Phenotypic and genetic parameters for growth characteristics of Morkaraman sheep

References

• Akçapınar H, Aydın İ. 1984. The growth and survival rate of Morkaraman sheep under semi intensive conditions in a private enterprise in Erzurum city. Atatürk Univ Vet Fac J. 31:128–136.
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous 2009. TUIK. Statistics of sheep and goats. Available from: http://www.tuik.gov.tr/VeriBilgi.do?tb_id=46&ust_id=13
   Google Scholar
• Dayıoğlu H, Aksakal V, Karaoğlu M, Macit M, Esenbuga N. 1999. The growth and development characteristics of purebred and hybrid lambs bred based on local gen resources. International Farm Animals Congress; September 21–24; İzmir (Turkey): Ege Univ Agr Fac Department of Animal Science; p. 743–747.
   Google Scholar
• Dayıoğlu H, Aksoy A, Emsen H. 1990. Kapalı ve kan katılmış sürülerde döl verimi bakımından mukayeseli araştırmalar [The comparison of two Redkaraman sheep flocks raised on closebreeding and interbreeding systems for reproductive traits]. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi [Atatürk Univ Agr Fac J]. 21:75–83.
   Google Scholar
• Esenbuğa N, Dayıoglu H. 2002. The effects of some environmental factors on the growth and development of İvesi ve Morkaraman lambs. Turk J Vet Anim Sci. 26:145–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geliyi C, İlaslan M. 1978. Reproductive traits, milk and wool yields of red karaman sheep raised in Karacaören village of Kars province(1). Kars (Turkey): Experiment and Production Station of Kars. Publication No: 4.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey WR. 1990. Users guide for lsmlmw pc-1 version. Mixed model least-squares and maximum likelihood computer program. Columbus: Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• James JW. 1979. The theory behind breeding schemes. In: Tomes JL, Robertson DE, Muresk L, Perth RJ editors. Sheep breeding. Australia: Butterworth; p. 205–213.
   Google Scholar
• Karaca O, Altın T, Okut H. 1996. Karakaş sheep in village farms. Some parameter estimations regarding live weight gains. Agr Fac J. 6:59–72.
   Google Scholar
• Macit M, Esenbuğa N, Karaoğlu M. 2002. Growth performance and carcass characteristics of Awassi, Morkaraman and Tushin lambs grazed on pasture and supported with concentrate. Small Rumin Res. 44:241–246. 10.1016/S0921-4488(02)00077-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macit M, Karaoğlu M, Dayıoğlu H, Kopuzlu S, Esenbuğa N. 1998. Morkaraman, İvesi ve Tuj Saf ve Melez Kuzuların Yarı Entansif Şartlarda Besi Özellikleri Bakımından Değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of fattening performance characteristics of Awassi, Morkaraman, Tushin purebred and crossbred lambs reared in the semi-intensive conditions]. East Anatolian Agricultural Congress; 1996 Sep 14–18; Erzurum (Turkey): Atatürk Univ Agr Fac., Department of Animal Science p. 904–911.
   Google Scholar
• Macit M, Karaoğlu M, Esenbuğa N, Kopuzlu S, Dayıoğlu H. 2001. Growth performance of purebred Awassi, Morkaraman and Tushin lambs and their crosses under semi-intensive management in turkey. Small Rumin Res. 41:177–180. 10.1016/S0921-4488(01)00202-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özcan L. 1990. A comparative research on capability. Fırat Univ Vet Fac J. 11:203–212.
   Google Scholar
• Roden JA. 1994. Review of the theory of open nucleus breeding systems. Anim Breed Abstr. 62:151–157.
   Google Scholar
• SAS. 1999. The SAS system. Version 8. Cary (NC): Sas Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Soysal Mİ. 2010. The genetic resources of local domestic animals in Turkey. Tekirdağ; Nanık Kemal Univ Agr Fac., Department of Animal Science; p. 34.
   Google Scholar
• Ulusan HOK, Aksoy AR. 1996. The productivity performance of Tuj and Morkaraman sheep raised in Kafkas University, Veterinary Faculty Farm. 2. Growth and body sizes. Kafkas Univ Vet Fac J. 2:139–146.
   Google Scholar
• Yaprak M, Macit M, Emsen H. 1996. The relations between hemoglobin types and some productivity rates in İvesi and Morkaraman sheep. Atatürk Univ Agr Fac J. 27:387–397.
   Google Scholar