Towards signature assessment and feedback practices: a taxonomy of discipline-specific elements of assessment for learning

References

• Anderson, C., & Hounsell, D. (2007). Knowledge practices: ‘doing the subject’ in undergraduate courses. The Curriculum Journal, 18(4), 463–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170701687910
   Google Scholar
• Baird, J. A., Andrich, D., Hopfenbeck, T. N., & Stobart, G. (2017). Assessment and learning: Fields apart? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 24(3), 317–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1319337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baird, J. A., Hopfenbeck, T. N., Newton, P. N., Stobart, G., & Steen-Utheim, A. T. (2014). Assessment and learning. State of the field review. Knowledge Centre for Education. Case Number 13/4697.
   Google Scholar
• Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of the disciplines. Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique. Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 25(6), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D. (2019). Feedback loops and the longer-term: towards feedback spirals. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,44(5), 705–714. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1531108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffey, J. E., Hammer, D., Levin, D. M., & Grant, T. (2011). The missing disciplinary substance of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1109–1136. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, P., Carless, D., & Lee, P. P. W. (2020). Authentic feedback: Supporting learners to engage in disciplinary feedback practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2, 286–296. http://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1769022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey, E. L., & Associates. (2008). Should colleges focus more on personal and social responsibility? Association of American Colleges and Universities. http://www.aacu.org/core_commitments/documents/PSRII_Findings_April2008.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Esterhazy, R. (2018). What matters for productive feedback? Disciplinary practices and their relational dynamics. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1302–1314. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T. (2016). Professional responsibility and professionalism: A sociomaterial examination. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, S. (1991). Social epistemology. Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gravett, K. (2020). Feedback literacies as sociomaterial practice. Critical Studies in Education, 1–14. Online first. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2020.1747099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, M., Phillips, M., Ryan, T., Boud, D., Dawson, P., Molloy, E., & Mahoney, P. (2019). Conditions that enable effective feedback. Higher Education Research and Development, 38(7), 1401–1416. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1657807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., Edwards-Groves, C., Lloyd, A., Grootenboer, P., Hardy, I., & Wilkinson, J. (2017). Learning as being “stirred in” to practices. In P. Grootenboer, C. Edwards-Groves, & S. Choy (Eds.), Practice theory perspectives on pedagogy and education (pp. 45–65). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3130-4
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. (2020). The power of internal feedback: Exploiting natural comparison processes, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. Online first. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1823314
   Google Scholar
• Pitt, E. 2019. Operationalising dialogic feedback to develop students’ evaluative judgement and enactment of feedback. In M. Henderson, R. Ajjawi, D. Boud, & E. Molloy Eds., The impact of feedback in higher education: Improving assessment outcomes for learners, 129–146. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25112-3.
   Google Scholar
• Pitt, E., & Norton, L. (2017). Now that’s the feedback I want!’ Students’ reactions to feedback on graded work and what they do with it. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(4), 499–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1142500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinlan, K. M. (1999). Commonalities and controversy in context: A study of academic historians’ educational beliefs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15(4), 447–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(98)00066-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinlan, K. M. (2016). Developing student character through disciplinary curricula: An analysis of UK QAA subject benchmark statements. Studies in Higher Education, 41(6), 1041–1054. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.966069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinlan, K. M. (2019). Emotion and moral purposes in university teaching: Poetic case examples of teacher experiences. Studies in Higher Education, 9(44), 1662–1675. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1458829
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X029007004
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1162/0011526054622015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stobart, G. (2008). Testing times: The uses and abuses of assessment. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Panadero, E. (2018). Developing evaluative judgement: Enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work. Higher Education, 76(3), 467–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towle, A., Bainbridge, L., Godolphin, W., Katz, A., Kline, C., Lown, B., Madularu, I., Solomon, P., & Thistlethwaite, J. (2010). Active patient involvement in the education of health professionals. Medical Education, 44(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03530.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weingart, P. (2010). A short history of knowledge formations. In R. Frodeman (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity (pp. 3–14). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. (1994). The primacy of mediated action in sociocultural studies. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 1(4), 202–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039409524672
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. (2019). Why formative assessment is always both domain-general and domain-specific and what matters is the balance between the two. In H. Andrade, R. E. Bennett, & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment in the disciplines (pp. 272–294). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Winstone, N., Nash, R., Rowntree, J., & Menezes, R. (2016). What do students want most from feedback information? Distinguishing necessities from luxuries using a budgeting methodology. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(8), 1237–1253. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1075956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar