PHILOSOPHY IN THE LIGHT OF AI

bibliography

• Belaval, Yvon. Études Leibniziennes. De Leibniz à Hegel. Paris: Gallimard, 1976. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Bordeleau, Erik. “Proof-of-Withdrawal: Finance in the Undercommons.” Finance in the Undercommons. Ed. Pepita Hesselberth and Joost de Bloois. London: Rowman, 2020. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Colson, Daniel. A Little Lexicon of Anarchism. Trans. Jesse Cohn. Colchester: Minor Compositions, 2018. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, Gilles. Difference and Repetition. Trans. Paul Patton. New York: Continuum, 1994. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, Gilles. The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque. Trans. Tom Conley. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1993. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. What Is Philosophy? Trans. Hugh Tomlinson and Graham Burchell. New York: Columbia UP, 1994. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Genosko, Gary. Félix Guattari. An Aberrant Introduction. London: Continuum, 2002. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Jonathan. “‘Let us Calculate!’ Leibniz, Llull, and the Computational Imagination.” The Public Domain Review 11 Nov. 2016. Web. <https://publicdomainreview.org/essay/let-us-calculate-leibniz-llull-and-the-computational-imagination>.
   Google Scholar
• Guyer, Paul. “Hegel, Leibniz, and the Contradiction of the Finite.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 40.1 (1979): 75–98. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Halpern, Orit, et al. “The Smartness Mandate: Notes toward a Critique.” Grey Room 68 (2017): 106–29. Print. doi: 10.1162/GREY_a_00221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Lectures on the History of Philosophy. 1825–6 Vol. III Medieval and Modern Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2009. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Phenomenology of Spirit. Trans. Terry Pinkard. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2018. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, Joachim Christian. Monade und Begriff. Der Weg von Leibniz zu Hegel. Vienna: Oldenbourg, 1965. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Hui, Yuk. “On Cosmotechnics: For a Renewed Relation between Technology and Nature in the Anthropocene.” Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 2.2–3 (2017): 1–23. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Hui, Yuk. Recursivity and Contingency. London: Rowman, 2019. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Irrgang, Daniel. “Leibniz – I Ching – Cage. Blind Thinking and Chance Operations.” Dialogos. Ramon Llull’s Method of Thought and Artistic Practice. Ed. Amador Vega, Peter Weibel, and Siegfried Zielinski. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2019. 270–82. Print.
   Google Scholar
• James, William. Pragmatism and Other Writings. London: Penguin, 2000. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Werner S. Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1996 [1781]. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Akademieausgabe. Berlin: Akademieverlag, 1923. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Opera Omnia. Ed. Louis Dutens. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1989. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Philosophical Papers. Trans. Roger Ariew and Daniel Graber. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1989. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Textes inédits. Ed. Gaston Grua. Paris: PUF, 1948. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Lovink, Geert. “Cybernetics for the Twenty-First Century: An Interview with Philosopher Yuk Hui.” E-flux Journal 102 (Sept. 2019). Web. <https://www.e-flux.com/journal/102/282271/cybernetics-for-the-twenty-first-century-an-interview-with-philosopher-yuk-hui/>.
   Google Scholar
• Lovink, Geert. “Philosophy of Technology in China: Second Interview with Yuk Hui.” Institute of Network Cultures 4 Sept. 2017. Web. <https://networkcultures.org/geert/2017/09/04/philosophy-of-technology-in-china-second-interview-with-yuk-hui/?pdf=1446>.
   Google Scholar
• Lyotard, Jean-François. The Inhuman. Trans. Geoffrey Bennington and Rachel Bowlby. Cambridge: Polity, 1991. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Negarestani, Reza. Intelligence and Spirit. Falmouth: Urbanomic, 2018. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Pelletier, Arnaud. “‘The Point of View is in the Body’: On the Leibnizian Turns of Anthropology.” Leibniz’s Legacy and Impact. Ed. Julia Weckend and Lloyd Strickland. New York: Routledge, 2020. 225–42. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Prévost, Bertrand. La peinture en actes. Gestes et manières dan l’Italie de la Renaissance. Paris: Actes Sud, 2007. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Serres, Michel. Hermès I. La communication. Paris: Minuit, 1968. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Serres, Michel. Hermès III. La traduction. Paris: Minuit, 1974. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Serres, Michel. Le système de Leibniz et ses modèles mathématiques. Paris: PUF, 1968. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Serres, Michel. The Natural Contract. Trans. Elizabeth MacArthur and William Paulson. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 2008. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Simondon, Gilbert. On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects. Trans. Cecile Malaspina and John Rogove. Minneapolis: Univocal, 2017. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Stengers, Isabelle. Cosmopolitics I. Trans. Robert Bononno. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2010. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Stengers, Isabelle. Cosmopolitics II. Trans. Robert Bononno. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2011. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Stengers, Isabelle. The Invention of Modern Science. Trans. Daniel W. Smith. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2000. Print.
   Google Scholar
• van Tuinen, Sjoerd. “Common Sense: From Critique to Care (Arendt Beyond Arendt).” To Mind is to Care. Ed. Joke Brouwer and Sjoerd van Tuinen. Rotterdam: NAi Publishers/V2_Institute for Unstable Media, 2019. 124–57. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, Norbert. Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. Cambridge, MA: MIT P, 1965. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, Norbert. Invention. The Care and Feeding of Ideas. Cambridge, MA: MIT P, 1994. Print.
   Google Scholar