Defence lawyers’ views on and identification of suspect vulnerability in criminal proceedings

References

• Bayliss, C. M. & Polk, O. E. (2005) Attorneys’ self-reported perspectives and criteria for requesting competency evaluations in criminal defense cases, Criminal Justice Review, 30, pp. 312–324.
   Google Scholar
• Braanker, M. B. (2010) Verstandig recht, recht naar verstand. De rechtspositie van kwetsbaardere verdachten, in het bijzonder verstandelijk beperkten, na Salduz, Strafblad, 8, pp. 302–319.
   Google Scholar
• Brants, C. & Franken, S. (2009) The protection of fundamental human rights in criminal process. General report, Utrecht Law Review, 5, pp. 7–65.
   Google Scholar
• Brants, C. & Ringnalda, A. (2011) Issues of Convergence: Inquisitorial Prosecution in England and Wales? (Nijmegen, Wolf Legal Publishers).
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2012) Social Research Methods (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Cape, E. (2011) Defending Suspects at Police Stations. The Practitioner's Guide to Advice and Representation (London, LAG).
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory. A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis (London, Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Constantine, R., Andel, R., Petrila, J., Becker, M., Robst, J., Teague, G., Boaz, T. & Howe, A. (2010) Characteristics and experiences of adults with a serious mental illness who were involved in the criminal justice system, Psychiatric Services, 61, pp. 451–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches (Thousand Oaks, Sage).
   Google Scholar
• De Keijser, J. W., Malsch, M., Kranendonk, R. & De Gruijter, M. (2012) Written records of police interrogation: differential registration as determinant of statement credibility and interrogation quality, Psychology, Crime & Law, 18, pp. 613–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaghani, R. (2019) Vulnerability in Police Custody. Police Decision-Making and the Appropriate Adult Safeguard (London, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Dehaghani, R. (2021) Interrogating vulnerability: reframing the vulnerable suspect in police custody, Social & Legal Studies, 30, pp. 251–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Smet, B. (1999) Internationale samenwerking in strafzaken tussen Angelsaksische en continentale landen (Antwerp, Intersentia Rechtswetenschappen).
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, L. & Cuskelly, M. (2011) A focus group study of police officers’ recognition of individuals with intellectual disability, Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 19, pp. 35–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fair Trials. (2012) Defence Rights in the EU (London, Fair Trials International).
   Google Scholar
• Farrugia, L. & Gabbert, F. (2020) Vulnerable suspects in police interviews: exploring current practice in England and Wales, Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 17, pp. 17–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forst, B. (2013) Wrongful convictions in a world of miscarriages of justice, in: C.R. Huff & M. Killias (Eds) Wrongful Convictions & Miscarriages of Justice (New York/London, Routledge), pp. 15–43.
   Google Scholar
• Geijsen, K. (2018) Persons at Risk During Interrogations in Police Custody. Different Perspectives on Vulnerable Suspects (Enschede, Ipskamp printing).
   Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G. H. (1993) Confession evidence, psychological vulnerability and expert testimony, Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 3, pp. 117–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G. H. (2003) The Psychology of Interrogations and Confessions. A Handbook (Chichester, John Wiley & Sons).
   Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G. H. (2010) Psychological vulnerabilities during police interviews. Why are they important?, Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15, pp. 161–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G. H., Clare, I., Rutter, S. & Pearse, J. (1993) Persons at Risk During Interviews in Police Custody: The Identification of Vulnerabilities (London, Royal Commission on Criminal Justice, HMSO).
   Google Scholar
• Guest, G., Bunce, A. & Johnson, L. (2006) How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variabililty, Field Methods, 18, pp. 59–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellenbach, M. (2011) Learning disabilities and criminal justice: custody sergeants’ perceptions of alleged offenders with learning disabilities, British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, pp. 15–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennink, M., Hutter, I. & Bailey, A. (2011) Qualitative Research Methods (London, Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Herrington, V. & Roberts, K. (2012) Addressing psychological vulnerability in the police suspect interview, Policing (bradford, England), 6, pp. 177–186.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, J. (2011) Safeguarding suspects’ rights in Europe: a comparative perspective, New Criminal Law Review, 14, pp. 611–665.
   Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M. (2005) On the psychology of confessions. Does innocence put innocents at risk?, American Psychologist, 60, pp. 215–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M. (2014) False confessions: causes, consequences, and implications for reform, Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, pp. 112–121.
   Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M., Drizin, S. A., Grisso, T., Gudjonsson, G. H., Leo, R. A. & Redlich, A. D. (2010) Police-induced confessions: risk factors and recommendations, Law and Human Behavior, 34, pp. 3–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M. & Gudjonsson, G. H. (2004) The psychology of confessions. A review of the literature and issues, Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, pp. 33–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komter, M. L. (2012) The career of a suspect's statement: talk, text, context, Discourse Studies, 14, pp. 731–752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komter, M. L. (2002) The construction of records in Dutch police interrogations, Information Design Journal & Document Design, 11, pp. 201–213.
   Google Scholar
• Komter, M. L. (2006) From talk to text: the interactional construction of a police record, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 39, pp. 201–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb, H. R., Weinberger, L. E. & Gross, B. H. (2004) Mentally ill persons in the criminal justice system: some perspectives, Psychiatric Quarterly, 75, pp. 107–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leo, R. A. & Gould, J. B. (2009) Studying wrongful convictions: learning from social science, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 7, pp. 7–30.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J. (2002) Qualitative Researching (London, Sage).
   Google Scholar
• McKinnon, J. & Grubin, D. (2010) Health screening in police custody, Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 17, pp. 209–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meissner, C. A., Horgan, J. A. & Albrechtsen, J. S. (2009) False confessions, in: R.N. Kocsis (Ed) Applied Criminal Psychology: a Guide to Forensic Behavioural Sciences (Springfield, Charles C Thomas Publisher LTD), pp. 191–212.
   Google Scholar
• Mergaerts, L. & Dehaghani, R. (2020) Protecting vulnerable suspects in police investigations in Europe: lessons learned from England and Wales and Belgium, New Journal of European Criminal Law, 11, pp. 313–334.
   Google Scholar
• Mergaerts, L., Van Daele, D. & Vervaeke, G. (2018) Challenges in defining and identifying a suspect's vulnerability in criminal proceedings: what's in a name and who's to blame?, in: P. Cooper & L. Hunting (Eds) Access to Justice for Vulnerable People (London, Wildy, Simmonds & Hill Publishing), pp. 48–71.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, M. A. & Saldana, J. (2014) Qualitative Data Analysis (Thousand Oaks, Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mortelmans, D. (2009) Het kwalitatief onderzoeksdesign, in: T. Decorte & D. Zaitch (Eds) Kwalitatieve methoden en technieken in de criminologie (Leuven, Acco), pp. 74–117.
   Google Scholar
• Pivaty, A., Vanderhallen, M., Daly, Y. & Conway, V. (2020) Contemporary criminal defence practice: importance of active involvement at the investigative stage and related training requirements, International Journal of the Legal Profession, 27, pp. 25–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Protheroe, D. & Roney, G. (1996) Assessing detainees’ ‘fitness to be interviewed’. Implications for senior registrars’ training, Psychiatric Bulletin, 20, pp. 104–105.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Elam, G., Tennant, R. & Rahim, N. (2014) Designing and selecting samples, in: J. Ritchie, J. Lewis, C. McNaughton Nicholls & R. Ormston (Eds) Qualitative Research Practice (London, Sage), pp. 111–145.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, O. C. (2014) Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: a theoretical and practical guide, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11, pp. 25–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (2013) Doing Qualitative Research (London, Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Verstraeten, R. (2012) Handboek strafvordering (Antwerp, Maklu).
   Google Scholar
• Young, S., Goodwin, E. J., Sedgwick, O. & Gudjonsson, G. H. (2013) The effectiveness of police custody assessments in identifying suspects with intellectual disabilities and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, BMC Medicine, 11, pp. 1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar