Repackaging growth at Davos: the World Economic Forum’s inclusive growth and development approach

References

• Albert, M. (2020). Beyond continuationism: Climate change, economic growth, and the future of world (dis)order. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 1–20. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2020.1825334
   Google Scholar
• Anand, R., Mishra, S., & Peiris, S. (2013). Inclusive growth revisited: Measurement and determinants. Economic premise; no. 122. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/22618
   Google Scholar
• Asian Development Bank. (1999). Fighting poverty in Asia and the Pacific: The poverty reduction strategy. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/11540/4876
   Google Scholar
• Asian Development Bank. (2008). Strategy 2020: The long-term strategic framework of the Asian Development Bank 2008–2020. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/11540/2980
   Google Scholar
• Asian Development Bank. (2018). Inclusive green growth index: A new benchmark for quality of growth. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank. https://doi.org/10.22617/TCS189570-2
   Google Scholar
• Barry, J. (2020). A Genealogy of economic growth as ideology and cold war core state imperative. New Political Economy, 25(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2018.1526268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Béland, D., Foli, R., Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Woo, J. J. (2018). Instrument constituencies and transnational policy diffusion: The case of conditional cash transfers. Review of International Political Economy, 25(4), 463–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2018.1470548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouder, A. (2009). World Economic Forum. In C. Tietji & A. Brouder (Eds.), Handbook of transnational economic governance regimes (pp. 279–303). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bruff, I., & Starnes, K. (2019). Framing the neoliberal canon: Resisting the market myth via literary enquiry. Globalizations, 16(3), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2018.1502489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, W. K. (2010). The making of a transnational capitalist class: Corporate power in the twenty-first century. Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cerny, P. G. (1991). The changing architecture of politics: Structure, agency, and the future of the state. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, D., & Porter, D. (2006). Development beyond neoliberalism? Governance, poverty reduction, and political economy. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Deeming, C., & Smyth, P. (2018). Social investment, inclusive growth that is sustainable and the new global social policy. In C. Deeming & P. Smyth (Eds.), Reframing global social policy: Social investment for sustainable and inclusive growth (pp. 11–44). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Business Innovation and Skills. (2012). Benchmarking UK competitiveness in the global economy. BIS Economics Paper (No. 19). London: Department of Business Innovation and Skills. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/34647/12-1207-benchmarking-uk-competitiveness-in-the-global-economy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Davies, W. (2014). The limits of neoliberalism: Authority, Sovereignty & the logic of competition. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Elias, J. (2013). Davos woman to the rescue of global capitalism: Postfeminist politics and competitiveness promotion at the World Economic Forum. International Political Sociology, 7(2), 152–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Management Forum. (1979). The report on the competitiveness of European industry 1979. European Management Forum.
   Google Scholar
• European Management Forum. (1980). Report on the competitiveness of European industry 1980. European Management Forum.
   Google Scholar
• European Management Forum. (1985). EMF’s report on international competitiveness 1985. European Management Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, I., & Fairclough, N. (2012). Political discourse analysis: A method for advanced students. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2005). Language and globalization. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N., & Thomas, P. (2004). The discourse of globalization and the globalization of discourse. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick & L. Putnam (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 379–396). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, B. (1999). The Developmental state is dead: Long live social capital? Development and Change, 30(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fougner, T. (2008). Corporate power in world politics: The case of the world economic forum. The Journal of International Trade and Diplomacy, 2(2), 97–134.
   Google Scholar
• Friesen, E. (2009). Post-neoliberalism and the emergence of human rights politics in international finance. In L. Macdonald & A. Ruckert (Eds.), Post-neoliberalism in the Americas (pp. 71–85). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Friesen, E. (2012). Challenging global finance: Civil society and transnational networks. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Friesen, E. (2020). The World Economic Forum and transnational networking. Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Garsten, C., & Sörbom, A. (2016). Magical formulae for market futures tales from the world economic forum meeting in Davos. Anthropology Today, 32(6), 18–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8322.12312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garsten, C., & Sörbom, A. (2018). Discreet power: How the world economic forum shapes market agendas. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giannone, D. (2017). The politics of global indicators in designing, promoting and legitimating the competition state. The Open Journal of Sociopolitical Studies, 10(2), 472–491. https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v10i2p472
   Google Scholar
• Giesler, M., & Veresiu, E. (2014). Creating the responsible consumer: Moralistic governance regimes and consumer subjectivity. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(3), 840–857. https://doi.org/10.1086/677842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graz, J. (2003). How powerful are transnational elite clubs? The social myth of the World Economic Forum. New Political Economy, 8(3), 321–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356346032000138041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graz, J. (2022). Grounding the politics of transnational private governance: Introduction to the special section. New Political Economy, Advance Online Publication, 27(2), 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2021.1881472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GrowInclusive. (2021). Overview. Retrieved December 20, 2021, from http://www.growinclusive.org/about/
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2001). Spaces of capital: Towards a critical geography. Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hasmath, R. (2015). The paradigms of inclusive growth, development, and welfare policy. In R. Hasmath (Ed.), Inclusive growth, development and welfare policy: A critical assessment (pp. 1–9). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Held, D. (1998). Globalization: The timid tendency. Marxism Today, November/December, pp. 24–7
   Google Scholar
• Hemerijck, A. (2017). Social investment and its critics. In A. Hemerijck (Ed.), The uses of social investment (pp. 3–39). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hickel, J., & Kallis, G. (2020). Is green growth possible? New Political Economy, 25(4), 469–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.1598964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope, D., & Limberg, J. (2020). The economic consequences of major tax cuts for the rich. International Inequalities Institute Working Papers (55). London School of Economics and Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Ianchovichina, E., & Lundstrom, S. (2012). What is inclusive growth?. In R. Arezki, C. Pattillo, M. Quintyn, & M. Zhu (Eds.), Commodity prices and inclusive growth in low-income countries (pp. 147–60). International Monetary Fund.
   Google Scholar
• International Development Research Centre. (2018). Inclusive growth and development: An IDRC-World Economic Forum collaboration to promote innovative public-private-civil society partnerships. https://www.idrc.ca/en/project/inclusive-growth-and-development-idrc-world-economic-forum-collaboration-promote-innovative
   Google Scholar
• IMF. (2015). Causes and consequences of income inequality: A global perspective. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/sdn/2015/sdn1513.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IMF. (2020). G-20 report on strong, sustainable, balanced and inclusive growth. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/external/np/g20/110220.htm
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity without growth: Economics for a finite planet. Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, T., & Webster, T. (2018). Limits to growth revisited. In C. Deeming & P. Smyth (Eds.), Reframing global social policy: Social investment for sustainable and inclusive growth (pp. 295–322). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenson, J. (2015). The ‘social’ in inclusive growth the social investment perspective. In R. Hasmath (Ed.), Inclusive growth, development and welfare policy: A critical assessment (pp. 108–123). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Klak, T., Wiley, J., Mullaney, E. G., Peteru, S., Regan, S., & Merilus, J.-Y. (2011). Inclusive neoliberalism?: Perspectives from Eastern Caribbean farmers. Progress in Development Studies, 11(1), 33–61. 10.1177/146499341001100103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klasen, S. (2010). Measuring and monitoring inclusive growth: Multiple definitions, open questions, and some constructive proposals. ADB Sustainable Development Working Paper Series (No. 12). Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/11540/1404
   Google Scholar
• Lee, N. (2019). Inclusive growth in cities: A sympathetic critique. Regional Studies, 53(3), 424–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1476753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• London, J. (2018). Welfare and inequality in marketizing East Asia. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, L., & Ruckert, A. (2009). Post-Neoliberalism in the Americas: An introduction. In L. Macdonald & A. Ruckert (Eds.), Post-neoliberalism in the Americas (pp. 1–20). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mahon, R. (2011). The jobs strategy: From neo- to inclusive liberalism? Review of International Political Economy, 18(5), 570–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2011.603668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahon, R. (2019). Broadening the social investment agenda: The OECD, the World Bank and inclusive growth. Global Social Policy, 19(1–2), 121–138. 10.1177/1468018119826404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Competitiveness Council. (2020). Ireland’s competitiveness challenge 2020. Dublin: Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment. http://www.competitiveness.ie/publications/2020/ireland%20s%20competitiveness%20challenge%202020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nunn, A., & Morgan, J. (2020). The political economy of Public Employment Services: Measurement and disempowered empowerment? Policy Studies, 41(1), 42–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2018.1540777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2014). Focus on inequality and growth. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/social/Focus-Inequality-and-Growth-2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2018). Opportunities for all: A framework for policy action on inclusive growth. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264301665-en
   Google Scholar
• Ostry, J. D., Loungani, P., & Berg, A. (2019). Confronting inequality: How societies can choose inclusive growth. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J. (2010). Constructions of neoliberal reason. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pigman, G. A. (2007). The world economic forum: A multi-stakeholder approach to global governance. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. (2001). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Beacon Press. (Original work published 1944).
   Google Scholar
• Porter, D., & Craig, D. (2004). The third way and the third world: Poverty reduction and social inclusion in the rise of ‘inclusive’ liberalism. Review of International Political Economy, 11(2), 387–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290420001672881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, W. I. (2014). Global capitalism and the crisis of humanity. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rupert, M. (2005). Class powers and the politics of global governance. In M. Barnett and R. Duvall (Eds.), Power in Global Governance (pp. 205–228), Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saad-Filho, A. (2016). Transcending neoliberalism through pro-poor and democratic economic development strategies. In A. Kadri (Ed.), Development challenges and solutions after the Arab Spring (pp. 74–93). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Saad-Filho, A. (2020). From Covid-19 to the end of neoliberalism. Critical Sociology, 46(4–5), 477–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920520929966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmelzer, M. (2016). The hegemony of growth: The OECD and the making of the economic growth paradigm. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, K. (2015). How can we achieve growth for the many, not just the few? Retrieved September 07, 2015, from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/09/how-can-we-achieve-growth-for-the-many-not-just-the-few/
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, K. (2018). The world needs ‘qualitative easing’ and business must lead. Retrieved January 22, 2018, from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/01/the-world-needs-qualitative-easing-and-business-must-lead/
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, S., & Soederberg, S. (2020). Redesigning the business of development: The case of the world economic forum and global risk management. Review of International Political Economy, 27(4), 828–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2019.1640125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sklair, L. (2001). The transnational capitalist class. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. R., & Myers, S. S. (2018). Impact of anthropogenic CO2 emissions on global human nutrition. Nature Climate Change, 8(9), 834–839. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0253-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., Biggs, r., Carpenter, S. R., De Vries, W., De Wit, C. A., Folke, C., Gerten, D., Heinke, J., Mace, G. M., Persson, L. M., Ramanathan, V., Reyers, B., & Sörlin, S. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science (New York, N.Y.), 347(6223), 1259855. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2012). Transfer and translation of policy. Policy Studies, 33(6), 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2012.695933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2013). Knowledge actors and transnational governance: The private-public policy nexus in the global agora. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. (2009). Transformations of neoliberalism in Latin America: From structural adjustment to ‘empowering the poor. In L. Macdonald & A. Ruckert (Eds.), Post-neoliberalism in the Americas (pp. 21–36). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Pijl, K. (1984). The making of an Atlantic ruling class. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Wanner, T. (2015). The new ‘passive revolution’ of the green economy and growth discourse: Maintaining the ‘Sustainable Development’ of neoliberal capitalism. New Political Economy, 20(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2013.866081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, M. (2014). Uneconomic economics and the crisis of the model world. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wigger, A. (2019). The new EU industrial policy: Authoritarian neoliberal structural adjustment and the case for alternatives. Globalizations, 16(3), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2018.1502496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Commission on Environment and Development . (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum and IMD. (1991). The world competitiveness report 1991. IMD and World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. (1993). The World competitiveness report 1993. IMD and World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. (1996). The global competitiveness report 1996. World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. (1997). The global competitiveness report 1997. World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. (2003). Global competitiveness report 2002–2003. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. (2004). The global competitiveness report 2003–2004. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. (2011). The global competitiveness report 2011–2012. World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. (2012). The global competitiveness report 2012–2013. World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. (2014). The global competitiveness report 2014–2015. World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. (2015). The inclusive growth and development report 2015. World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. (2016). The global competitiveness report 2016–2017. World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. (2017a). Annual report 2016–2017. World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. (2017b). The inclusive growth and development report 2017. World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. (2018a). The inclusive growth and development report 2018. World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. (2018b). Brazil competitiveness and inclusive growth lab report. World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. (2019a). The world economic forum: A partner in shaping history. Geneva: World Economic Forum. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_A_Partner_in_Shaping_History.pdf
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. (2019b). The global competitiveness report 2019. World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. (2021). Reports. https://www.weforum.org/reports
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum and European Investment Bank. (2017). Beyond the equity- efficiency trade-off: Practical ideas for inclusive growth and competitiveness in Europe. World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• World Inequality Lab. (2018). World inequality report 2018. Paris: Paris School of Economics. https://wir2018.wid.world/files/download/wir2018-summary-english.pdf
   Google Scholar
• World Metrological Organization. (2020). Carbon dioxide levels continue at record levels, despite COVID-19 lockdown Retrieved November 23, 2020, from https://public.wmo.int/en/media/press-release/carbon-dioxide-levels-continue-record-levels-despite-covid-19-lockdown
   Google Scholar
• WWF. (2020). Living planet report 2020: Bending the curve of biodiversity loss. WWF.
   Google Scholar