Teacher evaluation and local control in the US: an investigation into the degree of local control afforded to districts in defining evaluation procedures for teachers in non-tested subjects and grades

References

• Amrein, A. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2002). High-stakes testing, uncertainty, and student learning. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(18). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n18/
   Google Scholar
• Baker, B. D., Oluwole, J. O., & Green, P. C. (2013). The legal consequences of mandating high stakes decisions based on low quality information: Teacher evaluation in the race-to-the-top era. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 21(4/5). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1298/1043
   Google Scholar
• Braun, H. (2004). Reconsidering the impact of high-stakes testing. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(1). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n1/
   Google Scholar
• Buckley, K., & Marion, S. (2011). A Survey of approaches used to evaluate educators in non-tested grades subjects. Dover, NH: Harvard University and National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Carnoy, M., & Loeb, S. (2002). Does external accountability affect student outcomes? A cross-state analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 305–331.10.3102/01623737024004305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2004). Standards, accountability, and school reform. Teachers College Record, 106, 1047–1085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dee, T. S., & Jacob, B. (2011). The impact of No Child Left Behind on student achievement. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30, 418. doi:10.2307/23018959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figlio, D., & Loeb, S. (2011). School accountability. In E. A. Hanushek, S. Machin, & L. Woessmann (Eds.), Handbooks of the economics of education, Vol. 3 (pp. 383–421). North-Holland: Elsevier B.V.
   Google Scholar
• Finn, C.E., & Petrilli, M.J. (2013). The failures of U.S. education governance today. In P. Manna, & P. McGuinn (Eds.), Education Governance for the twenty-first century: Overcoming the structural barriers to school reform (pp. 21–35). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goe, L. (2010). Evaluating teachers’ contributions to student learning growth in the non-tested subjects and grades. Wichita, KS: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Gong, B., & Marion, S. (2006). Dealing with flexibility in assessments for students with significant cognitive disabilities (synthesis report 60). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
   Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A., & Raymond, M. E. (2004). The effect of school accountability systems on the level and distribution of student achievement. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2, 406–415.10.1162/jeea.2004.2.issue-2-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henig, J. R. (2009). The politics of localism in an era of centralization, privatization, and choice. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 108(1), 112–129.10.1111/ysse.2009.108.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Herman, J. L., Heritage, M., & Goldschmidt, P. (2011). Developing and selecting assessments of student growth for use in teacher evaluation systems. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
   Google Scholar
• Honig, M. I., & Rainey, L. R. (2012). Autonomy and school improvement: What do we know and where do we go from here? Educational Policy, 26(3), 465–495.10.1177/0895904811417590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull, J. (2013). Trends in teacher evaluation: How states are measuring teacher performance. Alexandria, VA: The Center for Public Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ingersoll, R. M. (2005). The problem of underqualified teachers: A sociological perspective. Sociology of Education, 78(2), 175–178.10.1177/003804070507800206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, R., & Saultz, A. (2012). The polls – trends. Who should control education? Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(2), 379–390. doi:10.1093/poq/nfs017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layton, L. (2015, December 9). Senate overwhelmingly passes new national education legislation. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/senate-overwhelmingly-passes-new-national-education-legislation/2015/12/09/be1b1f94-9d2a-11e5-a3c5-c77f2cc5a43c_story.html
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. A., & Wohlstetter, P. (2013). Recent trends in intergovernmental relations: The resurgence of local actors in education policy. Educational Researcher, 42(5), 276–283. doi:10.3102/0013189X13492193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, K. A. (1999). Controlling public education: Localism versus equity. Studies in government and public policy. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• McDonnell, L. M. (2013). Educational accountability and policy feedback. Educational Policy, 27(2), 170–189. doi:10.1177/0895904812465119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuinn, P. (2012). Stimulating reform: Race to the Top, competitive grants and the Obama education agenda. Educational Policy, 26(1), 136–159.10.1177/0895904811425911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2012). Digest of education statistics 2012 Number of public school districts and public and private elementary and secondary schools: Selected years, 1869–70 through 2010–11. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d12/tables/dt12_098.asp
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2015). The condition of education 2015: Public school revenue sources. Washington: DC. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/pdf/coe_cma.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nee, E. (2010, November 19). Q&A: Joanne Weiss. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 15. Retrieved from http://www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/qa_joanne_weiss/
   Google Scholar
• Nunnaly, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Pennington, K. (2014). ESEA Waivers and teacher-evaluation plans: State oversight of district-designed teacher-evaluation systems. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, C. D., Schuermann, P. J., Guthrie, J. W., Witham, P. J., Milanowski, A. M., & Thorn, C. A. (2009): The other 69 percent: Fairly rewarding the performance of teachers of non-tested subjects and grades. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, Discussion paper.
   Google Scholar
• Resmovits, J. (2015, December 10). Obama signs every student succeeds act, marking the end of an era. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from http://www.latimes.com/local/education/standardized-testing/la-me-edu-essa-obama-signs-end-no-child-left-behind-20151210-story.html
   Google Scholar
• Riley, R. W., & Coleman, A. L. (2011). Turning the page on the equity debate in education: How to give all children a real opportunity. American Educator, 35(1), 26–30.
   Google Scholar
• Sawchuk, S. (2011). Wanted: Ways to assess the majority of teachers. Education Week, 30(19). Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2011/02/02/19teachers_ep.h30.html
   Google Scholar
• Superfine, B. M., Gottlieb, J. J., & Smylie, M. A. (2012). The expanding federal role in teacher workforce policy. Educational Policy, 26(1), 58–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, E. S., & Tyler, J. H. (2012). Can teacher evaluation improve teaching? Education Next, 12(4), 78–84.
   Google Scholar
• Toch, T. (2011). The teacher unions’ Odysseus. Phi Delta Kappan, 93, 66–67.10.1177/003172171109300112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, M. (2012). A different role for teachers unions. Education Next, 12(1), 16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, X. (2012). Are more stringent NCLB state accountability systems associated with better student outcomes? An analysis of NAEP results across states. Educational Policy, 26(2), 268–308.10.1177/0895904810386588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welner, K. G. (2001). Legal rights, local wrongs: When community control collides with educational equity. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar