Effect of feeding heat-processed broiler litter in pellet-form diet on the performance of fattening lambs

References

• Abdullah AY, Purchas RW, Davies AS. 1998. Patterns of change with growth for muscularity and other composition characteristics of Southdown rams selected for high and low back depth. New Zeal J Agr Res. 41:367–376. 10.1080/00288233.1998.9513321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AFRC (Agricultural and Food Research Council). 1992. Nutrient requirements of ruminant animals: protein. Technical committee on responses to nutrients, Report no. 10. Nutr Abstr Rev, Series B. 62:787–835.
   Google Scholar
• AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists). 1990. Official methods of analysis. 15th ed. Washington (DC): Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
   Google Scholar
• Azizi-Shotorkhoft A, Rezaei J, Fazaeli H. 2013. The effect of different levels of molasses on the digestibility, rumen parameters and blood metabolites in sheep fed processed broiler litter. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 179:69–76. 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azizi-Shotorkhoft A, Rouzbehan Y, Fazaeli H. 2012. The influence of the different carbohydrate sources on utilization efficiency of processed broiler litter in sheep. Livest Sci. 148:249–254. 10.1016/j.livsci.2012.06.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumont R. 1996. Palatability and feeding behaviour in ruminants: a review. Ann Zootech. 45:385–400. 10.1051/animres:19960501
   Google Scholar
• Chapman HD, Pratt PF. 1961. Methods of analysis for soils, plants and waters. Oklahoma, CA: Division of Agricultural Sciences, University of California; 309 p.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhry SM, Naseer Z. 2012. Processing and nutritional value of broiler litter as a feed for buffalo steers. J Anim Plant Sci. 22:358–364.
   Google Scholar
• Deshck A, Abo-Shehada M, Allonby E, Givens DI, Hill R. 1998. Assessment of the nutritive value for ruminants of poultry litter. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 73:29–35. 10.1016/S0377-8401(98)00135-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elemam MB, Fadelelseed AM, Salih AM. 2009. Growth performance, digestibility, N-balance and rumen fermentation of lambs fed different levels of deep-stack broiler litter. Res J Anim Vet Sci. 4:9–16.
   Google Scholar
• Esenbuga N, Macit M, Karaoglu M, Aksakal V, Aksu MI, Yoruk MA, Gul M. 2009. Effect of breed on fattening performance, slaughter and meat quality characteristics of Awassi and Morkaraman lambs. Livest Sci. 123:255–260. 10.1016/j.livsci.2008.11.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fàbrega E, Gispert M, Tibau J, Hortós M, Oliver MA, Furnols M. 2011. Effect of housing system, slaughter weight and slaughter strategy on carcass and meat quality, sex organ development and androstenone and skatole levels in Duroc finished entire male pigs. Meat Science 89:434–439. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.05.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fimbres H, Hernández-Vidal G, Picón-Rubio JF, Kawas JR, Lu CD. 2002. Productive performance and carcass characteristics of lambs fed finishing ration containing various forage levels. Small Ruminant Res. 43:283–288. 10.1016/S0921-4488(02)00014-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetsch AL, Aiken GE. 2000. Broiler litter in ruminant diets implications for use as a low-cost by-product feedstuff for goats. In: Merkel RC, Abebe G, Goetach AL, editors. The opportunity and challenged of enhancing goat production in East Africa. Langston, OK: Langston University; p. 58–69.
   Google Scholar
• Hailu A, Melaku S, Tamir B, Tassew A. 2011. Body weight and carcass characteristics of Washera sheep fed urea treated rice straw supplemented with graded levels of concentrate mix. Livest Res Rural Dev. 23:8.
   Google Scholar
• Harris DL. 1970. Breeding for efficiency in livestock production: defining the economic objectives. J Anim Sci. 30:860–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob JP, Kunkle RS, Trevola RS, Miles RD, Mather FB. 1997. Broiler litter, part 1: a feed ingredient for ruminants. Gainesville (FL): Institute of Food and Agricultural Science, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Jeremiah LE, Gibson LL. 2003. The effect of dietary poultry litter supplementation on beef chemical, cooking, and palatability properties and consumer acceptance. Food Res Int. 36:943–948. 10.1016/S0963-9969(03)00103-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyanzad MR. 2001. Crossbreeding of the three Iranian sheep breeds with emphasis on growth and carcass characteristics of the lambs [ Ph.D. Thesis]. Sintok: University of Utara.
   Google Scholar
• Mavimbela DT, Webb EC, Van Ryssen JBJ, Bosman MJC. 2000. Sensory characteristics of meat and composition of carcass fat from sheep fed diets containing various levels of broiler litter. S Afr J Anim Sci. 30:26–32. 10.4314/sajas.v30i1.3871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negesse T, Patra AK, Dawson LJ, Tolera A, Merkel RC, Sahlu T, Goetsch AL. 2007. Performance of Spanish and Boer × Spanish doelings consuming diets with different levels of broiler litter. Small Ruminant Res. 69:187–197. 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2006.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NRC (National Research Council). 1985. Nutrient requirements of sheep, 6th rev. ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 99 p.
   Google Scholar
• Obeidat BS, Awawdeh MS, Abdullah AY, Muwalla MM, Abu Ishmais MA, Telfah BT, Ayrout AJ, Mtarneh SK, Subih HS, Osaili TO. 2011. Effect of feeding broiler litter on performance of Awassi lambs fed finishing diets. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 165:15–22. 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olfaz M, Ocak N, Erener G, Cam MA, Garipoglu AV. 2005. Growth, carcass and meat characteristics of Karayaka growing rams fed sugar beet pulp, partially substituting for grass hay as forage. Meat Sci. 70:7–14. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.11.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos S, Tejido ML, Martinez ME, Ranilla ML, Carro MD. 2009. Microbial protein synthesis, ruminal digestion, microbial populations, and nitrogen balance in sheep fed diets varying in forage-to-concentrate ratio and type of forage. J Anim Sci. 87:2924–2934. 10.2527/jas.2009-1938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rankins DL, Poore MH, Capucille DJ, Rogers GM. 2002. Recycled poultry bedding as cattle feed. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 18:253–266. 10.1016/S0749-0720(02)00015-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temminghoff EJM, Houba JGV. 2004. Plant analysis procedures, 2nd ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Tilley JMA, Terry RA. 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J Br Grassland Soc. 18:104–111. 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1963.tb00335.x
   Google Scholar
• Titi HH, Dmour RO, Abdullah AY. 2008. Growth performance and carcass characteristics of Awasi lambs and Shami goat kids fed yeast culture in their finishing diet. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 142:33–43. 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.06.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci. 74:3583–3597. 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar