NEOSUBSTANTIVISM AS COSMOTECHNICS

bibliography

• Akrich, Madeleine, and Bruno Latour. “Summary of a Convenient Vocabulary for the Semiotics of Human and Nonhuman Assemblies.” Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Ed. Wiebe E. Bijker and John Law. Cambridge, MA: MIT P, 1992. 259–64. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Bailes, Jon. “The Political Theology of Neoliberalism.” State of Nature 2018. Web. 10 Nov. 2018 <http://stateofnatureblog.com/adam-kotsko-political-theology-neoliberalism/>.
   Google Scholar
• Barbrook, Richard, and Andy Cameron. “The Californian Ideology.” Science as Culture 6.1 (1996): 44–72. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Bardin, Andrea. Epistemology and Political Philosophy in Gilbert Simondon: Individuation, Technics, Social Systems. Dordrecht: Springer, 2015. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Bostrom, Nick. “Human Genetic Enhancements: A Transhumanist Perspective.” The Journal of Value Inquiry 37.4 (2003): 493–506. Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostrom, Nick. “In Defense of Posthuman Dignity.” Bioethics 19.3 (2005): 202–14. Print.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostrom, Nick. “Why I Want to be a Posthuman When I Grow Up.” Medical Enhancement and Posthumanity. Ed. Bert Gordijn and Ruth Chadwick. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008. 107–36. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Bostrom, Nick, and Anders Sandberg. “The Wisdom of Nature: An Evolutionary Heuristic for Human Enhancement.” Human Enhancement. Ed. Julian Savulescu and Nick Bostrom. New York: Oxford UP, 2009. 375–416. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Cassirer, Ernst. The Myth of the State. New Haven: Yale UP, 1946. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Cera, Agostino. “The Technocene or Technology as Neoenvironment.” Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 21.2–3 (2017): 243–81. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Andy. “Pressing the Flesh: A Tension in the Study of the Embodied, Embedded Mind?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76.1 (2008): 37–59. Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Combes, Muriel. Simondon: Une philosophie du transindividuel. Paris: Éditions Dittmar, 2013. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Ellul, Jacques. “The Search for Ethics in a Technicist Society.” Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 9 (1983): 23–26. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Ellul, Jacques. The Technological Society. New York: Vintage, 1964. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Mark. Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative? New York: Zero, 2009. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, Steve, and Veronika Lipinska. The Proactionary Imperative: A Foundation for Transhumanism. London: Palgrave, 2014. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Harari, Yuval Noah. Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow. London: Penguin Random, 2016. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, John. Enhancing Evolution: The Ethical Case for Making Better People. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2007. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Hayles, N. Katherine. How We Think: Digital Media and Contemporary Technogenesis. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2012. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, Martin. Vorträge und Aufsätze. Pfullingen: Neske, 1954. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Hui, Yuk. “Cosmotechnics as Cosmopolitics.” E-flux Journal 86 (Nov. 2017). Web. 3 Feb. 2018 <https://www.e-flux.com/journal/86/161887/cosmotechnics-as-cosmopolitics/>.
   Google Scholar
• Hui, Yuk. “On Cosmotechnics: For a Renewed Relation Between Technology and Nature in the Anthropocene.” Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 21.2–3 (2017): 319–41. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Hui, Yuk. The Question Concerning Technology in China: An Essay in Cosmotechnics. Falmouth: Urbanomic, 2016. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Hui, Yuk. Recursivity and Contingency. London: Rowman, 2019. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Istvan, Zoltan. “Environmentalists are Wrong: Nature isn’t Sacred and We Should Replace It.” The Transhumanist Wager 13 Apr. 2019. Web. 14 Apr. 2019 <https://mavenroundtable.io/transhumanistwager/transhumanism/environmentalists-are-wrong-nature-isn-t-sacred-and-we-should-replace-it-TZ7Msb4mOk-B3n4kNqsyqg/>.
   Google Scholar
• Ito, Joichi. “Resisting Reduction: A Manifesto.” JoDS 14 Oct. 2017. doi:10.21428/8f7503e4. Web. 3 July 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, Kevin. What Technology Wants. New York: Viking, 2010. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Kurzweil, Ray. The Age of Spiritual Machines: When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence. New York: Viking, 1999. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Kurzweil, Ray. “The Law of Accelerating Returns.” Alan Turing: Life and Legacy of a Great Thinker. Ed C. Teuscher. Berlin: Springer, 2004. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Kurzweil, Ray. The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. New York: Viking, 2005. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Land, Nick. “Ideology, Intelligence, and Capital: An Interview with Nick Land.” Vast Abrupt 15 Aug. 2018. Web. 4 Apr. 2019 <https://vastabrupt.com/2018/08/15/ideology-intelligence-and-capital-nick-land/>.
   Google Scholar
• Land, Nick. “Meltdown.” Fanged Noumena: Collected Writings 1987–2007. Falmouth: Urbanomic, 2011. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. “On Technical Mediation: Philosophy, Sociology, Genealogy.” Common Knowledge 3.2 (1994): 29–64. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1999. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. New York: Oxford UP, 2005. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1987. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Leroi-Gourhan, André. Gesture and Speech. Trans. from French by Anna Bostock Berger. Cambridge, MA: MIT P, 1993. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Lyotard, Jean-François. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Trans. Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1979. Print.
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod, Ken. The Cassini Division. New York: Tor, 1998. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels. The Communist Manifesto: A Modern Edition. London: Verso, 2012. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Mayr, Otto. Authority, Liberty and Automatic Machinery in Early Modern Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1989. Print.
   Google Scholar
• More, Max. “The Proactionary Principle: Optimizing Technological Outcomes.” The Transhumanist Reader: Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology, and Philosophy of the Human Future. Ed. Max More and Natasha Vita-More. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013. 258–67. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Morozov, Evgeny. To Save Everything Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. London: Allen Lane, 2013. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, Timothy. Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology After the End of the World. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2013. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Nitzke, Solvejg, and Nicolas Pethes. “Introduction: Visions of the ‘Blue Marble’: Technology, Philosophy, Fiction.” Imagining Earth: Concepts of Wholeness in Cultural Constructions of Our Home Planet. Ed. Solvejg Nitzke and Nicolas Pethes. Bielefeld: Transcript, 2017. 7–21. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Noys, Benjamin. “Drone Metaphysics.” Culture Machine 16 (2015). Web. 15 Apr. 2017 <http://culturemachine.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/595-1453-1-PB.pdf>.
   Google Scholar
• Read, Jason. The Politics of Transindividuality. Leiden: Brill, 2016. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Rothschild, Michael. Bionomics: Economy as Business Ecosystem. Washington, DC: Beard, 2004. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Sandrone, Darío. “Realismo tecnológico y diseño antropométrico: Dos ontologías técnicas.” La técnica en cuestión: Artificialidad, materialidad y ontología de lo creado. Ed. Diego Lawler et al. Buenos Aires: Teseo, 2017. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Simondon, Gilbert. Imagination et invention (1965–1966). Chatou: Éditions de la Transparence, 2008. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Simondon, Gilbert. L’individuation à la lumière des notions de forme et d’information. Grenoble: Millon, coll. Krisis, 1995. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Simondon, Gilbert. On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects. Trans. Cecile Malaspina and John Rogove. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2017. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Simondon, Gilbert. Sur la technique: 1953–1983. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2014. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Sloterdijk, Peter. “The Anthropocene: A Process-State at the Edge of Geohistory?” Art in the Anthropocene: Encounters among Aesthetics, Politics, Environments and Epistemologies. Ed. Heather Davis and Etienne Turpin. London: Open Humanities, 2015. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Srnicek, Nick, and Alex Williams. Inventing the Future: Postcapitalism and a World Without Work. London: Verso, 2015. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Stiegler, Bernard. Technics and Time 1: The Fault of Epimetheus. Trans. Richard Beardsworth and George Collins. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1998. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Trawick, Paul, and Alf Hornborg. “Revisiting the Image of Limited Good: On Sustainability, Thermodynamics, and the Illusion of Creating Wealth.” Current Anthropology 56.1 (2015): 1–27. Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaccari, Andrés. “El artefacto, ¿estructura intencional o sistema autónomo? La ontología de la función artefactual a la luz del intencionalismo, el dualismo y la filosofía de Gilbert Simondon.” Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad 19.7 (2011): 197–208. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Vaccari, Andrés. “Why Should We Become Posthuman? The Beneficence Argument Questioned.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 44.2 (2009): 192–219. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Verbeek, Peter-Paul. “Materializing Morality: Design Ethics and Technological Mediation.” Science, Technology & Human Values 31 (2006): 361–80. Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeek, Peter-Paul. “Obstetric Ultrasound and the Technological Mediation of Morality: A Post Phenomenological Analysis.” Human Studies 31 (2008): 11–26. Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeek, Peter-Paul. What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency and Design. University Park: Pennsylvania State UP, 2005. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Vinge, Vernor. “First Word.” Omni Jan. 1983: 10. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Winner, Langdon. “Are Humans Obsolete?” The Hedgehog Review: Critical Reflections on Contemporary Culture 4.3 (2002): 25–44. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Winner, Langdon. “Decadencia y caída del tecnotriunfalismo.” REDES 22.43 (2016): 127–42. Print.
   Google Scholar