Varieties of privatization: informal networks, trust and state control of the commanding heights

References

• Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., & Zangl, B. (2016). Two Logics of Indirect Governance: Delegation and Orchestration. British Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 719–729. doi:10.1017/S0007123414000593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert, M. (1993). Capitalism against capitalism. London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Andres, C., Betzer, A., & van den Bongard, I. (2011). Das Ende der Deutschland AG. Kredit und Kapital, 44(2), 185–216.
   Google Scholar
• Appel, H. (2000). The ideological determinants of liberal economic reform: the case of privatization. World Politics, 52(4), 520–549. doi:10.1017/S0043887100020098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmann, R., & Inkpen, A. C. (2011). Understanding institutional-based trust building processes in inter-organizational relationships. Organization Studies, 32(2), 281–301. doi:10.1177/0170840610397477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beach, D., & Pedersen, R. B. (2013). Process-tracing methods: Foundations and guidelines. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beach, D., & Pedersen, R. B. (2016). Causal case study methods: Foundations and guidelines for comparing, matching and tracing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, T. (2012). Legal institutions and economic development. In D. C. Mueller (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of capitalism (pp. 38–77). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, A. (2008). Process tracing: A Bayesian perspective. In J. M. Box-Steffensmeier, H. E. Brady, & D. Collier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political methodology (pp. 702–721). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bortolotti, B., & Faccio, M. (2009). Government control of privatized firms. Review of Financial Studies, 22(8), 2907–2939. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhn077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortolotti, B., & Pinotti, P. (2008). Delayed privatization. Public Choice, 136(3-4), 331–351. doi:10.1007/s11127-008-9299-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosanquet, N. (1981). Sir Keith’s reading list. The Political Quarterly, 52(3), 324–341. doi:10.1111/j.1467-923X.1981.tb02809.x
   Google Scholar
• British Aerospace. (1981). Articles of Association. London: The National Archives.
   Google Scholar
• Casper, S. (2001). The legal framework for corporate governance: The influence of contract law on corporate strategies in Germany and the United States. In P. A. Hall & D. W. Soskice (Eds.), Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage (pp. 387–416). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coates, D. (2000). Models of capitalism: Growth and stagnation in the modern era. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colli, A., Mariotti, S., & Piscitello, L. (2014). Governments as strategists in designing global players: The case of European utilities. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(4), 487–508. doi:10.1080/13501763.2013.861764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conservative Party (1979). Election Manifesto. Retrieved from https://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/110858.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, K. S., Hardin, R., & Levi, M. (2005). Cooperation without trust? New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Culpepper, P. D. (2005). Institutional change in contemporary capitalism: Coordinated financial systems since 1990. World Politics, 57(2), 173–199. doi:10.1353/wp.2005.0016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daimler-Benz AG, Bavaria, Bremen, & Hamburg (1989, March 13). Framework agreement between MBB’s public shareholders - Bavaria. Bremen, Hamburg - and Daimler-Benz AG on MBB’s privatization. Hamburg: Staatsarchiv Hamburg.
   Google Scholar
• Daimler-Benz AG & Senate of Hamburg (1989, 12 November). Draft of a notarially certified contract between Hamburg and Daimler-Benz AG on the privatization of MBB. Hamburg: Staatsarchiv Hamburg.
   Google Scholar
• Daimler-Benz AG. (1974). Annual Report 1974. Stuttgart: Daimler-Benz AG.
   Google Scholar
• De Vore, M. R. (2014). Defying convergence: globalisation and varieties of defence-industrial capitalism. New Political Economy, 20(4), 569–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vore, M. R., & Weiss, M. (2014). Who’s in the cockpit? The political economy of collaborative aircraft decisions. Review of International Political Economy, 21(2), 497–533. doi:10.1080/09692290.2013.787947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deb, H. C. (1979, November 20). British Aerospace Bill, Hansard.
   Google Scholar
• Deb, H. C. (1985, January 15). British Aerospace plc, Hansard.
   Google Scholar
• Der Spiegel (1975). Geschenk von Apel, 51, p. 33.
   Google Scholar
• Der Spiegel (1985). Der Stern strahlt noch in 100 Jahren. Der Stuttgarter Automobilhersteller Daimler-Benz - Deutschlands Musterunternehmen, 37, 36–67.
   Google Scholar
• Der Spiegel (1987a). Daumenschrauben anlagen, 33, 26–29.
   Google Scholar
• Der Spiegel (1987b). Nur die Hutablage, 23, 47–50.
   Google Scholar
• Der Spiegel (1988a). Der Fall ist schon ein dicker Klops. SPIEGEL-Interview mit Kartellamtspräsident Wolfgang Kartte über Großfusionen und den Fall Daimler/MBB, 46, pp. 122–126.
   Google Scholar
• Der Spiegel (1988b). Daimler rüstet sich für MBB-Einstieg, 19, p. 111.
   Google Scholar
• Der Spiegel (1988c). Die neue deutsche Rüstungsmacht, 31, pp. 24–32.
   Google Scholar
• Der Spiegel (1988d). Spitzer Bleistift, 26, pp. 76–77.
   Google Scholar
• Der Spiegel (1989a). Daimler hatte Bonner Zusage, 15, p. 121.
   Google Scholar
• Der Spiegel (1989b). Daimler/MBB: Das Nein des Kartellamts, 11, pp. 118–119.
   Google Scholar
• Der Spiegel (1989c). Daimler/MBB: Leicht durchdrücken. 39, p. 140.
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, J. P., & Sköns, E. (2010). The military industrial complex. In A. T. H. Tan (Ed.), Routledge international handbooks. The global arms trade: A handbook (pp. 281–292). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eckl, J. (2014). The power of private foundations: Rockefeller and Gates in the struggle against malaria. Global Social Policy: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Public Policy and Social Development, 14(1), 91–116. doi:10.1177/1468018113515978
   Google Scholar
• Eglau, H. O. (1991). Edzard Reuter. Düsseldorf: ECON.
   Google Scholar
• Ehlers, M. (1989, March 10). Decision minutes of negotiations between Hamburg and Daimler-Benz AG (work level). Hamburg: Staatsarchiv Hamburg.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, H. (2009). The Political Economy of Trust: Institutions. Interests, and Inter-Firm Cooperation in Italy and Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fioretos, O. (2011). Historical Institutionalism in International Relations. International Organization, 65(2), 367–399. doi:10.1017/S0020818311000002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N. (2006). Sense Making and the Emergence of a New Form of Market Governance. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7), 949–960. doi:10.1177/0002764205285174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gellert, O. (1989, November 2). Letter of legal-economic advisers on behalf of Hamburg to Daimler-Benz AG (Karl Schirner). Hamburg: Staatsarchiv Hamburg.
   Google Scholar
• Genschel, P., & Zangl, B. (2014). State Transformations in OECD Countries. Annual Review of Political Science, 17(1), 337–354. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-061312-113943
   Google Scholar
• German Bundestag. (2008). Entwurf eines Dreizehnten Gesetzes zur Änderung des Außenwirtschaftsgesetzes und der Außenwirtschaftsverordnung. Berlin: Bundestagsdrucksache.
   Google Scholar
• German Federal Government. (1984). Kabinettssitzung, TOP 5: Airbus A 320. Koblenz: Bundesarchiv.
   Google Scholar
• Gholz, E., & Sapolsky, H. M. (1999/2000). Restructuring the U.S. Defense industry. International Security, 23(3), 5–51. doi:10.1162/016228899560220
   Google Scholar
• Graham, C., & Prosser, T. (1987). Privatising nationalised industries: Constitutional issues and new legal techniques. The Modern Law Review, 50(1), 16–51. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.1987.tb02558.x
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001). An introduction to varieties of capitalism. In P. A. Hall & D. W. Soskice (Eds.), Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage (pp. 1–68). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. W. (Eds.). (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, R. (2006). Trust. Key concepts. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C. (2019). Does capitalism (still) come in varieties?. Review of International Political Economy, 1–18. doi:10.1080/09692290.2019.1633382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayward, K. (1989). The British aircraft industry. British industries in the twentieth century. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helmke, G., & Levitsky, S. (2004). Informal institutions and comparative politics: A research agenda. Perspectives on Politics, 2(04), 725–740. doi:10.1017/S1537592704040472
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, A. M. (2002). A conceptualization of trust in international relations. European Journal of International Relations, 8(3), 375–401. doi:10.1177/1354066102008003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House of Commons Standing Committee ‘G’ (1979). British aerospace bill. London: The National Archives.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, G. (1980). British aerospace. London: The National Archives.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, C., Hall, P., Soskice, D., Streeck, W., Yamamura, K., & Coates, D. (2003). Varieties of Capitalism: And Then There Was One? Comparative Politics, 36(1), 103–124. doi:10.2307/4150162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huck, B. J. (1989). Die Fusion von Daimler Benz und MBB: Ressourcenbündelung statt Abrüstung und Rüstungskonversion. Wissenschaft und Frieden, (4), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• James, A. (2002). Comparing European responses to defense industry globalization. Defense & Security Analysis, 18(2), 123–143. doi:10.1080/14751790220132547
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, K. (1979a). British aerospace: Sale to the private sector: Memorandum by the secretary of state for industry. The National Archives.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, K. (1979b). British aerospace: Introduction of private sector capital: Memorandum by the secretary of state for industry. The National Archives.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, K. (1980). Memorandum from Joseph to the PM. The National Archives.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, K. (1981). Relationship between HM government and BAe after offer for sale. London: The National Archives.
   Google Scholar
• Kiener, T. (1989). Summary of Hamburg’s legal-economic adviser concerning the negotiations with Daimler-Benz AG. Hamburg: Staatsarchiv Hamburg.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. (2007). Fears of foreign ownership: The old face of economic nationalism. SAIS Review of International Affairs, 27(2), 167–177. doi:10.1353/sais.2007.0033
   Google Scholar
• Krahmann, E. (2010). States, citizens and the privatisation of security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krotz, U. (2011). Flying tiger: International relations theory and the politics of advanced weapons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2008). The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(2), 285–332. doi:10.1257/jel.46.2.285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, C. (1997). The social regulation of inter-firm relations in Britain and Germany: Market rules, legal norms and technical standards. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 21(2), 197–215. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a013666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibfried, S., & Zürn, M. (Eds.). (2005). Transformations of the state? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lovell, A. H. (1985). BAe: Appointment of nominee director. The National Archives.
   Google Scholar
• Markusen, A. R. (2003). The case against privatizing national security. Governance, 16(4), 471–501. doi:10.1111/1468-0491.00225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maulny, J.-P., Taylor, T., Schmitt, B., & Caillaud, F.-E. (2000). Industrial and strategic co-operation models for armaments companies in Europe. Brussels: EU Commission Working Document.
   Google Scholar
• MBB (1989). Secret protocol of MBB’s shareholder meeting. Hamburg: Staatsarchiv Hamburg.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, M. C. (1979). British Aerospace LTD: Foreign ownership. London: The National Archives.
   Google Scholar
• Mercille, J., & Murphy, E. (2017). What is privatization? A political economy framework. Environment and Planning A, 49(5), 1040–1059. doi:10.1177/0308518X16689085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michell, M. J. (1985). Draft letter to government nominated director. London: The National Archives.
   Google Scholar
• Milosch, M. S. (2006). Modernizing Bavaria: The politics of Franz-Josef Strauss and the CSU, 1949–1969 New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mittelbach, B. (1989a). Internal Summary on the Negotiations between Hamburg and Daimler-Benz on 8 March. Hamburg: Staatsarchiv Hamburg.
   Google Scholar
• Mittelbach, B. (1989b). Note for the file on Hamburg’s negotiations with Daimler-Benz AG, Hamburg: Staatsarchiv Hamburg.
   Google Scholar
• Obinger, H., Schmitt, C., & Traub, S. (2016). The political economy of privatization in rich democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, D. (2009). The official history of privatisation. Whitehall histories. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, D., & Hartley, K. (2003). Transaction costs, relational contracting and public private partnerships: A case study of UK defence. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 9(3), 97–108. doi:10.1016/S0969-7012(02)00035-7
   Google Scholar
• Peters, J. (2012). Neoliberal convergence in North America and Western Europe: Fiscal austerity, privatization, and public sector reform. Review of International Political Economy, 19(2), 208–235. doi:10.1080/09692290.2011.552783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priemel, K. C. (2009). Die Krise des Flick-Konzerns in den siebziger Jahren. Vierteljahrshefte Für Zeitgeschichte, 57(1), 1–32. doi:10.1524/vfzg.2009.0031
   Google Scholar
• Rathbun, B. C. (2012). Trust in international cooperation: International security institutions, domestic politics, and American multilateralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reuter, E. (1998). Schein und Wirklichkeit: Erinnerungen. Berlin: Siedler.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, H., & Voeten, E. (2007). Measuring legal systems. Journal of Comparative Economics, 35(4), 711–728. doi:10.1016/j.jce.2007.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rüchardt, F., & Weiss, M. (2018). Der Staat als Broker? Rüstungsdiplomatie als die vernachlässigte Seite von Waffenexporten. Zeitschrift für Friedens- und Konfliktforschung, 7(2), 210–245. doi:10.5771/2192-1741-2018-2-210
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Games real actors play: Actor-centered institutionalism in policy research. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schirner, K. (1989). Response of Daimler-Benz AG on Hamburg’s letter concerning the privatization of MBB. Hamburg: Staatsarchiv Hamburg.
   Google Scholar
• Social Democratic Party (Bavaria). (1989). On the state of negotiations concerning the Daimler-Benz AG’s acquisition of MBB shares. Munich/Ottobrunn: Airbus Corporate Archive.
   Google Scholar
• Soskice, D. (1999). Divergent production regimes: Coordinated and uncoordinated market economies in the 1980s and 1990s. In H. Kitschelt, P. Lange, G. Marks, & J. D. Stephens (Eds.), Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism (pp. 101–134). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, R. W. (2011). Controlling institutions: International organizations and the global economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, W., & Höpner, M. (2003). Einleitung: Alle Macht dem Markt? In W. Streeck & M. Höpner (Eds.), Alle Macht dem Markt? Fallstudien zur Abwicklung der Deutschland AG (pp. 11–59). Frankfurt: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (Eds.). (2005). Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tandler, G. (1989). Report of the Bavarian Minister of Finance on the state of negotiations with the Daimler-Benz AG concerning its acquisition of MBB shares. Airbus Corporate Archive.
   Google Scholar
• The Financial Times. (1981, December 14). Ministers urged to heed Industry, p. 4.
   Google Scholar
• The Financial Times. (1982, January 21). Call for Liaison to create better defence industry, p. 8.
   Google Scholar
• The Financial Times. (1984a, May 17). Government will not block thorn and BAe merger, p. 1.
   Google Scholar
• The Financial Times. (1984b, June 13). British aerospace rejects thorn Emi merger offer.
   Google Scholar
• The Financial Times. (1984c, July 17). British aerospace ends GEC talks.
   Google Scholar
• The Financial Times. (1989, April 8). Foreign-held BAe shares below limit, p. 8.
   Google Scholar
• The Independent. (1989, March 11). Foreign buyers breach BAe limit, p. 19.
   Google Scholar
• Toninelli (2000). The rise and fall of state-owned enterprise in the western world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G. (2002). Veto players: How political institutions work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Waarden, F. (2012). The governance of markets: On generating trust in transactions. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), Oxford handbook of governance (pp. 355–371). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, S. K. (1998). Freer markets, more rules: Regulatory reform in advanced industrial countries. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Voscherau, H. (1989a). Report to Hamburg’s Senate on negoatiations with Daimler-Benz AG on the privatization of MBB (20.03.1989). Hamburg: Staatsarchiv Hamburg.
   Google Scholar
• Voscherau, H. (1989b). Letter to Alfred Herrhausen, CEO of Deutsche bank and chairman of the supervisory board of Daimler-Benz AG (11.05. 1989). Hamburg: Staatsarchiv Hamburg.
   Google Scholar
• Voscherau, H. (1989c). Letter to Bavarian PM, Max Streibl, concerning the privatization of MBB (30.10.1989). Hamburg: Staatsarchiv Hamburg.
   Google Scholar
• Voscherau, H. (1989d). Statement at the supervisory board meeting of MBB (17.11.1989). Hamburg: Staatsarchiv Hamburg.
   Google Scholar
• Voscherau, H., Krupp, H.-J., & Rahlfs, W. (1988). Protocol of the working group on the privatization of MBB (06.10.1988). Hamburg: Staatsarchiv Hamburg.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, M. (2018). How to become a first mover? Mechanisms of military innovation and the development of drones. European Journal of International Security, 3(2), 187–210. doi:10.1017/eis.2017.15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, M. (2019). From wealth to power? The failure of layered reforms in India’s defense sector. Journal of Global Security Studies, 4(4), 560–578. doi:10.1093/jogss/ogz036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, M., & Jankauskas, V. (2019). Securing cyberspace: How states design governance arrangements. Governance, 32(2), 259–275. doi:10.1111/gove.12368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winn, A. (1991, 31 July–6 August). Forgotten Society? Flight international, p. 21. Retrieved from https://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1991/1991%20-%202007.html?search=forgotten%20society%20allan%20winn.
   Google Scholar
• Zohlnhöfer, R., Obinger, H., & Wolf, F. (2008). Partisan politics, globalization, and the determinants of privatization proceeds in advanced democracies (1990–2000). Governance, 21(1), 95–121. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00387.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar