Ratcheting up protective regulations in the shadow of the WTO: NGO strategy and food safety standard-setting in India

References

• AOAC International. (2008) ‘GC/MS and LC/MS/MS methods for the determination of pesticides residues in soft drinks and sports beverages granted AOAC official method status’, Journal of AOAC International 91(2): 37A–39A.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, A. (2006) ‘India's storm in a Cola Cup’, Time International (South Pacific Edition). August 21, p. 10.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1995) Ecological Politics in an Age of Risk, Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bonneuil, C. and Levidow, L. (2011) ‘How does the World Trade Organization know?’, Social Studies of Science 42: 75–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J. and Drahos, P. (2000) Global Business Regulation, Cambridge: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Bremner, B. and Lakshman, N. (2006) ‘India: Pesticide claims shake up Coke and Pepsi’, BusinessWeek Online August 11, p. 4.
   Google Scholar
• Burawoy, M. (1991) ‘The extended case method’, in M Burawoy et al., (eds) Ethnography Unbound, Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 271–287.
   Google Scholar
• Business Standard. 2003. ‘Pepsi chief slams EU norms’, August 31. http://www.business-standard.com/bsonline/storypage.php?autono=136182&leftnm=1
   Google Scholar
• Büthe, T. and Harris, N. (2011) ‘Codex alimentarius commission’ in T. Hale and D. Held (eds.) Handbook of Transnational Governance: New Institutions and Innovations, Cambridge: Polity, pp. 219–228.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L. (2004) Institutional Change and Globalization, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Capling, A. and Nossal, K. R. (2003) ‘Parliament and the democratization of foreign policy: the case of Australia's joint standing committee on treaties’, Canadian Journal of Political Science 36(4): 835–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chafe, Z. (2004) ‘Pesticides found in Indian soft drinks’, World Watch, January/February, 9.
   Google Scholar
• Charnovitz, S. (2000) ‘Opening the WTO to non-governmental interests’, Fordham International Law Journal 18(2): 173–216.
   Google Scholar
• Chorev, N. (2005) ‘The institutional project of neo-liberal globalism: The case of the WTO’, Theory and Society 34: 317–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chorev, N. (2007) Remaking US Trade Policy: From Protectionism to Globalization, Ithaca: Cornell.
   Google Scholar
• Chorev, N. and Babb, S. (2009) ‘The crisis of neoliberalism and the future of international institutions’, Theory and Society 38: 459–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Codex (Codex Alimentarius Commission). (1993) Codex Alimentarius Volume Two: Pesticide Residues in Food, 2nd edition. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Conca, K. (2000) ‘The WTO and the undermining of global environmental governance’, Review of International Political Economy 7(3): 484–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conti, J (n.d.) ‘Transnational state-ness: The World Trade Organization and Hierarchy in global affairs’. unpublished manuscript, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R. W. (1987) Production, Power, and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of World History, New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• CSE (Centre for Science and the Environment). (2003a) ‘Can't convince? Confuse!’, Press release, New Delhi, August 17. Available: http://www.rainwaterharvesting.org/cse/aboutus/press_releases/press_20030817.htm
   Google Scholar
• CSE (Centre for Science and the Environment). (2003b) ‘Hard truths about soft drinks’, Press release, New Delhi, August 5. Available: http://www.cseindia.org/userfiles/Aug503-Release%201%20on%20soft%20drinks.pdf
   Google Scholar
• CSE (Centre for Science and the Environment). (2004a) ‘Government committee plays into the hands of soft drink manufacturers’, Press release, New Delhi, June 24. Available: http://www.rainwaterharvesting.org/cse/aboutus/press_releases/press_20040624.htm
   Google Scholar
• CSE (Centre for Science and the Environment). (2004b) ‘Poison vs. nutrition: A briefing paper on pesticide contamination and food safety’, New Delhi. Available: http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/poison.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• CSE (Centre for Science and the Environment). (2006a) ‘CSE demolishes claims made by cola companies’, Press release, New Delhi, August 11. http://www.cseindia.org/userfiles/PR11-8-06(1).pdf
   Google Scholar
• CSE (Centre for Science and the Environment). (2006b) ‘CSE rejects offer to meet Coca-Cola’, Press release, New Delhi, September 6. Available: http://www.cseindia.org/userfiles/press%20release-6-9-06.pdf
   Google Scholar
• CSE (Centre for Science and the Environment). (2006c) ‘If we can drink them, we can test them, says CSE’. Press release, New Delhi, August 14. http://www.cseindia.org/userfiles/press_release-14-8-06.pdf
   Google Scholar
• CSE (Centre for Science and the Environment). (2006d) ‘Sugar and spice’, Down to Earth 15: 20060815, August.
   Google Scholar
• Daemmrich, A. (1998) ‘The evidence does not speak for itself: Expert witnesses and the organization of DNA-typing companies’, Social Studies of Science 28(5-6): 741–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagleton-Pierce, M. (2012) ‘The Competing Kings of Cotton: (Re)framing the WTO African Cotton Initiative’. New Political Economy 17(3):313–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagleton-Pierce, M. (2013) Symbolic Power at the World Trade Organization, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1979) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Freidberg, S. (2004) French Beans and Food Scares: Culture and Commerce in an Anxious Age, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fujimura, J. H. (1996) ‘Crafting science: Standardized packages, boundary objects, and “translation”’, in A Pickering(ed) Science as Practice and Culture, Chicago: University of Chicago, pp. 168–211.
   Google Scholar
• Ganguly, N. K. (2007) Report, National Level Experts Group to Guide Pesticide Residues Sub-Committee of Central Committee for Food Standards Constituted by Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. New Delhi: Indian Council of Medical Research.
   Google Scholar
• Government of India. (2009) ‘Ministry of health and family welfare notification: G.S.R.’ 427(E). Gazette of India. New Delhi, June 17.
   Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. (1983) ‘Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists’, American Sociological Review 48(6): 781–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, T. C. and Carruthers, B. G. (2009) Bankrupt: Global Lawmaking and Systemic Financial Crisis, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, T. C. and Shaffer, G. (2015) Transnational Legal Orders’, in T. C. Halliday and G. Shaffer (eds) Transnational Legal Orders, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hills, J. and Welford, R. (2005) ‘Case study: Coca-Cola and water in India’, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 12: 168–177.
   Google Scholar
• Hopewell, K. (2015) ‘Multilateral trade governance as social field: Global civil society and the WTO’, Review of International Political Economy 22(6): 1128–1158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopewell, K. (2016) ‘Invisible barricades: Civil society and the discourse of the WTO’, Globalizations, DOI: 10.1080/14747731.2016.1162984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indian Express. (2003) ‘Coke and Pepsi dismiss claim, may Sue NGO’. August 6.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (1990) The Fifth Branch: Science Advisors as Policymakers, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (1997) ‘Capitalism and its future: Remarks on regulation, government and governance”’, Review of International Political Economy 4(3): 561–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2002) The Future of the Capitalist State, Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S, Saikia, N, and Kumar, A, (2006) Analysis of Pesticide Residues in Soft Drinks, New Delhi: Centre for Science and the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• JPC (Joint Parliamentary Committee). 2004. Report of the Joint Committee on Pesticide Residues in and Safety Standards for Soft Drinks, Fruit Juice and Other Beverages. Thirteenth Lok Sabha. Presented to Lok Sabha on 4 February, Laid on the table of Rajya Sabha on 4 February. New Delhi: Lok Sabha Secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• Kaup, B. (2013) Market Justice: Political Economic Struggle in Bolivia, New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keck, M and Sikkink, K. (1998) Activists Beyond Borders. Ithaca: Cornell.
   Google Scholar
• Kinchy, A. (2012) Seeds, Science, and Struggle: The Global Politics of Transgenic Crops, Cambridge: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, A. (2011) World Trade Law after Neoliberalism: Re-Imagining the Global Economic Order, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, A. and Scott, J. (2009) ‘The hidden world of WTO governance’, The European Journal of International Law 20(3): 575–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1983) ‘Give me a laboratory and I will raise the world’, in Knorr-Cetina and Mulkay (eds.) Science Observed, London: Sage, pp. 141–170.
   Google Scholar
• Loconto, A. and Busch, L. (2010) ‘Standards, techno-economic networks, and playing fields: Performing the global market economy’, Review of International Political Economy 17(3): 507–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. (2005) Power: A Radical View, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mandavilli, A. (2007) ‘A Breath of fresh air.’ Nature Online 445(7129): 706–708, 15 February.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathur, H. B., Johnson, S, and Kumar, A. (2003) Analysis of Pesticide Residues in Soft Drinks, New Delhi: Centre for Science and the Environment, August 5.
   Google Scholar
• McMichael, P. (2004) Development and Social Change, 3rd Edition. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge.
   Google Scholar
• Moghadam, V. (2009) Globalization and Social Movements: Islamism, Feminism, and the Global Justice Movement, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, H. (2010) The Making of International Trade Policy: NGOs, Agenda-Setting and the WTO, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Narain, S. 2005. ‘World class products.’ Down to Earth 13: 20050228, pp. 19. 27 February.
   Google Scholar
• O'Connell, J. (1993) ‘Metrology: The creation of universality by the circulation of particulars’, Social Studies of Science 23(1): 129–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odell, J. and Sell, S. (2006) ‘Reframing the issue: The WTO coalition on intellectual property and health, 2001’, in J. Odell (ed) Negotiating Trade: Developing Countries in the WTO and NAFTA, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ottinger, G. (2010) ‘Buckets of resistance: standards and effectiveness of citizen science’, Science, Technology, & Human Values 35(2): 244–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overdevest, C. (2010) ‘Comparing forest certification schemes: the case of ratcheting standards in the forest sector’, Socio-Economic Review 8: 47–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overdevest, C. and Zeitlin, J. (2014) ‘Assembling an experimentalist regime: Transnational governance interactions in the forest sector’, Regulation & Governance 8: 22–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peet, R. (2003) Unholy Trinity: The IMF, World Bank and WTO, London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• PepsiCo. (2006) ‘PepsiCo's products are safe’. Press release, August 12. www.pepsicoin.co.in.
   Google Scholar
• Pohland, A. (2009) The Great Collaboration: 25 Years of Change, Gaithersburg: AOAC International.
   Google Scholar
• Poli, S. (2004) ‘The European Community and the adoption of International Food Standards within the Codex Alimentarius Commission’, European Law Journal 10(5): 613–30.
   Google Scholar
• Post, D. L. (2005) ‘The rise of regulatory capitalism: The global diffusion of a new order’, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 598: 168–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quack, S. (ed) (2010) Socio-Economic Review, Special issue on “Law, expertise, and legitimacy in transnational economic governance.” 8(1): 1–210.
   Google Scholar
• Quark, A. (2012) ‘Scientized politics and global governance in the cotton trade: Evaluating divergent theories of scientization’, Review of International Political Economy 19(5): 895–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quark, A. (2013) Global Rivalries: Standards Wars and the Transnational Cotton Trade, Chicago: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Raman, K. (2010) ‘Corporate social responsibility, local livelihood and human rights: The case of Coca-Cola in India’, in K. Raman and R. D. Lipschutz (eds) Corporate Social Responsibility: Comparative Critiques, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 182–200.
   Google Scholar
• Ramesh, R. (2004) ‘Soft-drink giants accused over pesticides’, The Guardian, February 4. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/feb/05/india.randeepramesh
   Google Scholar
• Schurman, R. and Munro, W A. (2010) Fighting for the Future of Food: Activists versus Agribusiness in the Struggle over Biotechnology, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (2003) ‘European regulation of GMOs and the WTO’, Columbia Journal of European Law 9: 213–239.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer, G. (2003) Defending Interests: Public–Private Partnerships in WTO Litigation, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer, G. (2013) Transnational Legal Ordering and State Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer, G. (2015) ‘How the World Trade Organization shapes regulatory governance’, Regulation & Governance 9: 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, S. (1997) ‘Degrees of freedom: the interaction of standards of practice and engineering judgment’, Science, Technology, & Human Values 22(3): 286–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha, A. (2007) ‘The Changing Political Economy of Federalism in India: A Historical Institutionalist Approach’, in B. R. Nayar (ed) Globalization and Politics in India, New Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 477–515.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. and Griesemer, J. R. (1989) ‘Institutional ecology, “translations,” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berekeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39’, Social Studies of Science 19(3): 387–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stecklow, S. (2005) ‘How a global web of activists gives coke problems in India’, Wall Street Journal Online June 7.
   Google Scholar
• The Economist. (2006) ‘The real thing’, August 24. http://www.economist.com/node/7827267
   Google Scholar
• Tickell, A. and Peck, J. (2003) ‘Making global rules: globalization or neoliberalisation?’ in J. Peck and H. Yeung (eds) Remaking the Global Economy, London: Sage, pp. 163–182.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Bossche. (2008) ‘NGO involvement in the WTO: A comparative perspective’, Journal of International Economic Law 11(4): 717–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vedwan, N. (2007) ‘Pesticides in Coca-Cola and Pepsi: Consumerism, brand image, and public interest in a globalizing India’, Cultural Anthropology 22(4): 659–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, M. (2011) ‘Law talk v. science talk: The languages of law and science in WTO Proceedings’. Fordham International Law Journal 35(1):152–200.
   Google Scholar
• WHO (World Health Organization). (1997) Guidelines for Predicting Dietary Intake of Pesticide Residues. WHO/FSF/FOS/97.7. Geneva: WHO.
   Google Scholar
• WHO (World Health Organization). (2011) Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, Fourth edition. Geneva: WHO.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. (2007) ‘Compliance by WTO members with adverse WTO dispute settlement rulings’, Journal of International Economic Law 10(2): 397–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winickoff, D. E. and Bushey, D. M. (2010). ‘Science and power in global food regulation: The rise of codex alimentarius’, Science, Technology, & Human Values 35(3): 356–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WTO (World Trade Organization). (1994) ‘The WTO Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures’. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/sps_e/spsagr_e.htm
   Google Scholar
• WTO (World Trade Organization). (2015) ‘Members and Observers’, https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/org6_e.htm
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. (2007) ‘Risky delusions: Misunderstanding science and misperforming publics in the GE Crops Issue’, in I. E. P. Taylor (ed) Genetically Engineered Crops: Interim Policies, Uncertain Legislation, New York: Haworth Food and Agricultural Products Press, pp. 341–372.
   Google Scholar