How schools cope with the double challenge of excellence in high-stakes risk tests and investment in education

References

• Altrichter, H., & Kemethofer, D. (2015). Does accountability pressure through school inspections promote school improvement? School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, 26, 32–56.10.1080/09243453.2014.927369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Au, W. (2007). High-Stakes Testing and Curricular Control: A Qualitative Metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36(5), 258–267.
   Google Scholar
• BenDavid-Hadar, I., & Ziderman, A. (2011). A new model for equitable and efficient resource allocation to schools: The Israeli case. Education Economics, 19, 341–362.10.1080/09645291003726467
   Google Scholar
• Berliner, D. (2011). Rational responses to high stakes testing: The case of curriculum narrowing and the harm that follows. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41, 287–302.10.1080/0305764X.2011.607151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berliner, D., & Nichols, S. I. (2007). Collateral damage: How high-stakes testing corrupts America’s schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cefai, C., & Cavioni, V. (2014). Social and emotional education in primary school: Integrating theory and research into practice. … From Pisa to Santander: A statement on children’s growth and wellbeing. International Journal of Emotional Education, 6, 86–89.
   Google Scholar
• Darling Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. New York, NY: Teachers’ College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dulude, E., Spillane, J. P., & Dumay, X. (2015). High stakes policy and mandated curriculum: The social processes that shape school leaders’ and teachers’ strategic responses. Educational Policy., 1, 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Elmore, R. (2004). School reform from the inside out. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Figlio, D. N., & Loeb, S. (2011). School accountability. In E. A. Hanushek, S. J. Machin, & L. Woessmann (Eds.), Handbooks in economics: Economics of education (Vol. 3, pp. 383–421). North-Holland: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, G. V. (Ed.). (2008). Fertilizers, pills & magnetic strips: The fate of public education in America. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, S. G. (2003). History lessons: Teaching, learning and testing in U.S. high school classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (2014). Distributed leadership matters.Los Angeles: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hout, M., & Elliott, S. (Eds.). (2011). Incentives and test-based accountability in education, national research council. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. G., Jones, B., & Hargrove, T. (2003). The unintended consequences of high risk stakes testing. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J. (2008). Decentralized management in schools: Delegating authority – From theory and research to practice. Tel Aviv: Cherikover Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Koretz, D. (2008). Measuring up: What educational testing really tells us. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mansell, W. (2007). Education by numbers: The tyranny of testing. London: Politico’s Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education and Culture. (2013). Retrieved August 25, 2013, from http://cms.education.gov.il/EducationCMS/Units/Owl/Hebrew/AlSederHayom/VaadaMeitzav.htm
   Google Scholar
• Mintrop, H., & Sunderman, G. L. (2009). Why high stakes accountability sounds good but doesn’t work – And why we keep on doing it anyway. Los Angeles, CA: The Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles at UCLA.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, A. (2011). Student standardised testing: Current practices in OECD countries and a literature review ( OECD Education Working Papers No. 65).Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for education reform. Washington, DC: GPO.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, S. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2007). The inevitable corruption of indicators and educators through high-stakes testing. Tempe, AZ: Education Policy Studies Laboratory, Arizona State University.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, S. L., Glass, G. V., & Berliner. D. C. (2006). High-stakes testing and student achievement: Does accountability pressure increase student learning? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 14(1), 1–172. Retrieved March 5, 2014, from http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/2750/275022797020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, S. L., Glass, G. V, & Berliner, D. C. (2012). High-stakes testing and student achievement: Updated analyses with NAEP data. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 20, Retrieved March 5, 2014, from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1048
   Google Scholar
• Nir, A. E. (Ed.). (2009). Centralization and school empowerment: From rhetoric to practice. New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Noddings, N. (2007). When school reforms go wrong. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenkvist, M. (2010). Using student test results for accountability and improvement: A literature review ( OECD Education Working Papers No. 54). Paris: OECD Publishing10.1787/5km4htwzbv30-en
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, R., Jacobson, R., & Wilder, T. (2008). Grading education: Getting accountability right. New York, NY: Economic Policy Institute and Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hover, S. D. (2006). Teaching history in the old dominion: The impact of Virginia’s accountability reform on seven secondary beginning history teachers. In S. G. Grant (Ed.), Measuring history: Cases of state-led testing across the US (pp. 157–176). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Volansky, A. (2007). The rise and the price of the standards movement. Tel Aviv: School of Education, Tel aviv University.
   Google Scholar
• Wayne, A. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36, 258–267.
   Google Scholar
• Zohar, A. (2013). It’s not all about tests scores: Reviving pedagogical discourse. Bnei Brak: Sifriat Poalim, Hakibbutz Hameuchad.
   Google Scholar