In vitro gas and methane production of two mixed rations influenced by three different cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

References

• Ahmed MH, Salem AZM, Olafadehan OA, Kholif AE, Rivero N, Mariezcurrena MA, Camacho LM, Elghandour MMY, Alonso MU, Almaz AHA. 2016. Effect of pre- and post-partum dietary crude protein level on the performance of ewes and their lambs. Small Rumin Res. 136:221–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsersy H, Salem AZM, Borhami BE, Olivares J, Gado HM, Mariezcurrena MD, Yacuot MH, Kholif AE, El-Adawy M, Hernandez SR. 2015. Effect of Mediterranean saltbush (Atriplex halimus) ensilaging with two developed enzyme cocktails on feed intake, nutrient digestibility and ruminal fermentation in sheep. Anim Sci J. 86:51–58. doi: 10.1111/asj.12247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [AOAC] Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1997. Official methods of analysis. 16th ed. Arlington, VA: AOAC.
   Google Scholar
• Bach A, Calsamiglia S, Stern MD. 2005. Nitrogen metabolism in the rumen. J Dairy Sci. 88:9–21. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)73133-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blümmel M, Steingss H, Becker K. 1997. The relationship between in vitro gas production, in vitro microbial biomass yield and 15N incorporation and its implications for the prediction of voluntary feed intake of roughages. Br J Nutr. 77:911–921. doi: 10.1079/BJN19970089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaway ES, Martin SA. 1997. Effects of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture on ruminal bacteria that utilize lactate and digest cellulose. J Dairy Sci. 80:2035–2044. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76148-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calsamiglia S, Busquet M, Cardozo PW, Castillejos L, Ferret A. 2007. Invited review: Essential oils as modifiers of rumen microbial fermentation. J Dairy Sci. 90(6):2580–2595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaucheyras-Durand F, Walker ND, Bach A. 2008. Effects of active dry yeasts on the rumen microbial ecosystem: Past, present and future. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 145:5–26. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.04.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elghandour MMY, Kholif AE, Márquez-Molina O, Vázquez-Armijo JF, Puniya AK, Salem AZM. 2015. Influence of individual or mixed cellulase and xylanase mixture on in vitro rumen gas production kinetics of total mixed rations with different maize silage and concentrate ratios. Turk J Vet Anim Sci. 39:435–442. doi: 10.3906/vet-1410-26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elghandour MMY, Salem AZM, Martínez Castañeda JS, Camacho LM, Kholif AE, Vázquez Chagoyán JC. 2015. Direct-fed microbes: a tool for improving the utilization of low quality roughages in ruminants. J Integr Agr. 14(3):526–533. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60834-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elghandour MMY, Vázquez Chagoyán JC, Salem AZM, Kholif AE, Martínez Castañeda JS, Camacho LM, Cerrillo-Soto MA. 2014. Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae at direct addition or pre-incubation on in vitro gas production kinetics and degradability of four fibrous feeds. Ital J Anim Sci. 13:295–301. doi: 10.4081/ijas.2014.3075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• France J, Dijkstra J, Dhanoa MS, López S, Bannink A. 2000. Estimating the extent of degradation of ruminant feeds from a description of their gas production profiles observed in vitro: derivation of models and other mathematical considerations. Br J Nutr. 83:143–150. doi: 10.1017/S0007114500000180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goering MK, Van Soest PJ. 1970. Forage fibre analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). Washington, DC: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.
   Google Scholar
• Guedes CM, Goncalves D, Rodrigues MAM, Dias-da-Silva A. 2008. Effect of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae on ruminal fermentation and fiber degradation of maize silage in cows. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 145:27–40. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.06.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harikrishna C, Mahender M, Ramana Reddy Y, Gnana Prakash M, Sudhakar K, Pavani M. 2012. Evaluation of in vitro gas production and nutrient digestibility of complete diets supplemented with different levels of thermo tolerant yeast in Nellore rams. Vet World. 5:477–485. doi: 10.5455/vetworld.2012.477-485
   Google Scholar
• Hristov AN, Oh J, Firkins JL, Dijkstra J, Kebreab E, Waghorn G, Makkar HP, Adesogan AT, Yang W, Lee C, et al. 2013. Special topics: mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: I. A review of enteric methane mitigation options. J Anim Sci. 91:5045–5069. doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-6583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iqbal MF, Cheng YF, Zhu WY, Zeshan B. 2008. Mitigation of ruminant methane production: current strategies, constraints and future options. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 24:2747–2755. doi: 10.1007/s11274-008-9819-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jouany JP. 2001. A new look to the yeast culture as probiotics for ruminants. Feed Mix. 9:17–19.
