Collateral benefit: the developmental effects of EU-induced state building in Central and Eastern Europe

References

• Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., & Zilibotti, F. (2006). Distance to frontier, selection, and economic growth. Journal of the European Economic Association, 4(1), 37–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acemoglu, D., García-Jimeno, C., & Robinson, J. (2015). State capacity and economic development: A network approach. American Economic Review, 105(8), 2364–2409. doi:10.1257/aer.20140044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aghion, P., Akcigit, U., & Howitt, P. (2013). What do we learn from the Schumpeterian growth theory? (NBER Working Paper No. W18824). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Aghion, P., & Bircan, C. (2016). The middle-income trap from a Schumpeterian perspective (ADB Economics Working Paper Series No. 521). Mandaluyong: Asian Development Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Barro, R. J.. (1991). Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, CVI, 407–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1992). Convergence. Journal of Political Economy, 100(2), 223–251. doi:10.1086/261816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besley, T., & Persson, T. (2009). The origins of state capacity: Property rights, taxation, and politics. American Economic Review, 99(4), 1218–1244. doi:10.1257/aer.99.4.1218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besley, T., & Persson, T. (2011). Pillars of prosperity: The political economics of development clusters. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bieber, F. (2011). Building impossible states? State-building strategies and EU membership in the Western Balkans. Europe-Asia Studies, 63(10), 1783–1802. doi:10.1080/09668136.2011.618679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohle, D., & Greskovits, B. (2012). Capitalist diversity on Europe’s periphery. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruszt, L., & Campos, N. (2017). Deep economic integration and state capacity: A mechanism for avoiding the middle-income trap? (ADB Economics Working Paper Series No. 547). Mandaluyong: Asian Development Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Bruszt, L., & Langbein, J. (2015). Development by stealth: Governing market integration in the eastern peripheries of the European Union (Working Paper No. 17, MAXCAP Working Paper Series). Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Bruszt, L., & McDermott, G. (Eds.). (2014). Leveling the playing field: Transnational regulatory integration and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruszt, L., & Munkacsi, Z. (2016). Foreign trade sophistication in Eastern and Central Europe. Central European University, Department of Political Sciences (Manuscript-available at request).
   Google Scholar
• Bruszt, L., & Palestini, S. (2016). Regional development governance. In T. Börzel & T. Risse (Eds.), Oxford handbook of comparative regionalism (pp. 374–405). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruszt, L., & Vukov, V. (2017). Making states for the single market: European integration and the reshaping of economic states in the Southern and Eastern peripheries of Europe. West European Politics, 40(4), 663–687. doi:10.1080/01402382.2017.1281624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canova, F. (2004). Testing for convergence clubs in income per capita: A predictive density approach. International Economic Review, 45(1), 49–77. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2354.2004.00117.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doner, R., & Schneider, B. R. (2016). The middle-income trap: More politics than. World Politics, 68(4), 608–644. doi:10.1017/S0043887116000095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2005). Guide to the main administrative structures required for implementing the acquis. Working Document. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (1999). Regular Report – 13/10/99 on Czech Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2005). What is high tech trade? Definition based on the SITC nomenclature. Brussels: European Commission, Eurostat.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, P. (1979). Dependent development: The alliance of multinational, state, and local capital in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, P. (1995). Embedded autonomy: States and industrial transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, P., Rueschemeyer, D., & Skocpol, T. (1985). Bringing the state back in new perspectives on the state as institution and social actor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gereffi, G. (1995). Global production systems and third world development. In B. Stallings (Ed.), Global change, regional response: The new international context of development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gereffi, G., & Evans, P. (1981). Transnational corporations, dependent development, and state policy in the semi-periphery: A comparison of Brazil and Mexico. Latin American Research Review, 16(3), 31–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78–104. doi:10.1080/09692290500049805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gereffi, G., & Wyman, D. (1990). Manufacturing miracle. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R. E., & Jones, C. I. (1999). Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(1), 83–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellman, J. S. (1998). Winners take all: The politics of partial reform in postcommunist transitions. World Politics, 50(2), 203–234. doi:10.1017/S0043887100008091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henisz, W. (2000). The institutional environment of economic growth. Economics and Politics, 12(1), 1–31. doi:10.1111/1468-0343.00066
   Google Scholar
• Henrekson, M., Torstensson, J., & Torstensson, R. (1997). Growth effects of European integration. European Economic Review, 41(8), 1537–1557. doi:10.1016/S0014-2921(97)00063-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hille, P., ' Knill, C. (2006). It's the Bureaucracy ‘Stupid’: the implementation of the acquis communautaire in EU candidate countries, 1999–2003 (Vol. 7, pp. 531–552). European Union Politics.
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, J., & Schmitz, H. (2000). Governance and upgrading: Linking industrial cluster and global value chain research (Working Paper No. 120). Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, The University of Sussex.
   Google Scholar
• Jacoby, W. (2006). Inspiration, coalition, and substitution: External influences on postcommunist transformations. World Politics, 58(4), 623–651. doi:10.1353/wp.2007.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janos, A. (1989). The politics of backwardness in continental Europe, 1780–1945. World Politics, 41(3), 325–358. doi:10.2307/2010503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janos, A. (2000). East Central Europe in the modern world: The politics of the borderlands from pre- to postcommunism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. doi:10.1086/ahr/108.4.1243-a
   Google Scholar
• Kochenov, D., & Bárd, P. (2018). Rule of law crisis in the new member states of the EU: The pitfalls of overemphasising enforcement (July 27, 2018). Reconnect Working Papers (Leuven) No. 1. Retrieved from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3221240
   Google Scholar
• Kovács, K., & Scheppele, K. L. (2018). The fragility of an independent judiciary: Lessons from Hungary and Poland – and the European Union. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 51(3), 189–200. doi:10.1016/j.postcomstud.2018.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koyama, M., & Johnson, N. (2017). States and economic growth: Capacity and constraints. Explorations in Economic History, 64(2), 1–20. doi:10.1016/j.eeh.2016.11.002
   Google Scholar
• Lall, S. (2000). The technological structure and performance of developing country manufactured exports, 1985–1998 (Working Paper No. 44, QEH Working Paper Series). Oxford: Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, R. M. (2013). The promise and limits of private power: Promoting labor standards in a global economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. (2011). The entrepreneurial state. London: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer-Sahling, J. (2004). Civil service reform in post-communist Europe: The bumpy road to depoliticization. West European Politics, 27(1), 71–103. doi:10.1080/01402380412331280813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nölke, A., & Vliegenthart, A. (2009). Enlarging the varieties of capitalism: The emergence of dependent market economies in East Central Europe. World Politics, 61(4), 670–702. doi:10.1017/S0043887109990098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2007). OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2007. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Peneder, M. (2001). Entrepreneurial competition and industrial location. Chapter 3: Intangible investment and human resources. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (Ed.). (1975). The formation of national states in Western Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G. (2002). Veto players: How political institutions work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, R. (1990). Governing the market: Economic theory and the role of government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, L. (1998). The myth of the powerless state. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar