Misrecognised, misfit and misperceived: why not a Latin American school of IPE?

References

• Acharya, A., & Buzan, B. (2007). Why is there no non-Western international relations theory? An introduction. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 7(3), 287–312. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcm012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acharya, A., Deciancio, M., & Tussie, D. (Eds.). (2022). Latin America in global international relations. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Almeida, R. (1994). Kemmerer en el Ecuador. FLACSO Ecuador.
   Google Scholar
• Amin, S. (1975). El desarrollo desigual. Fontanella.
   Google Scholar
• Anderl, F., & Witt, A. (2020). Problematising the Global in Global IR. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 49(1), 32–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829820971708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antúnes, A. (2007). Infra-estrutura na América do Sul: situação atual, necessidades e complementaridades possíveis com o Brasil. CEPAL.
   Google Scholar
• Bambirra, V. (1974). El capitalismo dependiente latinoamericano. Siglo XXI.
   Google Scholar
• Belén Herrero, M., Loza, J., & Belardo, M. B. (2019). Collective health and regional integration in Latin America: An opportunity for building a new international health agenda. Global Public Health, 14(6–7), 835–846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaney, D., & Inayatullah, N. (2018). Liberal International Political Economy as colonial science. In A. Gofas, I. Hamati-Ataya, & N. Onuf (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of the history, philosophy and sociology of international relations (pp. 60–74). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Blyth, M. (Ed.). (2009). Handbook of International Political Economy (IPE): IPE as a global conversation. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Borón, A. (1970). Desarrollo económico y comportamiento político. Escuela Latinoamericana de Ciencia Política. y Administración Pública.
   Google Scholar
• Borón, A. (2008). Teoría(s) de la Dependencia. Realidad Económica, (238), 20–44.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, J. (2020). In scramble for coronavirus supplies, rich countries push poor aside. The New York Times [online], April 9. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/09/world/coronavirus-equipment-rich-poor.html
   Google Scholar
• Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (2010). As três interpretações da Dependência. Perspectivas, (38), 17–48.
   Google Scholar
• Burges, S. (2017). Brazil in the world: The international relations of a South American giant. University of Manchester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caporaso, J. (1980). Dependency theory: Continuities and discontinuities in development studies. International Organization, 34(4), 605–628. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300018865
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso, F. H. (1977). The consumption of dependency theory in the United States. Latin American Research Review, 12(3), 7–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso, F. H., & Faletto, E. (1979). Dependency and development in Latin America. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Centeno, M. A. (2002). Blood and debt: War and the nation-state in Latin America. Penn State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Centeno, M. A. (2008). Latin American independence and the double dilemma. Latin American Politics and Society, 50(3), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2008.00025.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cepik, M., Chagas-Bastos, F., & Ioris, R. (2021). Missing the China factor: Evidence from Brazil and Mexico. Economic and Political Studies, 9(3), 358–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/20954816.2021.1933767
   Google Scholar
• Chagas-Bastos, F. (2015). Modelos de inserção internacional na América Latina do início do século XXI (1990–2014): uma análise comparativa de Brasil e México [Doctoral thesis]. University of São Paulo, São Paulo.
   Google Scholar
• Chagas-Bastos, F. (2022a). Between ‘lo práctico’ and ‘lo posible’: International Insertion as an Innovation in Latin America's Contribution to Global IR. In A. Acharya, M. Deciancio, & D. Tussie (Eds.), Latin America in global international relations (pp. 202–219). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chagas-Bastos, F. (2022b). International insertion: A non-Western contribution to IR. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Chagas-Bastos, F., et al. (forthcoming). The Global IR/worlding turn coming of age: Diagnoses and paths forward. International Studies Perspectives.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, G., Pearson, M., & Yong, W. (2013). Introduction: IPE with Chinese characteristics. Review of International Political Economy, 20(6), 1145–1164. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2013.831370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clift, B., Kristensen, P., & Rosamond, R. (2022). Remembering and forgetting IPE: Disciplinary history as boundary work. Review of International Political Economy, 29(2), 339–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2020.1826341
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, B. (2008). International political economy: An intellectual history. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, B. (2019). Advanced introduction to international political economy. 2nd.ed. Edgar Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R. (1981). Social forces, states and world orders: Beyond international relations theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10(2), 126–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298810100020501
   Google Scholar
• Deciancio, M. (2016). International relations from the south: A regional research agenda for global IR. International Studies Review, 18(1), 106–119. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viv020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deciancio, M., & Quiliconi, C. (2020). Widening the ‘global conversation’: Highlighting the voices of IPE in the Global South. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, 9(2), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.726271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado, J. (2016). Sociedades posneoliberales en América Latina y persistencia del extractivismo. Economía Informa, 396, 84–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecin.2016.01.005
   Google Scholar
• Devés-Valdés, E. (2017). Pensamiento Periférico Asia, África, América Latina, Eurasia y más. Una tesis interpretativa global. 2nd ed. Ariadna Ediciones.
   Google Scholar
• Díaz Alejandro, C. (1983). Open economy, closed polity? In D. Tussie (Ed.), Latin America in the world economy: New perspectives. St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diniz, E., Boschi, R., & Gaitán, F. (2012). Elites estratégicas y cambio institucional: la construcción del proyecto post-neoliberal en Argentina y Brasil. Revista de Estudos e Pesquisas Sobre as Américas, 6(2), 14–53.
   Google Scholar
• Dussel, E. (1993). Eurocentrism and modernity (introduction to the Frankfurt lectures). Boundary 2, 20(3), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.2307/303341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Estay, J., & Sánchez, G. (2005). Una revisión general del ALCA y sus implicaciones. In J. Estay & G. Sánchez (Coord.), El ALCA y sus peligros para América Latina (pp. 17–106). CLACSO.
   Google Scholar
• Etchemendy, S. (2011). Models of economic liberalization. Business, workers, and compensation in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, P., et al. (2017). The relevance of dependent development then and now. In U. Kufakurinani (Ed.), Dialogues on development—dependency theory (pp. 27–33). Institute for New Economic Thinking.
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, L. (2012). Between West and non-West: Latin American contributions to international thought. The International History Review, 34(4), 679–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2012.707980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández Alonso, J. (2018). Diplomacia financiera en la periferia global: entre la cooperación y la coerción. Aproximaciones teórico-empíricas a partir de las relaciones crediticias de Argentina con Venezuela y China. Desafíos, 30(2), 43–88. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/desafios/a.6139
   Google Scholar
• Ferrer, A. (1997). Hechos y Ficciones de la Globalización: Argentina y el Mercosur en el Sistema Internacional. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, A. G. (1966). The development of underdevelopment. Monthly Review, 18(4), 17–31.
   Google Scholar
• Furtado, C. (1961). Desenvolvimento e subdesenvolvimento. Fundo de Cultura.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, A., Mendonça, M. L., Sá, M., et al. (2016). International political economy in Latin America: Redefining the periphery. In A. Cafruny (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of critical international political economy (pp. 431–452). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosn, F. (forthcoming). How can we define who is in the South? International Studies Perspectives.
   Google Scholar
• Gilpin, R. (1987). The political economy of international relations. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giraudo, M. E. (2020). Dependent development in South America: China and the soybean nexus. Journal of Agrarian Change, 20(1), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobat, M. (2013). The invention of Latin America: A transnational history of anti-imperialism, democracy, and race. The American Historical Review, 118(5), 1345–1375. https://doi.org/10.1093/ahr/118.5.1345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudynas, E. (2009). Diez tesis urgentes sobre el nuevo extractivismo. Contextos y demandas bajo el progresismo actual. In Centro Andino de Acción Popular (CAAP) de Ecuador and Centro Latino Americano de Ecología Social (CLAES) (Eds.), Extractivismo, política y sociedad (pp. 187–225). CAAP & CLAES.
   Google Scholar
• Helleiner, E., & Rosales, A. (2017a). Peripheral thoughts for international political economy: Latin American ideational innovation and the diffusion of the nineteenth century free trade doctrine. International Studies Quarterly, 61(4), 924–934. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqx063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helleiner, E., & Rosales, A. (2017b). Toward global IPE: The overlooked significance of the Haya-Mariátegui debate. International Studies Review, 19(4), 667–691. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/vix034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helleiner, E., & Wang, H. (2018). Beyond the tributary tradition of Chinese IPE: The indigenous roots of early Chinese economic nationalism. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 11(4), 451–483. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poy016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrich, J. (2020). The WEIRDest people in the world: How the West became psychologically peculiar and particularly prosperous. Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, J. (2020). Multicultural origins of the global economy: Beyond the western-centric frontier. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hofferberth, M. (2019). Get your act(ors) together! Theorizing agency in global governance. International Studies Review, 21(1), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viy018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. (1968). Political order in changing societies. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Ianni, O. (1968). Colapso do populismo no Brasil. Civilização Brasileira.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, C. (2001). El abismo entre las ilusiones y los efectos del ALCA. Nueva Sociedad, (174), 33–39.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, C. (2018). La Teoría de la Dependencia Cincuenta Años Después. Batalla de Ideas.
   Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, P. (2018). The second coming? Reflections on a global theory of international relations. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 11(4), 373–390. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poy012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, R., & Nye, J. (1977). Power and interdependence: World politics in transition. Brown & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Kingah, S., and Quiliconi, C. (Eds.). (2016). Global and regional leadership of BRICS countries. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kufakurinani, U., et al. (Eds.). (2017). Dialogues on development—Dependency theory. Institute for New Economic Thinking.
   Google Scholar
• Kvangraven, I. (2021). Beyond the stereotype: Restating the relevance of the dependency research programme. Development and Change, 52(1), 76–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazzarini, S. (2010). Capitalismo de Laços. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Leander, A. (2002). Do we really need reflexivity in IPE? Bourdieu’s two reasons for answering affirmatively. Review of International Political Economy, 9(4), 601–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969229022000021817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leander, A. (2009). Why we need multiple stories about the global political economy. Review of International Political Economy, 16(2), 321–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290902718486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leira, H., & Carvalho, B. (2018). The function of myths in International Relations: Discipline and identity. In A. Gofas, I. Hamati-Ataya, & N. Onuf (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of the history, philosophy and sociology of international relations (pp. 222–235). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Maliniak, D., Peterson, S., Powers, R., & Tierney, M. (2018). Is international relations a global discipline? Hegemony, insularity, and diversity in the field. Security Studies, 27(3), 448–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2017.1416824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margulis, M. (Ed.). (2017). The global political economy of Raúl Prebisch. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marini, R. M. (1969). Subdesarrollo y Revolución. Siglo XXI.
   Google Scholar
• Mattoo, A. (2009). Upgrading the study of international relations. The Hindu, April 21.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzuca, S. (2021). Latecomer state formation: Political geography and capacity failure in Latin America. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merquior, J. G. (1991). The other West: On the historical position of Latin America. International Sociology, 6(2), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/026858091006002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mignolo, W. (2003). Histórias locais/Projetos globais: colonialidade, saberes subalternos e pensamento liminar. Humanitas.
   Google Scholar
• Mignolo, W. (2007). La idea de América Latina. Gedisa.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, R. (1988). O espelho de Próspero: cultura e ideias nas Américas. Companhia das Letras.
   Google Scholar
• Nemiña, P. (2015). Acción económica e incertidumbre: el aporte de Jens Beckert a la sociología económica. Equidad y Desarrollo, (23), 9–33. https://doi.org/10.19052/ed.2884
   Google Scholar
• Nemiña, P. (2019). La relación entre el FMI y los gobiernos tomadores de crédito. El aporte de la EPI centrado en la incidencia de los intereses. Desafíos, 31(2), 341–373. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/desafios/a.6140
   Google Scholar
• Palma, J. G. (2009). Why did the Latin American critical tradition in the social. Sciences become practically extinct? In M. Blyth (Ed.), The handbook of international political economy (pp. 243–265). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, M., & Schulz, C.-A. (2018). Setting the regional agenda: A critique of posthegemonic regionalism. Latin American Politics and Society, 60(1), 102–127. https://doi.org/10.1017/lap.2017.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, N. (2005). Globalizing international political economy. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, N. (2009). The slow death of pluralism. Review of International Political Economy, 16(1), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290802524125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picq, M. (2020). Resistance to extractivism and megaprojects in Latin America. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.
   Google Scholar
• Pose Ferraro, N. (2018). Ideas y política exterior económica en el mundo en desarrollo. El caso de la salida de Uruguay de las negociaciones del TiSA. Desafíos, 30(2), 89–126. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/desafios/a.6134
   Google Scholar
• Prebisch, R. (1950). The economic development of Latin America and its principal problems. United Nations Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Quijano, A. (2010). La crisis del horizonte de sentido colonial/moderno/eurocentrado. Revista de la Casa de Las Américas, (259–260), 4–15.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos, L. (2014). Potências médias emergentes e reforma da arquitetura financeira mundial? Uma análise do BRICS no G20. Revista de Sociologia e Política, 22(50), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-987314225005
   Google Scholar
• Ravecca, P. (2019). The politics of political science: Re-writing Latin American experiences. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ravecca, P., & Dauphinee, E. (2018). Narrative and the possibilities for scholarship. International Political Sociology, 12(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olx029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riggirozzi, P. (2006). The World Bank as conveyor and broker of knowledge and funds in Argentina’s governance reforms. In D. Stone & C. Wright (Eds.), The World Bank and governance: A decade of reform and reaction (pp. 207–227). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Riggirozzi, P. (2014). Regionalism through social policy: Collective action and health diplomacy in South America. Economy and Society, 43(3), 432–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2014.881598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riggirozzi, P., & Tussie, D. (2012). The rise of post-hegemonic regionalism. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, J. (2016). International relations in the prison of political science. International Relations, 30(2), 127–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117816644662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rostow, W. (1960). The stages of economic growth: A non-communist manifesto. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Santiso, J. (2006). Latin America’s political economy of the possible. Beyond good revolutionaries and free-marketeers. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, T. (1968). El nuevo carácter de la dependencia. Cuadernos Del Centro de Estudios Sociológicos, 10, 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, C.-A. (2017). Accidental activists: Latin American status-seeking at The Hague. International Studies Quarterly, 61(3), 612–622. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqx030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slipak, A. (2014). América Latina y China: ¿Cooperación Sur-Sur o ‘Consenso de Beijing’? Nueva Sociedad, (250), 102–113.
   Google Scholar
• Spero, J. (1977). The politics of international economic relations. St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stavenhagen, R. (1972). Siete tesis equivocadas sobre América Latina. In R. Stavenhagen (Eds.), Sociología y Subdesarrollo. Editorial Nuestro Tiempo.
   Google Scholar
• Strange, S. (1970). International economics and international relations: A case of mutual neglect. International Affairs, 46(2), 304–315. https://doi.org/10.2307/2613829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strange, S. (1976). International monetary relations of the western world. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strange, S. (1997). The future of global capitalism; or will divergence persist forever ? In C. Crouch & W. Streeck (Eds.), Political economy of modern capitalism: Mapping convergence and diversity (pp. 182–191). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Svampa, M. (2013). Consenso de las Commodities y lenguajes de valoración en América Latina. Nueva Sociedad, (244), 30–46.
   Google Scholar
• Tickner, A. (2003). Seeing IR differently: Notes from the Third World. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 32(2), 295–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298030320020301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tickner, A. (2008). Latin American IR and the Primacy of lo práctico. International Studies Review, 10(4), 735–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2008.00829.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (1975). The formation of national states in Western Europe. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trucco, P. (2016). Socios en la integración productiva. La estrategia asociativa de las empresas en el Mercosur. FLACSO.
   Google Scholar
• Tussie, D. (2018). Set to shake up global economic governance: Can the BRICS be dismissed? Global Governance, 24(3), 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02403002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tussie, D., & Riggirozzi, P. (2015). A global conversation: Rethinking IPE in post-hegemonic scenarios. Contexto Internacional, 37(3), 1041–1068. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-85292015000300009
   Google Scholar
• Underhill, G. (2000). State, market, and global political economy: Genealogy of an (inter-?) discipline. International Affairs, 76(4), 805–824. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urdinez, F., Mouron, F., Schenoni, L., & Oliveira, A. (2016). Chinese economic statecraft and US hegemony in Latin America: An empirical analysis, 2003–2014. Latin American Politics and Society, 58(4), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/laps.12000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Klaveren, A. (1997). América Latina: Hacia un regionalismo abierto. Estudios Internacionales, 30(117), 62–78.
   Google Scholar
• Vivares, E. (2013). El Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo en la década neoliberal. FLACSO Ecuador.
   Google Scholar
• Vivares, E., & Dolcetti-Marcolini, M. (2016). Two regionalisms, two Latin Americas or beyond Latin America? Contributions from a critical and decolonial IPE. Third World Quarterly, 37(5), 866–882. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1109438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, C., & Quiliconi, C. (2007). China’s surge in Latin American markets: Policy challenges and responses. Politics & Policy, 35(3), 410–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00067.x
   Google Scholar