Bridging assessment and learning: a view from second and foreign language assessment

References

• Alderson, J. C. (2005). Diagnosing foreign language proficiency: The interface between learning and assessment. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Alderson, J. C., Brunfaut, T., & Harding, L. (2015). Towards a theory of diagnosis in second and foreign language assessment: Insights from professional practice across diverse fields. Applied Linguistics, 36, 236–260.10.1093/applin/amt046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderson, J. C., Haapakangas, E.-L., Huhta, A., Nieminen, L., & Ullakonoja, R. (2015). The diagnosis of reading in a second or foreign language. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bachman, L. F. (1989). Language testing-SLA research interfaces. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 9, 193–209.
   Google Scholar
• Bachman, L. F., & Cohen, A. D. (1998). Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baird, J.-A., Andrich, D., Hopfenbeck, T. N., & Stobart, G. (2017). Assessment and learning: Fields apart? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 24, 317–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartning, I., Martin, M., & Vedder, I. (2010). Communicative proficiency and linguistic development: Intersections between SLA and language testing research. Amsterdam: Eurosla.
   Google Scholar
• Brunfaut, T. (2016). Looking into reading II: A follow-up study on test-takers’ cognitive processes while completing Aptis B1 reading tasks (British Council Validation Series, VS/2016/001). London: The British Council.
   Google Scholar
• Brunfaut, T., & Harding, L. (in press). Teachers setting the assessment (literacy) agenda: A case study of a teacher-led national test development project in Luxembourg. In D. Xerri, & P. Vella Briffa (Eds.), Teacher involvement in high stakes language testing. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brunfaut, T., & McCray, G. (2015). Looking into test-takers’ cognitive processes whilst completing reading tasks: A mixed-method eye-tracking and stimulated recall study (ARAGs Research Reports Online, AR-G/2015/001). London: The British Council.
   Google Scholar
• Chalhoub-Deville, M. (2016). Validity theory: Reform policies, accountability testing, and consequences. Language Testing, 33, 453–472.10.1177/0265532215593312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapelle, C. A., Enright, M. K., & Jamieson, J. M. (2008). Building a validity argument for the test of English as a foreign language. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, L. (2014). Consequences, impact, and washback. In A. J. Kunnan (Ed.), The companion to language assessment (pp. 1130–1146). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, F., & Fulcher, G. (2007). The Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) and the design of language tests: A matter of effect. Language Teaching, 40, 231–241.10.1017/S0261444807004351
   Google Scholar
• Froetscher, D. M. (2017). An investigation into the washback of a standardized national exam on the classroom testing of reading (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Lancaster University, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Fulcher, G. (2012). Assessment literacy for the language classroom. Language Assessment Quarterly, 9, 113–132.10.1080/15434303.2011.642041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, L., Alderson, J. C., & Brunfaut, T. (2015). Diagnostic assessment of reading and listening in a second or foreign language: Elaborating on diagnostic principles. Language Testing, 32, 317–336.10.1177/0265532214564505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inbar-Lourie, O. (2008). Constructing a language assessment knowledge base: A focus on language assessment courses. Language Testing, 25, 385–402.10.1177/0265532208090158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, N., & Saville, N. (2016). Learning-oriented assessment: A systemic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2008). Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages. London: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2011). Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for second language development. Language Teaching Research, 15, 11–33.10.1177/1362168810383328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–23). New York, NY: American Council on Education.
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, B. (2015). Aptis test development approach (Technical Report TR/2015/001). London: The British Council. Retrieved from https://www.britishcouncil.org/exam/aptis/research/publications/test-development-approach
   Google Scholar
• Pill, J., & Harding, L. (2013). Defining the language assessment literacy ‘gap’: Evidence from a parliamentary inquiry. Language Testing, 30, 381–402.10.1177/0265532213480337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pižorn, K., & Nagy, E. (2009). The politics of examination reform in Central Europe. In J. C. Alderson (Ed.), The politics of language education (pp. 185–202). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Scarino, A. (2013). Language assessment literacy as self-awareness: Understanding the role of interpretation in assessment and in teacher learning. Language Testing, 30, 309–327.10.1177/0265532213480128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spöttl, C., Kremmel, B., Holzknecht, F., & Alderson, J. C. (2016). Evaluating the achievements and challenges in reforming a national language exam: The reform team’s perspective. Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, 5(1), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, C. E., & Purpura, J. E. (2015). Learning-oriented assessment in second and foreign language classrooms. In D. Tsagari & J. Banerjee (Eds.), Handbook of second language assessment (pp. 255–272). Berlin: DeGruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Weir, C. J. (2005). Language testing and validation: An evidence-based approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.10.1057/9780230514577
   Google Scholar