Soft power with a hard edge: EU policy tools and energy security

References

• Abdelal, R. (2013) ‘The profits of power: commerce and realpolitik in Eurasia’, Review of International Political Economy 20(3): 421–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alden, C., Large, D., and Oliveira, R. S. (2007) China Returns to Africa: A Rising Power and a Continent Embrace, London: C. Hurst Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Armitage, R. and Nye, J. S. Jr. (2007) A Smarter and Safer America, Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) Commission on Smart Power.
   Google Scholar
• Ashton, C. (2011) ‘A world built on co-operation, sovereignty, democracy and stability’, European Commission – SPEECH/11/126. Available from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-11-126_en.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M. S. (1962) ‘Two faces of power’, American Political Science Review 56(4): 947–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamberger, C. and Waelde, T. (2007) ‘The energy charter treaty’, in R. Marta, R. Catherine, I. D. Guayo and R. Anita (eds) Energy Law in Europe. National, EU and International Law and Institutions, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 145–95.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, M. and Duvall, R. (2005) ‘Power in international politics’, International Organization 59(1): 39–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, E. (2011) ‘Putin pledges to follow Gazprom Antitrust Inquiry.’ New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• Begg, l. (1996) ‘Introduction: regulation in the European Union.’ Journal of European Public Policy 3(4): 525–35.
   Google Scholar
• Belyi, A. V. (2009) A Russian Perspective on the Energy Charter Treaty (ARI), Madrid: Real Instituto Elcano.
   Google Scholar
• Birchfield, V. L. and Duffield, J. S. (eds) (2011) Toward a Common European Union Energy Policy. Problems, Progress, and Prospects, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bradford, A. (2012) ‘The Brussels effect’, Northwestern University Law Review 107(1): 1–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buschle, D. (2011) ‘The enforcement of energy law in wider Europe’, in S. Hirsbrunner, D. Buschle and C. Kaddous (eds) European Energy Law/Droit Européen de l'énergie, Brussels: Bruylant, pp. 303–42.
   Google Scholar
• Chee, F. Y. and Sytas, A. (2013) ‘EU preparing to charge Gazprom in antitrust case’, Reuters, 03 October.
   Google Scholar
• Colgan, J. D. (2013) ‘Fueling the fire. Pathways from oil to war. International Security 38(2): 147–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. (2004) ‘Hard power, soft power and the goals of diplomacy’, in D. Held and M. Koenig-Archibugi (eds) American Power in the 21st Century, Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 167–80.
   Google Scholar
• Cottier, T., Matteotti-Berkutova S. and Nartova, O. (2010) ‘Third country relations in EU unbundling of natural gas markets: the “Gazprom clause” of directive 2009/73 EC and WTO law’, Working Paper 2010(06), Bern: NCCR, pp. 16.
   Google Scholar
• Damro, C. (2012) ‘Market power Europe’, Journal of European Public Policy 19(5): 682–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Hauteclocque, A. (2008) ‘EC antitrust enforcement in the aftermath of the energy sector inquiry: a focus on long-term supply contracts in electricity and gas’, in B. Delvaux, M. Hunt and K. Talus (eds) EU Energy Law and Policy Issues, Brussels: Euroconfidentiel.
   Google Scholar
• Drezner, D. W. (2007) All Politics Is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eliassen, K. A. and Sitter, N. (2003) ‘Ever Closer Co-operation? The Limits of the ‘Norwegian Method’ of European Integration’, Scandinavian Political Studies 26(2): 125–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2012) ‘Antitrust: Commission opens proceedings against Gazprom.’ [Press release]. 04 September.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2013) ‘Energy: Commission unveils list of 250 infrastructure projects that may qualify for €5,85 billion of funding.’ [Press release]. 14 October.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014) ‘Commission launches negotiations with Georgia to join the Energy Community.’ [Press Release IP/14/170]. 20 February.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. (2011) Conclusions on Energy, European Council of 4 February 2011. Brussels: European Council.
   Google Scholar
• European Investment Bank. (2010) ‘EBRD, EIB and IFC start appraisal of Nabucco pipeline.’ [Press release]. 06 September.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and the Council. (1998) Directive 98/30/EC concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas, 22 June. Brussels: European Parliament and Council of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and the Council. (2003) Directive 2003/55/EC concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas and repealing Directive 98/30/EC, 26 June. Brussels: European Parliament and Council of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and the Council. (2009) Directive 2009/73/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas and repealing Directive 2003/55/EC. Brussels: European Parliament and Council of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2012) ‘Energy production and imports.’ accessed at http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/energy/data/main_tables, 21 November 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, P. C. and Downs, E. S. (2006) ‘Untangling China's quest for oil through state-backed financial deals’, Brookings Policy Brief No. 154, Washington DC: Brookings Institution, pp. 7.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, C. (2011) Hard Power and Soft Power: The Utility of Military Force as an Instrument of Policy in the 21st Century, Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hibbs, M. (2013) ‘Uranium in Saharan Sands: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.’ accessed at http://carnegieendowment.org/2013/01/22/uranium-in-saharan-sands/f4ej, 27 February 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, C. (1993) ‘The capability-expectations gap, or conceptualizing Europe's international role’, Journal of Common Market Studies 31(3): 305–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hirschausen, C. (2011) ‘Financing trans-European energy infrastructures – past, present and perspectives’, Notre Europe Policy Paper No. 48, Paris: Notre Europe, pp. 74.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1983) The Tools of Government, London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde-Price, A. (2006) ‘“Normative” power Europe: a realist critique’, Journal of European Public Policy 13(2): 217–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IHS CERA. (2010) Caspian Development Corporation. Final Implementation Report, Washington DC: IHS.
   Google Scholar
• Keating, D. (2013) South Stream must be renegotiated – commission. European Voice, 05 December.
   Google Scholar
• Kuzemko, C., Belyi, A., Goldthau, A. and Keating, M. (eds) 2012. Dynamics of Energy Governance in Europe and Russia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Laïdi, Z. (ed) (2008) EU Foreign Policy in a Globalized World. Normative Power and Social Policies, Garnet Series: Europe in the World, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lavenex, S. (2014) ‘The power of functionalist extension: how EU rules travel’, Journal of European Public Policy 21(6): 885–903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodge, M. (2008) ‘Regulation, the regulatory state and European politics’, West European Politics 31(1/2): 280–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. (1974) Power: A Radical View. London: MacMillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Majone, G. (1996) Regulating Europe. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McGowan, L. E. E. and Wilks, S. (1995) ‘The first supranational policy in the European Union: competition policy’, European Journal of Political Research 28(2): 141–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meunier, S. and Nicolaidis, K. (2006) ‘The European Union as a conflicted trade power’, Journal of European Public Policy 13(6): 906–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, M. (2002) ‘Review article: understanding the regulatory state’, British Journal of Political Science 32(2): 391–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (2010, March) ‘Europe, the second superpower’, Current History 109(725): 91–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noreng, O. (2006) Crude Power: Politics and the Oil Market, London: I.B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, J. S. (2011) The Future of Power, New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, J. S. Jr. (2008) ‘Public diplomacy and soft power’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616(1): 94–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye, J. S. Jr. (2009) ‘Get Smart: Combining Hard and Soft Power.’ Foreign Affairs, July/August.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye, J. S. Jr. (2004) Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics, New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• OAO Gazprom. (2013) Gazprom in Figures 2008–2012. Factbook, Moscow: OAO Gazprom.
   Google Scholar
• O'Sullivan, M. (2013) ‘The entanglement of energy, grand strategy, and international security’, in A. Goldthau (ed) Wiley Handbook of Global Energy Policy, London: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 30–47.
   Google Scholar
• Pelkmans, J. (2001) ‘The GSM standard: explaining a success story’, Journal of European Public Policy 8(3): 432–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley, A. (2012) ‘Commission v. Gazprom: the antitrust clash of the decade?’ CEPS Policy Brief No. 285, 31 October. Brussels: CEPS.
   Google Scholar
• Schattschneider, E. E. (1960) The Semi-sovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Shapovalova, N. (2010) ‘The battle for Ukraine's energy allegiance’, FRIDE Policy Brief No. 55, September. Madrid: FRIDE.
   Google Scholar
• Shiryaevskaya, A. and Krukowska, E. (2010) ‘EU says Russia, Poland negotiations on new gas supply deal are “very good”’, Bloomberg, 08 September. New York: Bloomberg.
   Google Scholar
• Sitter, N. (2001) ‘Dancing to the European tune? Comparing Scandinavian competition policy reform’, CEAR Report, Oslo: The Norwegian School of Management BI.
   Google Scholar
• Sitter, N. (2005) ‘European Organisations: From negotiated design to overlapping competencies and quasi-membership’, in M. P. van der Hoek (ed) Handbook on Public Policy and Administration in the EU, New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, pp. 49–73.
   Google Scholar
• Sjursen, H. (2006) ‘The EU as a “normative power”: how can this be?’ Journal of European Public Policy 13(2): 235–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K. (2006) ‘Security implications of Russian energy policies’, CEPS Policy Brief No. 90, Brussels: CEPS.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. (2008) Russia and European Energy Security: Divide and Dominate, Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, L. M. (2002) The Tools of Government: A Guide to New Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, P. (2010) The ‘Shale Gas Revolution’: Hype and Reality, London: Chatham House.
   Google Scholar
• Stulberg, A. N. (2012) ‘Strategic bargaining and pipeline politics: confronting the credible commitment problem in Eurasian energy transit’, Review of International Political Economy 19(5): 808–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talus, K. (2011) ‘Long-term natural gas contracts and antitrust law in the European Union and the United States’, Journal of World Energy Law & Business 4(3): 260–315i.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talus, K. (2012) ‘Winds of change: long-term gas contracts and the changing energy paradigms in the European Union’, in C. Kuzemko, M. Keating, A. Goldthau and A. Belyi (eds) Dynamics of Energy Governance in Europe and Russia, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 227–42.
   Google Scholar
• Whitman, R. G. (2011) Normative Power Europe: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives, London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Wilks, S. (1996) ‘Regulatory compliance and capitalist diversity in Europe’, Journal of European Public Policy 3(4): 536–59.
   Google Scholar
• Willey, D. (2012) ‘Italy and Libya move to re-establish old friendship’, BBC News, 04 February.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. J. III. (2008) ‘Hard power, soft power, smart power’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616(1): 110–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yergin, D. (1991) The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money, and Power, New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Yergin, D. (2006) ‘Ensuring energy security’, Foreign Affairs 85(2): 69–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youngs, R. (2009) Energy Security: Europe's New Foreign Policy Challenge. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zielonka, J. (2008) ‘Europe as a global actor: empire by example?’ International Affairs 84(3): 471–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar