Networks hanging loose: the domestic sources of US–EU patent disputes

REFERENCES

• ABA Section of Intellectual Property Law . 2007 . “ A Section White Paper: Agenda for 21st Century Patent Reform ” . <http://www.patentsmatter.org/media/issue/resources/20070501_ABAWhitePaper.pdf> (accessed 12 July 2010)
   Google Scholar
• Adamczak , A. 2006 . Future Patent Policy in Europe. Basic Principles of the Patent System <http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/indprop/docs/patent/hearing/adamczak_en.pdf> (accessed 12 July 2010)
   Google Scholar
• Alexandria Group . 2006 . “ Chair's Text for discussion at the Fifth Group I/B+ Experts Meeting ” . Tokyo , , Japan
   Google Scholar
• Bailey , C. J. 1989 . The US Congress , Oxford : Basil Blackwell .
   Google Scholar
• Borràs , S. 2006 . The Governance of the European Patent System: Effective and Legitimate? . Economy and Society , 35 ( 4 ) : 594 – 610 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CA/65/05 . 2005 . “ Various EPC delegations’ comments on the Priority Choice ” . Munich 25 February
   Google Scholar
• CA/68/06 . 2006 . “ Netherland's delegation to the EPO: Dutch Paper on the Strategy Debate ” . Munich 15 February 2006
   Google Scholar
• CA/128/05 . 2005 . “ President of the European Patent Office: Proposals under CA/94/05 ” . Munich 25 November 2005
   Google Scholar
• Cerny , P. G. Multi-Nodal Politics: Toward a Political Process Theory of Globalization . Paper prepared for presentation at the annual conference of the International Political Economy Society . Stanford University . 9–10 November
   Google Scholar
• Chazimarkakis , J. 2007 . ‘Unpublished speech delivered at a conference of the European Patent Office: Computer-implemented inventions: where do we stand in the debate on software patents?’ . Brussels , 5 July 2007
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson , Q. T. 2005 . “ Statement Before the Senate Committee on the Judiciary ” . Washington , DC : Subcommittee on Intellectual Property . 26 July, < http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearings/testimony.cfm?id=1582&wit_id=4548> (accessed 20 March 2009)
   Google Scholar
• DoC . 2009 . Department of Commerce Mission Statement . <http://hr.commerce.gov/Employees/WorkLifeIssues/PROD01_008096> (accessed 12 July 2010)
   Google Scholar
• Drahos , P. and Braithwaite , J. 2002 . Information Feudalism , London : Earthscan .
   Google Scholar
• Drezner , D. W. 2007 . All Politics is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes , Princeton , NJ : Princeton University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Dudas , J. W. 2007 . “ Patent Reform: The Future of American Innovation, Statement Before the Senate Committee on the Judiciary ” . Washington , DC 6 June, < http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearings/testimony.cfm?renderforprint=1&id=2803&wit_id=6506> (accessed 20 March 2009)
   Google Scholar
• Eimer , T. R. 2008 . ‘Decoding Divergence in Software Regulation: Paradigms, Power Structures, and Institutions in the US and the EU’ . Governance , 21 ( 2 ) : 275 – 96 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission . 2009 . “ ‘United States Barriers to Trade and Investment Report for 2008’ ” . <http://hr.commerce.gov/Employees/WorkLifeIssues/PROD01_008096> (accessed 12 July 2010)
   Google Scholar
• Foley , M. and Owens , J. E. 1996 . Congress and the Presidency. Institutional Politics in a Separated System , Manchester : Manchester University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Galama , J. E. M. 2000 . “ Expert opinion on the case for and against the introduction of a grace period in European patent law ” . Eindhoven : Phillips International B.V. .
   Google Scholar
• Geller , P. E. 2003 . An International Patent Utopia? . European Intellectual Property Review European Intellectual Property Review , 25 ( 11 ) : 515
   Google Scholar
• Geuna , A. and Nesta , L. J. J. 2006 . University Patenting and its Effects on Academic Research: The Emerging European Evidence . Research Policy , 35 ( 6 ) : 790 – 807 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gourevitch , P. 1978 . The Second Image Reversed: The International Sources of Domestic Politics . International Organization , 32 ( 4 ) : 881 – 912 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grande , E. and Pauly , L. W. 2005 . “ Complex Soverignty and the Emergence of Transnational Authority ” . In Complex Sovereignty: Reconstituting Polititical Authority in the Twenty-first Century , Edited by: Grande , E. and Pauly , L. W. 285 – 300 . Toronto : University of Toronto Press .
   Google Scholar
• Hall , B. H. University–Industry Research Partnerships in the United States . Kansai Conference Paper . February <http://elsa.berkeley.edu/~bhhall/papers/BHH04_Kansai.pdf> (accessed 12 July 2010)
   Google Scholar
• H.R. 1908 . Patent Reform Act of 2007 . 110th Congress (2007–2008) ,
   Google Scholar
• King , A. 1997 . The Vulnerable American Politician . British Journal of Political Science , 27 ( 1 ) : 1 – 22 .
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon , J. W. 1989 . Congressmen's Voting Decisions , Ann Arbor , MI : University of Michigan Press .
   Google Scholar
• Klopschinski , S. 2007 . Die Implementierung von Gemeinschaftsrecht und internationalen Verträgen in das Europäische Patentübereinkommen nach der Revisionskonferenz im Jahr 2000 . GRUR Int , 56 ( 7 ) : 555 – 62 .
   Google Scholar
• Kloth , H. M. 2005 . UN Reform im 109. US Congress. Oder: Wenn Außenpolitik zum innenpolitischen Spielball wird . Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen , 36 ( 3 ) : 705 – 22 .
   Google Scholar
• Lehman , B. A. 2009 . Global Patent Protection. The International Patent System and the New Administration . Science Progress , : 87 – 96 . <http://www.scienceprogress.org/2009/01/global-patent-protection/> (accessed 12 July 2010)
   Google Scholar
• May , C. and Sell , S. 2006 . Intellectual Property Rights. A Critical History , London : Lynne Rienner Publishers .
   Google Scholar
• Milbrath , L. W. 1971 . “ The Impact of Lobbying on Governmental Decisions ” . In The American Political System. Introductory Readings , Edited by: Morgan , R. E. and Connor , J. E. 126 – 39 . New York : Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Inc. .
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik , A. 1991 . Negotiating the Single European Act: National Interests and Conventional Statecraft in the European Community . International Organization , 45 ( 1 ) : 19 – 56 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moravcsik , A. [1993] 2006 . “ Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach ” . In Debates on European Integration. A Reader , Edited by: Eilstrup-Sangiovanni , M. 264 – 303 . Houndmills , Basingstoke : Palgrave MacMillan .
   Google Scholar
• Mossinghoff , G. J. 2005 . “ Statement before the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Intellectual Property ” . Washington , DC 26 July, <http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearings/testimony.cfm?id=1582&wit_id=4547> (accessed 20 March 2009)
   Google Scholar
• PIA . 2007 . “ Leading Inventors Urge Bush to Protect Intellectual Property Rights. Professional Inventors Alliance ” . News release, 25 September
   Google Scholar
• Prinz zu Waldeck and Pyrmont , W. 2006 . The Patent System of the Future: the Role of the Trilateral Offices – Konferenz der Trilateralen Patentämter am 17. November 2005 im Europäischem Patentamt . GRURInt , 55 ( 4 ) : 303 – 07 .
   Google Scholar
• Pugatch , M. P. 2004 . The International Political Economy of Intellectual Property Rights , Cheltenham : Edward Elgar .
   Google Scholar
• Rosenau , J. N. 1997 . Along the Domestic Frontier. Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf , F. W. 1994 . Games Real Actors Could Play: Positive and Negative Cooreination in Embedded Negotiations . Journal of Theoretical Politics , 6 ( 1 ) : 27 – 53 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf , F. W. 2006 . The Joint-decision Trap Revisited . Journal of Common Market Studies , 44 ( 4 ) : 845 – 64 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skocpol , Theda . 2003 . ‘Voice and Inequality: The Transformation of American Civic Democracy’, . Perspectives on Politics , 2 ( 1 ) : 3 – 20 .
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter , A.-M. 2004 . A New World Order , Princeton , NJ : Princeton University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter , A.-M. and Zaring , D. 2006 . Networking Goes International: An Update . Annual Review of Law and Social Science , 2 : 211 – 29 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone , D. 2008 . Global Public Policy, Transnational Policy Communities, and Their Networks . The Policy Studies Journal , 36 ( 1 ) : 19 – 38 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straus , J. 2000 . “ Expert Opinion on the Introduction of a Grace Period in the European Patent Law ” . Munich : Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Patent, Copyright, and Competition Law .
   Google Scholar
• Straus , J. and Klunker , N.-S. 2007 . Harmonisierung des internationalen Patentrechts . GRURInt , 56 ( 2 ) : 91 – 104 .
   Google Scholar
• Trilateral Conference . 2008 . “ Summary of the 26th Trilateral Conference ” . The Netherlands : The Hague .
   Google Scholar
• Congress , U S . 2007 . “ Markup of approval of assignment to subcommittee vacancies; and H.R. 1908, the “Patent Reform Act of 2007” . Washington , DC : House of Representatives, Committee on the Judiciary .
   Google Scholar
• US-EU Summit . 2008 . “ EU-US Summit Declaration ” . Brdo , , Slovenia 10 June
   Google Scholar
• VFA . 2006 . “ Verband forschender Arzneimittelhersteller: Einführung einer Neuheitsschonfrist in das Patentrecht ” . <http://www.vfa.de/de/presse/positionen/pos-neuheitsschonfrist.html/pos-neuheitsschonfrist.pdf> (accessed 12 July 2010)
   Google Scholar
• Wienecke , N. F. 2008 . “ ‘Letter to Patrick J. Leahy, proving the views of the Administration on S. 1145, the “Patent Reform Act of 2007”’ ” . <http://www.ogc.doc.gov/ogc/legreg/letters/110/S1145Apr0308.pdf> (accessed 12 July 2010)
   Google Scholar