Globalize IPE, not just the syllabi! Virtual classrooms interactions and the making of the Atlantic Diagonals glossary

References

• Acharya, A. (2014). Global International Relations (IR) and regional worlds: A new Agenda for International Studies. International Studies Quarterly, 58(4), 647–659. https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhambra, G. K. (2021). Colonial global economy: Towards a theoretical reorientation of political economy. Review of International Political Economy, 28(2), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2020.1830831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhambra, G. K., & Holmwood, J. (2018). Colonialism, postcolonialism and the liberal welfare state. New Political Economy, 23(5), 574–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2017.1417369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilgin, P. (2008). Thinking past ‘Western’ IR? Third World Quarterly, 29(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590701726392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonner, R., Desa, G., Petkova, A. P., & Baack, S. (2022). Teaching with Conceptboard: A professional online tool for student engagement and collaboration. Management Teaching Review, 7(3), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/23792981221098382
   Google Scholar
• Chan, S., Mandaville, P., & Bleiker, R. (Eds.). (2001). The Zen of International Relations: IR Theory from East to West. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M., & Petry, J. (2023). What about the dragon in the room? Incorporating China into international political economy (IPE) teaching. Review of International Political Economy, 30(3), 801–822. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2023.2175711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochrane, L., & Oloruntoba, S. O. (2021). Whose voice matters in the teaching and learning of IPE? Implications for policy and policy making. Policy and Society, 40(4), 545–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2021.1975220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, B. J. (2007). The transatlantic divide: Why are American and British IPE so different? Review of International Political Economy, 14(2), 197–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290701288277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, B. J. (2019). Advanced introduction to international political economy (2nd ed.). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R. W. (1992). Towards a post-hegemonic conceptualization of world order. Reflections on the relevancy of Ibn Khalun. In J. N. Rosenau & E. O. Czempiel (Eds.), Governance without government order and change in world politics (pp. 132–159). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deciancio, M., & Quiliconi, C. (2020). Widening the ‘global conversation’: Highlighting the voices of IPE in the Global South. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, 9(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.726271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunne, G. (2015). Beyond critical thinking to critical being: Criticality in higher education and life. International Journal of Educational Research, 71, 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Editors. (2009). Reflections on the ‘British School’ of international political economy. New Political Economy, 14(3), 313–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563460903087425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grayson, K. (2015). The challenges of teaching popular culture and world politics. In F. Caso & C. Hamilton (Eds.), Popular culture and world politics: Theories, methods, pedagogies (pp. 160–168). E-International Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Green, L. (Ed.). (2013). Contested ecologies: Dialogues in the South on nature and knowledge. HSRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gruffydd Jones, B. (2006). Decolonizing international relations. Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Haffner, D. (2018, March 21). Contesting coloniality in international relations’ reading lists. LSE Department of International Relations. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/internationalrelations/2018/03/20/contesting-coloniality-in-international-relations-reading-lists/
   Google Scholar
• Hett, E. J. (1993). The development of an instrument to measure global mindedness [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of San Diego.
   Google Scholar
• Helleiner, E. (2015). Globalising the classical foundations of IPE thought. Contexto Internacional, 37(3), 975–1010. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-85292015000300007
   Google Scholar
• Helleiner, E. (2021). The neomercantilists: A global intellectual history. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helleiner, E. (2023). The contested world economy: The deep and global roots of international political economy. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, J. M. (2012). The Eurocentric conception of world politics: Western international theory, 1760–2010. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, W. D. (2004). Got global competency? International Educator, 13(2), 6–12. https://globallycompetent.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Hunter-2004-Got-Global-Competency.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Katz-Rosene, R. M., Kelly-Bisson, C., & Paterson, M. (2021). Teaching students to think ecologically about the global political economy, and vice versa. Review of International Political Economy, 28(4), 1083–1098. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2020.1748092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. (2005). Commentary: Disrupting and destabilizing Anglo-American and English-language hegemony in geography. Social & Cultural Geography, 6(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464936052000335937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kothari, A., Salleh, A., Escobar, A., Demaria, F., & Acosta, A. (2019). (Eds.). Pluriverse: A post-development dictionary. Tulika Books and Authorsupfront.
   Google Scholar
• Kurki, M. (2020). International relations in a relational universe. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kurki, M. (2022). Relational revolution and relationality in IR: New conversations. Review of International Studies, 48(5), 821–836. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210521000127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvangraven, I. H., & Kesar, S. (2023). Standing in the way of rigor? Economics’ meeting with the decolonization agenda. Review of International Political Economy, 30(5), 1723–1748. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2022.2131597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M. (2007). Opening up the ideologies in ‘Learning: The Treasure Within. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 4, 17–36. https://www.kedi.re.kr/eng/kedi/cmmn/file/fileDown.do?menuNo=200067&atchFileId=FILE_000000000003510&fileSn=1&bbsId
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, L. H. M. (2002). Postcolonial international relations: Conquest and desire between Asia and the West. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Lobo-Guerrero, L., Lo Presti, L., & Re, F. dos (Eds.). (2021). Mapping, connectivity, and the making of European empires. Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Maliniak, D., Peterson, S., Powers, R., & Tierney, M. J. (2018). Is international relations a global discipline? Hegemony, insularity, and diversity in the field. Security Studies, 27(3), 448–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2017.1416824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maliniak, D., & Tierney, M. J. (2009). The American school of IPE. Review of International Political Economy, 16(1), 6–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290802524042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantz, F. (2019). Decolonizing the IPE syllabus: Eurocentrism and the coloniality of knowledge in International Political Economy. Review of International Political Economy, 26(6), 1361–1378. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2019.1647870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mignolo, W. (2000). Local histories/global designs. Coloniality, subaltern knowledges, and border thinking. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moulin, C., Sajed, A., Leander, A., & Yamato, R. V. (2015). Towards a global conversation. Contexto Internacional, 37(3), 835–837. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-85292015000300001
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2018). Preparing our youth for an inclusive and sustainable world. The PISA global competence framework. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/aboutpisa/global-competency-for-an-inclusive-world.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Palan, R. (2000). New trends in global political economy. In R. Palan (Ed.), Global political economy: Contemporary theories. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Querejazu, A. (2022). Cosmopraxis: Relational methods for a pluriversal IR. Review of International Studies, 48(5), 875–890. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210521000450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quijano, A. (2000). Coloniality of power and Eurocentrism in Latin America. International Sociology, 15(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580900015002005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, S. L. (2021). Provincializing the OECD-PISA global competences project. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 19(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2021.1887725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seabrooke, L., & Young, K. L. (2017). The networks and niches of international political economy. Review of International Political Economy, 24(2), 288–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2016.1276949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shilliam, R. (Ed.). (2011). International relations and non-western thought: Imperialism, colonialism and investigations of global modernity. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sousa Santos de, B. (2014). Epistemologies of the south: Justice against epistemicide. Paradigm.
   Google Scholar
• Sousa Santos de, B. (2018). The end of the cognitive empire: The coming of age of epistemologies of the south. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steger, M. B. (2016). Reflections on ‘critical thinking’ in global studies. ProtoSociology, 33, 19–40. https://doi.org/10.5840/protosociology2016332
   Google Scholar
• Tickner, A. B., & Blaney, D. L. (Eds.). (2012). Thinking international relations differently. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tickner, A. B., & Blaney, D. L. (Eds.). (2013). Claiming the international. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tickner, A. B., & Wæver, O. (Eds.). (2009). International relations scholarship around the world. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Trownsell, T. (2022). Recrafting ontology. Review of International Studies, 48(5), 801–820. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210521000668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tussie, D., & Riggirozzi, P. (2015). A global conversation: Rethinking IPE in post-hegemonic scenarios. Contexto Internacional, 37(3), 1041–1068. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-85292015000300009
   Google Scholar
• Sunder Rajan, K. (2021). Toward a diasporic anthropology. In K. Sunder Rajan (Ed.), Multisituated: Ethnography as diasporic praxis (pp. 169–188). Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1zn1sz3.9
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (1974). Recommendation concerning Education for International Understanding, Co-operation and Peace and Education relating to Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=13088&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (1996). Learning: The treasure within. Report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century (highlights). United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000109590
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2013). Learning to be: The world of education today and tomorrow. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000223222
   Google Scholar
• Vahed, A., & Rodriguez, K. (2021). Enriching students’ engaged learning experiences through the collaborative online international learning project. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(5), 596–605. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1792331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitalis, R. (2015). White world order, black Power politics: The birth of American international relations. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vivares, E. (2020). Global conversations and inquiries. In E. Vivares (Ed.), The Routledge handbook to global political economy: Conversations and inquiries (pp. 9–25). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, C. (2009). Reflections on the American school: An IPE of our making. Review of International Political Economy, 16(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290802541228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar