References
- Assessment Reform Group. (1999). Assessment for learning: Beyond the black box. Cambridge: University of Cambridge School of Education. Retrieved from: https://www.aaia.org.uk
- Baird, J., Andrich, D., Hopfenbeck, T. N., & Stobart, G. (2017). Assessment and learning: Fields apart? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 24, 317–350.
- Baird, J., & Black, P. (2013). Test theories, educational priorities and reliability of public examinations in England. Research Papers in Education, 28, 5–21. doi:10.1080/02671522.2012.754224
- Baker, E., McGaw, B., & Peterson, P. (Eds.). (2010). International encyclopedia of education: Third edition (Vol. 3). Oxford: Elsevier.
- Bennett, R. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18, 5–25. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678.
- Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1989a). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5, 5–75. doi:10.1080/0969595980050102
- Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998b). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. London: King’s College London, School of Education. Retrieved from GL Assessment, London http://www.gl-assessment.co.uk/products/inside-black-box
- Bramley, T. (2007). Paired comparison methods. In P. Newton, J.-A. Baird, H. Goldstein, H. Patrick, & P. Tymms (Eds.), Techniques for monitoring the comparability of examination standards (pp. 246–294). London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
- Bredo, E. (1997). The social construction of learning. In G. D. Phye (Ed.), Handbook of academic learning: Construction of knowledge (pp. 3–45). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-012554255-5/50002-8
- British Academy. (2016). Crossing paths: Interdisciplinary institutions, careers, education and applications. London: British Academy. Retrieved from http://www.britac.ac.uk/interdisciplinarity
- Broadfoot, P., James, M., McMeeking, S., Nuttall, D., & Stierer, B. (1988). Records of achievement: report of the national evaluation of pilot schemes. London: HMSO.
- Earl, L. M. (2013). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
- Elliott, J. G. (2003). Dynamic assessment in educational settings: Realising potential. Educational Review, 55, 15–32. doi:10.1080/00131910303253
- Elwood, J. (2006). Gender issues in testing and assessment. In C. Skelton, B. Francis, & L. Smulyan (Eds.), The SAGE handbook on gender and education (pp. 262–278). London: Sage.10.4135/9781848607996
- Greeno, J. G., Pearson, P. D., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (1996). Implications for NAEP of research on learning and cognition (Report of a study commissioned by the National Academy of Education. Panel on the NAEP Trial State Assessment, conducted by the Institute for Research on Learning). Stanford, CA: National Academy of Education.
- Grigorenko, E. (1998). Mastering tools of the mind in school (Trying out Vygotsky’s ideas in classrooms). In R. Sternberg & W. Williams (Eds.), Intelligence, instruction and assessment: Theory into practice (pp. 201–231). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- James, M. (1989). Negotiation and dialogue in student assessment and teacher appraisal. In H. Simons & J. Elliott (Eds.), Rethinking assessment and appraisal (pp. 147–160). Milton Keynes: Open University.
- James, M. (1992, April 5). Assessment for learning. Paper presented to the annual conference of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, New Orleans, LA.
- James, M. (1994). Experience of quality assurance at key stage one. In W. Harlen (Ed.), Enhancing quality in assessment (pp. 116–138). London: Paul Chapman.
- James, M. (2006). Assessment, teaching and theories of learning. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 47–60). London: Sage.
- James, M. (2008). Assessment and learning. In S. Swaffield (Ed.), Unlocking assessment: Understanding for reflection and application (pp. 20–35). Abingdon: Routledge (David Fulton).
- James, M. (2010). An overview of educational assessment. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (Vol. 3, pp. 161–171). Oxford: Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.01713-9
- James, M. (2012). Assessment in harmony with our understanding of learning: Problems and possibilities. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (2nd ed., pp. 187–205). London: Sage.10.4135/9781446250808
- James, M. (2013). Educational assessment, evaluation and research: The selected works of Mary E. James. Abingdon: Routledge.
- James, M., & Conner, C. (1993). Are reliability and validity achievable in national curriculum assessment? Some observations on moderation at key stage 1 in 1992. Curriculum Journal, 4, 5–19.10.1080/0958517930040102
- James, M., McCormick, R., Black, P., Carmichael, P., Drummond, M.-J., Fox, A., … Wiliam, D. (2007). Improving learning how to learn - Classrooms, schools and networks. Abingdon: Routledge.
- Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815355
- Maxwell, G. S. (2010). Moderation of students’ work by teachers. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (Vol. 3, pp. 457–463). Oxford: Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00347-X
- Murphy, P. (Ed.). (1999). Learners, learning & assessment. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
- Ofsted. (2011). History for all: History in English schools 2007/10. London: Author.
- Pedder, D., & James, M. (2012). Professional learning as a condition for assessment for learning. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (2nd ed., pp. 33–48). London: Sage.10.4135/9781446250808
- Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (Eds.). (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 535–550. doi:10.1080/02602930903541015
- Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27, 4–13. doi:10.3102/0013189X027002004
- Sizer, T. (1992). Horace’s school: Redesigning the American high school. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
- Stenhouse, L., & Verma, G. (1980). Educational procedures and attitudinal objectives: A paradox. Norwich: CARE, University of East Anglia (mimeograph).
- Torrance, H. (2007). Assessment as learning? How the use of explicit learning objectives, assessment criteria and feedback in post-secondary education and training can come to dominate learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14, 281–294. doi:10.1080/0969594070159186710.1080/09695940701591867
- Turnbull, C. (1972). The mountain people. London: Triad/Paladin Books.
- Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.
- Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803932
- Woods, P., Jeffrey, B., Troman, G., & Boyle, M. (1997). Restructuring schools, restructuring teachers: Responding to changes in primary schools. Buckingham: Open University Press.