Contemporary criminal defence practice: importance of active involvement at the investigative stage and related training requirements

References

• Apistola, M. (2006) Advocaat en Kennismanagement, Doctoral dissertation VU University, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Balcioğlu, E., Pala, E. & Yildirim, A. (2015) Developing interprofessional collaborative practice in the criminal justice system in England and Wales, Journal of Sociological Research, 18(2), pp. 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Barendrecht, M., Kistemaker, L., Scholten, H.J., Schrader, R. & Wrzesinska, M. (2014) Legal Aid in Europe: Nine Different Ways to Guarantee Access to Justice? (The Hague, WODC, Ministerie van Justitie).
   Google Scholar
• Barkai, J.L. & Fine, V.O. (1983) Empathy training for lawyers and students, Southwestern University Law Review, 13, pp. 505–529.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, H., Hammick, M., Freeth, D., Koppel, I. & Reeves, S. (2000) Evaluating Interprofessional Education: A UK Review for Health and Social Care (London, BERA/CAIPE).
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, S. & Brumfitt, S.M. (2008) Professional differences in interprofessional working, Journal of Interprofessional Care, 22 (3), pp. 239–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder, D.A. & Price, S.C. (1977) Legal Interviewing and Counseling: A Client-Centered Approach (Eagan, MN, West Academic Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Blackstock, J., Cape, E., Hodgson, J., Ogorodova, A. & Spronken, T. (2014a) Inside Police Custody: An Empirical Account of Suspects’ Rights in Four Jurisdictions (Cambridge-Antwerp-Portland, Intersentia).
   Google Scholar
• Blackstock, J., Cape, E., Hodgson, J., Ogorodova, A., Spronken, T. & Vanderhallen, M. (2014b) Inside Police Custody. Training Framework on the Provision of Suspect's Rights (Cambridge-Antwerp-Portland, Intersentia).
   Google Scholar
• Boccaccini, M.T., Boothby, J.L. & Brodsky, S.L. (2002) Client-relations skills in effective lawyering: attitudes of criminal defense attorneys and experienced clients, Law & Psychology Review, 26, pp. 97–121.
   Google Scholar
• Boccaccini, M.T. & Brodsky, S.L. (2001) Characteristics of the ideal criminal defense attorney from the client’s perspective: empirical findings and implications for legal practice, Law & Psychology Review, 25, pp. 81–117.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, G. (2010) Reflective Practice (London: SAGE Publications).
   Google Scholar
• Cahn, D.D. & Abigail, R.A. (2014) Managing Conflict through Communication (Upper Saddle River, NJ, Pearson Education).
   Google Scholar
• Cape, E. (2018) Inside Police Custody 2: An Empirical Study of Suspects’ Rights at the Investigative Stage of the Criminal Process in Nine EU Countries. Comparative Report.
   Google Scholar
• Cape, E., Namoradze, Z., Smith, R. & Spronken, T. (2009) Effective Criminal Defence in Europe (Antwerp-Oxford-Portland, Intersentia).
   Google Scholar
• Celiksoy, E. (2018) Ibrahim and others v. UK: watering down the Salduz principles?, New Journal of European Criminal Law, 9 (2), pp. 229–246.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran, D. (2018) Interviewing Skills for Legal Professionals. Working with the Law (Toronto, Emond Montgomery Publications).
   Google Scholar
• Conway, V. & Daly, Y. (2019) From legal advice to legal assistance: recognising the changing role of the solicitor in the Garda station, Irish Judicial Studies Journal, 3, pp. 103–123.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper H., Carlisle C., Gibbs T. & Watkins C. (2001) Developing an evidence base for interdisciplinary learning: a systematic review, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 35(2), pp. 228–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotterill, J. (2013) A Language and Power in Court. A Linguistic Analysis of the O.J. Simpson Trial (New York, Palgrave MacMillan).
   Google Scholar
• Crijns J.H. (2017) Modernisering van het Wetboek van Strafvordering: fundamentele herijking of grote voorjaarsschoonmaak?, in: B.J.G. Leeuw, F.P. Ölçer & J.M. ten Voorde (Eds) Leidse gedachten voor een modern straf(proces)recht. Meijers-reeks no. 279 (Den Haag, Boom Juridisch), pp. 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Cruz, H.D., Gillingham, P. & Melendez, S. (2007) Reflexivity: a concept and its meanings for practitioners working with children and families, Critical Social Work, 8(1), pp. 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, L. (2016), Spacing Law and Politics: The Constitution and Representation of the Juridical (Oxon and New York, Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, D. & Stokoe, E. (2011) “You don't have to answer”: lawyers’ contributions in police interrogations of suspects, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 44(1), pp. 21–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights [FRA] (2016) Rights of Suspected and Accused Persons Across the EU: Translation, Interpretation and Information (Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union).
   Google Scholar
• Fair Trials International (2015) Legal Advisory Panel Survey Report: Access to the Case File, March 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Fair Trials International (2017) The Dissappearing Trial. Towards a Rights-based Approach to Trial Waiver Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, S. & Wilson, K. (1981) The value of interpersonal skills in lawyering, Law and Human Behavior, 5(4), pp. 311–324.
   Google Scholar
• Field, S. (2003) Dialogue and the inquisitorial tradition: French defence lawyers in the pre-trial criminal process, Criminal Law Forum, 14(3), pp. 261–316.
   Google Scholar
• Finlay, L. (2008) Reflecting on Reflective Practice. PBPL Paper 52.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R.P., Ross, S.J. & Cahill, B.S. (2010) Interviewing witnesses and victims, in: P.A. Granhag (Ed.) Forensic Psychology in Context: Nordic and International Approaches (Devon, UK, Willan Publishing), pp. 56–74.
   Google Scholar
• Giannoulopoulos, D. (2016) Strasbourg jurisprudence, law reform and comparative law: a tale of the right to custodial legal assistance in five countries, Human Rights Law Review, 16 (1), pp. 103–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. (2005) Interprofessional teamwork: professional cultures as barriers, Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19, pp. 188–196.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hammick, M., Freeth, D., Koppel, I., Reeves, S. & Barr, H. (2007) A best evidence systematic review of interprofessional education, Medical Teacher, 29(8), pp. 735–751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haworth, K. (2017) The discursive construction of evidence in police interviews: case study of a rape suspect, Applied Linguistics, 38(2), pp. 194–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, D., Hamilton, C., Daly, Y. & Butler, M. (2015) The Routledge Handbook of Irish Criminology (London, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Hean, S., Staddon, S., Clapper, A., Fenge, L.A., Jack, E. & Heaslip, V. (2012) Interagency Training to Support the Liaison and Diversion Agenda (Bournemouth, UK, Bournemouth University and SW Offender Health).
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, J. (2005) French Criminal Justice. A Comparative Account of the Investigation and Prosecution of Crime in France (Oxford, Hart Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, J. (2009) Constructing the pre-trial role of the defence in French criminal procedure: an adversarial outsider in an inquisitorial process?, International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 6 (1), pp. 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, A.C. (1998) Legal ethics for a fragmented society: between professional and personal, International Journal of the Legal Profession, 2 (3), pp. 175–192.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. (2016) Cultural barriers on the road to providing suspects with access to a lawyer, in: R. Colson & S. Field (Eds) EU Criminal Justice and the Challenges of Diversity. Legal Cultures in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), pp. 181–198.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, V. (2010) Transforming Legal Aid: Access to Criminal Defence Services (London, Legal Services Commission, Legal Services Research Centre).
   Google Scholar
• Laal, M. & Ghodsi, S.M. (2012). Benefits of collaborative learning, Journal of Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, pp. 486–490.
   Google Scholar
• Leering, M. (2014) Conceptualizing reflective practice for legal professionals, Journal of Law and Social Policy, 23, pp. 83–106.
   Google Scholar
• Leo, R.A. (2008), Police Interrogation and American Justice (Harvard, Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Maegherman, E. & Vanderhallen, M. (2018a) Effective Police Station Legal Advice – Country Report 1: Belgium. Project Report (Nottingham, University of Nottingham).
   Google Scholar
• Maegherman, E. & Vanderhallen, M. (2018b) Effective Police Station Legal Advice – Country Report 4: The Netherlands. Project Report (Nottingham, University of Nottingham).
   Google Scholar
• Maughan, C. & Webb, J. (2005) Lawyering Skills and the Legal Process (Cambridge, Cambridge Univesity Press).
   Google Scholar
• McConville, M., Hodgson, F., Bridges, L. & Pavlovic, A. (1993) Standing Accused. The Organization and Practices of Criminal Defence Lawyers in Britain (Oxford, Clarendon Press).
   Google Scholar
• Mols, V. (2017) Bringing directives on procedural rights of the EU to police stations: practical training for criminal defence lawyers, New Journal of European Criminal Law, 8 (3), pp. 300–308.
   Google Scholar
• Nederlandse Orde van Advocaten [NOVA] (2017) Curriculum Beroepsopleiding Advocaten.
   Google Scholar
• Oandasan, I. F., Conn L. G., Lingard, L. & Karim, A. (2009) The impact of space and time on interprofessional teamwork in Canadian primary health care settings: implications for health care Reform, Primary Health Care Research & Development, 10 (2), pp.151–162.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson-Badali, M., Care, S. & Broeking, J. (2007) Young people’s perceptions and experiences of the lawyer–client relationship, Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 49(3), pp. 375–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pivaty, A. (2018) The right to custodial legal advice: in search for the rationales, European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 26(1), pp. 62–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pivaty, A. & Soo, A. (2019) Article 7 of the Directive 2012/13/EU on the right to information in criminal proceedings: a missed opportunity to ensure equality of arms in pre-trial proceedings?, European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 27 (2), pp. 126–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preložnjak, B. (2017) Impact of cuts to legal aid – comparative view and economic prospects, InterEULawEast: Journal for the International and European Law, Economics and Market Integrations, IV(2), pp. 35–61.
   Google Scholar
• Raelin, J. & Coghlan, D. (2006) Developing managers as learners and researchers: using action learning and action research, Journal of Management Education, 30 (5), pp. 670–689.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves S., Zwarenstein M., Goldman J., Barr H., Freeth D., Hammick M. & Koppel, I. (2008) Interprofessional Education: Effects on Professional Practice and Health Care Outcomes (York, Cochrane Library).
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, S., Zwarenstein, M., Goldman, J., Barr, H., Freeth, D., Koppel, I. & Hammick, M. (2010) The effectiveness of interprofessional education: key findings from a new systematic review, Journal of Interprofessional Care, 24 (3), pp. 230–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, J.D. (2004) Interpersonal dynamics: helping lawyers learn the skills, and the importance, of human relationships in the practice of law. University of Miami Law Review, 58, pp. 1225–1283.
   Google Scholar
• Rusanow, G. (2003) Knowledge Management and the Smarter Lawyer (New York, ALM Publishing)
   Google Scholar
• Sauceman, J., Ruis, A.R. & Shaffer, D.W. (2017) Automating the detection of reflecting-on-action, Journal of Learning Analytics, 4 (2), pp. 212–239.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think In Action (New York, Basic Books).
   Google Scholar
• Skinns, L. (2011) Police Custody: Governance, Legitimacy and Reform in the Criminal Justice Process (Cullompton, Willan Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Office on Drug and Crime [UNODC] (2014) Early Access to Legal Aid in Criminal Justice Processes: A Handbook for Policymakers and Practitioners. Criminal Justice Handbook Series (New York, United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• Vanderhallen, M., de Jong, A., Nelen, H. & Spronken, T. Toga’s in De Verhoorkamer: De Invloed Van Rechtsbijstand op Het Politieverhoor (Den Haag, Boom Lemma, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Vanderhallen, M., Oosterhout, M., Panzavolta, M. & de Vocht, D. (2016) Interrogating Young Suspects: Procedural Safeguards from an Empirical Perspective (Cambridge, Intersentia)
   Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Hope, L. & Fisher, L.P. (2014) Eliciting reliable information in investigative interviews, Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), pp. 129–136.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, W.A., van Koppen, P.J. & Crombag, H.F.M. (1993) Anchored Narratives: The Psychology of Criminal Evidence (Hertfordshire, England, Harvester Wheatsheaf; New York, St Martin's Press)
   Google Scholar
• Walker, A. G. (1987) Linguistic manipulation, power and the legal setting, in: L. Kedar (Ed.) Power through Discourse (Norwood, NJ, Ablex Publishing), pp. 57–80.
   Google Scholar
• Weigend, T. (2006) Why have a trial when you can have a bargain?, in: A. Duff, L. Farmer, S. Marshall, V. Tadros (Eds) The Trial on Trial: Volume 2. The Judgment and Calling to Account (Oxford and Portland, OR, Hart Publishing), pp. 207–223.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (2010) Communities of practice and social learning systems: the career of a concept, in: C. Blackmore (Ed.), Social Learning Systems and Communities of Practice (London, Springer), pp. 179–198.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E., McDermott, R. & Snyderm, W.M. (2002) Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge (Boston, MA, Harvard Business School Press).
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation [WHO] (2010) Framework for Action on Interprofessional Education & Collaborative Practice.
   Google Scholar
• Wooff, A. & Skinns, L. (2018) The role of emotion, space and place in police custody in England: towards a geography of police custody, Punishment & Society, 20(5), pp. 562–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case Law
   Google Scholar
• A.T v. Luxembourg 30460/13 [2015] ECHR 367.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle v. Ireland 51979/17[2019] 377.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim and others v. United Kingdom 50541/08 [2016] ECHR 750.
   Google Scholar
• Salduz v Turkey 36391/02 [2008] ECHR 1542.
   Google Scholar
• Legislation
   Google Scholar
• Directive 2013/48/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 on the right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and in European arrest warrant proceedings, and on the right to have a third party informed upon deprivation of liberty and to communicate with third persons and with consular authorities while deprived of liberty, O. J. 2013L 294/1.
   Google Scholar
• Directive 2012/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 on the right to information in criminal proceedings, O.J. L 142.
   Google Scholar
• Uniform reglement verhoorbijstand Salduz in het kader van de permanentiedienst (Staatsblad no. 198) – Orde van Vlaamse Balies (OVB), in werking getreden op 9 april 2019 (Verhoorbijstand Salduz in het kader van de permanentiedienst).
   Google Scholar