   Google Scholar
• Kholif AE, Khattab HM, El-Shewy AA, Salem AZM, Kholif AM, El-Sayed MM, Gado HM, Mariezcurrena MD. 2014. Nutrient digestibility, ruminal fermentation activities, serum parameters and milk production and composition of lactating goats fed diets containing rice straw treated with Pleurotus ostreatus. Asian Australas J Anim Sci. 27:357–364. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2013.13405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makkar HPS, Blümmel M, Becker K. 1995. Formation of complexes between polyvinyl pyrrolidones or polyethylene glycols and tannins and their implications in gas production and true digestibility in in vitro techniques. Br J Nutri. 73:897–933. doi: 10.1079/BJN19950095
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao HL, Mao HL, Wang JK, Liu JX, Yoon I. 2013. Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product on in vitro fermentation and microbial communities of low-quality forages and mixed diets. J Anim Sci. 91:3291–3298. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin SA, Nisbet DJ. 1992. Effect of direct-fed microbials on rumen microbial fermentation. J Dairy Sci. 75:1736–1744. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)77932-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu F, Jouany JP, Senaud J, Bohatier J, Berthin G, Mercier M. 1996. The effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Aspergillus orizae on fermentations in the rumen of faunated and defaunated sheep; protozoal and probiotic interactions. Reprod Nutr Dev. 36:271–287. doi: 10.1051/rnd:19960305
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McGuffey RK, Richardson LF, Wilkinson JID. 2001. Ionophore for dairy cattle: current status and future outlook. J Dairy Sci. 84:194–203. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)70218-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendoza MGD, Ricalde VR, Esparza BH, Vela A zquez TL. 1995. Nota: Efecto de dos cultivos de Saccharomyces cerevisiae en la degradacio A n ruminal de la fibra neutron detergente de paja de trigo. Invest Agr Prod Sanid Anim. 10:33–38.
   Google Scholar
• Menke KH, Raab L, Salewski A, Steingass H, Fritz D, Schneider W. 1979. The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feeding stuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. J Agric Sci. 93:217–222. doi: 10.1017/S0021859600086305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosoni P, Chaucheyras-Durand F, Berat-Maillet C, Forano E. 2007. Quantification by real time PCR of cellulolitic bacteria in the rumen of sheeps after supplementation of a forage diet with readily fermentable carbohydrates. Effect of a yeast additive. J Appl Microbiol. 103:2676–2685. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03517.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mwenya B, Santoso B, Sar C, Gamo Y, Kobayashi T, Arai I, Takahashi J. 2004. Effects of including 1,4-galacto-oligosaccharides, lactic acid bacteria or yeast culture on methanogenesis as well as energy and nitrogen metabolism in sheep. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 115:313–326. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2004.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newbold CJ, Wallace RJ, McIntosh FM. 1996. Mode of action of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a feed additive for ruminants. Br J Nutr. 76:249–261. doi: 10.1079/BJN19960029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [NRC] National Research Council. 1985. Nutrient requirements of sheep. 6th rev ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• [NRC] National Research Council. 2001. Nutrient requirement of dairy cattle. 7th rev. ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patra AK. 2012. The use of live yeast products as microbial feed additives in ruminant nutrition. Asian J Anim Vet Adv. 7:366–375. doi: 10.3923/ajava.2012.366.375
   Google Scholar
• Paya H, Taghizadeh A, Janmohammadi H, Moghadam GA. 2007. Nutrient digestibility and gas production of some tropical feeds used in ruminant diets estimated by the in vivo and in vitro gas production techniques. Amer J Anim Vet. Sci. 2:108–113. doi: 10.3844/ajavsp.2007.108.113
   Google Scholar
• Pinloche E, McEwan N, Marden JP, Bayourthe C, Auclair E, Newbold CJ. 2013. The effects of a probiotic yeast on the bacterial diversity and population structure in the rumen of cattle. PLoS ONE. 8(7):e67824. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0067824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polyorach S, Wanapat M, Cherdthong A. 2014. Influence of yeast fermented cassava chip protein (YEFECAP) and roughage to concentrate ratio on ruminal fermentation and microorganisms using in vitro gas production technique. Asian Australas J Anim Sci. 27:36–45. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2013.13298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell JB, Houlihan AJ. 2003. Ionophore resistance of ruminal bacteria and its potential impact on human health. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 27:65–74. doi: 10.1016/S0168-6445(03)00019-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salem AZM, Kholif AE, Elghandour MMY, Hernandez SR, Domínguez-Vara IA, Mellado M. 2014. Effect of increasing levels of seven tree species extracts added to a high concentrate diet on in vitro rumen gas output. Anim Sci J. 85:853–860. doi: 10.1111/asj.12218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [SAS] Statistic Analysis System. 2002. User’s Guide: Statistics. Cary, NC: Ver 9.0.SAS Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Steel RGD, Torrie JH, Dickey DA. 1997. Principles and procedures of statistics: a biometrical approach. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Theodorou MK, Williams BA, Dhanoa MS, McAllan AB, France J. 1994. A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 48:185–197. doi: 10.1016/0377-8401(94)90171-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdes KI, Salem AZM, Lopez S, Alonso MU, Rivero N, Elghandour MMY, Domínguez IA, Ronquillo MG, Kholif AE. 2015. Influence of exogenous enzymes in presence of Salix babylonica extract on digestibility, microbial protein synthesis and performance of lambs fed maize silage. J Agric Sci. 153:732–742. doi: 10.1017/S0021859614000975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. 1991. Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci. 74:3583–3597. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wambui CC, Awano T, Ando S, Abdulrazak SA, Ichinohe T. 2010. Effect of yeast supplementation on in vitro ruminal degradability of selected browse species from Kenya. J Food Agric Environ. 8:553–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams PEV, Tait CAG, Innes GM, Newbold CJ. 1991. Effects of the inclusion of yeast culture (Saccharomyces cerevisiae plus growth medium) in the diet of cows on milk yield and forage degradation and fermentation patterns in the rumen of sheep and steers. J Anim Sci. 69:3016–3026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar