Effect of live Saccharomyces cerevisiae (NCDC-49) supplementation on growth performance and rumen fermentation pattern in local goat

References

• Abd El-Ghani AA. 2004. Influence of diet supplementation with yeast culture (Saccharomyces Cerevisiae) on performance of Zaraibi goats. Small Rumin Res. 5:223–229. 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2003.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal N, Kamra DN, Chaudhary LC, Agarwal I, Sahoo A, Pathak NN. 2002. Microbial status and rumen enzyme profile of crossbred calves fed on different microbial feed additives. Lett Appl Microbiol. 34(5):329–336. 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2002.01092.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrighetto I, Bailoni L, Cozzi G, Berzaqhi P. 1993. Effects of yeast culture addition on digestion in sheep fed a high concentrate diet. Small Rumin Res. 12:27–34. 10.1016/0921-4488(93)90035-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argüello A. 2011. Trends in goat research, a review. J Appl Anim Res. 39(4):429–434. 10.1080/09712119.2011.637362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Association of official analytical chemists (AOAC). 2000. Official methods of analysis. 25th ed. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett JGA, Reid RL. 1956. Studies on the production of volatile fatty acids from the grass by rumen liquor in an artificial rumen. Volatile fatty acids production from grass. J Agric Sci. 48:315.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson KA, Tricarico J. 2002. The evolution of yeast cultures-20 years of research. In: Navigating from Niche Markets to Mainstream. Proceedings of Alltech's European, Middle Eastern and African Lecture Tour, 2011 Nov 20, All tech UK, p. 26–43.
   Google Scholar
• Elseed AMAF, Abusamra RMA. 2007. Effects of supplemental yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) culture on NDF digestibility and rumen fermentation of forage sorghum hay in Nubian goat's kids. Res J Agric & Biol Sci. 3(3):133–137.
   Google Scholar
• Eweedah NM, Mohsen MK, Bassiouni MI, Ali MF, Khalafalla MM. 2005. Performance of lambs fed on rations containing soybean meal treated with formaldehyde and probiotics. 1. Feeding value, rumen fermentation and degradability. Egyptian J Nutr Feed (Special Issue). 8:361.
   Google Scholar
• Gaafar HM, Mohi El-Din M, Basiuoni M, El-Riedy KF. 2009. Effect of concentrate to roughage ratio and baker's yeast supplementation during hot season on performance of lactating buffaloes. Slovak J Anim Sci. 42(4):188–195.
   Google Scholar
• Haddad SG, Goussous SN. 2005. Effect of yeast culture supplementation on nutrient intake digestibility and growth performance of Awassi lambs. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 118:343–348. 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2004.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayabal T, Murallidharan R, Tensingh-Gnanaraj T, Murugan M. 2008. Growth performance of stall-fed goats under probiotic supplementation. Tamilnadu J Vet Anim Sci. 4(5):179–184.
   Google Scholar
• Jinturkar AS, Gujar BV, Chauhan DS, Patil RA. 2009. Effect of feeding probiotics on the growth performance and feed conversion efficiency in Goat. Indian J Anim Res. 43(1):49–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamra DN, Chaudhary LC, Agarwal N, Singh R, Pathak NN. 2002. Growth performance, Nutrient utilization, rumen fermentation and enzyme activities in calves fed on Saccharomyces cerevisiae supplemented diet. Indian J Anim Sci. 72:472–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khuntia A, Chaudhary LC. 2002. Performance of male crossbred calves as influenced by substitution of grain by wheat bran and the addition of lactic acid bacteria to diet. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci. 15(2):188–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar U, Sareen VK, Singh S. 1994. Effect of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae yeast culture supplement on ruminal metabolism in buffalo calves given a high concentrate diet. Anim Prod. 59:209–215. 10.1017/S0003356100007698
   Google Scholar
• Lohnert HJ, Ochrimenko WI, Sunder A, Ludke H. 2001. Influence of living yeast cells (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on the rearing of calves. Vitamine-und-Zusatzstoffe-in-der-Ernahrung-von-Mensch-und-Tier-8-Symposium,-26-und-27-September 2001, Jena/Thuringen,-Germany, 497–500.
   Google Scholar
• Maurya MS. 1993. Effect of feeding live yeast culture (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on rumen fermentation and Nutrient digestibility in Goats [ M.V.Sc. Thesis]. Izatnagar (India): IVRI Deemed University.
   Google Scholar
• Panda AK, Singh R, Pathak NN. 1995. Effect of dietary inclusion of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on growth performance of crossbred calves. J Appl Anim Res. 7(2):195–200. 10.1080/09712119.1995.9706071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prahalada HK, Kamra DN, Pathak NN. 2001. Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lactobacillus acidophilus on nutrient utilization and performance of crossbred cattle calves. Int J Anim Sci. 16:103–107.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson PH. 2002. Yeast products for growing and lactating dairy cattle: impacts on rumen fermentation and performance. In: Proceeding of the Xll International Meeting in milk and meat production in hot climates, 2002 Nov 3-4 Mexicali, Mexico: University of Baja California, p. 12.
   Google Scholar
• Sauvant D, Giger-Reverdin S, Schmidely P. 2004. Rumen acidosis: modeling ruminant response to yeast culture. In: Lyons TP, Jacques KA, editors. Alltech's 20th Annual Symposium Biotechnology Feed Industry. Re-imagining the Feed Industry. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press. p. 221–229.
   Google Scholar
• Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. 1994. Statistical methods. 6th ed. Ames (IA): Lowa state University press.
   Google Scholar
• Weatherburn MW. 1967. Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia. Anal Chem. 39:971–974. 10.1021/ac60252a045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar