, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 151–206.
   Google Scholar
• Vaubel, R. (2006) ‘ Principal-agent problems in international organizations’, The Review of International Organizations, 1(2): 125–138.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, H. (2010) ‘An institutional anatomy and five policy modes’ in H. Wallace, M. Pollack and A. Young (eds.) Policy-making in the European Union, 6th edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 69–104.
   Google Scholar