Facebook Recruitment for Children with Advanced Cancer and Their Parents: Lessons from a Web-based Pediatric Palliative Intervention Study

References

• Frampton GK, Shepherd J, Pickett K, et al. Digital tools for the recruitment and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: A systematic map. Trials 2020;21:478.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nelson EJ, Loux T, Arnold LD, et al. Obtaining contextually relevant geographic data using Facebook recruitment in public health studies. Health Place 2019;55:37–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reagan L, Nowlin SY, Birdsall SB, et al. Integrative review of recruitment of research participants through Facebook. Nurs Res 2019;68(6):423–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beasant L, Brigden A, Parslow RM, et al. Treatment preference and recruitment to pediatric RCTs: A systematic review. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2019;14:100335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crocker JC, Beecham E, Kelly P, et al. Inviting parents to take part in paediatric palliative care research: A mixed-methods examination of selection bias. Palliat Med 2015;29(3):231–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman K. Survey reveals patient recruitment is the biggest challenge in pediatric trials. Appl Clin Trials 2012;21(6).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weaver MS, Mooney-Doyle K, Kelly KP, et al. The Benefits and Burdens of Pediatric Palliative Care and End-of-Life Research: A Systematic Review. J Palliat Med 2019;22(8):915–926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akard TF, Gerhardt CA, Hendricks-Ferguson V, et al. Facebook advertising to recruit pediatric populations. J Palliat Med 2016;19(7):692–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolfall K, Shilling V, Hickey H, et al. Parents’ agendas in paediatric clinical trial recruitment are different from researchers’ and often remain unvoiced: A qualitative study. PLoS One 2013;8(7):e67352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaguelidou F, Amiel P, Blachier A, et al. Recruitment in pediatric clinical research was influenced by study characteristics and pediatricians’ perceptions: A multicenter survey. J Clin Epidemiol 2013;66(10):1151–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoot RA, van Ommen CH, Caron HN, et al. Accrual in supportive care trials in pediatric oncology, a challenge!. Support Care Cancer 2012;20(12):3149–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baca-Motes K, Edwards AM, Waalen J, et al. Digital recruitment and enrollment in a remote nationwide trial of screening for undiagnosed atrial fibrillation: Lessons from the randomized, controlled mSToPS trial. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2019;14:100318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter-Harris L. Facebook targeted advertisement for research recruitment: A primer for nurse researchers. Appl Nurs Res 2016;32:144–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tustin JL, Crowcroft NS, Gesink D, et al. Facebook recruitment of vaccine-hesitant Canadian parents: Cross-sectional study. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2017;3(3):e47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lohse B. Facebook is an effective strategy to recruit low-income women to online nutrition education. J Nutr Educ Behav 2013;45(1):69–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAleese S, Clyne B, Matthews A, et al. Gone for good? An online survey of emigrant health professionals using Facebook as a recruitment tool. Hum Resour Health 2016;14:34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung SY, Hacker ED, Rawl S, et al. Using Facebook in recruiting kidney transplant recipients for a REDCap study. West J Nurs Res 2019;41(12):1790–812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitaker C, Stevelink S, Fear N. The use of Facebook in recruiting participants for health research purposes: A systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2017;19(8):e290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beecham E, Hudson BF, Oostendorp L, et al. A call for increased paediatric palliative care research: Identifying barriers. Palliat Med 2016;30(10):979–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson BF, Oostendorp LJ, Candy B, et al. The under reporting of recruitment strategies in research with children with life-threatening illnesses: A systematic review. Palliat Med 2017;31(5):419–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akard TF, Wray S, Friedman DL, et al. Transforming a face-to-face legacy intervention to a web-based legacy intervention for children with advanced cancer. J Hosp Palliat Nurs 2020;22(1):49–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Akard TF, Dietrich MS, Friedman DL, et al. Digital storytelling: An innovative legacy-making intervention for children with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2015;62(4):658–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster TL. Personal reflections on legacy making. Palliat Support Care 2010;8(1):99–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson PC, Dietrich MS, Akard TF. Associations of age, gender, and family income with quality of life in children with advanced cancer. J Pediatr Oncol.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akard TF, Dietrich MS, Friedman DL, et al. Effects of a web-based pediatric oncology legacy intervention on parental coping. Onco Nurs Forum.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akard TF, Gilmer MJ. Research Cooperative Groups in Pediatric Palliative Care Research. Palliative Medicine Reports 2020;1(1):321–325.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Akard TF, Dietrich MS, Friedman DL, et al. Improved parent–child communication following a RCT evaluating a legacy intervention for children with advanced cancer. Prog Palliat Care 2020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akard TF, Dietrich MS, Friedman DL, et al. Randomized Clinical Trial of a Legacy Intervention for Quality of Life in Children with Advanced Cancer. J Palliat Med 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akard TF, Wray S, Gilmer MJ. Facebook advertisements recruit parents of children with cancer for an online survey of web-based research preferences. Cancer Nurs 2015;38(2):155–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRobert CJ, Hill JC, Smale T, et al. A multi-modal recruitment strategy using social media and internet-mediated methods to recruit a multidisciplinary, international sample of clinicians to an online research study. PLoS One 2018;13(7):e0200184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trivedi RB, Szarka JG, Beaver K, et al. Recruitment and retention rates in behavioral trials involving patients and a support person: A systematic review. Contemp Clin Trials 2013;36(1):307–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badr H, Smith CB, Goldstein NE, et al. Dyadic psychosocial intervention for advanced lung cancer patients and their family caregivers: Results of a randomized pilot trial. Cancer 2015;121(1):150–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topolovec-Vranic J, Natarajan K. The use of social media in recruitment for medical research studies: A scoping review. J Med Internet Res 2016;18(11):e286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dworkin J, Hessel H, Gliske K, et al. A comparison of three online recruitment strategies for engaging parents. Fam Relat 2016;65(4):550–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamp K, Herbell K, Magginis WH, et al. Facebook recruitment and the protection of human subjects. West J Nurs Res 2019;41(9):1270–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedict C, Hahn AL, Diefenbach MA, et al. Recruitment via social media: Advantages and potential biases. Digit Health 2019;5:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franzke AS, Bechmann A, Zimmer M, et al. Internet research: Ethical guidelines 3.0. Retrieved 2021 from https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets RV. Introducing: Netnography, qualitative social media research methods, and this book. In: RV Kozinets, (ed.) Netnography: The essential guide to qualitative social media research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2020. p. 1–32.
   Google Scholar