The domestic battle over the design of non-trade issues in preferential trade agreements

References

• Aaronson, S. A. (2007) ‘A match made in the corporate and public interest: marrying voluntary CSR initiatives and the WTO’, Journal of World Trade 41(3): 629–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aaronson, S. A. and Zimmerman, J. M. (2008) Trade Imbalance: The Struggle to Weigh Human Rights Concerns in Trade Policymaking, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Abbott, K. W., Keohane, R. O., Moravcsik, A., Slaughter, A.-M. and Snidal, D. (2000) ‘The concept of legalization’, International Organization 54(3): 401–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AFL-CIO (2016) Recent Trade Agreements. Available from: http://www.aflcio.org/Issues/Trade/Recent-Trade-Agreements.
   Google Scholar
• Aggarwal, V. K. and Govella, K. (2013) Linking Trade and Security: Evolving Institutions and Strategies in Asia, Europe, and the United States. The Political Economy of the Asia Pacific, New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Aggarwal, V. K. and Lee, S., editors (2011) Trade Policy in the Asia-Pacific: The Role of Ideas, Interests, and Domestic Institutions. The Political Economy of the Asia Pacific, New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ahnlid, A. (2013) ‘The trade do-gooder? Linkages in EU free trade agreement negotiations,’ In Linking trade and security, The Political Economy of the Asia Pacific, New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Alliance Sud ( 16 December 2010) FTA with China: Focusing on Human Rights. Available from: http://www.alliancesud.ch/en/policy/trade/fta-china-and-human-rights.
   Google Scholar
• Baccini, L., Du¨r, A. and Haftel, Y. Z. (2015) ‘Imitation and innovation in international Governance: the diffusion of trade agreement design,’ In Trade Cooperation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, M. B. (2005) ‘No country left behind: the exporting of U. S. legal norms under the guise of economic integration,’ Emory International Law Review, 19(3).
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, L. (2005) Human Rights Conditionality in the EU's International Agreements. Oxford studies in European law. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bechtel, M. M., Bernauer, T. and Meyer, R. (2012) ‘The green side of protectionism: environmental concerns and three facets of trade policy preferences’, Review of International Political Economy 19(5): 837–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhagwati, J. N. and Hudec, R. E., editors (1996) Fair trade and harmonization: Prerequisites for free trade?, volume 1 of economic analysis, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhagwati, J. N. and Srinivasan, T. N. (1983) ‘On the choice between capital and labour mobility’, Journal of International Economics 14(3–4): 209–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, A. L. (1995) The economics of the trade union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Business Europe (November 2014) Trade-Roadmap for the European Commission. Available from: file:///C:/Users/b1002720/Desktop/businesseurope.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, M. A. and Tomlin, B. W. (2002) The Making of NAFTA: How the Deal was Done, 1ts ed., Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chase, K. A. (2003) ‘Economic interests and regional trading arrangements: the case of NAFTA’, International Organization 57(1): 137–74.
   Google Scholar
• Chauffour, J.-P. and Maur, J.-C., editors (2011) Preferential Trade Agreement Policies for Development: A Handbook. Washington , DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Chipman, J. S. (1969) ‘Factor price equalization and the Stolper-Samuelson theorem,’ International Economic Review 10(3): 399–406.
   Google Scholar
• Cingranelli, D. L., Richards, D. L. and Chad Clay, K. (2014) ‘CIRI Human Rights Data Projekt’, Available from: http://humanrightsdata.com.
   Google Scholar
• Coase, R. H. (1960) The problem of social cost. The journal of law & economics 3: 1–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CTU ( 29 May 2009) CTU Submission on a Proposed New Zealand-India Free Trade Agreement. Available from: http://union.org.nz/policy/submission-on-proposed-new-zealand-india-free-trade-agreement.
   Google Scholar
• Du¨r, A. and Bievre, D. d. (2007) ‘Inclusion without influence? NGOs in European trade policy’, Journal of Public Policy 27(01): 79.
   Google Scholar
• Du¨r, A., Lechner, L. and Morin, J.-F. ( 3 May 2016) Mapping the trade and environment Nexus: Insights from a new dataset.
   Google Scholar
• Eckhardt, J. (2013) ‘EU unilateral trade policy-making: What role for import-dependent firms?’ Journal of Common Market Studies 51(6): 989–1005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EurActiv ( 17 March 2011) Indian pharma firms, NGOs oppose EU free trade deal. Available from: http://www.euractiv.com/trade/indian-pharmaceuticals-ngos-eu-oppose-free-trade-agreement-news-503025.
   Google Scholar
• EurWORK ( 27 January 1998) ETUC calls for social clauses in trade agreements. Available from: http://eurofound.europa.eu/es/observatories/eurwork/articles/working-conditions-other-social-policies/etuc-calls-for-social-clauses-in-trade-agreements.
   Google Scholar
• Fearon, J. D. (1994) ‘Domestic political audiences and the escalation of international disputes’, The American Political Science Review 88(3): 577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flam, H. and Helpman, E. (1987) ‘Vertical product differentiation and North-South trade’, The American Economic Review 77(5): 810–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontagn´e, L., Gaulier, G. and Zignago, S. (2008) ‘Specialization across varieties and North-South competition’, Economic Policy 23(53): 51–91.
   Google Scholar
• Gabel, M. J. and Huber, J. D. (2000) ‘Putting parties in their place: inferring party left-right ideological positions from party manifestos data’, American Journal of Political Science 44(1): 94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawande, K. and Hoekman, B. (2006) ‘Lobbying and agricultural trade policy in the United States’, International Organization 60(3): 527–61.
   Google Scholar
• Gillman, E. (2009) Legal transplants in trade and investment agreements: Understanding the exportation of U.S. law to Latin America. Georgetown Journal of International Law 41(1): 263–83.
   Google Scholar
• Greenpeace (July 2014) Dirty Deals: How Trade Talks Threaten to Undermine EU Climate Policies and Bring Tar Sands to Europe. Available from: http://www.greenpeace.org/eu-unit/Global/eu-unit/reports-briefings/2014/foee-fqd-trade-ttip-170714.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, G. M. and Helpman, E. (1995) ‘The politics of free-trade agreements’, The American Economic Review 85(4): 667–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grynberg, R. and Qalo, V. (2006) ‘Labour standards in US and EU preferential trade agreements’, Journal of World Trade 40(4): 619–53. Available from: https://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=TRAD2006033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner-Burton, E. M. (2009) Forced to be Good: Why Trade Agreements Boost Human Rights. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heinen, T. (1996) Latent Class and Discrete Latent Trait Models: Similarities and Differences, volume 6 of Advanced quantitative techniques in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, H., Mavroidis, P. C. and Sapir, A. (2010) ‘Beyond the WTO? An anatomy of EU and US preferential trade agreements’, The world Economy: The Leading Journal on International Economic Relations 33(11): 1565–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ILO (2015) The Social Dimensions of Free Trade Agreements. Available from: http://www.ilo.org/global/research/publications/WCMS_228965/lang–en/index.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K. (2002) The WTO core agreement, non-trade issues and institutional integrity. World Trade Review 1(3): 257–76.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, T. (2011) NAFTA and the Politics of Labor Transnationalism. Cambridge studies in contentious politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M. (2012) ‘Ex Ante due diligence: formation of PTAs and protection of labor rights’, International Studies Quarterly 56(4): 704–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohl, T., Brakman, S. and Garretsen, H. (2016) ‘Do trade agreements stimulate international trade differently? Evidence from 296 trade agreements’, The World Economy 39(1): 97–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K¨onig, T., Marbach, M. and Osnabrugge, M. (2013) ‘Estimating party positions across countries and time–a dynamic latent variable model for manifesto data’, Political Analysis 21(4): 468–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koremenos, B., Lipson, C. and Snidal, D. (2001) ‘The rational design of international institutions’, International Organization 55(4): 761–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krings, T. (2009) ‘A race to the bottom? trade unions, EU enlargement and the free movement of labour’, European Journal of Industrial Relations 15(1): 49–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, A. O. (1997) ‘Free trade agreements versus customs unions’, Journal of Development Economics 54(1): 169–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. (1997) ‘What should trade negotiators negotiate about?’ Journal of Economic Literature 35(1): 113–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kucik, J. (2012) ‘The domestic politics of institutional design: Producer preferences over trade agreement rules’, Economics & Politics 24(2): 95–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahidji and Karim ( 3 September 2014) EU-Vietnam: FIDH and VCHR submit a Complaint to EU Ombudsperson. Available from: http://www.corporatejustice.org/EU-Vietnam-FIDH-and-VCHR-submit-a-Complaint-to-EU-Ombudsperson?lang=en.
