Asymmetric diffusion: World Bank ‘best practice’ and the spread of arbitration in national investment laws

References

• Allee, T., & Peinhardt, C. (2014). Evaluating three explanations for the design of bilateral investment treaties. World Politics, 66(1), 47–87. doi:10.1017/S0043887113000324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, M., & Finnemore, M. (2004). Rules for the world: International organizations in global politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Best, J. (2017). The rise of measurement-driven governance: The case of international development. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 23(2), 163–181. doi:10.1163/19426720-02302003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betz, T., & Pond, A. (2019). Foreign financing and the international sources of property rights. World Politics, 71(3), 503–539. doi:10.1017/S0043887119000017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block-Lieb, S., & Halliday, T. C. (2017). Global lawmakers: International organizations in the crafting of world markets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnitcha, J. (2017). Investment laws of ASEAN countries: A comparative review. Winnipeg, Canada: International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD).
   Google Scholar
• Bonnitcha, J., Poulsen, L. N. S., & Waibel, M. (2017). The political economy of the investment treaty regime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., & Jones, B. S. (2004). Event history modelling: A guide for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broome, A., & Quirk, J. (2015). Governing the world at a distance: The practice of global benchmarking. Review of International Studies, 41(5), 819–841. doi:10.1017/S0260210515000340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broome, A., & Seabrooke, L. (2007). Seeing like the IMF: Institutional change in small open economies. Review of International Political Economy, 14(4), 576–601. doi:10.1080/09692290701475346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broome, A., & Seabrooke, L. (2012). Seeing like an international organisation. New Political Economy, 17(1), 1–16. doi:10.1080/13563467.2011.569019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broome, A., & Seabrooke, L. (2015). Shaping policy curves: Cognitive authority in transnational capacity building. Public Administration, 93(4), 956–972. doi:10.1111/padm.12179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broome, A., Homolar, A., & Kranke, M. (2018). Bad science: International organizations and the indirect power of global benchmarking. European Journal of International Relations, 24(3), 514–539. doi:10.1177/1354066117719320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caron, D. (2010). The interpretation of national foreign investment laws as unilateral acts under international law. In M. Arsanjani, J. Cogan, R. Sloane, & S. Wiessner (Eds.), Looking to the future: Essays on international law in honor of W. Michael Reisman (pp. 649–674). Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Chorev, N. (2013). Restructuring neoliberalism at the World Health Organization. Review of International Political Economy, 20(4), 627–666. doi:10.1080/09692290.2012.690774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clegg, L. (2010). Our dream is a world full of poverty indicators: The US, the World Bank, and the power of numbers. New Political Economy, 15(4), 473–492. doi:10.1080/13563461003763170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooley, A., & Ron, J. (2002). The NGO scramble: Organizational insecurity and the political economy of transnational action. International Security, 27(1), 5–39. doi:10.1162/016228802320231217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooley, A., & Snyder, J. (Eds.). (2015). Ranking the world: Grading states as a tool of global governance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coppedge, M., Gerring, J., Knutsen, C. H., Lindberg, S. I., Skaaning, S.-E., Teorell, J., … Ziblatt, D. (2018). ‘V-Dem Codebook, v8’, Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, K., Fisher, A., Kingsbury, B., & Merry, S. E. (Eds.). (2012). Governance by indicators: Global power through quantification and rankings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elkins, Z., Guzman, A. T., & Simmons, B. A. (2006). Competing for capital: The diffusion of bilateral investment treaties, 1960–2000. International Organization, 60(4), 811–846. doi:10.1017/S0020818306060279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fatouros, A. A. (1962). Government guarantees to foreign investors. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• FIAS. (2006). FIAS, the facility for investment climate advisory services: 2006 annual report. Washington DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• FIAS. (2010). Investment law reform: A handbook for development practitioners. Washington DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• FIAS. (2014). FIAS, the facility for investment climate advisory services: 2014 annual review. Washington DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Finnemore, M. (1993). International organizations as teachers of norms: The United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization and science policy. International Organization, 47(4), 565–597. doi:10.1017/S0020818300028101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gertz, G. (2018). Commercial diplomacy and political risk. International Studies Quarterly, 62(1), 94–107. doi:10.1093/isq/sqx079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golub, J. (2008). Survival analysis. In J. M. Box-Steffensmeier, H. E. Brady, & D. Collier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, B., & Tucker, A. T. (2019). The international political economy data resource. The Review of International Organizations, 14(1), 149–161. doi:10.1007/s11558-017-9285-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzman, A. T. (1998). Why LDCs sign treaties that hurt them: Explaining the popularity of bilateral investment treaties. Virginia Journal of International Law, 38, 639–688.
   Google Scholar
• Gwynn, M. (2016). Power in the international investment framework. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, T. C., Block-Lieb, S., & Carruthers, B. G. (2010). Rhetorical legitimation: Global scripts as strategic devices of international organizations. Socio-Economic Review, 8(1), 77–112. doi:10.1093/ser/mwp024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hepburn, J. (2018). Domestic investment statutes in international law. American Journal of International Law, 112(4), 658–706. doi:10.1017/ajil.2018.85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertz-Picciotto, I., & Rockhill, B. (1997). Validity and efficiency of approximation methods for tied survival times in Cox regression. Biometrics, 53(3), 1151–1156. doi:10.2307/2533573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby, W. (2001). Tutors and pupils: International organizations, Central European elites, and Western models. Governance, 14(2), 169–200. doi:10.1111/0952-1895.00157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jandhyala, S., Henisz, W. J., & Mansfield, E. D. (2011). Three waves of BITs: The global diffusion of foreign investment policy. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 55(6), 1047–1073. doi:10.1177/0022002711414373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, J., & Simmons, B. (2015). Politics by number: Indicators as social pressure in international relations. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 55–70. doi:10.1111/ajps.12119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, J., & Simmons, B. (2019). Introduction: The power of global performance indicators. International Organization, 73(03), 491–510. doi:10.1017/S0020818319000146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kentikelenis, A. E., & Seabrooke, L. (2017). The politics of world polity: Script-writing in international organizations. American Sociological Review, 82(5), 1065–1092. doi:10.1177/0003122417728241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korobeinikov, A. (2017). Kyrgyzstan. In The Baker McKenzie international arbitration yearbook 2016–2017. London: Baker McKenzie.
   Google Scholar
• Liebert, S., & Tiulegenov, M. (2013). Public administration in Kyrgyzstan. In S. Liebert, S. Condrey, & D. Goncharov (Eds), Public administration in post-communist countries: Former Soviet Union, Central and Eastern Europe, and Mongolia. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, M., Gurr, T. R., & Jaggers, K. (2018). Polity IV Project. Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2017. Dataset users’ manual. Vienna, VA: Center for Systemic Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Maurer, N. (2013). The Empire Trap: The Rise and Fall of U.S. Intervention to Protect American Property Overseas, 1893–2013. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merry, S. E., Davis, K. E., & Kingsbury, B. (Eds.). (2015). The quiet power of indicators: Measuring governance, corruption, and rule of law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S., & Vetterlein, A. (2010). Owning development: Creating policy norms in the IMF and World Bank. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parra, A. (1992). Principles Governing Foreign Investment, as Reflected in National Investment Codes. ICSID Review, 7(2), 428–452. doi:10.1093/icsidreview/7.2.428
   Google Scholar
• Parra, A. (1997). Provisions on the settlement of investment disputes in modern investment laws, bilateral investment treaties and multilateral instruments on investment. ICSID Review, 12(2), 287–364. doi:10.1093/icsidreview/12.2.287
   Google Scholar
• Parra, A. (2017). The History of ICSID (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pelc, K. J. (2017). What explains the low success rate of investor-state disputes?. International Organization, 71(3), 559–583. doi:10.1017/S0020818317000212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potestà, M. (2011). The interpretation of consent to ICSID arbitration contained in domestic investment laws. Arbitration International, 27(2), 149–170.
   Google Scholar
• Poulsen, L. N. S. (2015). Bounded rationality and economic diplomacy: The politics of investment treaties in developing countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poulsen, L. N. S., & Aisbett, E. (2013). When the claim hits: Bilateral investment treaties and bounded rational learning. World Politics, 65(2), 273–313. doi:10.1017/S0043887113000063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seabrooke, L., & Sending, O. J. (2019). Contracting development: Managerialism and consultants in intergovernmental organizations. Review of International Political Economy, 1–26. doi:10.1080/09692290.2019.1616601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308. doi:10.1177/1065912907313077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharman, J. (2012). Seeing like the OECD on tax. New Political Economy, 17(1), 17–33. doi:10.1080/13563467.2011.569022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shihata, I. F. I. (1991). Promotion of foreign direct investment – A general account, with particular reference to the role of the World Bank. ICSID Review, 6(2), 484–509. doi:10.1093/icsidreview/6.2.484
   Google Scholar
• Shihata, I. F. I. (1993). Legal treatment of foreign investment: The World Bank Guidelines. London: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• St John, T. (2018). The rise of investor-state arbitration: Politics, law and unintended consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strang, D. (1991). Adding social structure to diffusion models: An event history framework. Sociological Methods & Research, 19(3), 324–353. doi:10.1177/0049124191019003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNCTAD. (2016). Investment laws: A widespread tool for the promotion and regulation of foreign investment. UNCTAD Investment Policy Monitor, Special Issue, November.
   Google Scholar
• Vetterlein, A. (2012). Seeing like the World Bank on poverty. New Political Economy, 17(1), 35–58. doi:10.1080/13563467.2011.569023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellhausen, R. (2015). The shield of nationality: When governments break contracts with foreign firms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank (1998). Memorandum of the President of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the International Development Association and the International Finance Corporation to the Executive Directors on a joint country assistance strategy of the World Bank Group for the Kyrgyz Republic. Washington DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (1995). The World Bank and legal technical assistance: Initial lessons (Policy Research Working Paper 1414). Washington, DC: World Bank Legal Department.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2000a). Performance audit report: The Kyrgyz Republic Rehabilitation Credit (RC) and Privatization and Enterprise Sector Adjustment Credit (PESAC). Washington DC: World Bank Operations Evaluations Department.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2000b). Foreign Investment Advisory Service (FIAS) program bi-annual report for FY1999 and FY2000. Washington DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2001). Foreign Investment Advisory Service - FIAS - program annual report for FY2001. Washington DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2004). An evaluation of World Bank investment climate activities. Washington DC: World Bank Operations Evaluation Department.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2009). Implementation completion and results report on a IDA credit to the Kyrgyz Republic for a governance structural adjustment credit. Washington DC: World Bank Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Unit.
   Google Scholar