References
- Álvarez Castillo, J. L., Martínez Usarralde, M. J., González González, H., & Buenestado Fernández, M. (2017). El aprendizaje-servicio en la formación del profesorado de las universidades españolas/Service-learning in teacher training in Spanish universities. Revista española de pedagogía, 75(2), 199–217. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22550/REP75-2-2017-02
- Baird, J. A., Andrich, D., Hopfenbeck, T. N., & Stobart, G. (2017). Assessment and learning: Fields apart? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 24(3), 317–350. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1319337.
- Barba-Martín, R. A., Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., Pérez-Pueyo, Á., & Sánchez-Santamaría, J. (2020). Conceptual analysis of influential factors in the motivation and involvement of the university student towards the assessment in physical education. Sustainability, 12(21), 8842. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218842
- Bazeley, P. (2013). Qualitative data analysis. Practical strategies. Sage.
- Bearman, M., Dawson, P., Bennett, S., Hall, M., Molloy, E., Boud, D., & Joughin, G. (2017). How university teachers design assessments: A cross-disciplinary study. Higher Education, 74(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0027-7
- Bearman, M., Dawson, P., Boud, D., Bennett, S., Hall, M., & Molloy, E. (2016). Support for assessment practice: Developing the Assessment Design Decisions Framework. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(5), 545–556. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1160217
- Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
- Bers, T. H., Davis, B. D., & Taylor, B. (2000). The use of syllabi in assessments: Unobtrusive indicators and tools for faculty development. Assessment Update, 12(3), 4–7.
- Bloxham, S. (2015). Assessing Assessment: New Developments in Assessment Design, Feedback Practices and Marking in Higher Education. In H. Fry, S. Ketteridge, & S. Marshall (Eds.), A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (4th ed., pp. 107–122). Routledge.
- Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2007). Rethinking assessment in Higher Education. Abingdon: Routledge
- Brinkworth, R., McCann, B., Matthews, C., & Nordström, K. (2009). First year expectations and experiences: Student and teacher perspectives. Higher Education, 58(2), 157–173. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9188-3
- Brown, G. T., Gao, L., & Gritter, K. (2015). Chinese teachers’ conceptions of assessment for and of learning: Six competing and complementary purposes. Cogent Education, 2(1), 993836. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2014.993836
- Brown, G. T., Kennedy, K. J., Fok, P. K., Chan, J. K. S., & Yu, W. M. (2009). Assessment for student improvement: Understanding Hong Kong teachers’ conceptions and practices of assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(3), 347–363. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940903319737
- Carless, D. (2015). Exploring learning-oriented assessment processes. Higher Education, 69(6), 963–976. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9816-z
- Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches (5a ed.). Sage.
- Esterhazy, R. (2018). What matters for productive feedback? Disciplinary practices and their relational dynamics. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1302–1314. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463353
- Fernández Ruiz, J., Panadero, E., García-Pérez, D., & Pinedo, L. (2021). Assessment design decisions in practice: Profile identification in approaches to assessment design Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1937512
- Fernández-Ruiz, J., & Panadero, E. (2020). Comparison between conceptions and assessment practices among secondary education teachers: More differences than similarities (Comparación entre concepciones y prácticas de evaluación en profesores de Educación Secundaria: Más diferencias que semejanzas). Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 43(2), 309–346. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2020.1722414
- Fraile, J., Pardo, R. Y., & Panadero, E. (2018). Autoevaluación y autocalificación en el Grado en Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte: Estudio censal de las guías docentes. Profesorado. Revista de Currículum Y Formación de Profesorado, 22(3), 163–182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v22i3.7997
- Gil, L. V., & Beltrán, J. C. H. (2018). The Bologna process could be at stake: Some thoughts from Spain. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(4), 769–774. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060420
- Gómez, G. R., Sáiz, M. S. I., & Jiménez, E. G. (2013). Autoevaluación, evaluación entre iguales y coevaluación: Conceptualización y práctica en las universidades españolas. Revista de Investigación En Educación, 11(2), 198–210. http://reined.webs4.uvigo.es/index.php/reined/article/view/183
- Govaerts, M. (2008). Educational competencies or education for professional competence? Medical Education, 42 (3), 234–236. PMid: 18275410. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.03001.x
- Harman, K., & McDowell, L. (2011). Assessment talk in design: The multiple purposes of assessment in HE. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2010.507309
- Haukland, L. H. (2020). The Bologna process and HEIs institutional autonomy. Athens Journal of Education, 7(4), 365–383. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.7-4-3
- Hay, P. J. (2006). Assessment for learning in physical education. In D. Kirk, D. MacDonald, & M. O′Sullivan (Eds.), The handbook of physical education (pp. 312–325). Sage.
- Howard, E., Meehan, M., & Parnell, A. (2019). Quantifying participation in, and the effectiveness of, remediating assessment in a university mathematics module. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1476670
- Iannone, P., & Simpson, A. (2011). The summative assessment diet: How we assess in mathematics degrees. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 30(4), 186–196. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrr017
- Ibarra, M. S., & Rodríguez, G. (2010). An approach to the dominant discourse of learning assessment in higher education. Revista de Educación, 351, 385–407. http://hdl.handle.net/11162/76444
- Izci, K., & Caliskan, G. (2017). Development of prospective teachers’ conceptions of assessment and choices of assessment tasks. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 3(2), 464–474. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.327906
- Jessop, T., & Maleckar, B. (2016). The influence of disciplinary assessment patterns on student learning: A comparative study. Studies in Higher Education, 41(4), 696–711. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.943170
- Jessop, T., & Tomas, C. (2017). The implications of programme assessment patterns for student learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(6), 990–999. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1217501
- Joy Cumming, J., & Maxwell, G. S. (1999). Contextualising authentic assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 6(2), 177–194. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09695949992865
- Lipnevich, A. A., Guskey, T., Murano, D. M., & Smith, J. K. (2020). What do grades mean? Variation in grading criteria in American college and university courses. Assessment and Evaluation: Principles, Policy, and Practice 27(5) , 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2020.1799190
- Lipnevich, A. A., Panadero, E., Gjicali, K., & Fraile, J. (2021). What’s on the syllabus? An analysis of assessment criteria in first year courses across US and Spanish universities. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 1–25.
- López-Pastor, V. M., Kirk, D., Lorente-Catalán, E., MacPhail, A., & Macdonald, D. (2013). Alternative assessment in physical education: A review of international literature. Sport, Education and Society, 18(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2012.713860
- McMillan, J. H. (2003). Understanding and improving teachers’ classroom assessment decision making: Implications for theory and practice. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(4), 34–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2003.tb00142.x
- Meyer, L. H., Davidson, S., McKenzie, L., Rees, M., Anderson, H., Fletcher, R., & Johnston, P. M. (2010). An investigation of tertiary assessment policy and practice: Alignment and contradictions. Higher Education Quarterly, 64(3), 331–350. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2010.00459.x
- Mohammadi, S., & Karupiah, P. (2020). Quality of work life and academic staff performance: A comparative study in public and private universities in Malaysia. Studies in Higher Education, 45(6), 1093–1107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1652808
- Norton, L., Richardson, T. E., Hartley, J., Newstead, S., & Mayes, J. (2005). Teachers’ beliefs and intentions concerning teaching in higher education. Higher Education, 50(4), 537–571. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6363-z
- Panadero, E., Brown, G. T. L., & Courtney, M. G. R. (2014). Teachers’ reasons for using self- assessment: A survey self-report of Spanish teachers. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(3), 365–383. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.919247
- Panadero, E., & Brown, G. T. L. (2017). Teachers’ reasons for using peer assessment: Positive experience predicts use. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 32(1), 133–156. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-015-0282-5
- Panadero, E., Fraile, J., Fernández Ruiz, J., Castilla-Estévez, D., & Ruiz, M. A. (2019). Spanish university assessment practices: examination tradition with diversity by faculty. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(3), 379–397.
- Postareff, L., Virtanen, V., Katajavuori, N., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2012). Academics’ conceptions of assessment and their assessment practices. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 38(3–4), 84–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.06.003
- Quesada-Serra, V., Rodríguez-Gómez, G., & Ibarra-Sáiz, M. S. (2016). What are we missing? Spanish teachers’ perceptions of their assessment practices. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(1), 48–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.930353
- Quinlan, K. M. (2016). Developing student character through disciplinary curricula: An analysis of UK QAA subject benchmark statements. Studies in Higher Education, 41(6), 1041–1054. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.966069
- Quinlan, K. M., & Pitt, E. (2021). Towards signature assessment and feedback practices: A taxonomy of discipline-specific elements of assessment for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 28(2) , 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2021.1930447
- Sambell, K., McDowell, L., & Montgomery, C. (2012). Assessment for learning in higher education. London: Routledge.
- Sandelowski, M. (2010). What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Research in Nursing & Health, 33(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20362
- Schuwirth, L. W., & Van Der Vleuten, C. P. (2019). Current assessment in medical education: Programmatic assessment. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 20(S2), 2–10. http://jattjournal.net/index.php/atp/article/view/143673.
- Silió, E. (2019). “La carrera de Matemáticas se dispara en plena era del Big Data”. El País. https://elpais.com/sociedad/2019/05/28/actualidad/1559060134_280031.html
- Stiggins, R. (2007). Assessment through the student’s eyes. Educational Leadership, 64(8), 22.
- Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77–100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806292430
- Tian-Ci Quek, T., Tam, W. S., Tran, X., Zhang, B., Zhang, M., Su-Hui, Z., Ho, C., & Chun-Man Ho, R. (2019). The global prevalence of anxiety among medical students: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(15), 2735. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16152735
- Trenholm, S., Alcock, L., & Robinson, C. (2015). An investigation of assessment and feedback practices in fully asynchronous online undergraduate mathematics courses. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science & Technology, 46(8), 1197–1221. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1036946
- Villarroel, V., Bloxham, S., Bruna, D., Bruna, C., & Herrera-Seda, C. (2018). Authentic assessment: Creating a blueprint for course design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 840–854. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1412396
- Wächter, B. (2004). The Bologna process: Developments and prospects. European Journal of Education, 39(3), 265–273. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2004.00182.x
- Watkins, D., Dahlin, B., & Ekholm, M. (2005). Awareness of the backwash effect of assessment: A phenomenographic study of the views of Hong Kong and Swedish teachers. Instructional Science, 33(4), 283–309. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-3002-8
- Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001
- Wiliam, D. (2019). Why formative assessment is always both domain-general and domain-specific and what matters is the balance between the two. In H. Andrade, R. E. Bennett, & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment in the disciplines (pp. 272–294). Routledge.
- Wu, Q., & Jessop, T. (2018). Formative assessment: Missing in action in both research-intensive and teaching focused universities? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(7), 1019–1031. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1426097
- Yan, Z., & Brown, G. T. (2021). Assessment for learning in the Hong Kong assessment reform: A case of policy borrowing. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68, 100985. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.100985
- Yan, Z., Li, Z., Panadero, E., Yang, M., Yang, L., & Lao, H. (2021). A systematic review on factors influencing teachers’ intentions and implementations regarding formative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 1–33.