How do signature pedagogies get their signatures? The role of assessment and professional artefacts in preparing students for their professions

References

• Albino, J. E. N., Young, S. K., Neumann, L. M., Kramer, G. A., Andrieu, S. C., Henson, L., Horn, B., & Hendricson, W. D. (2008). Assessing dental students’ competence: Best practice recommendations in the performance assessment literature and investigation of current practices in predoctoral dental education. Journal of Dental Education, 72(12), 1405–1435. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2008.72.12.tb04620.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benner, P., Sutphen, M., Leonard, V., & Day, L. (2009). Educating nurses: A call for radical transformation. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, S., & Milstein, E. S. (2007). Rounds: A signature pedagogy for clinical education. Clinical Law Review, 14(1), 195–252.
   Google Scholar
• Buchy, M., & Quinlan, K. M. (2000). Adapting the scoring matrix: A case study of adapting disciplinary tools for learning centred evaluation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(1), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/713611419
   Google Scholar
• Cowie, B., & Moreland, J. (2015). Leveraging disciplinary practices to support students’ active participation in formative assessment. Assessment in Education, 22(2), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2015.1015960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowther, P. (2013). Understanding the signature pedagogy of the design studio and the opportunities for its technological enhancement. Journal of Learning Design, 6(3), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v6i3.155
   Google Scholar
• De Lange, T., Møystad, A., & Torgersen, G. (2020). How can video-based assignments integrate practical and conceptual knowledge in summative assessment? Student experiences from a longitudinal experiment. British Educational Research Journal, 46(6), 1279–1299. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Lange, T., Møystad, A., & Torgersen, G. R. (2018). Increasing clinical relevance in oral radiology: Benefits and challenges when implementing digital assessment. European Journal of Dental Education, 22(3), 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhart, M. (2009). Generalization from qualitative inquiry. In K. Ercikan & W. M. Roth (Eds.), Generalizing from educational research: Beyond qualitative and quantitative polarization (pp. 51–66). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Esterhazy, R. (2018). What matters for productive feedback? Disciplinary practices and their relational dynamics. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1302–1314. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havnes, A. (2004). Examination and learning: An activity-theoretical analysis of the relationship between assessment and educational practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(2), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042000188456
   Google Scholar
• Hay, D. B., Tan, P. L., & Whaites, E. (2010). Non-traditional learners in higher education: Comparison of a traditional MCQ examination with concept mapping to assess learning in a dental radiological science course. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 577–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602931003782525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinert, J. (2017). Peer critique as a signature pedagogy in writing studies. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 16(3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022216652767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, T., & Maleckar, B. (2016). The influence of disciplinary assessment patterns on student learning: A comparative study. Studies in Higher Education, 41(4), 696–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.943170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motley, P. (2016). Critique and process: Signature pedagogies in the graphic design classroom. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 16(3), 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022216652765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesi, H., & Gardner, S. (2006). Variations in disciplinary culture: University tutors’ views on assessed writing tasks. In P. Kiely, P. Rea-Dickens, H. Woodfield, & G. Clibbon (Eds.), Language, culture and identity in applied linguistics (pp. 99–118). Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, R. (2001). Disciplinary differences and university teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 26(2), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070120052071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, R., Dunne, E., & Farrand, P. (2013). Integrating technologies into ‘‘authentic’’ assessment design: An affordances approach. Research in Learning Technology, 21, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21i0.21986
   Google Scholar
• Schrand, T., & Eliason, J. (2012). Feedback practices and signature pedagogies: What can the liberal arts learn from the design critique? Teaching in Higher Education, 17(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2011.590977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1162/0011526054622015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squires, G. (2005). Art, science and the professions. Studies in Higher Education, 30(2), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070500043077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, W. M., Colby, A., Wegner, J. W., Bond, L., & Shulman, L. S. (2007). Educating lawyers: Preparation for the profession of law. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Tennant, M., McMullen, C., & Kaczynski, D. (2010). Teaching, learning and research in higher education: A critical approach. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Gijp, A., Van Der Schaaf, M. F., Van Der Schaaf, I. C., Huige, J. C. B. M., Ravesloot, C. J., Van Schaik, J. P. J., & Ten Cate, T. J. (2014). Interpretation of radiological images: Towards a framework of knowledge and skills. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 19(4), 565–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-013-9488-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wayne, J., Bogo, M., & Raskin, M. (2010). Field education as the signature pedagogy of social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 46(3), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2010.200900043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. (1994). The primacy of mediated action in sociocultural studies. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 1(4), 202–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039409524672
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001
   Google Scholar