A SUSPICION OF ARCHITECTONIC IN KANT’S TRANSITION PROJECT

bibliography

• Baumgarten, Alexander. Metaphysics: A Critical Translation with Kant’s Elucidations, Selected Notes, and Related Materials. Trans. Courtney D. Fugate and John Hymers. London: Bloomsbury, 2017. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, Hein van den. Kant on Proper Science: Biology in the Critical Philosophy and the Opus postumum. Dordrecht: Springer, 2014. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Caygill, Howard. “The Transition Problem in Kant’s Opus postumum.” Kant: Making Reason Intuitive. Ed. Loli Patellis, Kyriaki Goudeli, and Pavlos Kontos. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. 16–27. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Ducheyne, Steffen. “Kant and Whewell on Bridging Principles between Metaphysics and Science.” Kant-Studien 102.1 (2011): 22–45. Print. doi: 10.1515/kant.2011.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Extrand, C.W. “Forces, Pressures and Energies Associated with Liquid Rising in Nonuniform Capillary Tubes.” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 450 (2015): 135–40. Print. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2015.03.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Förster, Eckhart. Kant’s Final Synthesis: An Essay on the Opus postumum. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 2000. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Michael. Kant’s Construction of Nature: A Reading of the Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2015. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Michael. Kant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1994. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Gabriel, Markus. Why the World Does Not Exist. Trans. Gregory Moss. Cambridge: Polity, 2015. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Bryan Wesley. The Post-Critical Kant: Understanding the Critical Philosophy through the Opus postumum. Milton Park: Routledge, 2017. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Hatfield, Gary. “Kant on the Phenomenology of Touch and Vision.” Kant’s Lectures on Anthropology: A Critical Guide. Ed. Alix Cohen. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2014. 38–57. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Hoppe, Hansgeorg. Kants Theorie der Physik: Eine Unterschung über das Opus postumum von Kant. Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1969. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, Stephen. “Kant and Force: Dynamics, Natural Science and Transcendental Philosophy.” Ph.D. diss. Kingston U, London, 2017. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel. Opus postumum. Trans. Eckart Förster and Michael Rosen. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2012. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Maimon, Salomon. Essay on Transcendental Philosophy. Trans. Nick Midgley, Henry Somers-Hall, Alistair Welchman, and Merten Reglitz. London: Continuum, 2010. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Rueger, Alexander. “Brain Water, the Ether, and the Art of Constructing Systems.” Kant-Studien 86.1 (2009): 26–40. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Thorndike, Oliver. Kant’s Transition Project and Late Philosophy: Connecting the Opus postumum and Metaphysics of Morals. London: Bloomsbury, 2018. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Tuschling, Burkhard. “Apperception and Ether: On the Idea of a Transcendental Deduction of Matter in Kant’s Opus postumum.” Kant’s Transcendental Deductions: The Three “Critiques” and the “Opus postumum.” Ed. Eckart Förster. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1989. 193–217. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Tuschling, Burkhard. Metaphysische und Transzendentale Dynamik in Kants Opus postumum. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1971. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Werkmeister, William. Kant’s Conception of “The Highest Form of Transcendental Philosophy.” Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 6.3 (1975): 19–27. Print. doi: 10.5840/swjphil19756346
   Google Scholar
• Westphal, Kenneth R. “Does Kant’s Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science Fill a Gap in the Critique of Pure Reason?” Synthese 103.1 (1995): 43–86. Print. doi: 10.1007/BF01063718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Žižek, Slavoj. Organs without Bodies: On Deleuze and Consequences. London: Routledge, 2012. Print.
   Google Scholar