Association between electrical conductivity and milk production traits in Dairy Gyr cows

References

• Ali AKA, Shook GE. 1980. An optimum transformation for somatic cell concentration in milk. J Dairy Sci. 63:487–490. [cited 2014 Sep 25]. Available from: http://www.journalofdairyscience.org/article/S0022-0302(80)82959-6/pdf. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(80)82959-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade LM, El Faro L, Cardoso VL, Albuquerque LG, Cassoli LD, Machado PF. 2007. Efeitos genéticos e de ambiente sobre a produção de leite e a contagem de células somáticas em vacas holandesas. Rev.Bras Zootec. 36:343–349. [cited 2014 Apr 16]. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982007000200010&lng=en&nrm=iso doi: 10.1590/S1516-35982007000200010
   Google Scholar
• Auldist MJ, Coats S, Rogers GL, McDowell GH. 1995. Changes in the compositional of milk from healthy and mastitis dairy cows during the lactation cycle. Aust J Exp Agric Melbourne. 35:427–436. [cited 2014 Apr 13]. Available from: http://www.publish.csiro.au/paper/EA9950427. doi:10.1071/EA9950427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auldist MJ, Hublle IB. 1998. Effects of mastitis on raw milk and dairy products. Aust J Dairy Technol. 53:28–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbano DM, Clark JL. 1989. Infrared milk analysis – challenges for the future. J Dairy Sci. 72:1627–1636. [cited 2014 Jan 20]. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030289792754. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79275-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentley Instruments. 1995. Somacount 300: Operator's manual. Chaska, MN; p. 12.
   Google Scholar
• Brasil, Ministério de Agricultura Pecuária e Abastecimento (MAPA). Instrução Normativa n° 62 de 29/12/2011. Instrução Normativa n.62, de 29 de dezembro de. 2011. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, Distrito Federal, 30 de dezembro de 2011. Seção 1.
   Google Scholar
• Brito MAVP, Brito JRF. 2001. Produção de Leite e Sociedade: Uma análise crítica da cadeia do leite no Brasil. Belo Horizonte: FEPMVZ. Chapter 3, Qualidade do leite; p. 61–74. [cited 2014 Aug 20]. Available from: http://www.fernandomadalena.com/site_arquivos/900.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Coldebella A, Machado PF, Demétrio CGB, Ribeiro Júnior PJ, Meyer PM, Corassin CH, Cassoli LD. 2004. Contagem de células somáticas e produção de leite em vacas holandesas confinadas. Rev Bras Zootec. [online]. 33:623–634. [cited 2014 Aug 20]. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982004000300011 doi: 10.1590/S1516-35982004000300011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa CN, Melo CMR de, Machado CHC, Freitas AF de, Packer IU, Cobuci JA. 2005. Parâmetros genéticos para a produção de leite de controles individuais de vacas da raça Gir estimados com modelos de repetibilidade e regressão aleatória. Rev Bras Zootec. 34:1519–1530. [cited 2014 Aug 20]. Available from: http://www.revista.sbz.org.br/artigo/visualizar.php?artigo=4591 doi: 10.1590/S1516-35982005000500012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmons DB, Ernstrom CA, Lacroix C, Verret P. 1990. Predictive formulas for yield of cheese from composition of milk – a review. J Dairy Sci. 73:1365–1394. [cited 2014 Aug 20]. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030290788030 doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(90)78803-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janzekovic M, Brus M, Mursec B, Vinis P, Stajnco D, Cus F. 2009. Mastitis detection based on electric conductivity of milk. J Achiev Mater Manuf Eng. 34:39–46. [cited 2014 Aug 20]. Available from: http://www.journalamme.org/papers_vol34_1/3415.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kitchen BJ. 1981. Bovine mastitis: milk compositional changes and related diagnostic tests. J Dairy Res. 48:167–188. [cited 2014 Apr 12]. Available from: http://journals.cambridge.org/article_S0022029900021580. doi:10.1017/S0022029900021580
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malek dos Reis CB, Barreiro JR, Moreno JF, Porcinato MA, Santos MV. 2011. Evaluation of somatic cell count thresholds to detect subclinical mastitis in Gyr cows. J Dairy Sci. 94:4406–4412. [cited 2014 Nov 24]. Available from: http://www.journalofdairyscience.org/article/S0022-0302(11)00453-X/abstract. doi:10.3168/jds.2010-3776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mrode RA, Swanson GJT. 2002. Estimation of genetic parameters for somatic cell count in the first three lactations using random regression. Liv Prod Sci. 79:239–247. [cited 2014 Nov 24]. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301622602001690. doi:10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00169-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielen M, Deluyker H, Schukken YH, Brand A. 1992. Electrical conductivity of milk: measurement, modifiers, and meta analysis of mastitis detection performance. J Dairy Sci. 75:606–614. [cited 2014 Apr 14]. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030292777984. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)77798-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NMC (National Mastitis Council). 1997. A look at physiological and regulatory SCC standards in milk. In: NMC newsletter “Udder Topics”. [cited 2014 Apr 21]. Available from: http://www.nmconline.org/articles/scclook.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Norberg E, Hogeveen H, Korsgaard IR, Friggens NC, Sloth KH, Lovendahl P. 2004. Electrical conductivity of milk: ability to predict mastitis status. J Dairy Sci. 87:1099–1107. [cited 2014 Aug 22]. Available from: http://www.journalofdairyscience.org/article/S0022-0302(04)73256-7/pdf. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73256-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira RJ, Lopes PS, Verneque RS, Santana Júnior ML, Lagrotta MR, Torres RA. 2010. Funções de covariância para produção de leite no dia do controle em bovinos Gir leiteiro. Pesq. Agropec. Bras. 45:1303–1311. [cited 2014 Aug 22]. Available from: doi:10.1590/S0100-204X2010001100011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porcionato MAD, Soares WVB, Malek dos Reis CB, Cortinhas CS, Mestiri L, Santos MV. 2010. Milk flow, teat morphology and subclinical mastitis prevalence in Gyr cows. Pesq Agropec Bras. 45:1507–1512. [cited 2014 Aug 22]. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-204X2010001200023. doi:10.1590/S0100-204X2010001200023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos MV. 2005. Uso da condutividade elétrica do leite para detecção da mastite. Milkpoint. Radares técnicos. [cited 2014 Apr 23]. Available from: http://www.milkpoint.com.br/radar-tecnico/qualidade-do-leite/uso-da-condutividade-eletrica-do-leite-para-deteccao-de-mastite-26525n.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• SAS Institute Inc. 2003. SAS user's guide: statistics. Version 9.1.Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Shuster DE, Harmon RJ, Jackson JA, Hemken RW. 1991. Suppression of milk production during endotoxin-induced mastitis. J Dairy Sci. 74:3763–3774. [cited 2014 Apr 12]. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030291785688. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78568-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavares MCV. 2010. A condutividade eléctrica do leite na avaliação da sanidade do úbere de vacas leiteiras [dissertation]. Angra do Heroísmo: Universidade dos Açores.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfinger R. 1993. Covariance structure selection in general mixed models. Commun Statist Simula. 22(4):1079–1106. [cited 2014 Jan 22]. Available from: doi:10.1080/03610919308813143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar