Effect of nanoclay minerals on growth performance, internal organs and blood biochemistry of broiler chickens compared to vaccines and antibiotics

References

• Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1990. Official methods of analysis. 15th ed. Washington (DC): AOAC International.
   Google Scholar
• Botsoglou NA, Fletouris DJ. 2001. Drug residues in foods. Pharmacology, food safety and analysis. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc; p. 541–548.
   Google Scholar
• Buzea C, Pacheco BI, Robbie K. 2007. Nano materials and nano particles: sources and technology. Bioenterphases. 2(4):1–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai MP, Labhasetwar V, Waltwr E, Levy RJ, Amidon GL. 1997. The mechanism of uptake of biodegradable microparticles in Caco-2 cells in size dependent. Pharm Res. 14:1568–1573. doi: 10.1023/A:1012126301290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan DB. 1995. Multiple range and multiple F-test. Biometric. 1:1–42.
   Google Scholar
• El-Shuraydeh KN, Al-Beitawi NA, Al-Faqieh AM. 2014. Effect of aqueous nanosuspensions of clay minerals on broilers performance and some selected antibody titer. J Nanotechnol Eng Med. 5:1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Ghithrani BD, Chan WC. 2007. Elucidating the mechanism of cellular uptake and removal of protein – coated gold nanoparticles of different sizes and shapes. Nano Lett. 7:1542–1550. doi: 10.1021/nl070363y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hotowy A, Sawors E. Pindea L, Sawors F, Grodrik M, Chwalibog A. 2012. Silver nanoparticles administered to chicken effect VEGFA and FGF2 gene expression in breast muscle and heart. Nanoscale Res Lett. 7:416–418. doi: 10.1186/1556-276X-7-418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao CD, Hung WL, Jan KC, Yeh AI, Ho CT, Hwang LS. 2010. Nano/sub-micro sized lignin glycosides from sesame meal exhibit higher transport and absorption efficiency in Caco-2 cell monolayer. Food Chem. 119:896–902. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.07.056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansoori GA. 2005. Principles of nanotechnology: molecular based study of condensed matter in small systems. New York: World Scientific Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mc Dowell LR. 2003. Minerals in animal and human nutrition. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Good Scholar.
   Google Scholar
• Mohapatra P, Swain RK, Mishra SK, Behera T, Swain P, Brhura NC, Sahoo G, Sethy K, Bhol BP, Dhama K. 2014. Effect of dietary nano-selenium supplementation on the performance of layer growth birds. Asian J Anim Vet Adv. 9(10):641–652. doi: 10.3923/ajava.2014.641.652
   Google Scholar
• Moser M, Messikommer R, Pfirter HP, Wenk C. 2003. Influence of the phytogenic feed additive sangrovit on zootechnical effects in field trials. Paper presented at: 14th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition, August, Lillehammer, Norwaypp (Vol. 205).
   Google Scholar
• Mousavi RS, Rezaei M. 2011. Nanotechnology in agriculture and food production. J Appl Environ Biol Sci. 1(10):414–419.
   Google Scholar
• Mushtaq HMM, Parvin R, Kim J. 2014. Carcass and body organ characteristics of broilers supplemented with dietary sodium and sodium salts under a phase feeding system. J Anim Sci Technol. 56(4):2–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramirez-Mella M, Hernandez-Mendo O. 2010. Nanotechnology in animal production. Trop Subtrop Agroecosyst. 12(3):423–429.
   Google Scholar
• Real Academia Espanola. 2001. Diccionarion de la Lengue Espanola, 22. Edicion. Available from: www.rae.es.consultada el 30 de mayo de 2009
   Google Scholar
• Roduner E. 2006. Size matters: why nanomaterials are different. Chem Soc Rev. 35:583–592. doi: 10.1039/b502142c
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohner F, Emst F, Arnold M, Hible M, Biebinger R, Ehrensperger F, Prat sinis S, Langhans W, Hurrell R, Zummermann M. 2007. Synthesis, characterization, and biodisponibility in rats of ferric phosphate nanoparticles. J Nutr. 137:614–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero- Perez A, Garcia- Garcia E, Zavaleta- Mancera A, Ramirez- Bribiesca JE, Revilla-Vazquez A, Hernandez- Calva LM, Lopez- Arellano R, Cruz-Monterrosa RG. 2010. Designing and evaluation of sodium absorption in ruminants. Vet Res Commun. 34:71–79. doi: 10.1007/s11259-009-9335-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS. 2002. SAS users guide: statistics. Cary (NC): SAS Inst. Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Sawors F, Pineda L, Hotowy A, Jaworski S, Prasek M, Sawors E. 2013. Nano-nutrition of chicken embryos. The effects of silver nanoparticles and ATP on expression chosen genes involved in myogenesis. Arch Anim Nutr. 67(5):347–355. doi: 10.1080/1745039X.2013.830520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott NR. 2005. Nanotechnology and animal health. Rev Scientifique et Technique International Office of Epizootics. 22:425–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekhon BS. 2012. Nanoprobes and their applications in veterinary medicine and animal health. Res J Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Thromke S, Elwinger K. 1998. Growth promoters in feeding pigs and poultry. I. growth and feed efficiency responses to antibiotic growth promotants. Annales de zootechnie. 47:85–97. doi: 10.1051/animres:19980201
   Google Scholar
• Toghyani M, Tohidi M, Gheisari AA, Tebeidian SA. 2010. Growth performance, serum biochemistry and blood hematology of broiler chicks fed different levels of black seeds (Nigella Sativa) and Peppermint (Mentha Piperita). Livestock Sci. 129:173–178. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2010.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma KA, Singh VP, Vikas P. 2012. Application of nanotechnology as a tool in animal products processing and marketing: an overview. Am J Food Technol. 7:445–451. doi: 10.3923/ajft.2012.445.451
   Google Scholar
• Vijayakumar MP, Balakrishnan V. 2014. Effect of calcium phosphate nanoparticles supplementation on growth performance of broiler chicken. Indian J Sci Technol. 7(8):1149–1154.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss J, Takhistov P, McClements J. 2006. Functional material in food nanotechnology. J Food Sci. 71(9):107–116. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00195.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerlund, Fredrik. 2011. Russian Nanotechnology R&D. Russian Nanotechnology R&D: thinking big about small scale science. Department of Defence, FOI-R--3197--SE 168 p.
   Google Scholar
• Zha LY, Xu ZR, Wang MQ, Gu LY. 2008. Chromium nanoparticle exhibit higher absorption efficiency than chromium picolinate and chromium chloride in Caco-2 Cell Minelayers. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 92(2):131–140. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2007.00718.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar