New champions of preferential trade? Two-level games in China’s and India’s shifting commercial strategies

References

• Aggarwal V and Lee S (eds) (2011). Trade policy in the Asia-Pacific: The role of ideas, interests, and domestic institutions. Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Akhter, N., & Ghani, E. (2010). Regional integration in South Asia: an analysis of trade flows using the gravity model. The Pakistan Development Review, 49(2), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.30541/v49i2pp.105-118
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, R. (2006). Multilateralising regionalism: Spaghetti bowls as building blocs on the path to global free trade. The World Economy, 29(11), 1451–1518. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2006.00852.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardhan, P. (2020). Reflections on Indian Political Economy. In E. Chatterjee & M. McCartney (Eds.), Class and conflict (pp. 28–40). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Breslin, S. (2003). Reforming China's embedded socialist compromise: China and the WTO. Global Change, Peace & Security, 15(3), 213–229.
   Google Scholar
• Bogner, A., Littig, B. & Menz, W. (Eds.). (2009). Interviewing experts. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Capling, A., & Ravenhill, J. (2011). Multilateralising regionalism: What role for the trans-Pacific partnership agreement? The Pacific Review, 24(5), 553–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2011.634078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casas i Klett, T., & Serrano Oswald, O. R., S. (2018). Free trade agreements as BRI’s stepping-stone to multilateralism: Is the Sino–Swiss FTA the gold standard?. In W. Zhang, I. Alon, & C. Lattemann (Eds.), China's belt and road initiative: Changing the rules of globalization (pp. 75–93). Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Chaisse, J., Chakraborty, D., & Nag, B. (2011). The three-pronged strategy of india’s preferential trade policy – A contribution to the study of modern economic treaties. Connecticut Journal of International Law, 26(2), 415–455.
   Google Scholar
• Chase, K. (2003). Economic interests and regional trading arrangements: The case of NAFTA. International Organization, 57(1), 137–174. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818303571053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, C. P. (2007). Resolving China’s island disputes: A two-level game analysis. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 12(1), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-007-9001-7
   Google Scholar
• Da Conceição, H., & Mello, P. (2017). Two-level games in foreign policy analysis. In Oxford research Encyclopedia of politics (pp. 770–789). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dent, C. (2010). Free trade agreements in the Asia-Pacific a decade on: evaluating the past, looking to the future. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 10(2), 201–245. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcp022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desker, B. (2004). In defence of FTAs: From purity to pragmatism in East Asia. The Pacific Review, 17(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951274042000182393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dür, A. (2007). EU trade policy as protection for exporters: The agreements with Mexico and Chile. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(4), 833–855. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00750.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dür, A., Baccini, L., & Elsig, M. (2014). The design of international trade agreements: Introducing a new dataset. The Review of International Organizations, 9(3), 353–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-013-9179-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckhardt, J., & Poletti, A. (2016). The politics of global value chains: Import-dependent Firms and EU-Asia trade agreements. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(10), 1543–1562. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1085073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckhardt, J., & Wang, H. (2021). China's new generation trade agreements: Importing rules to lock in domestic reform? Regulation & Governance, 15(3), 581–597. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsig, M., & Eckhardt, J. (2015). The creation of the multilateral trade court: Design and experiential learning. World Trade Review, 14(S1), S13–S32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745615000130
   Google Scholar
• Feridhanusetyawan, T. (2005). Preferential Trade Agreements in the Asia-Pacific Region. IMF working paper, WP/05/149. International Monetary Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, P. B., Jacobson, H. K., Putnam, R. D., & Putnam, R. D. (1993). (Eds.). Double-edged diplomacy: International bargaining and domestic politics. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, P., Low, P., & Stoler, A. L. (Eds.). (2005). Managing the challenges of WTO participation: 45 case studies. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, R., & Kim, S. Y. (2012). Reciprocal trade agreements in Asia: Credible commitment to trade liberalization or paper tigers? Journal of East Asian Studies, 12(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1598240800007608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiscox, M. (2002). International trade and political conflict. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, C., Osnago, A., & Ruta, M. (2017). Horizontal depth: A new database on the content of preferential trade agreements. World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Hopewell, K. (2015). Different paths to power: The rise of Brazil, India and China at the WTO. Review of International Political Economy, 22(6), 1128–1158. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2015.1066696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopewell, K. (2016). Breaking the WTO: How emerging powers disrupted the neoliberal project. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hopewell, K. (2019). US-China conflict in global trade governance: the new politics of agricultural subsidies at the WTO. Review of International Political Economy, 26(2), 207–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2018.1560352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopewell, K. (2020). Clash of powers: US-China rivalry in global trade governance. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, D. A. (2017). Clashing over commerce: A history of US trade policy. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y. (2010). China’s pursuit of free trade agreements: Is China exceptional? Review of International Political Economy, 17(2), 238–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290903337799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, V. (2012). Econometric analysis of the India–Sri Lanka free trade agreement. Asian Economic Journal, 26(2), 159–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8381.2012.02078.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawai, M., & Wignaraja, G. (2013). Patterns of free trade areas in Asia. East-West Center.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, S. (2005). The business of lobbying in China. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kochanek, S. A. (1996). Liberalisation and business lobbying in India. The Journal of Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 34(3), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/14662049608447729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavenex, S., Serrano, O., & Büthe, T. (2021). Power transitions and the rise of the regulatory state: Global market governance in flux. Regulation & Governance, 15(3), 445–471.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, A. (2010). India’s trade with the world: retrospect and prospect. In: S. Acharya & R. Mohan, Eds., India’s Economy: Performances and Challenges. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, J. S. (1994). ‘ Learning and foreign policy: Sweeping a conceptual minefield. International Organization, 48(2), 279–312. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300028198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lütz, S. (2011). Back to the future? The domestic sources of transatlantic regulation. Review of International Political Economy, 18(4), iii–xxii. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2011.638607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lütz, S., & Hilgers, S. (2019). When overlapping organisations play two-level games: IMF–EU interaction in credit lending to Latvia and Greece. New Political Economy, 24(3), 299–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2018.1443063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manger, M. (2014). The economic logic of Asian preferential trade agreements: the role of intra-industry trade. Journal of East Asian Studies, 14(2), 151–184. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1598240800008894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner, H. (1997). Industries, governments, and regional trade blocs. In M. Edward & M. Helen, The Political Economy of Regionalism. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of External Affairs. (2018). Revision of standard operating procedures (SOPs) with respect to MoUs/Agreements with foreign countries. No. 312/AS(MD)/17. Retrieved April 5, 2019, from https://www.mea.gov.in/images/Revised-SOPs-with-forwarding-letter-02042018.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (1993). Introduction: integrating international and domestic theories of international bargaining. In P. B. Evans, H. K. Jacobson, & R. D. Putnam (Eds.), Double-edged diplomacy: International bargaining and domestic politics. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morin, J. F. (2010). The two-level game of transnational networks: The case of the access to medicines campaign. International Interactions, 36(4), 309–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2010.523656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narlikar, A. (2010). New powers: How to become one and how to manage them. Hurst.
   Google Scholar
• Odell, J. S. (Ed.). (2006). Negotiating trade: Developing countries in the WTO and NAFTA. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Odell, J. S. (2001). Case study methods in international political economy. International Studies Perspectives, 2(2), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/1528-3577.00047
   Google Scholar
• Organski, A. F. K. (1958). World Politics, 299–338. Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Pant, M., & Deepika, S. (2015). FDI in India: History policy and the asian perspective. Orient Blackswan.
   Google Scholar
• Poletti, A., & De Bievre, D. (2014). The political science of European trade policy: A literature review with a research outlook. Comparative European Politics, 12(1), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2012.35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulsen, L. N. S. (2015). Bounded rationality and economic diplomacy: The politics of investment treaties in developing countries. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Postigo, A. (2016). Institutional spillovers from the negotiation and formulation of East Asian free trade agreements. Review of International Political Economy, 23(3), 379–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2015.1135178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games. International Organization, 42(3), 427–460. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravenhill, J. (2010). The ‘New East Asian Regionalism’: A political domino effect. Review of International Political Economy, 17(2), 178–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290903070887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravenhill, J., & Jiang, Y. (2009). China’s Move to Preferential Trading: a new direction in China’s diplomacy. Journal of Contemporary China, 18(58), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670560802431420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosendorff, P., & Milner, H. (2001). The optimal design of international trade institutions: Uncertainty and escape. International Organization, 55(4), 829–857. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081801317193619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, T. (2020). The economic history of India (pp. 1857–2010). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saha, A. (2019). Trade policy and lobbying effectiveness: Theory and evidence for India. European Journal of Political Economy, 56, 165–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salidjanova, N. (2015). China’s trade ambitions: Strategy and objectives behind China’s pursuit of free trade agreements (Staff Research Report). The U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Saraswat, V. K., Priya, P., & Ghosh, A. (2018). A note on free trade agreements and their costs. National Institution for Transforming India (NITI Aayog).
   Google Scholar
• Sinha, A. (2019). A theory of reform consolidation in India: From crisis-induced reforms to strategic internationalization. India Review, 18(1), 54–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/14736489.2019.1576987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S. N. (2021). Harmonizing the periphery: China’s neighbourhood strategy under Xi Jinping. The Pacific Review, 34(1), 56–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2019.1651383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solís, M. (2013). Business advocacy in Asian PTAs: A model of selective corporate lobbying with evidence from Japan. Business and Politics, 15(1), 87–116. https://doi.org/10.1515/bap-2012-0045
   Google Scholar
• Solís, M., & Katada, S. N. (2007). The Japan-Mexico FTA: A cross-regional step in the path towards Asian regionalism. Pacific Affairs, 80(2), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.5509/2007802279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solís, M., & Wilson, J. D. (2017). From APEC to mega-regionals: the evolution of the Asia-Pacific trade architecture. The Pacific Review, 30(6), 923–937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, T. N., & Archana, V. (2009). India in the global and regional trade: determinants of aggregate and bilateral trade flows and firms' decision to export. No. 232. Working paper, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER), New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• The Economist. (2014). Chinese-Australian FTA Agreed after Ten Years. 14 November 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G. (2002). Veto players: How political institutions work. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Urata, S., & Okabe, M. (2010). The impacts of free trade agreements on trade flows: An application of the gravity model approach. In F. Christopher & U. Shujiro (Eds.), Free trade agreements in the Asia Pacific (pp. 195–239). World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Wan, M. (2010). The domestic political economy of China’s preferential trade agreements. In A. Vinod & L. Seungjoo (Eds.), Trade policy in the Asia-Pacific: The role of ideas, interests, and domestic institutions (pp. 29–48). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, D., & Zangl, B. (1996). The European economic and monetary union: Two-level games' and the formation of international institutions. European Journal of International Relations, 2(3), 355–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066196002003003
   Google Scholar
• Yang, J. (2009). China’s competitive FTA strategy: Realism on a liberal slide. In M. Solís, B. Stallings, S. Katada (Eds), Competitive regionalism: FTA diffusion in the Pacific rim (pp. 216–235). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Yeo, Y. (2009). Remaking the Chinese state and the nature of economic governance? The early appraisal of the 2008 ‘super-ministry’reform. Journal of Contemporary China, 18(62), 729–743. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670560903172808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, A. R. (2011). Of executive preferences and societal constraints: The domestic politics of the transatlantic GMO dispute. Review of International Political Economy, 18(4), 506–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2010.483885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, K. (2016). China’s free trade agreement diplomacy. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 9(3), 277–305. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pow009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, K., Lu, Y., & Li, Y. W. (2021). Trade agreements and global value chain (GVC) participation: Evidence from Chinese industries. Economics & Politics, 33(3), 533–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. (2010). The impact of free trade agreements on business activity: A survey of firms in the People's Republic of China. ABDI working paper.
   Google Scholar