   Google Scholar
• Lavenex, S. and Schimmelfennig, F. (2009) ‘EU rules beyond EU borders: theorizing external governance in European politics’, Journal of European Public Policy 16(6): 791–812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leebron, D. W. (2002) ‘Linkages’, The American Journal of International Law 96(1): 5–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liedong, T. A., Ghobadian, A., Rajwani, T. and O'Regan, N. (2014) ‘Toward a view of comple-mentarity: trust and policy influence effects of corporate social responsibility and corporate political activity’, Group & Organization Management 40(3):405–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim˜ao, N. (2007) ‘Are preferential trade agreements with non-trade objectives a stumbling block for multilateral liberalization?’ Review of Economic Studies 74(3):821–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahe, L. P. (1997) ‘Environment and quality standards in the WTO: new protectionism in agricultural trade? a European perspective’, European Review of Agricultural Economics 24(3–4): 480–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manger, M. S. (2009) Investing in Protection: The Politics of Preferential Trade Agreements Between North and South. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marvel, H. P. and Ray, E. J. (1987) ‘Intraindustry trade: sources and effects on protection’, Journal of Political Economy 95(6): 1278–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mary Jane, B. ( 13 December 2001) CRS Report for Congress: U.S.-Jordan Free Trade Agreement. Available from: http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2011/m1/1/high_res_d/RL30652_2001Dec13.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, J. F. and Moffitt, R. A. (1980) ‘The uses of Tobit analysis’, The Review of Economics and Statistics 62(2): 318–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milewicz, K., Hollway, J., Peacock, C. and Snidal, D. (2016) ‘Beyond trade: why do states include non-trade issues in trade agreements?’ Forthcoming in Journal of Conflict Resolution. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303631072_Beyond_Trade_The_Expanding_Scope_of_the_Non-Trade_Agenda_in_Trade_Agreements.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, E. A. and Banaszak-Holl, J. (2005) ‘Cognitive and normative determinants of state policymaking behavior: lessons from the sociological institutionalism’, Publius 35(2): 191–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. M. (2003) ‘A typology of legal transplants: Using sociology, legal history and Argentine examples to explain the transplant process’, The American Journal of Comparative Law 51(4): 839–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner, H. V. (1988) Resisting Protectionism: Global Industries and the Politics of International Trade. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 11.
   Google Scholar
• Mosley, L. and Uno, S. (2007) ‘Racing to the bottom or climbing to the top? Economic globalization and collective labor rights’, Comparative Political Studies 40(8): 923–48.
   Google Scholar
• Neuendorf, K. A. (2002) The Content Analysis Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA and London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C. and Wallis, J. J. (1994) ‘Integrating institutional change and technical change in economic history a transaction cost approach’, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 150(4): 609–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postnikov, E. (2014) ‘The design of social standards in EU and US preferential trade agreements,’ in Handbook of the International Political Economy of Trade, Handbooks of Research on International Political Economy series, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 531–49.
   Google Scholar
• Postnikov, E. and Bastiaenes, I. (2014) ‘Does dialogue work? The effectiveness of labor standards in EU preferential trade agreements’, Journal of European Public Policy 21(6): 923–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raess, D. and Sari, D. (2016) LABPTA: Labour Provisions in Preferential Trade Agreements. Project description available from: http://www.snis.ch/project.
   Google Scholar
• Rasch, G. (1980) Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment tests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer, G. C. and Pollack, M. A. (2010) ‘Hard v. soft law: alternatives, complements, and antagonists in international governance,’ Minnesota Law Review 94(3): 702–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, B. A. (2009) Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press u.a, 1. publ edition.
   Google Scholar
• Spagnolo, G. (2001) ‘Issue linkage, credible delegation, and policy cooperation’, CEPR Discussion Paper (2778): 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Spilker, G. and B¨ohmelt, T. (2012) ‘The impact of preferential trade agreements on governmental repression revisited’, The Review of International Organizations 8(3): 343–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steward, R. B. (1993) ‘The NAFTA: trade, competition, environmental protection’, The International Lawyer 27(3): 751–64.
   Google Scholar
• Strassel, K. A. ( 25 November 2011) ‘Stinging up Gibson guitar’, Wall Street Journal. Available from: http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052970204443404577054370383139472.
   Google Scholar
• Tobin, J. (1958) ‘Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables’, Econometrica 26(1): 24–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomz, M. (2007) ‘Domestic audience costs in international relations: an experimental approach’, International Organization 61(4): 821–40.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1991) ‘Loss aversion in riskless choice: a reference-dependent model’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106(4): 1039–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernon, R. (1966) ‘International investment and international trade in the product cycle’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 80(2): 190–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, D. (2013) ‘Global trade linkages: national security and human security’, in Linking Trade and Security, The Political Economy of the Asia Pacific. New York: Springer, pp. 23–48.
   Google Scholar
• Volkens, A., Lehmann, P., Regel, S., Merz, N. and Schultze, H. (2014) The manifesto data collection: Version 2014b. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin fu¨r Sozialforschung. Available from: https://manifestoproject.wzb.eu/datasets?archived=yes.
   Google Scholar
• Walmart (2012) Walmart statement on U.S.–Korea free trade agreement. Available from: http://news.walmart.com/news-archive/2010/12/03/walmart-statement-on-us-korea-free-trade-agreement.
   Google Scholar
• Warm, T. A. (1989) ‘Weighted likelihood estimation of ability in item response theory’, Psychometrika 54(3): 427–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WTO Appelate Body (1998) Dispute 8. Available from: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/envir_e/edis08_e.htm.
   Google Scholar
• WTO Appelate Body (2015) Dispute DS381. Available from: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds381_e.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Yasar, M. (2013) ‘Political influence of exporting and import-competing firms: evidence from eastern European and Central Asian countries’, World Development 51: 154–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, A. R. (2016) ‘Not your parents’ trade politics: the transatlantic trade and investment partnership negotiations’, Review of International Political Economy 23(3): 1–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar