Towards effective feedback: an investigation of teachers’ and students’ perceptions of oral feedback in classroom practice

References

• Adie, L., Van der Kleij, F., & Cumming, J. (2018). The development and application of coding frameworks to explore dialogic feedback interactions and self-regulated learning. British Educational Research Journal, 44(4), 704–723. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookhart, S. (2018). Summative and formative feedback. In A. A. Lipnevich & J. K. Smith (Eds.), The cambridge handbook of instructional feedback (pp. 52–78). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, P. C., & Mandel, V. (2010). Praise and feedback in the primary classroom: Teachers’ and students’ perspectives. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 10, 145–154. https://www.newcastle.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0013/100309/V10_burnett-_mandel.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543065003245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D. (2013). Trust and its role in facilitating dialogic feedback. In D. Boud & E. Molloy (Eds.), Feedback in higher and professional education: Understanding it and doing it well (pp. 90–103). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Gamlem, S. M., & Munthe, E. (2014). Mapping the quality of feedback to support students’ learning in lower secondary classrooms. Cambridge Journal of Education, 44(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2013.855171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamlem, S. M., & Smith, K. (2013). Student perceptions of classroom feedback. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 20(2), 150–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2012.749212
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, T., Lipnevich, A., Krannich, M., & Gogol, K. (2018). Performance feedback and emotions. In A. A. Lipnevich & J. K. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Instructional Feedback (pp. 554–574). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Handley, K., Price, M., & Millar, J. (2011). Beyond “doing time”: Investigating the concept of student engagement with feedback. Oxford Review of Education, 37(4), 543–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2011.604951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, E. (2011). Teachers’ feedback to pupils: “Like so many bottles thrown out to sea”? In R. Berry & B. Adamson (Eds.), Assessment reform in education: Policy and practice (pp. 121–133). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, E. (2012). Teachers‘ classroom feedback: Still trying to get it right. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 7(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2012.630454
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, E. (2013). Inquiring into children’s experiences of teacher feedback: Reconceptualising assessment for learning. Oxford Review of Education, 39(2), 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2013.787922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, L. R., Brown, G. T. L., & Harnett, J. A. (2014). Understanding classroom feedback practices: A study of New Zealand student experiences, perceptions, and emotional responses. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26(2), 107–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9187-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., Gan, M., & Brooks, C. (2016). Instruction based on feedback. In R. E. Mayer & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (2nd ed., pp. 290–324). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havnes, A., Smith, K., Dysthe, O., & Ludvigsen, K. (2012). Formative assessment and feedback: Making learning visible. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 38(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, F. (2003). Focusing on form: Student engagement with teacher feedback. System, 31(2), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00021-6
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, K. (2017). Exploring student perceptions of verbal feedback. Research Papers in Education, 32, 444–462.
   Google Scholar
• Lipnevich, A. A., Berg, D. A. G., & Smith, J. K. (2016). Toward a model of student response to feedback. In G. T. L. Brown & L. R. Harris (Eds.), The handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 169–185). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Looney, A., Cumming, J., Van der Kleij, F., & Harris, K. (2018). Reconceptualising the role of teachers as assessors: Teacher assessment identity. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(5), 442–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2016.1268090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyle, J. (2003). Stimulated recall: A report on its use in naturalistic research. British Educational Research Journal, 29(6), 861–878. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192032000137349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahfoodh, O. H. A., & Pandian, A. (2011). A qualitative case study of EFL students’ affective reactions to and perceptions of their teachers’ written feedback. English Language Teaching, 4(3), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n3p14
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, B. (2004). Goals or horizons — The conundrum of progression in English: Or a possible way of understanding formative assessment in English. The Curriculum Journal, 15(2), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/0958517042000226784
   Google Scholar
• Murtagh, L. (2014). The motivational paradox of feedback: Teacher and student perceptions. The Curriculum Journal, 25(4), 516–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2014.944197
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. (2013). Resituating feedback from the reactive to the proactive. In D. Boud & E. Molloy (Eds.), Feedback in higher and professional education (pp. 34–49). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ohta, A. (2000). Rethinking recasts: A learner-centered examination of corrective feedback in the Japanese language classroom in the Japanese classroom. In J. K. Hall & L. Verplaeste (Eds.), The construction of second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction (pp. 47–71). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, E. R., & Irving, S. E. (2008). Secondary school students‘ conceptions of assessment and feedback. Learning and Instruction, 18(3), 238–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QSR International. (2015). NVivo (Version 11) [Computer Software].
   Google Scholar
• Rakoczy, K., Harks, B., Klieme, E., Blum, W., & Hochweber, J. (2013). Written feedback in mathematics: Mediated by students‘ perception, moderated by goal orientation. Learning and Instruction, 27, 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, M., & Lin, A. (2018). Instructional feedback in mathematics. In A. A. Lipnevich & J. K. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of instructional feedback (pp. 169–190). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tjeerdsma, B. L. (1997). A comparison of teacher and student perspectives of tasks and feedback. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 16(4), 388–400. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.16.4.388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Kleij, F. M., Adie, L. E., & Cumming, J. J. (2019). Feasibility and value of using a GoPro camera and Apple iPad to study teacher-student assessment feedback interactions. In B. P. Veldkamp & C. Sluijter (Eds.), Theoretical and practical advances in computer-based educational measurement (pp. 339–359). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Kleij, F. M., Adie, L. E., & Cumming, J. J. (2017). Using video technology to enable student voice in assessment feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(5), 1092–1105. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Kleij, F. M., Vermeulen, J. A., Schildkamp, K., & Eggen, T. J. H. M. (2015). Integrating data-based decision making, assessment for learning and diagnostic testing in formative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(3), 324–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.999024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Schaaf, M., Baartman, L., Prins, F., Oosterbaan, A., & Schaap, H. (2013). Feedback dialogues that stimulate students‘ reflective thinking. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57(3), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2011.628693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, M. R. (2006). Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 379–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500353061
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. A. (2010). ‘You know what you’ve done right and what you’ve done wrong and what you need to improve on’: New Zealand students’ perspectives on feedback. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(3), 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.496249
   Google Scholar