COSMOTECHNICS FROM AN ANTHROPOTECHNOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE

bibliography

• Agamben, Giorgio. “What is an Apparatus?” What is an Apparatus?, and Other Essays. Trans. Stefan Pedatella. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2009. 1–24. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Bachelard, Gaston. Le matérialisme rationnel. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1953. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Descola, Philippe. Beyond Nature and Culture. Trans. Janet Lloyd. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2013. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Descola, Philippe. “Constructing Natures: Symbolic Ecology and Social Practice.” Nature and Society: Anthropological Perspectives. Ed. Philippe Descola and Gísli Pálsson. London: Routledge, 1996. 82–102. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Descola, Philippe. “Societies of Nature and the Nature of Society.” Conceptualizing Society. Ed. Adam Kuper. London: Routledge, 1992. 107–26. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Di Martino, Carmine. “Il simbolismo e i suoi antecedenti.” Sistemi intelligenti 31.1 (2019): 87–118. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Dobkin de Rios, Marlene, and Ronni Stachalek. “The Duboisia Genus, Australian Aborigines and Suggestibility.” Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 31.2 (1999): 155–61. Print.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito, Roberto. Persons and Things: From the Body’s Point of View. Trans. Zakiya Hanafi. Cambridge: Polity, 2015. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Routledge, 2002. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, Martin. “The Question Concerning Technology.” The Question Concerning Technology, and Other Essays. Trans. William Lovitt. New York: Harper, 1977. 3–35. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Holbraad, Martin, and Morten A. Pedersen. The Ontological Turn: An Anthropological Exposition. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2017. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Hui, Yuk. “Cosmotechnics as Cosmopolitics.” E-flux Journal 86 (2017): worker01.e-flux.com/pdf/article_161887.pdf. Web.
   Google Scholar
• Hui, Yuk. “On Cosmotechnics: For a Renewed Relation between Technology and Nature in the Anthropocene.” Techné 21.1–2 (2017): 1–23. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Hui, Yuk. The Question Concerning Technology in China. An Essay in Cosmotechnics. Cambridge: Urbanomic, 2016. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, Tim. Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture. Abingdon: Routledge, 2013. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, Marvin W., et al. “Australian Aborigines and Alcohol: A Review.” Drug and Alcohol Review 10.4 (1991): 351–66. Print.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krämer, Sybille. “Technik als Kulturtechnik. Kleines Plädoyer für eine kulturanthropologische Erweiterung des Technikkonzeptes.” Technik – System – Verantwortung. Ed. Klaus Kornwachs. Münster: Litt, 2003. 157–64. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Krämer, Sybille, and Horst Bredekamp. “Culture, Technology, Cultural Techniques – Moving beyond Text.” Trans. Michael Wutz. Theory, Culture & Society 30.6 (2013): 20–29. Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. We Have Never Been Modern. Trans. Catherine Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1993. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1979. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Leroi-Gourhan, André. Gesture and Speech. Trans. Anna Bostock Berger. Cambridge, MA: MIT P, 1993. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Macho, Thomas. “Second-Order Animals: Cultural Techniques of Identity and Identification.” Trans. Michael Wutz. Theory, Culture & Society 30.6 (2013): 30–47. Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, Gerald. “Dopamining and Disadjustment: Addiction and Digital Capitalism.” Are We All Addicts Now? Digital Dependence. Ed. Vanessa Bartlett and Henrietta Bowden-Jones. Liverpool: Liverpool UP, 2017. 68–75. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Simondon, Gilbert. On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects. Trans. Cecile Malaspina and John Rogove. Minneapolis: Univocal, 2016. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Sloterdijk, Peter. “The Domestication of Being: The Clarification of the Clearing.” Not Saved. Essays after Heidegger. Trans. Ian A. Moore and Christopher Turner. Cambridge: Polity, 2016. 89–148. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Sloterdijk, Peter. “The Time of the Crime of the Monstrous. On the Philosophical Justification of the Artificial.” Not Saved. Essays after Heidegger. Trans. Ian A. Moore and Christopher Turner. Cambridge: Polity, 2016. 281–95. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Sloterdijk, Peter. “Wozu Drogen? Zur Dialektik von Weltflucht und Weltsucht.” Weltfremdheit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1993. 118–60. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Stiegler, Bernard. Technics and Time 1. The Fault of Epimetheus. Trans. Richard Beardsworth and George Collins. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1998. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Stiegler, Bernard. Technics and Time 3. Cinematic Time and the Question of Malaise. Trans. Stephen Barker. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2010. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Stiegler, Bernard. What Makes Life Worth Living: On Pharmacology. Trans. Daniel Ross. Cambridge: Polity, 2013. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. Cannibal Metaphysics. Trans. Peter Skafish. Minneapolis: Univocal, 2014. Print.
   Google Scholar