Trasformismo or transformation? The global political economy of energy transitions

References

• Aglietta, M. (2000). A theory of capitalist regulation: The US experience. London, UK: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, R. (2012). Backward into the future: The shift from coal and implications for the next energy transition. Energy Policy, 50, 17–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appelbaum, R., & W. Robinson (Eds.). (2005).Critical globalization studies. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ayers, A. (2013). Beyond myths, lies and stereotypes: The political economy of a “New Scramble for Africa”. New Political Economy, 18(2), 227–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, L., Newell, P., & Phillips, J. (2014). The Political Economy of Energy Transitions: The Case of South Africa’. New Political Economy, 19(6), 791–818. ‘
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, U. (2008). Conflicts in environmental regulation and the internationalization of the state. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bromley, S. (1991). American hegemony and world oil. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., & Newell, P. (2010). Governing climate change Abingdon. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carmody, P. (2011). The New Scramble for Africa. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• CDP (2017). Retrieved from https://www.cdp.net/en/info/about-us Accessed 1st March.
   Google Scholar
• Colgan, J. (2014). The emperor has no clothes: The limits of OPEC in the global oil market. International Organization, 68(03), 599–632.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R. (1983). Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: An essay in method. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 12(2), 162.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R. (1987). Production, power and world order. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R. (1993). Structural issues of global governance: Implications for Europe. In S. Gill (Ed.), Gramsci, historical materialism and international relations (pp. 259–290). Cambridge, UK: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Di Muzio, T. (2012). Capitalizing a future unsustainable: Finance, energy and the fate of market Civilization. Review of International Political Economy, 19(3), 363–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Muzio, T. (2015). Carbon capitalism: Energy, social reproduction and world order. London, UK: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Di Muzio, T., & Ovadia, J. (Eds.). (2016). Energy, capital and world order. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, A., & Fairhead, J. (2014). The militarisation and marketisation of nature: An alternative lens to ‘Climate-Conflict’. Geopolitics, 19(4), 937–961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, B., & Rustomjee, Z. (1996). The political economy of South Africa: From minerals energy complex to industrialisation. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Florini, A., & Sovacool, B. K. (2009). Who governs energy? The challenges facing global energy governance. Energy Policy, 37(12), 5239–5248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fouquet, R. (2010). The slow search for solutions: Lessons from historical energy transitions by sector and service. Energy Policy, 38(11), 6586–6596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fouquet, R., & Pearson, P. (2012). Past and prospective energy transitions: Insights from history. Energy Policy, 50, 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, K. (Ed.). (2005). Putting development first: The importance of policy space in the WTO and International Financial Institutions. London, UK: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. (2010). Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Research Policy, 39, 495–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and case study. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1257–1274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2014). Regime resistance against low-carbon transitions: Introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspectives. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(5), 21–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, S. (1993). Gramsci and global politics: towards a post-hegemonic research agenda. In S. Gill (Ed.), Gramsci, historical materialism and international relations (pp. 1–21). Cambridge, UK: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, S. (1995). Globalization, market civilisation and disciplinary neoliberalism. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 24(3), 399–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldthau, A., Keating, M., & Kuzemko, C. (Eds.). (2018). Handbook of the IPE of energy and natural resources. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks, edited and translated by Q. Hoare and G. Nowell Smith. New York, NY: International Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Grubler, A. (2012). Energy transitions research: Insights and cautionary tales. Energy Policy, 50, 8–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P., & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, K. (2009). Unlocking finance for clean energy: The need for ‘Investment Grade’ policy (Energy, Environment and Development Programme Paper 09/04). London, UK: Chatham House.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2003). The new imperialism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heinrich Böll Foundation (2013). Research for and on the “Great Transformation”. Berlin: Heinrich Böll Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, M. (2011). Climate governance at the cross-roads: Experimenting with a global response after Kyoto. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, J., & Picciotto, S. (Eds.). (1978). State and capital: A marxist debate. London, UK: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, M. (2013). Lifeblood: Oil, freedom and the forces of capital Minnesota. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• ICTSD (2011). China to end challenged subsidies in wind power case. Bridges Trade BioRes, 11(11), 13. June.
   Google Scholar
• IMF (2015, July 17). Counting the Cost of Energy Subsidies. IMF Survey. Retrieved from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/survey/so/2015/NEW070215A.htm
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2002). The future of the capitalist state. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, P., & Newell, P. (2017). Sustainability transitions and the State. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 27, 72–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaldor, M., Karl, L. T., & Said, Y. (Eds.). (2007).Oil wars. London, UK: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S. (2010). The UN and global energy governance: Past challenges, future choices. Global Change, Peace and Security, 22(2), 175–195.
   Google Scholar
• Kern, F. (2011). Ideas, institutions and interests: Explaining policy divergence in fostering ‘system innovations’ towards sustainability. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29(6), 1116–1134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern, F., & Markard, J. (2016). Analysing energy transitions: Combining insights from transition studies and International Political Economy. In T. Van de Graaf (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of the international political economy of energy (pp. 291–318). London, UK: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• King, D. (n.d.) A global Apollo Programme to combat climate change. London, UK: LSE.
   Google Scholar
• Kuzemko, C., Watson, M., & Lawrence, A. (2018). The international political economy of energy: Specificities, interactions and change. Review of International Political Economy (this issue).
   Google Scholar
• Kuzemko, C., Lockwood, M., Mitchell, C., & Hoggett, R. (2016). Governing for sustainable energy system change: Politics, contexts and contingency. Energy Research and Social Science, 12, 96–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachapelle, E., MacNeil, R., & Paterson, M. (2017). The political economy of decarbonisation: from green energy ‘race’ to green ‘division of labour. New Political Economy, 22(3), 311–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachapelle, E., & Paterson, M. (2013). Drivers of national climate policy. Climate Policy, 13(5), 547–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb, N., & Fugere, D. (2014, March 24). Exxon Mobil's commitment to carbon asset risk is just the beginning. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/exxon-mobil-carbon-asset-risk-pressure-oil-gas-investors
   Google Scholar
• Lawhon, M., & Murphy, J. T. (2012). Socio-technical regimes and sustainability transitions: Insights from political ecology. Progress in Human Geography, 36(3), 354–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leftwich, A. (2000). States of development: On the primacy of politics in development. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Leggett, J. (1996). Climate change and the financial sector. Munich: Gerling Akademie Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, D., & Newell, P. (2002). Business strategy and international environmental governance: Toward a neo-Gramscian synthesis. Global Environmental Politics, 2(4), 84–101.
   Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D. (2007). Transition management: New mode of governance for sustainable development Utrecht. Utrecht, the Netherlands: International Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mathiesen, K. (2015, April 17). ‘World Bank fossil fuel financing leapt in 2014 despite its calls to end subsidies’. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/apr/17/world-bank-fossil-fuel-lending-leapt-in-2014-despite-its-calls-to-end-subsidies
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. (2011). The entrepreneurial state. London, UK: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• McGlade, C., & Ekins, P. (2015). The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2 °C. Nature, 517, 187–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J. (2011). Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 70–75.
   Google Scholar
• Mikler, J., & Harrison, N. (2012). Varieties of capitalism and technological innovation for climate change mitigation. New Political Economy, 17(2), 179–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milman, O. (2015, November 30). Zuckerberg, Gates and other tech titans form clean energy investment coalition. The Guardian.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. (2011). Carbon democracy: Political power in the age of oil. London, UK: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T., & Maxwell, S. (2010). Defining climate compatible development. CDKN Policy Brief. London: Climate and Development Knowledge Network.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, A. (2007). Unravelling Gramsci: Hegemony and passive revolution in the global economy. London, UK: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neville, K., Cook, J., Baka, J., Bakker, K., & Weinthal, E. (in press). Can shareholder advocacy shape energy governance? The case of the US anti-fracking movement. Review of International Political Economy.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, P. (2007). Trade and environmental justice in Latin America. New Political Economy, 12(2), 237–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, P. (2008). The political economy of global environmental governance. Review of International Studies, 34(3), 507–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, P. (2011). The governance of energy finance: The public, the private and the hybrid. Global Policy, 2(1), 94–105.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, P., & Mulvaney, D. (2013). The political economy of the just transition. The Geographical Journal, 179(2), 132–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, P., & Paterson, M. (1998). Climate for business: Global warming, the State and capital. Review of International Political Economy, 5(4), 679–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, P., & Paterson, M. (2010). Climate capitalism: Global warming and the transformation of the global economy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, P., & Phillips, J. (2016). Neoliberal energy transitions in the South: Kenyan experiences. Geoforum, 74, 39–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Meara, D. (2014, April 10). Companies respond to shareholder activism on carbon risks’. Financial Post.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, M. (2001). Risky business: Insurance companies in global warming politics. Global Environmental Politics, 1(4), 18–42.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, M. (2012). Who and what are carbon markets for? Politics and the development of climate policy. Climate Policy, 12(1), 82–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, P., & Foxon, T. (2012). A low carbon industrial revolution? Insights and challenges from past technological and economic transformations. Energy Policy, 50, 117–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pegels, A. (Ed.). (2013). Green industrial policy in emerging countries. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Perez, C. (2002). Technological revolutions and financial capital: The dynamics of bubbles and golden ages. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Perez, C. (2013). Unleashing a golden age after the financial collapse: Drawing lessons from history. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 6, 9–23.
   Google Scholar
• Podobnik, B. (2006). Global energy shifts: Fostering sustainability in a turbulent age. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. (1980). [1944]. The great transformation. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poulantzas, N. (2014). State, power, socialism. London, UK: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Rees, J. (2001). Imperialism: Globalization, the State and war. International Socialism, 93.
   Google Scholar
• Scarse, I., & Smith, A. (2009). The non-politics of managing low carbon socio-technical transitions. Environmental Politics, 18(5), 707–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E., & Walker, G. (2007). CAUTION! Transitions ahead: politics, practice, and sustainable transition management. Environment and Planning A, 39(4), 763–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scoones, I., Leach, M., & Newell, P. (Eds.). (2015). The politics of green transformations. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. (2014). Transforming power: Social science and the politics of energy choices. Energy Research and Social Sciences, 1, 83–95.
   Google Scholar
• Swilling, M., & Annecke, E. (2012). Just transitions: Explorations of sustainability in an unfair world. South Africa: UCT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tellam, I. (Ed.). (2000). Fuel for change: World Bank energy policy: Rhetoric and reality. London, UK: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Union of Concerned Scientists (2017). Retrieved from http://www.ucsusa.org/clean_vehicles/smart-transportation-solutions/us-military-oil-use.html#.WLAzTstviUk, accessed 24 February 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Graaf, T. (2013). The politics and institutions of global energy governance. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Graaf, T., Sovacool, B., Ghosh, A., & Kern, F. (Eds.). (2016). The Palgrave handbook of the international political economy of energy. London, UK: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Verbong, G., & Loorbach, D. (Eds.). (2012). Governing the energy transition: reality, illusion or necessity? London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, R. (2003). ‘What strategies are viable for developing countries today? The WTO and the shrinking of development space. In J. Timmons Roberts & A. Bellone Hite (Eds.), The globalization and development reader. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, J. (2015, December 3). ‘Uruguay makes dramatic shift to nearly 95% electricity from clean energy’ The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/dec/03/uruguay-makes-dramatic-shift-to-nearly-95-clean-energy
   Google Scholar
• WBGU (2011). World in transition: A social contract for sustainability. Berlin, Germany: German Advisory Council on Global Change.
   Google Scholar
• Yergin, D. (2008). The prize: The epic quest for oil, money and power. London, UK: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar