5,385
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Adoption status of artificial insemination in Indian dairy sector: application of multinomial logit model

, &
Pages 442-446 | Received 20 Mar 2015, Accepted 23 Jun 2016, Published online: 19 Jul 2016

References

  • ADB (Asian Development Bank). 1993. Policies and strategies for livestock development: regional seminar on policies and strategies for livestock development; 1993 Jan 18–22; Manila, Philippines, 251 p.; [cited 2016 Jul 10]. Available from: http://trove.nla.gov.au/version/11870674
  • Adeogun OA, Ajana AM, Ayinla OA, Yarhere MT, Adeogun MO. 2008. Application of logit model in adoption decision: a study of Hybrid Clarias in Lagos State, Nigeria. Am-Eurasi J Agric Environ Sci. 4:468–472.
  • Aulakh GS, Singh R. 2012. Adoption of recommended management practices by the buffalo owners. Indian J Dairy Sci. 65:431–434.
  • Basunathe VK, Sawarkar SW, Sasidhar PVK. 2010. Adoption of dairy production technologies and implications for dairy development in India. Outl Agric. 39:134–140. doi: 10.5367/000000010791745385
  • Chander M, Dutt T, Ravikumar R, Subrahmanyeswari B. 2010. Livestock technology transfer service in India: a review. Indian J Anim Sci. 80:1115–1125.
  • FAOSTAT. 2014. [cited 2014 Jul 20]. Available from: http://faostat.fao.org/
  • Gandhi RS, Singh A, Joshi BK. 1998. Current scenario and future prospects of sustainable Animal production in India. Indian Dairyman. 50:35–43.
  • GOI. 2012. Nineteenth Livestock Census, Department of Animal Husbandry Dairying and Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, New Delhi, India; p. 120; [cited 2014 Nov 29]. Available from: http://dahd.nic.in/dahd/WriteReadData/Livestock.pdf
  • Lal N. 2000. Sustainability of animal Husbandry Technologies [PhD thesis]. Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh: Indian Veterinary Research Institute.
  • Odendo M, Obare G, Salasya B. 2009. Factors responsible for differences in uptake of integrated soil fertility management practices amongst smallholders in Western Kenya. Afr J Agric Res. 4:1303–1311.
  • Prasad CS. 2011. Dairy production, quality control and marketing system in India. In: Pal SK, Siddiky NA editors. Dairy production, quality control and marketing system in SAARC Countries. Dhaka: SAARC Agricultural Centre; p. 53–122; [cited 2015 Jan 15]. Available from: http://www.saarcagri.org/images/abook_file/wp_2011_02.pdf
  • Pundo MO, Fraser GCG. 2006. Multinomial logit analysis of household cooking fuel choice in rural Kenya: the case of Kisumu district. Agrekon 45:24–37. doi: 10.1080/03031853.2006.9523731
  • Rathod P, Chander M. 2014. Identification of socio-economically important dairy innovations in India: A perspective of scientists. In: Karamidehkordi E, editor. Proceedings of the first international conference of the Asia and Pacific Islands Rural Advisory Services (APIRAS) and the fifth congress of extension and education in agriculture and natural resources management: facilitating information and innovations for empowering family farmers; 2014 Sep 2–4; University of Zanjan, Iran; p. 101.
  • Rathod P, Hiremath S, Manjunathachar HV, Balaraj BL, Bangar Y. 2014. Adoption of livestock innovations and factors affecting their adoption in Bidar district of Karnataka. Indian J Field Veterin. 9:62–65.
  • Rezvanfar A. 2007. Communication and socio-personal factors influencing adoption of dairy farming technologies amongst livestock farmers. Livest Res Rural Dev. 19; [cited 2013 Sep 3]. Available from: http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd19/3/rezv19033.htm
  • Torsten H, Otto G, Amit S. 2003. A review of milk production in India with particular emphasis on small scale producers. PPLPI working paper 2; p. 58; [cited 2015 Jan 30]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/programmes/en/pplpi/docarc/wp2.pdf