References
- Ackerly, B., & True, J. (2013). Methods and methodologies. In G. Waylen. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of gender and politics (pp. 1–26). Oxford University Press.
- Adler-Nissen, R., & Kropp, K. (2015). A sociology of knowledge approach to European integration: four analytical principles. Journal of European Integration, 37(2), 155–173. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2014.990133
- Aggarwal, V. (2010). I don’t get no respect: The travails of IPE. International Studies Quarterly, 54(3), 893–895. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2010.00615.x
- Ahlgren, P., Jarneving, B., & Rousseau, R. (2003). Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(6), 550–560. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10242
- Ashworth, L. (2011). Feminism, war and the prospects for peace. Helena Swanwick and the lost feminists of interwar international relations. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 13(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2011.534660
- Bedford, K., & Rai, S. (2010). Feminists theorize international political economy. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 36(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/652910
- Blaney, D., & Inayatullah, N. (2010). Savage economics. Routledge.
- Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008(10), P10008. [Database] https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008
- Blyth, M. (2009). Torn between two lovers? Caught in the middle of British and American IPE. New Political Economy, 14(3), 329–336. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13563460903087458
- Blyth, M., & Matthijs, M. (2017). Black Swans, Lame Ducks, and the Mystery of IPE’s missing macroeconomy. Review of International Political Economy, 24(2), 203–231. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2017.1308417
- Camic, C., Gross, N. & Lamont, M. (Eds.). (2011). Social knowledge in the making. University of Chicago Press.
- Chaudoin, S., & Milner, H. (2017). Science and the system: IPE and International Monetary Politics. Review of International Political Economy, 24(4), 681–698. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2017.1302974
- Clift, B. (2014). Comparative political economy: States, markets and global capitalism. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Clift, B. (2021). Comparative political economy: States, markets and global capitalism. 2nd Edition. Macmillan International Higher Education.
- Clift, B., & Rosamond, B. (2009). Lineages of a British International Political Economy. In Blyth, M. (Ed.). Routledge handbook of international political economy (pp. 95–111). Routledge.
- Cohen, B. J. (2007). The transatlantic divide: Why are American and British IPE so different?. Review of International Political Economy, 14(2), 197–219. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290701288277
- Cohen, B. J. (2008). International political economy: An intellectual history. Princeton University Press.
- Cohen, B. J. (2010). Are IPE Journals becoming boring?. International Studies Quarterly, 54(3), 887–891. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2010.00614.x
- Cohen, B. J. (2014). Advanced introduction to international political economy. Edward Elgar.
- Cohen, B. J. (2017). The IPE of money revisited. Review of International Political Economy, 24(4), 657–680. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2016.1259119
- Cohen, B. J. (2019). Advanced introduction to international political economy (2nd ed.). Edward Elgar.
- Colgan, J. (2017). Gender bias in international relations graduate education? New evidence from syllabi. PS: Political Science & Politics, 50(2), 456–460.
- Cox, R. W. (1992). Take Six Eggs’: Theory, finance, and the real economy in the work of Susan Strange. In Cox, R.W. & Sinclair, T. (Eds.) Approaches to worlds order. Cambridge University Press.
- Cox, R. (2009). The ‘British School’ in the global context. New Political Economy, 14(3), 315–328. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13563460903087441
- Denemark, R. (2010). Towards a vibrant IPE literature: Commiserating with Cohen. International Studies Quarterly, 54(3), 897–899. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2010.00616.x
- Egghe, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2009). The relation between Pearson’s correlation coefficient r and Salton’s cosine measure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(5), 1027–1036. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21009
- Elias, J. (2016). Whose crisis? Whose recovery? Lessons learned (and not) from the Asian crisis. In A. Hozic & J. True (Eds.), Scandalous economics: Gender and the politics of financial crises (pp. 109–125). Oxford University Press.
- Elias, J., & Roberts, A. (2016). Feminist global political economies of the everyday: From bananas to bingo. Globalizations, 13(6), 787–800. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2016.1155797
- Elias, J., & Roberts, A. (Eds.). (2018). Feminist global political economies of the everyday. Routledge.
- Fuller, S. (1991). Disciplinary boundaries and the rhetoric of the social sciences. Poetics Today, 12(2), 301–325. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1772855
- Gamble, A. (1995). The new political economy. Political Studies, 43(3), 516–530. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1995.tb00320.x
- Gamble, A., Payne, A., Hoogvelt, A., Dietrich, M., & Kenny, M. (1996). Editorial: New political economy. New Political Economy, 1(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13563469608406234
- Germain, R. (2009). The ‘American’ School of IPE? A dissenting view. Review of International Political Economy, 16(1), 95–105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290802524133
- Gieryn, T. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781–795. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2095325
- Gieryn, T. (1999). Cultural boundaries of science. University of Chicago Press.
- Gilpin, R. (1987). The political economy of international relations. Princeton University Press.
- Griffin, P. (2007). Refashioning IPE. What and how gender analysis teaches international (global) political economy. Review of International Political Economy, 14(4), 719–736. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290701475437
- Griffin, P. (2010). Gender, governance and the global political economy. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 64(1), 86–104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10357710903460030
- Hansen, L. (2011). A research agenda on feminist texts and the gendered constitution of international politics in Rebecca West’s Black Lamb and Grey Falcon. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 40(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829811412432
- Helleiner, E., & Rosales, A. (2017). Toward global IPE: The overlooked significance of the Haya-Mariátegui debate. International Studies Review, 19(4), 667–691. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/vix034
- Higgott, R., & Watson, M. (2007). All at sea in a barbed wire canoe: Professor Cohen’s transatlantic voyage in IPE. Review of International Political Economy, 15(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290701751241
- Hobson, J. (2013a). Part 1 – Revealing the Eurocentric foundations of IPE: A critical historiography of the discipline from the classical to the modern era. Review of International Political Economy, 20(5), 1024–1054. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2012.704519
- Hobson, J. (2013b). Part 2 – Reconstructing the non-Eurocentric foundations of IPE: From Eurocentric ‘open economy politics’ to inter-civilizational political economy. Review of International Political Economy, 20(5), 1055–1081. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2012.733498
- Hozic, A. & True, J. (Eds.). (2016). Scandalous economics: Gender and the politics of financial crises. Oxford University Press.
- Hozic, A., & True, J. (2017). Brexit as a scandal: Gender and global trumpism. Review of International Political Economy, 24(2), 270–287. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2017.1302491
- Hveem, H. (2009). Pluralist IPE: A view from outside the ‘schools’. New Political Economy, 14(3), 367–376. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13563460903087516
- Jackson, P. T. (2010). The conduct of inquiry in international relations. philosophy of science and its implications for the study of world politics. Routledge.
- Katzenstein, P. J. (2009). Mid-Atlantic: Sitting on the knife’s sharp edge. Review of International Political Economy, 16(1), 122–135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290802524158
- Katzenstein, P. J., Keohane, R. O., & Krasner, S. D. (1998). International Organization and the study of world politics. International Organization, 52(4), 645–685. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830003558X
- Keohane, R. O. (2009). The Old IPE and the new. Review of International Political Economy, 16(1), 34–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290802524059
- Keohane, R. O. & Nye, J. N. (Eds). (1971). Transnational relations and world politics. Harvard University Press.
- Kindleberger, C. P. (2013). The world in depression, 1929-1939. 40th anniversary edition. University of California Press.
- Klein, J. T. (1996). Crossing boundaries: knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities. University of Virginia Press.
- Krätke, M., & Underhill, G. R. D. (2005). The Emergence of IPE. In. R. Stubbs & G.R.D. Underhill (Eds.). Political economy and the changing global order (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
- Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
- Lake, D. (2006). International Political Economy: A Maturing Interdiscipline. In D. A. Wittman & B.A. Weingast (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political economy. Oxford University Press.
- Lake, D. (2011). Why ‘Isms’ are evil: Theory, epistemology, and academic sects as impediments to understanding and progress. International Studies Quarterly, 55(2), 465–480. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00661.x
- Lamont, M., & Molnar, V. (2002). The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 167–195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107
- Leydesdorff, L., & de Nooy, W. (2017). The dynamics of journal-journal citation relations: Can ‘hot spots’ in the sciences be mapped?. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(1), 197–213. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23634
- Maliniak, D., & Tierney, M. (2009). The American School of IPE. Review of International Political Economy, 16(1), 6–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290802524042
- Manicas, P. (1986). A history and philosophy of the social sciences. Basil Blackwell.
- McNamara, K. (2009). Of intellectual monocultures and the study of IPE. Review of International Political Economy, 16(1), 72–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290802524117
- Owens, P. (2018). Women and the history of international thought. International Studies Quarterly, 62(3), 467–481. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqy027
- Peterson, V. S. (2005). How (the meaning of) gender matters in political economy. New Political Economy, 10(4), 499–521. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13563460500344468
- Powell, L. (1914). Review: La Political Economique Internationale. The American Economic Review, 4, 356.
- Ravenhill, J. (2007). In search of the missing middle. Review of International Political Economy, 15(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290701751258
- RIPE. (1994). Editorial: Forum for heterodox international political economy. Review of International Political Economy, 1(1), 1–12.
- Rosamond, B. (2007). European integration and the social science of EU studies: The disciplinary politics of a subfield. International Affairs, 83(2), 231–252. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2007.00616.x
- Seabrooke, L., & Young, K. (2017). The networks and niches of international political economy. Review of International Political Economy, 24(2), 288–331. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2016.1276949
- Shapin, S. (1992). Discipline and bounding: The history and sociology of science as seen through the externalism-internslism debate. History of Science, 30(4), 333–369. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/007327539203000401
- Shapin, S. (1995). Here and everywhere: Sociology of scientific knowledge. Annual Review of Sociology, 21(1), 289–321. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.21.080195.001445
- Sharman, J., & Weaver, C. (2013). RIPE, the American School and diversity in global IPE. Review of International Political Economy, 20(5), 1082–1100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2013.824915
- Steans, J. (1999). The private is global: Feminist politics and the global political economy. New Political Economy, 4(1), 113–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13563469908406388
- Steans, J., & Tepe, D. (2010). Introduction – social reproduction in international political economy: Theoretical insights and international, transnational and local settings. Review of International Political Economy, 17(5), 807–815. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2010.481928
- Strange, S. (1970). International economics and international politics: A case of mutual neglect. International Affairs, 46(2), 304–315. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2613829
- Strange, S. (1971). Sterling and British policy. Oxford University Press.
- Strange, S. (1988). States and markets. Pinter.
- Swidler, A., & Arditi, J. (1994). The new sociology of knowledge. Annual Review of Sociology, 20(1), 305–329. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.20.080194.001513
- Tilley, L., & Shilliam, R. (2018). Raced markets: An introduction. New Political Economy, 23(5), 534–545. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2017.1417366
- True, J. (2016). The global financial crisis’s silver bullet: Women leaders after the financial crisis. In A. Hozic & J. True (Eds.), Scandalous economics: Gender and the politics of financial crises. (pp. 41–56)- Oxford University Press.
- Underhill, G. R. D. (2000). State, market, and global political economy: genealogy of an (inter-?) discipline. International Affairs, 76(4), 805–824. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00166
- Wagner, P., Wittrock, B., & Whitley, R.P. (Eds.). (1990). Discourses on society: The shaping of the social science disciplines. Springer.
- Watson, M. (2005). Foundations of international political economy. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Waylen, G. (1997). Gender, feminism and political economy. New Political Economy, 2(2), 205–220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13563469708406297
- Weaver, C. (2009). Reflections on the American School. Review of International Political Economy, 16(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290802541228
- Whitehead, A. N. (1917). The organisation of thought. Williams and Norgate.