Research on construction method of learning paths and learning progressions based on cognitive diagnosis assessment

References

• Alonzo, A. C., & Steedle, J. T. (2009). Developing and assessing a force and motion learning progression. Science Education, 93(3), 389–421. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ausubel, D. P. (1960). The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51(5), 267–272. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayers, E., Nugent, R., & Dean, N. (2009). A comparison of student skill knowledge estimates. Educational data mining 2009: 2nd International conference on educational data mining, proceedings. T. Barnes, M. Desmarais, C. Romero, & S. Ventura (Eds),  International Working Group on Educational Data Mining, Cordoba, Spain, p.101–110.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D. (1997). Human memory: Theory and practice. psychology press.
   Google Scholar
• Baroody, A. J., Cibulskis, M., Lai, M., & Li, X. (2004). Comments on the use of learning trajectories in curriculum development and research. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 227–260. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0602_8
   Google Scholar
• Battista, M. T. (2004). Applying cognition-based assessment to elementary school students’ development of understanding area and volume measurement. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 185–204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0602_6
   Google Scholar
• Battista, M. T. (2011). Conceptualizations and issues related to learning progressions, learning trajectories, and levels of sophistication. Mathematics Enthusiast, 8(3), 507–570. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/tme/vol8/iss3/5
   Google Scholar
• Chen, F., Yan, Y., & Xin, T. (2017). Developing a learning progression for number sense based on the rule space model in China. Educational Psychology, 37(2), 128–144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2016.1239817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., de la Torre, J., & Zhang, Z. (2013). Relative and absolute fit evaluation in cognitive. diagnosis modeling. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2012.00185.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. H., Ferron, J. M., Thompson, M. S., Gorin, J. S., & Tatsuoka, K. K. (2010). Group comparisons of mathematics performance from a cognitive diagnostic perspective. Educational Research and Evaluation, 16(4), 325–343. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2010.527760
   Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2014). Learning trajectories: Foundations for effective, research-based education. In A. P. Maloney, J. Confrey, & K. H. Nguyen (Eds.), Learning over time: Learning trajectories in mathematics education. Information Age Publishing, p.1–30
   Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H., Wilson, D. C., & Sarama, J. (2004). Young children’s composition of geometric figures: A learning trajectory. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 163–184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0602_5
   Google Scholar
• Confrey, J. (2006). The evolution of design studies as methodology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 135–151). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Confrey, J., Maloney, A., Nguyen, K., Mojica, G., & Myers, M. (2009). Equipartitioning/splitting as a foundation of rational number reasoning using learning trajectories. Paper presented at the 33rd conference of the International group for the psychology of mathematics education, Thessaloniki, Greece, p.345–352.
   Google Scholar
• Corcoran, T. B., Mosher, F. A., & Rogat, A. (2009). Learning progressions in science: An. evidence-based approach to reform, Consortium for Policy Research in Education. CPRE Research Reports. https://repository.upenn.edu/cpre_researchreports/53
   Google Scholar
• Council, N. R. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daro, P., Mosher, F. A., & Corcoran, T. B. (2011). Learning trajectories in mathematics: A foundation for standards, curriculum, assessment, and instruction,Consortium for Policy Research in Education. CPRE Research Reports. https://repository.upenn.edu/cpre_researchreports/60
   Google Scholar
• De la Torre, J., & Lee, Y. S. (2013). Evaluating the Wald test for item‐level comparison of. saturated and reduced models in cognitive diagnosis. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50(4), 355–373. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dogan, E., & Tatsuoka, K. K. (2008). An international comparison using a diagnostic testing. model: Turkish students’ profile of mathematical skills on TIMSS-R. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68(3), 263–272. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9099-8
   Google Scholar
• Duschl, R., Maeng, S., & Sezen, A. (2011). Learning progressions and teaching sequences: A. review and analysis. Studies in Science Education, 47(2), 123–182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2011.604476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(2), 163–166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/49/5/586
   Google Scholar
• Empson, S. B. (2011). On the idea of learning trajectories: Promises and pitfalls. Mathematics. Enthusiast, 8(3), 571–596. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/tme/vol8/iss3/6
   Google Scholar
• Foster, J., & Wiser, M. (2012). The potential of learning progression research to inform the design of state science standards. In A. Alonzo & A. W. Gotwals (Eds.), Learning progressions in science:Current challenges and future directions (pp. 435–460). Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gagne, R. M., & Briggs, L. J. (1974). Principles of instructional design. Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, X., Wang, T., & Sa, Y. (2018). Comparison of CDM and Its Selection: A saturated model, a simple model or a mixed model? Psychological Science, 41(3), 727–734. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20180333
   Google Scholar
• Gotwals, A. W., & Alonzo, A. C. (2012). Introduction: Leaping into learning progressions in science. In A. C. Alonzo & A. W. Gotwals (Eds.), Learning Progressions in science: Current challenges and future directions (pp. 3–12). Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gravemeijer, K. (2004). Local instruction theories as means of support for teachers in reform mathematics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 105–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0602_3
   Google Scholar
• Green, K., & Toker, T. (2013). Cognitive diagnostic assessment of timss-2007 mathematics. Achievement items for 8th graders in Turkey. Journal of Educational Science, 1(1), 1–16. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/653
   Google Scholar
• Grønmo, L. S., Lindquist, M., Arora, A., & Mullis, I. V. (2015). TIMSS 2015 mathematics framework. TIMSS, 11–27. https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/downloads/T15_FW_Chap1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Guo, L., Yang, J., & Song, N. (2020). Spectral clustering algorithm for cognitive diagnostic. Assessment. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 944. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00944
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houts, C. R., & Cai, L. (2013). flexMIRTR user’s manual version 2: Flexible multilevel multidimensional item analysis and test scoring. Vector Psychometric Group.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, J., Miller, M. D., Huggins-Manley, A. C., & Chen, Y. H. (2016). Evaluation of model fit in cognitive diagnosis models. International Journal of Testing, 16(2), 119–141. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2015.1133627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, J., Berlanga, A., Vogten, H., & Koper, R. (2008). Towards a learning path specification. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-long Learning, 18(1), 77–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCEELL.2008.016077
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, J., Berlanga, A. J., & Koper, R. (2011). Evaluation of the learning path specification. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(3), 218–230. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.14.3.218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kardan, A. A., Ebrahim, M. A., & Imani, M. B. (2014). A new personalized learning path generation method: Aco-map. Indian Journal of Scientific Research, 5(1), 17–24. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282612324
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Y. (2015). On learning path and sublimation learning. Journal of Higher Education, 36(11), 12–18.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, W., Iaconangelo, C., & de la Torre, J. (2016). Model similarity, model selection, and attribute classification. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40(3), 200–217. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621615621717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters, G., & Forster, M. (1996). Progress Maps. Assessment Resource Kit (ARK). Australian Council Educational Research (ACER).
   Google Scholar
• Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Joe, H. (2014). Assessing approximate fit in categorical data analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 49(4), 305–328. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.911075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merritt, J., Krajcik, J., & Shwartz, Y. (2008). Development of a learning progression for the particle model of matter, Proceedings of the 8th international conference on International conference for the learning sciences, international Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc. 2,78–81.
   Google Scholar
• Mishler, A., & Nugent, R. Clustering students and inferring skill set profiles with skill hierarchies, Originally presented at the Doctoral Consortium of the 11th International Conference on Educational Data Mining. Buffalo, NY https://educationaldatamining.org/files/conferences/EDM2018/papers/EDM2018_paper_190.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mohan, L., Chen, J., & Anderson, C. (2009). Developing a multi-year learning progression for carbon cycling in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 675–698. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parnphumeesup, P., & Kerr, S. A. (2011). Classifying carbon credit buyers according to their attitudes towards and involvement in CDM sustainability labels. Energy Policy, 39(10), 6271–6279. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.07.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roseman, J. E., Caldwell, A., Gogos, A., & Kurth, L. (2006). Mapping a coherent learning progression for the molecular basis of heredity. In National association for research in science teaching annual meeting. American Association for the Advancement of Science, San Francisco, CA
   Google Scholar
• Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 114–145. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/749205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C. L., Wiser, M., Anderson, C. W., & Krajcik, J. (2006). Implications of research on children’s learning for standards and assessment: A proposed learning progression for matter and the atomic-molecular theory. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 4(1–2), 1–98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2006.9678570
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, S. Y., Shin, N., & Krajcik, J. S. (2009). Towards a model for the development of an empirically tested learning progression. Paper presented at the Learning Progressions in Science (LeaPS) Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Tatsuoka, K. K. (1984). Analysis of errors in fraction addition and subtraction problems: Computer-based education research laboratory. National Inst. of Education (ED). Report No: ED257665, Urbana, University of Illinois
   Google Scholar
• Tatsuoka, K. K., Corter, J. E., & Tatsuoka, C. (2004). Patterns of diagnosed Mathematical Content and process skills in TIMSS-R across a sample of 20 countries. American Educational Research Journal, 41(4), 901–926. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312041004901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Templin, J., & Bradshaw, L. (2013). Measuring the reliability of diagnostic classification model examinee estimates. Journal of Classification, 30(2), 251–275. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-013-9129-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorndike, E. L. (1922). The psychology of arithmetic. MacMillan Co,6(2),163–165. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/11080-000
   Google Scholar
• Toker, T., & Green, K. (2012). An application of cognitive diagnostic assessment on TIMMS-2007 8th grade mathematics items. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 4, 14–16. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED543803.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vrieze, S. I. (2012). Model selection and psychological theory: A discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Psychological Methods, 17(2), 228–243. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, S., & Jia, Y. (2010). The new trends and enlightenments of the research on science education in the United States: Promoting the consistence of the curriculum, teaching and evaluation by learning progressions. Curriculum, Teaching Material and Method, 30(10), 98–108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19877/j.cnki.kcjcjf.2010.10.019
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M., & Bertenthal, M. (2005). Systems for state science assessment. Board on testing and assessment. In Center for Education, National Research Council of the National Academies. National Academies Press, Washington, DC. p.229–248
   Google Scholar
• Wu, K., Deng, H., & Yang, J. (2017). Progress and implications of learning progression research in mathematics education. Journal of Mathematics Education, 26(6), 40–46.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, X., Wu, R., Chang, -H.-H., Kong, Q., & Zhang, Y. (2020). International comparative study on PISA mathematics achievement test based on cognitive diagnostic models. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(2230). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02230
   Google Scholar
• Wu, X., Xu, T., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Research on the data analysis knowledge assessment of pre-service teachers from China based on cognitive diagnostic assessment. Current Psychology, 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01836–y
   Google Scholar
• Wu, X., Zhang, Y., Wu, R., & Chang, H. H. (2021). A comparative study on cognitive diagnostic assessment of mathematical key competencies and learning trajectories. Current Psychology, 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01230–0
   Google Scholar
• Xin, T., Le, M.-L., Guo, Y.-F., & Jinag, Y. (2015). The approach to establishing achievement standard: The learning progressions based on cognition diagnostic. Journal of Educational Studies, 11(5), 72–79. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.14082/j.cnki.1673-1298.2015.05.009
   Google Scholar
• Xin, T., Xu, Z., & Tatsuoka, K. (2004). Linkage between teacher quality, student achievement,and cognitive skills: A rule-space model. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 30(3), 205–223. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2004.09.002
   Google Scholar
• Yang, F., Li, F. W., & Lau, R. W. (2014). A fine-grained outcome-based learning path model. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 44(2), 235–245. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2013.2263133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan, P. (2020). Longitudinal learning diagnosis: Minireview and future research directions. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01185
   Google Scholar
• Zhan, P., Jiao, H., Liao, D., & Li, F. (2019). A longitudinal higher-order diagnostic classification model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 44(3), 251–281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998619827593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar