References
- Americans for Free Trade. (2018). Letter to congress on formation of Americans for free trade coalition. http://americansforfreetrade.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Americans-for-Free-Trade-Announcement-Congressional-Letter-091218-House.pdf
- Barley, S. R. (2010). Building an institutional field to corral a government: A case to set an agenda for organization studies. Organization Studies, 31(6), 777–805. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840610372572
- Blonigen, B. A. (2011). Revisiting the evidence on trade policy preferences. Journal of International Economics, 85(1), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2011.05.010
- Buzard, K. (2017). Trade agreements in the shadow of lobbying. Review of International Economics, 25(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12254
- Chorev, N. (2007). Remaking U.S. trade policy: From protectionism to globalization. Cornell University Press.
- Dreiling, M., & Darves, D. (2011). Corporate unity in American trade policy: A network analysis of corporate-dyad political action. American Journal of Sociology, 116(5), 1514–1563. https://doi.org/10.1086/657524
- Dreiling, M. C., & Darves, D. Y. (2016). Agents of neoliberal globalization: Corporate networks, state structures, and trade policy. Cambridge University Press.
- ECC. (2016). European business in China business confidence survey 2016. The European Union Chamber of Commerce in China.
- Ehrlich, S. (2018). The politics of fair trade: Moving beyond free trade and protection. Oxford University Press.
- Evans, R., & Kay, T. (2008). How environmentalists ‘greened’ trade policy: Strategic action and the architecture of field overlap. American Sociological Review, 73(6), 970–991. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240807300605
- Fairbrother, M. (2014). Economists, capitalists, and the making of globalization: North American free trade in comparative-historical perspective. American Journal of Sociology, 119(5), 1324–1379. https://doi.org/10.1086/675410
- Fromartz. (2006, March 1). Who lobbies for small manufacturers on China? https://money.cnn.com/magazines/fsb/fsb_archive/2006/03/01/8370319/index.htm.
- Gawande, B. K., Krishna, P., & Olarreaga, M. (2012). Lobbying competition over trade policy. International Economic Review, 53(1), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2354.2011.00673.x
- Gawande, K., & Magee, C. (2012). Free riding and protection for sale. International Studies Quarterly, 56(4), 735–747. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2012.00745.x
- Gawande, K., & Bandyopadhyay, U. (2000). Is protection for sale? A test of the Grossman-Helpman theory of endogenous protection. Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(1), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465300558579
- Goldberg, P. K., & Maggi, G. (1999). Protection for sale: An empirical investigation. American Economic Review, 89(5), 1135–1155. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.5.1135
- Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1994). Protection for sale. The American Economic Review, 84(4), 833–850.
- Kay, T., & Evans, R. L. (2018). Trade battles: Activism and the politicization of international trade policy. Oxford University Press.
- Kay, T. (2011). NAFTA and the politics of labor transnationalism. Cambridge University Press.
- Kelsey, J. (2008). Serving whose interests?: The Political economy of trade in services agreements. Routledge.
- Kim, I. S., & Osgood, I. (2019). Firms in trade and trade politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-063728
- Kim, I. S., Milner, H. V., Bernauer, T., Osgood, I., Spilker, G., & Tingley, D. (2019). Firms and global value chains: Identifying firms’ multidimensional trade preferences. International Studies Quarterly, 63(1), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqy055
- Kim, I. S. (2017). Political cleavages within industry: Firm-level lobbying for trade liberalization. American Political Science Review, 111(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000654
- Krueger, Anne, ed. (1996). The political economy of trade protection. University of Chicago Press.
- Levin, S. (2015). Levin trade speech: Withhold fast track until TPP is on course. Ways and Means Committee—Democrats. https://waysandmeans.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/levin-trade-speech-withhold-fast-track-until-tpp-course.
- Lighthizer, R. (2018). 9th China Business Conference. The China Business Conference: Dedicated to economic, political, and regulatory developments affecting American business in China. http://videos.uschamber.com/detail/videos/latest-videos/video/5781409427001/9th-china-business-conference.
- Limão, N. (2016). Preferential trade agreements [Working Paper]. National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Liss, J. (2019). Social and political drivers of the reorientation of U.S. Social Currents, 6(3), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329496519825512
- Madeira, M. A. (2016). New trade, new politics: intra-industry trade and domestic political coalitions. Review of International Political Economy, 23(4), 677–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2016.1218354
- Mansfield, E. D., & Mutz, D. C. (2009). Support for free trade: Self-interest, sociotropic politics, and out-group anxiety. International Organization, 63(3), 425–457. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818309090158
- Martina, M. (2019, June 11). Trump defends tariff strategy, China says ‘not afraid’ of trade war. Reuters.
- McGregor, J. (2017). How Trump can win with China. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/02/03/towards-a-trump-pacific-partnership-a-way-forward-to-win-on-trade-with-china/.
- Milner, H. V. (1989). Resisting protectionism. Princeton University Press.
- Osgood, I. (2017a). Industrial fragmentation over trade: The role of variation in global engagement. International Studies Quarterly, 61(3), 642–659. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqx027
- Osgood, I. (2017b). The breakdown of industrial opposition to trade: Firms, product variety, and reciprocal liberalization. World Politics, 69(1), 184–231.
- Osgood, I. (2018). Globalizing the supply chain: Firm and industrial support for US trade agreements. International Organization, 72(2), 455–484.
- Rodrik, D. (1997). Has globalization gone too far? Peterson Institute for International Economics.
- Saldana, J. (2011). Fundamentals of qualitative research. Oxford University Press.
- Schaffer, L. M., & Spilker, G. (2019). Self-interest versus sociotropic considerations: An information-based perspective to understanding individuals’ trade preferences. Review of International Political Economy, 26(6), 1266–1292. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2019.1642232
- Sell, S. K., & Prakash, A. (2004). Using ideas strategically: The contest between business and NGO networks in intellectual property rights. International Studies Quarterly, 48(1), 143–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-8833.2004.00295.x
- Sell, S. K. (2003). Private power, public law: The globalization of intellectual property rights. Cambridge University Press.
- Stern, R. M. (2009). Globalization and international trade policies. World Scientific.
- Stolper, W. F., & Samuelson, P. A. (1941). Protection and real wages. The Review of Economic Studies, 9(1), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.2307/2967638
- Stumo, M. (2018). Address by Michael Stumo to the John William Pope and Jesse Helms center foundations. CPA. https://www.prosperousamerica.org/address_by_michael_stumo_to_the_john_william_pope_and_jesse_helms_center_foundations.
- US Chamber of Commerce. (2019). Strengthen the World Trade Organization. https://www.uschamber.com/issue-brief/strengthen-the-world-trade-organization.
- USTR. (2018a). Report to congress on China’s WTO compliance. United States Trade Representative. https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/2018-USTR-Report-to-Congress-on-China%27s-WTO-Compliance.pdf.
- USTR. (2018b). USTR issues tariffs on Chinese products in response to unfair trade practices. United States Trade Representative. https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2018/june/ustr-issues-tariffs-chinese-products.
- USTR. (2018c). 2018 trade policy agenda and 2017 annual report of the President of the United States on the trade agreements program. United States Trade Representative. https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/Press/Reports/2018/AR/2018%20Annual%20Report%20FINAL.PDF.
- USTR. (2018d). Section 301 report into China’s acts, policies, and practices related to technology transfer, intellectual property, and innovation. United States Trade Representative. https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/Section%20301%20FINAL.PDF.
- Wallach, L., & Woodall, P. (2004). Whose trade organization?: A comprehensive guide to the WTO. New Press.
- Waterman, J. (2016). Jeremie Waterman speaks at the China card conference. USC U.S.-China Institute.